Effects of Different Irrigation Rates on Remontant Strawberry Cultivars Grown in Soil
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials
2.2. Experimental Design and Irrigation Scheduling
2.3. Plant Growth and Vegetative Parameters
2.4. Fruit Production
2.5. Fruit Quality
2.5.1. Fruit Organoleptic Quality
2.5.2. Fruit Nutritional Quality
2.5.3. HPLC
2.5.4. Spectrophotometry
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Vegetative Parameters
3.2. Productive Parameters
3.3. Qualitative Parameters
3.4. Nutritional Parameters
Cultivar | |||
---|---|---|---|
Vitamin C (mg 100 g−1 of FW) | Albion | Monterey | S. Andreas |
W100 | 23.89 ± 0.81 c | 26.63 ± 0.05 a | 17.76 ± 0.03 f |
W80 | 23.38 ± 0.10 d | 25.23 ± 0.01 b | 16.90 ± 0.25 g |
W60 | 23.72 ± 0.01 cd | 22.18 ± 0.06 e | 18.08 ± 0.12f |
Folates (µg 100 g−1 of FW) | |||
W100 | 27.21 ± 0.74 de | 28.87 ± 0.32 cd | 29.94 bc ± 0.73 bc |
W80 | 28.51 ± 1.17 cde | 31.50 ± 0.67 ab | 27.02 ± 2.38 e |
W60 | 28.47 ± 0.65 cde | 33.12 ± 0.19 a | 30.78 ± 0.65 b |
TPH (mgGA 100 g−1 of FW) | |||
W100 | 367.80 ± 27 ab | 367.10 ± 3.58 ab | 349.81 ± 22.69 b |
W80 | 351.38 ± 14.67 b | 358.72 ± 1.46 b | 393.11 ± 31.77 a |
W60 | 359.38 ± 7.64 b | 391.15 ± 9.94 a | 422.50 ± 33.81 a |
ACY (mg PEL-3- GLU 100 g−1 of FW) | |||
W100 | 35.49 ± 4.68 b | 36.24 ± 0.62 b | 44.27 ± 3.93 a |
W80 | 33.58 ± 2.52 b | 33.82 ± 0.25 b | 42.50 ± 5.50 a |
W60 | 32.25 ± 1.32 b | 34.06 ± 1.72 b | 44.63± 5.86 a |
TAC (mg TroloxEq 100 g−1 of FW) | |||
W100 | 509.13 ± 19.93 bc | 552.06 ± 8.98 abc | 506.66 ± 31.91 c |
W80 | 539.86 ± 49.26 bc | 559.79 ± 18.45 abc | 557.57 ± 37.87 abc |
W60 | 535.92 ± 36.63 bc | 561.27 ± 42.33 ab | 599.23 ± 13.12 a |
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ibrahim, M.H.; Nulit, R.; Sakimin, S.Z. Influence of Drought Stress on Growth, Biochemical Changes and Leaf Gas Exchange of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) in Indonesia. AIMS Agric. Food 2022, 7, 37–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro-Hortal, M.D.; Romero-Márquez, J.M.; Esteban-Muñoz, A.; Sánchez-González, C.; Rivas-García, L.; Llopis, J.; Cianciosi, D.; Giampieri, F.; Sumalla-Cano, S.; Battino, M.; et al. Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa cv. Romina) methanolic extract attenuates Alzheimer’s beta amyloid production and oxidative stress by SKN-1/NRF and DAF-16/FOXO mediated mechanisms in C. elegans. Food Chem. 2022, 372, 131272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battino, M.; Giampieri, F.; Cianciosi, D.; Ansary, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, D.; Gil, E.; Forbes-Hernández, T. The roles of strawberry and honey phytochemicals on human health: A possible clue on the molecular mechanisms involved in the prevention of oxidative stress and inflammation. Phytomedicine 2021, 86, 153170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iqbal, A.Z.; Javaid, N.; Hameeda, M. Synergic interactions between berry polyphenols and gut microbiota in cardiovascular diseases. Med. J. Nutr. Metab. 2022, 15, 555–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micek, A.; Owczarek, M.; Jurek, J.; Guerrera, I.; Torrisi, S.A.; Grosso, G.; Alshatwi, A.A.; Godos, J. Anthocyanin-rich fruits and mental health outcomes in an Italian cohort. J. Berry Res. 2022, 14, 551–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, H.; De Filippis, A.; Santarcangelo, C.; Daglia, M. Epigenetic regulation by polyphenols in diabetes and related complications. Med. J. Nutr. Metab. 2020, 13, 289–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhutia, P.O.; Kewlani, P.; Pandey, A.; Rawat, S.; Bhatt, I.D. Physico-chemical properties and nutritional composition of fruits of the wild Himalayan strawberry (Fragaria nubicola Lindle.) in different ripening stages. J. Berry Res. 2021, 11, 481–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battino, M.; Forbes-Hernández, T.Y.; Gasparrini, M.; Afrin, S.; Cianciosi, D.; Zhang, J.; Manna, P.P.; Reboredo-Rodríguez, P.; Varela Lopez, A.; Quiles, J.L.; et al. Relevance of functional foods in the Mediterranean diet: The role of olive oil, berries and honey in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 893–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galli, V.; da Silva Messias, R.; Perin, E.C.; Borowski, J.M.; Bamberg, A.L.; Rombaldi, C.V. Mild Salt Stress Improves Strawberry Fruit Quality. LWT 2016, 73, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sperry, J.S.; Love, D.M. What Plant Hydraulics Can Tell Us about Responses to Climate-Change Droughts. New Phytol. 