Next Article in Journal
Effect of Turmeric and Aloe Vera Extract on Shelf-Life of Goat and Buffalo Admixture Milk Paneer during Refrigeration Storage
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study on Physicochemical and Nutritional Qualities of Kiwifruit Varieties
Previous Article in Journal
Emulgels Structured with Dietary Fiber for Food Uses: A Rheological Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Profiling of Nutritionally Vital Bioactive Compounds in Emerging Green Leafy Vegetables: A Comparative Study

Department of Crop Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(23), 3867; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233867
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 25 November 2022 / Accepted: 26 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrient Composition and Bioactive Components of Foods)

Abstract

:
Green leafy vegetables (GLVs), especially lettuce and spinach, are the key source of bioactive antioxidants in a diet. This research compared the contents and composition of lettuce and spinach bioactive compounds with emerging GLVs, moringa and fenugreek. Liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) with single ion monitoring (SIM) was used to examine carotenoids and tocols, while phytosterols were examined using gas chromatography (GC)-MS. Among the studied GLVs, the (all-E)-lutein was the most dominating carotenoid ranging between 31.3 (green/red lettuce)–45.3 % (fenugreek) of total carotenoids, followed by (all-E)-violaxanthin and (all-E)-β-carotene. Surprisingly, (all-E)-β-carotene, a provitamin A carotenoid, was the second most dominating carotenoid in moringa, accounting for 109.2 µg/g fresh weight (FW). Moreover, the significantly highest (p < 0.05; Tukey HSD) contents of total carotenoids (473.3 µg/g FW), α-tocopherol (83.7 µg/g FW), and total phytosterols (206.4 µg/g FW) were recorded in moringa. Therefore, moringa foliage may serve as an affordable source of nutritionally vital constituents in a diet.