2015, 207, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO; UN Water. Progress on the Level of Water Stress: Global Status and Acceleration Needs for SDG Indicator 6.4.2; FAO: Rome, Italy; United Nations Water (UN Water): Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, A.D.; Mishra, R.; Maurya, K.K.; Singh, R.B.; Wilson, D.W. Estimates for World Population and Global Food Availability for Global Health. In The Role of Functional Food Security in Global Health; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 106, pp. 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancosu, N.; Snyder, R.L.; Kyriakakis, G.; Spano, D. Water Scarcity and Future Challenges for Food Production. Water 2015, 7, 975–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanham, D.; Hoekstra, A.Y.; Wada, Y.; Bouraoui, F.; de Roo, A.; Mekonnen, M.M.; van de Bund, W.J.; Batelaan, O.; Pavelic, P.; Bastiaanssen, W.G.M.; et al. Physical Water Scarcity Metrics for Monitoring Progress towards SDG Target 6.4: An Evaluation of Indicator 6.4.2 “Level of Water Stress”. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 613, 218–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- UNWATER. Available online: https://sdg6data.org/en/country-or-area/Italy#anchor_6.4.2 (accessed on 10 December 2022).
- ISAC-CNR. Available online: https://www.isac.cnr.it/ (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Van Halsema, G.E.; Vincent, L. Efficiency and Productivity Terms for Water Management: A Matter of Contextual Relativism versus General Absolutism. Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 108, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Karunanidhi, D.; Subramani, T.; Srinivasamoorthy, K. Sources and Consequences of Groundwater Contamination. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 80, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaves, N.P.; Pocasangre, L.E.; Elango, F.; Rosales, F.E.; Sikora, R. Combining Endophytic Fungi and Bacteria for the Biocontrol of Radopholus Similis (Cobb) Thorne and for Effects on Plant Growth. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 122, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flexas, J.; Bota, J.; Escalona, J.M.; Sampol, B.; Medrano, H. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: An evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Funct. Plant Biol. 2002, 29, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariza, M.T.; Miranda, L.; Gómez-Mora, J.A.; Medina, J.J.; Lozano, D.; Gavilán, P.; Soria, C.; Martínez-Ferri, E. Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberry Cultivars under Different Irrigation Regimes. Agronomy 2021, 11, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabbadini, S.; Capocasa, F.; Battino, M.; Mazzoni, L.; Mezzetti, B. Improved Nutritional Quality in Fruit Tree Species through Traditional and Biotechnological Approaches. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 117, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strawberry Breeding & Research. University of California, Davis. Available online: https://research.ucdavis.edu/industry/ia/industry/strawberry/cultivars/ (accessed on 5 October 2022).
- Marche Region Directive 786 on 10 July 2017. Available online: https://www.norme.marche.it/Delibere/2017/DGR0786_17.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2019).
- Davey, B.G.; Conyers, M.K. Determining the pH of acid soils. Soil Sci. 1988, 146, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gee, G.W.; Bauder, J.W. Particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods; American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Washington, DC, USA, 1986; Volume 5, pp. 383–411. [Google Scholar]
- Olsen, S.R. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate; (No. 939); US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1954.