1. Introduction

Clinical studies have shown the benefits of the consumption of fruits and vegetables in minimizing the occurrence of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD), neurodegenerative diseases, type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity, and cancer [1,2,3]. The bioactive antioxidants, including carotenoids and tocols obtained from fruits and vegetables, help prevent oxidative damage to cellular lipids, proteins, and DNA, thus minimizing the incidence of these chronic diseases [4,5,6,7].
Carotenoids are tetraterpenoid pigments universally produced by photoautotrophs. Provitamin A carotenoids (e.g., β-carotene) perform crucial roles in animals by serving as a dietary supply of provitamin A. Moreover, provitamin A and non-provitamin A carotenoids have antioxidant properties that protect against cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic syndromes (CVD and T2D), and photooxidative damage to the skin and eyes in animals [6,8].
As essential components of cellular lipids, tocopherols and tocotrienols (α-, β-, γ- and δ), also known as tocols, or vitamin E, scavenge free radicals and protect lipids from oxidative damage. Phytosterols are another group of health-promoting lipophilic compounds essential for maintaining blood levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and endothelial function [9]. The American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that in order to attain the health advantages of lowering blood total and LDL and lowering the risk of coronary heart disease, a dietary intake of 2 g/d of nonesterified plant sterols is required [10].
The risk of hunger and malnutrition is increasing at an alarming rate due to multiple factors, including low access to a healthy diet. High food prices due to low agricultural productivity in a changing climate and increasing populations cause a significant obstacle among low to medium- income consumers to balancing good nutrition with affordability. Therefore, there is a great need to find an affordable source of nutritionally vital constituents. Green leafy vegetables (GLVs), a component of a healthy diet, are key sources of nutritionally and nutraceutically vital constituents, including dietary fiber, minerals, vitamins, carotenoids, and polyphenolic compounds [11]. Among the commonly consumed culinary GLVs, lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.; Asteraceae family) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.; Amaranthaceae family) are the most widely consumed [12]. These GLVs are a rich source of carotenoids [13,14,15], polyphenols, and several other bioactive compounds [16,17].
Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graceum L.; Fabaceae family) is an annual herb of medicinal importance [18]. Foliages are rich in carotenoids, ascorbate, and minerals [19,20]. Due to the unique aroma and flavor of seeds and dehydrated foliage, they are widely cultivated as a spice in the Middle East, Mediterranean countries, Russia, and Asia [21]. Moreover, in Asian countries, foliage is consumed raw, similarly to other GLVs [21].
Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.), also known as the “drumstick tree”, belonging to the Moringaceae family, is a tropical deciduous perennial tree cultivated in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world [22]. The immature pods, foliage, and flowers of this tree are used for culinary vegetables in tropical and subtropical countries. The moringa foliages are exceptionally rich in carotenoids [23], tocopherols [24], polyphenols [25], glucosinolates, and several other bioactives [26,27,28,29,30]. Moringa is emerging as a natural and affordable source of nutrients [31].
The carotenoid composition of GLVs, including lettuce, spinach, and moringa, have been widely investigated [14,15,32]. Moringa is considered a prominent source of carotenoids [23,27]; however, the carotenoid contents of moringa foliage were not widely compared with other commonly consumed GLVs. Comparative profiling may be helpful in the selection of nutrient-dense GLVs for culinary preparations.
Moreover, only a few studies are available on the phytosterols profile of GLVs. In addition, previous studies have reported contrary observations regarding the phytosterol composition of spinach. For instance, Piironen et al. [33] recorded the dominance of spinasterol in spinach foliage. In contrast, Han et al. [34] reported the dominance of β-sitosterol in spinach and stigmasterol. Additionally, despite the vast consumption of fenugreek foliage, its bioactive composition has not been extensively investigated. Furthermore, the bioactive composition and antioxidant potential may be influenced by genetic, environmental, and geographical factors [35,36,37].
The carotenoid and tocopherol profile reported from GLVs is mainly based on HPLC-diode array (DAD) or ultraviolet (UV)-visible detection [14,21,32]. Mass spectrometry (MS) based quantification has several advantages over UV/Vis detection, including higher sensitivity and selectivity. Moreover, the interferences from co-eluting compounds can be avoided in an MS-based analysis [38].
Considering the above facts, in the present study, the contents and composition of major lipophilic compounds, including carotenoids, tocols, and phytosterols of lettuce and spinach, were compared with the emerging GLVs moringa and fenugreek. For this comparison, three carotenoid-rich green (cv. Esse), green/red (cv. Jeokcima), and red (cv. Super caesar red) lettuce cultivars were particularly selected based on our previous report [14]. Liquid chromatography (LC)- MS with single ion monitoring (SIM) was used to examine carotenoids and tocols, while phytosterols were analyzed using gas chromatography (GC)-MS. The profiling of nutritionally vital bioactive compounds of commonly consumed GLVs can significantly contribute to identifying nutritionally enriched vegetables for food formulations and dietary recommendations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Reagents, and Standards

Seeds of green (cv. Esse), green/red (cv. Jeokcima), and red (cv. Super caesar red) lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivars, and Moringa oleifera Lam. were obtained from the Asia Seeds Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea. The spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds were obtained from a local supplier. The cool season vegetables, lettuce, spinach, and fenugreek were grown between April and May 2022 (average high temperature of 10–20 °C), while the tropical plant, moringa, was grown between June and August 2022 (mean temperature of 25–30 °C) in an open space at an ambient temperature and humidity. Seeds of lettuce, spinach, and fenugreek were shown in three replicates in ports measuring 28 × 48 cm, filled with a commercial potting mix (Asia Seeds Co., Ltd. Seoul, Korea), comprising 300–500 ppm NPK and 30–100 cmol/kg of cation exchange capacity (CEC).
After the germination of lettuce, fenugreek, and spinach (a week after sowing), 10–18 plants were maintained in each pot. In the case of moringa, only two plants were maintained in each pot of 28 × 48 cm (five replicates). The plants were raised without applying any fertilizers and pesticides. Lettuce, spinach, and fenugreek foliage was harvested seven weeks after showing, while moringa foliage was harvested 12 weeks after showing. Healthy foliages from the entire plant were collected, cleaned, and stored in a −80 °C deep freezer, until analysis.
Authentic standards of (all-E)-β-carotene, 5-β-cholestan-3α-ol (internal standard), campesterol (24α-methyl cholesterol), β-sitosterol (24α-ethyl cholesterol), stigmasterol, and α-spinasterol were obtained from Merck Ltd., Seoul, South Korea.
A tocols mix (δ-, γ-, β-, and α-tocopherol and tocotrienol) solution was purchased from ChromaDex, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA. (all-E)-zeaxanthin used in this study was purified from corn seeds, while (all-E)-violaxanthin, 9-Z-neoxanthin, (all-E)-lactucaxanthin, and (all-E)-lutein were purified from lettuce using our established protocol [39]. (all-E)-luteoxanthin was prepared from (all-E)-violaxanthin using an acid-catalyzed reaction [40].
The organic solvents used for extraction and analysis were of LC grade and procured from J.T. Baker®, Suwon-Si, Korea.

2.2. Extraction of Crude Lipids (Lipophilic Compounds)

The lipophilic bioactives, including carotenoids, tocols, and phytosterols, were concurrently extracted from fresh foliage using our optimized method [14] with minor modifications. The extraction procedure is outlined in Figure S1. To minimize the oxidative degradation of lipophilic compounds, synthetic antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was added to the extraction solvent (0.1% w/v) [41]. Tocols and carotenoids were analyzed without hydrolysis, as hydrolysis can degrade these compounds [42].
An 0.7 mL aliquot of the extracted sample was hydrolyzed and converted to trimethylsiloxy [−O-Si(CH3)3; TMS] derivatives (Figure S2) [42], and utilized for GC-MS analysis of phytosterols.

2.3. LC-SIM-MS Analysis of Tocols and Carotenoids

The LC-SIM-based MS approach using a LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer was used to analyze the carotenoids and tocols (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The LC-MS parameters are outlined in Table 1. Additionally, the selected ion monitoring (SIM) parameters are shown in Table 2.

2.4. GC-MS Analysis of Phytosterols

Phytosterols were analyzed using QP2010 SE GC-MS (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) after silylation with trimethylsiloxy groups [−O-Si(CH3)3; TMS] group. The analytical details are summarized in Table 3. The mass fragmentation pattern of obtained phytosterols was compared with authentic standards and reference databases, including Wiley9, NIST08, and NIST08S.

2.5. Statistical Analysis and Quality Control

A total of three separate replicate extractions and analysis were performed for each GLV. IBM SPSS statistics (version 25) software was utilized to perform the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), considering a significance level of 0.05 (Tukey HSD).
The LC-SIM-MS and GC-MS method used for the quantification of carotenoids and tocols, and phytosterols, respectively, was validated in terms of accuracy, linearity, and precision [44,45]. The limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantitation (LOQ) were determined according to the following equations [44].
L O D = 3.3   ×   S t a n d a r d   d e v i a t i o n   o f   t h e   r e s p o n s e S l o p e   o f   t h e   c a l i b r a t i o n   c u r v e  
L O Q = 10   ×   S t a n d a r d   d e v i a t i o n   o f   t h e   r e s p o n s e S l o p e   o f   t h e   c a l i b r a t i o n   c u r v e
The instrumental precision (intra-day and inter-day) for retention time and peak area count was calculated from the data obtained with numerous injections of the same concentration (within the working range) and expressed as the percentage of the coefficient of variation (% CV). Six replicate injections of the same concentration in a single day were performed to measure the intra-day precision. In contrast, standards were injected six times over the course of two separate, non-consecutive days to establish the inter-day precision.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Method Validation

The LC-SIM-MS and GC-MS methods used for the quantification of carotenoids and tocols, and phytosterols, respectively, were validated in terms of accuracy, linearity, and precision [44,45]. The coefficient of variation (CV), also known as relative standard deviation (RSD), was recorded below 9.25 and 0.32% (intra-day and inter-day) for the peak areas count and retention times, respectively, for carotenoids and tocopherol using LC-SIM-MS (Table S1). For the bioanalytical method, a CV below 15% is acceptable [46]. The calibration curves also showed a high coefficient of correlation (r2; >0.999–1.000) between standard concentrations and peak area counts.
Similarly, the CV values were recorded below 4.78 and 0.07% (intra-day and inter-day) for peak area count and retention times, respectively, for sterols using GC-MS (Table S2). The calibration curves also showed a high coefficient of correlation (r2; >0.991–1.000) between standard concentrations and peak area counts. These observations supported the good accuracy, linearity, and precision of the deployed LC-SIM and GC-MS methods.