- McKeague, J.A.; Brydon, J.E.; Miles, N.M. Differentiation of forms of extractable iron and aluminum in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1971, 35, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbafieri, M.; Lubrano, L.; Petruzzelli, G. Characterization of heavy metal pollution in soil. Ann. Chim. 1996, 86, 635–652. [Google Scholar]
- Jeffrey, A.J.; McCallum, L.E. Investigation of a hot 0.01 M CaCl2 soil boron extraction procedure followed by ICP-AES analysis. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1988, 19, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bremner, J.M.; Keeney, D.R. Determination and isotope-ratio analysis of different forms of nitrogen in soils: 3. Exchangeable ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite by extraction-distillation methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1966, 30, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knudsen, D.; Peterson, G.A.; Pratt, P.F. Lithium, sodium, and potassium. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties; American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Washington, DC, USA, 1983; Volume 9, pp. 225–246. [Google Scholar]
- Capocasa, F.; Balducci, F.; Di Vittori, L.; Mazzoni, L.; Stewart, D.; Williams, S.; Hargreaves, R.; Bernardini, D.; Danesi, L.; Zhong, C.F.; et al. Romina and Cristina: Two New Strawberry Cultivars with High Sensorial and Nutritional Values. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2016, 16, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcellini, M.; Mazzoni, L.; Raffaelli, D.; Pergolotti, V.; Balducci, F.; Capocasa, F.; Mezzetti, B. Evaluation of Single-Cropping under Reduced Water Supply in Strawberry Cultivation. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadler, G.D.; Murphy, P.A. pH and titratable acidity. Food Anal. 2010, 4, 219–238. [Google Scholar]
- Mezzetti, B.; Balducci, F.; Capocasa, F.; Zhong, C.F.; Cappelletti, R.; Di Vittori, L.; Mazzoni, L.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M. Breeding Strawberry for Higher Phytochemicals Content and Claim It: Is It Possible? Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2016, 16, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iniesta, M.D.; Perez-Conesa, D.; Garcia-Alonso, J.; Ros, G.; Periago, M.J. Folate content in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum): Influence of cultivar, ripeness, year of harvest, and pasteurization and storage temperatures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4739–4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jastrebova, J.; Witthoft, C.; Grahn, A.; Svensson, U.; Jagerstad, M. HPLC determination of folates in raw and processed beetroots. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strålsjö, L.; Arkbåge, K.; Witthöft, C.; Jägerstad, M. Evaluation of a radioprotein-binding assay (RPBA) for folate analysis in berries and milk. Food Chem. 2002, 79, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fredericks, C.H.; Fanning, K.J.; Gidley, M.J.; Netzel, G.; Zabaras, D.; Herrington, M.; Netzel, M. High-Anthocyanin Strawberries through Cultivar Selection. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giusti, M.; Wrolstad, R.E. Characterization and Measurement of anthocyanins by UV-visible Spectroscopy. In Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry, 1st ed.; Wrolstad, R.E., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. F1.2.1–F1.2.13. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, N.J.; Rice-Evans, C.; Davis, M.J. A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant status in premature neonates. Clin. Sci. 1993, 83, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slinkard, K.; Singleton, V.L. Total phenol analysis: Automation and comparison with manual methods. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1977, 28, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gehrmann, H. Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberries As Affected By Water Supply. Acta Hortic. 1985, 171, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awang, Y.B.; Atherton, J.G.; Taylor, A.J. Salinity Effects on Strawberry Plants Grown in Rockwool. I. Growth and Leaf Water Relations. J. Hortic. Sci. 1993, 68, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, B.Z.; Sun, J.; Nishiyama, S. Effect of Drip Irrigation on Strawberry Growth and Yield inside a Plastic Greenhouse. Biosyst. Eng. 2004, 87, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, O.M.; Davies, M.J.; Johnson, A.W.; Simpson, D.W. Physiological and Growth Responses to Water Deficits in Cultivated Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) and in One of Its Progenitors, Fragaria chiloensis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 83, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.S.; Choudhary, V.K.; Bhagawati, R. Influence of Mulching and Irrigation Level on Water-Use Efficiency, Plant Growth and Quality of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 82, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
- Saied, A.S.; Keutgen, A.J.; Noga, G. The Influence of NaCl Salinity on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberry Cvs. “Elsanta” and “Korona”. Sci. Hortic. 2005, 103, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terry, L.A.; Chope, G.A.; Giné Bordonaba, J. Effect of Water Deficit Irrigation and Inoculation with Botrytis Cinerea on Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) Fruit Quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10812–10819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giné Bordonaba, J.; Terry, L.A. Manipulating the Taste-Related Composition of Strawberry Fruits (Fragaria × ananassa) from Different Cultivars Using Deficit Irrigation. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 1020–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Ferri, E.; Soria, C.; Ariza, M.T.; Medina, J.J.; Miranda, L.; Domíguez, P.; Muriel, J.L. Water Relations, Growth and Physiological Response of Seven Strawberry Cultivars (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) to Different Water Availability. Agric. Water Manag. 2016, 164, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardeñosa, V.; Medrano, E.; Lorenzo, P.; Sánchez-Guerrero, M.C.; Cuevas, F.; Pradas, I.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M. Effects of Salinity and Nitrogen Supply on the Quality and Health-Related Compounds of Strawberry Fruits (Fragaria × ananassa Cv. Primoris). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 2924–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Soil Parameter | Unit | Results | Method |
---|---|---|---|
pH | 8.14 | [25] | |
Sand | g Kg−1 | 304 | [26] |
Silt | g Kg−1 | 399 | [26] |
Clay | g Kg−1 | 297 | [26] |
Active limestone | g Kg−1 | 61 | [26] |
Total limestone | g Kg−1 | 174 | [26] |
Assimilable P | g Kg−1 | 3.7 | [27] |
Exchangeable Na | g Kg−1 | 15 | D.M. 13/09/99 GU SO n.248 del 21/10/1999 III.2, XIII.2.6 |
Cation exchange capacity | mEQ 100 g−1 | 21.9 | D.M. 13/09/99 GU SO n.248 del 21/10/1999 III.2 |
Assimilable iron | g Kg−1 | 9.7 | [28] |
Assimilable M n | g Kg−1 | 4.1 | [29] |
Assimilable Z n | g Kg−1 | 0.52 | [29] |
Assimilable C u | g Kg−1 | 2.7 | [29] |
Boron soluble | 0.1 | [30] | |
C/N | 7.7 | ||