3.2. Carotenoids Composition

Among the lipophylic vitamins and other bioactive compounds in GLVs, carotenoids are the most vital constituents that substantially impact the nutritional value and attractive color of food [47]. In this study, seven major carotenoids, viz., (all-E)-violaxanthin (retention time (RT) of 14.63 min), 9-Z-neoxanthin (15.54 min), (all-E)-luteoxanthin (16.30 min), (all-E)-lactucaxanthin (18.41 min), (all-E)-lutein (19.96 min), (all-E)-zeaxanthin (21.43 min), and (all-E)-β-carotene (32.36 min) were identified and quantified using the LC-SIM-based MS method (Figure 1, Table 4).
Among the studied foliages, the (all-E)-lutein was the most dominating carotenoid, ranging between 31.3 (green/red lettuce)–45.3 % (fenugreek) of total carotenoids, followed by (all-E)-violaxanthin and (all-E)-β-carotene. Surprisingly, (all-E)-β-carotene was the second most dominating carotenoid in moringa, accounting for 109.2 µg/g FW.
Provitamin A carotenoids, especially β-carotene, are nutritionally vital for their vitamin A activity [47], while non-provitamin A carotenoids (e.g., xanthophylls) are important for their antioxidative activities, which prevent chronic and metabolic disorders [6,8]. Considering the substantially high amount of (all-E)-β-carotene in the moringa foliage, its consumption can help improve the body’s vitamin A status. The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of vitamin A is 900 retinol equivalents (RE; 900 RE = 900 μg of retinol or 10,800 µg of dietary β-carotene) for adult men [48]. Considering the (all-E)-β-carotene contents of 109.2 µg/g FW (9.1 μg of RE/g FW), consumption of 100g fresh moringa foliage can supply 101.1% of the RDA of vitamin A.
In addition to the (all-E)-β-carotene, significantly high contents of (all-E)-lutein (204.6 μg/g FW) and (all-E)-zeaxanthin (84.2 μg/g FW) were recorded in moringa, compared to other studied GLVs. Lutein and zeaxanthin are macular pigments acting as blue light filters protecting the retina and, therefore, vision [49]. Studies have shown that increased lutein and zeaxanthin intake can help maintain ocular health [49]. Thus, among the GLVs researched in the present study, moringa is the most vital to increase the intake of lutein and zeaxanthin in a diet.
Moringa is a fast-growing, drought-resistant, and easy-to-cultivate tropical plant. Moringa foliage is an affordable source of nutrients for the populations of developing countries where malnutrition persists [50]. Moreover, moringa foliage can be harvested during the dry season when no other GLVs are readily available [51]. In the present study, the total carotenoid contents (TCC) of moringa (473.3 µg/g FW) was recorded nearly four times higher than lettuce (86.3–116.1 µg/g FW), and two times higher than spinach (218.5 µg/g FW) and fenugreek (214.2 µg/g FW). Suggesting that moringa is a more significant source of carotenoids than other commonly consumed GLVs.
We have previously investigated the carotenoid profile of 23 diverse lettuce cultivars [14]; three carotenoid-rich cultivars with green, green/red, and red foliage were selected in the present investigation to compare their profile with other commonly consumed GLVs. The carotenoid profile and contents recorded in the present investigation are in agreement with our previous report [14]. Similarly, the carotenoid profile of lettuce cultivars recorded in the present study agrees with our previous report from minimally processed ready-to-eat baby-leaf vegetables, including green and red Romaine lettuce [13]. Moreover, we have previously analyzed the carotenoid profile of eight diverse moringa cultivars grown in India [52]. In that study, 118.6 (cv. PAVM-1)–231.5 µg/g FW (cv. Bhagya) of (all-E)-β-carotene contents was recorded, which agrees with the present study.
The all trans (all-E) is the major form of β-carotene in green leafy vegetables, including spinach [15]. In a previous study, (all-E) form accounted for 86.3–87.6 % of β-carotene in spinach with a minor presence of 9-Z- and 13-Z-β-carotene [15]. In that study, 36.2, 56.6, 38.3, and 29.2 µg/g FW of (all-E)-β-carotene was recorded from authentic field-grown, greenhouse-grown, fresh commercial, and frozen commercial spinach, respectively [15]. These results are in agreement with the (all-E)-β-carotene recorded from spinach in the present study.
A previous study on fenugreek foliage reported the presence of a significant amount of β-cryptoxanthin (75 µg/g FW), zeaxanthin (82 µg/g FW), and γ-carotene (41 µg/g FW), with the TCC of 712 µg/g FW [21]. In contrast, we recorded 5.16 µg/g FW of (all-E)-zeaxanthin, with the TCC of 214.2 µg/g FW, while β-cryptoxanthin and γ-carotene were not detected. Lutein and zeaxanthin are positional isomers. In general, in most green leafy vegetables, including fenugreek, lutein dominates with a minor presence of zeaxanthin [32].
Recently, Lee et al. [38] analyzed the content of carotenoids and tocopherols in 26 green leafy vegetables, including spinach, moringa, and fenugreek. The β-carotene contents reported in that study from spinach (43 µg/g FW) and moringa (108 µg/g FW) foliage are in agreement with the present study. However, we recorded a substantially low amount of violaxanthin and neoxanthin compared to that study.
A significant variation in carotenoid content obtained in the present study from previous reports is probably driven by the harvesting stage, as well as cultivational, environmental, and genetic factors, which influence the carotenoid contents and crop compositions [35].

3.3. Tocols Composition

Tocols includes four naturally occurring tocopherols (δ-, γ-, β-, and α-) and four tocotrienols (δ-, γ-, β-, and α-) [53]. In this study, the LC-SIM-MS-based method was employed for analyzing the tocol contents and composition. Among the studied foliages, 22.0 (spinach)–87.7 µg/g FW (moringa) of α-tocopherol was recorded (Table 4), while other forms were not detected in a substantial amount.
The RDA for both men and women is 15 mg/day of α-tocopherol [54]. Among the naturally occurring tocols, α-tocopherol is considered the highest 100% vitamin E activity (1 mg α-tocopherol = 1 α-TE), followed by β-tocopherol (50%), α-tocotrienol (30%), γ-tocopherol (10%), β-tocotrienol (5%), and δ-tocopherol (3%) [54]. Vegetable oil, especially wheat gem oil, is the major source of vitamin E in the body [54]. However, considering the highest α-tocopherol contents of 87.3 µg/g FW, which is 2–4 times higher than other studied GLVs, 100g of fresh moringa foliage can supply 55.8% of the RDA of vitamin E. Moreover, α-tocopherol is well known for its chain-breaking antioxidant functions that prevent the propagation of lipid peroxidation, thus minimizing oxidative stress-related diseases [54,55,56,57].
The previous reports of α-tocopherol contents from GLVs have shown substantial variation. In a study by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2.2–5.5 and 19.6 µg/FW of α-tocopherol was recorded from various types of lettuce, and spinach, respectively [58]. We also recorded 22.0 µg/FW of α-tocopherol from spinach, while α-tocopherol contents from studied lettuce are substantially higher (25.1–30.1 µg/FW) in the present study. The contents of α-tocopherol significantly depend on the leaf position in the head of matured lettuce. For instance, a significantly higher amount of α-tocopherol (16.2 µg/g FW) was recorded from the outer leaf, compared to the middle (5.1 µg/g FW) and central leaves (8.5 µg/g FW) of the lettuce head [59]. We harvested lettuce and other studied GLVs at the baby-leaf stage (7 weeks after showing). At this stage, all the leaves received a nearly equal amount of sunlight; this is the probable reason for the high amount of α-tocopherol recorded in the present investigation.
Recently, Lee et al. [38] recorded 183 µg/g FW of α-tocopherol in moringa foliage. Similarly, in our previous study, 173 µg/g FW of α-tocopherol was recorded from moringa (cv. PKM-1) grown in the field in India, which is higher than the contents recorded in the present study (83.7 µg/g FW). However, α-tocopherol contents recorded from moringa in the present study are in good agreement with the report of Ching and Mohamed [60], who recorded 90 µg/g FW α-tocopherol in moringa foliage.
A recent study on fenugreek foliage recorded 31.2 µg/g FW of α-tocopherol [38], which is lower than documented in the present study (43.6 µg/g FW).