Organic matter | g Kg−1 | 11.9 | D.M. 13/09/99 GU SO n.248 del 21/10/1999-VII.3. VII.3.6 |
Total N | g Kg−1 | 0.90 | [31] |
Mg/K | 2.7 | ||
Exchangeable Mn | mg Kg−1 | 155 | [29] |
Exchangeable K | mg Kg−1 | 410 | [32] |
Cultivar | |||
---|---|---|---|
Number of branch crowns | Albion | Monterey | S. Andreas |
W100 | 2.3 ± 0.8 cd | 2.6 ± 0.9 bc | 3.2 ± 0.8 a |
W80 | 2.6 ± 1.0 b | 2.2 ± 0.8 d | 3.1 ± 1.0 a |
W60 | 2.3 ± 0.7 cd | 2.3 ± 0.8 cd | 2.7 ± 0.7 b |
Number of inflorescences | |||
W100 | 2.2 ± 2.4 bc | 2.7 ± 3.0 a | 2.0 ± 3.2 cd |
W80 | 2.5 ± 2.0 ab | 2.5 ± 2.6 ab | 1.8 ± 2.7 d |
W60 | 2.0 ± 2.7 cd | 2.3 ± 2.3 bc | 2.0 ± 3.4 cd |
Leaf length (cm) | |||
W100 | 7.3 ± 1.1 bc | 7.0 ± 1.1 cd | 7.9 ± 1.2 a |
W80 | 7.3 ± 1 bc | 6.8 ± 1.1 d | 7.9 ± 1.3 a |
W60 | 7.4 ± 1.0 b | 7.0 ± 1.0 cd | 7.8 ± 0.9 a |
Leaf width (cm) | |||
W100 | 6.7 ± 0.8 bc | 6.7 ± 1.1 bc | 7.2 ± 1.0 a |
W80 | 6.9 ± 1.3 ab | 6.5 ± 0.9 c | 7.2 ± 0.8 a |
W60 | 6.8 ± 0.8 bc | 6.7 ± 1.0 bc | 7.0 ± 1.0 ab |
Cultivar | |||
---|---|---|---|
Precocity index (days) | Albion | Monterey | S. Andreas |
W100 | 214.2 ± 2.4 ab | 214.6 ± 3.4 ab | 215.1 ± 6.3 a |
W80 | 209.4 ± 1.4 abcd | 209.7 ± 0.1 abc | 211.1 ± 4.1 ab |
W60 | 208.6 ± 4.5 bcd | 204.4 ± 2.7 cd | 203.6 ± 2.8 d |
Average fruit weight (g) | |||
W100 | 11.0 ± 0.1 cd | 12.2 ± 1.8 abc | 13.4 ± 0.8 a |
W80 | 10.5 ± 0.5 d | 10.5 ± 0.9 d | 11.6 ± 1.4 bcd |
W60 | 11.1 ± 0.4 cd | 12.1 ± 1.2 abcd | 12.9 ± 0.5 ab |
Commercial production (g/plant) | |||
W100 | 162.9 ± 24.8 ab | 181.2 ± 42.3 a | 122.1 ± 11.4 bcd |
W80 | 122.6 ± 26.2 bcd | 174.0 ± 44.2 a | 79.2 ± 26.5 d |
W60 | 103.1 ± 15.9 cd | 142.3 ± 17.1 abc | 80.9 ± 22.0 d |
Total production (g/plant) | |||
W100 | 204.8 ± 26.1 ab | 241.8 ± 32.4 a | 159.4 ± 14.9 bc |
W80 | 164.5 ± 26.0 bc | 206.3 ± 50.8 ab | 107.5 ± 26.8 d |
W60 | 144.7 ± 31.7 cd | 187.9 ± 15.0 bc | 104.5 ± 19.2 d |
Cultivar | |||
---|---|---|---|
Sugar content (°Brix) | Albion | Monterey | S. Andreas |
W100 | 14.1 ± 1.2 c | 14.5 ± 0.8 bc | 11.2 ± 0.7 e |
W80 | 14.6 ± 1.2 bc | 15.2 ± 1.1 ab | 11.4 ± 0.8 e |
W60 | 15.1 ± 1.3 ab | 15.7 ± 1.4 a | 12.3 ± 0.8 d |
Titratable acidity (mEQ of NaOH/100 g of fruit weight) | |||
W100 | 14.9 ± 0.8 a | 13.2 ± 1.1 b | 13.5 ± 1.3 b |
W80 | 14.5 ± 1.7 a | 13.3 ± 1 b | 13.2 ± 1.0 b |
W60 | 14.5 ± 1.3 a | 13.3 ± 1.2 b | 13.5 ± 1.0 b |
Firmness (g) | |||
W100 | 371.0 ± 94.2 c | 422.1 ± 105.7 a | 338.9 ± 78.2 d |
W80 | 391.9 ± 88.9 b | 419.7 ± 110.3 a | 361.4 ± 100.1 c |
W60 | 395.6 ± 91.4 b | 420.3 ± 121.5 a | 359.1 ± 105.5 c |
Chroma | |||
W100 | 43.7 ± 5.5 cd | 43.2 ± 6.5 d | 45.6 ± 5.7 a |
W80 | 44.4 ± 5.0 bc | 44.2 ± 5.8 bc | 44.8 ± 5.9 ab |
W60 | 45.4 ± 5.3 a | 44.4 ± 5.9 bc | 44.5 ± 5.9 bc |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Marcellini, M.; Raffaelli, D.; Mazzoni, L.; Pergolotti, V.; Balducci, F.; Armas Diaz, Y.; Mezzetti, B.; Capocasa, F. Effects of Different Irrigation Rates on Remontant Strawberry Cultivars Grown in Soil. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9091026
Marcellini M, Raffaelli D, Mazzoni L, Pergolotti V, Balducci F, Armas Diaz Y, Mezzetti B, Capocasa F. Effects of Different Irrigation Rates on Remontant Strawberry Cultivars Grown in Soil. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(9):1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9091026
Chicago/Turabian StyleMarcellini, Micol, Davide Raffaelli, Luca Mazzoni, Valeria Pergolotti, Francesca Balducci, Yasmany Armas Diaz, Bruno Mezzetti, and Franco Capocasa. 2023. "Effects of Different Irrigation Rates on Remontant Strawberry Cultivars Grown in Soil" Horticulturae 9, no. 9: 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9091026