3.4. Phytosterol Composition

In this study, lipophilic extract derivatized with trimethylsiloxy groups [−O-Si(CH3)3; TMS] and analyzed utilizing GC-MS revealed the presence of campesterol (RT-18.494), stigmasterol (RT-19.017), β-sitosterol (RT-20.419), spinasterol (RT-20497), and 22,23-dihydrospinasterol (RT-21.966) in the studied samples (Figure 2).
The trimethylsilanol (TMS-OH) loss, yielding a major ion fragment at m/z [M-90]•+, is a characteristic often utilized for the mass spectrometric identification of sterols [61]. Additionally, the Δ5-steryl-TMS, such as β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, and campesterol, give a distinctive fragmentation involving loss of TMS-OH with the C-3, C-2, and C-1 of the sterol A-ring, resulting in dominant ions at m/z 129 and m/z [M-129]•+ for the remaining part of the sterol compound (Figures S3 and S4) [61]. In contrast, the Δ7-steryl TMS, such as α-spinasterol and 22-23 dihydrospinasterol, produce distinctive ion [M-141]+ by losing the side chain with two hydrogens (Figure S4) [62].
In this study, β-sitosterol was the most dominating phytosterol among the studied GLVs (except spinach), ranging between 53.3 (green lettuce)−85.7 (fenugreek) µg/g FW, which accounted for 46.0 (green/red lettuce)−85.4% (fenugreek) of total phytosterol (Table 5). Interestingly, α-spinasterol was the most dominating sterol in spinach, accounting for 81.9% of total phytosterols, while other commonly occurring forms were not detected.
In the present study, the significantly highest (p < 0.05; Tukey HSD) contents of total phytosterols were recorded from moringa foliage (206.4 µg/g FW), followed by green/red lettuce (153.4 µg/g FW), and red lettuce (135.7 µg/g FW) (Table 5). These results show that moringa foliages are a rich source of phytosterols compared to other commonly consumed GLVs.
In agreement with the present study, β-sitosterol is reported as the most dominating phytosterol in fruits and vegetables, except for spinach and a few others [33]. In spinach, 102 µg/g FW of total phytosterols were reported by Piironen et al. [33], with the dominance of spinasterol (62%) and dihydrospinasterol (27%). Interestingly, we also recorded 109.9 µg/g FW of total phytosterols in spinach with the α-spinasterol and 22,23-dihydrospinasterol. In contrast, Han et al. [34] reported the dominance of β-sitosterol in spinach (54 µg FW) and stigmasterol (29 54 µg FW).
Limited studies are available on the phytosterol composition of green leafy vegetables. We have previously recorded the dominance of β-sitosterol in herbs such as Kaempferia parviflora Wall. Ex Baker (30.6–36.6 µg/g FW) [63] and perilla (Perilla frutescens Britt.; 27.7–37.9 µg/g FW) [64], with campesterol as a minor phytosterol.

4. Conclusions

High food prices cause a significant obstacle among low- to medium-income consumers to balancing good nutrition with affordability. Thus, there is a great need to find an affordable source of nutritionally vital constituents. This research compared the contents and composition of lettuce and spinach bioactive compounds with the emerging GLVs moringa and fenugreek. Among the three cultivars of lettuce foliage studied, moringa, spinach, and fenugreek, the significantly highest (p < 0.05; Tukey HSD) contents of total carotenoids (473.3 µg/g FW), α-tocopherol (83.7 µg/g FW), and total phytosterols (206.4 µg/g FW) were recorded in moringa. Considering the (all-E)-β-carotene (a provitamin A carotenoid) contents of 109.2 µg/g FW, consumption of 100g fresh moringa foliage can supply 101.1% of the RDA of vitamin A. These observations suggest that moringa is a more significant source of carotenoids, α-tocopheol, and phytosterols than other commonly consumed GLVs studied in the present investigation.
In this study, β-sitosterol was the most dominating phytosterol among the studied GLVs (except for spinach). Interestingly, α-spinasterol was the most dominating sterol in spinach, accounting for 81.9% of total phytosterols. Limited studies are available on the phytosterol composition of GLVs. In the future, more GLVs will need to be screened for their phytosterol composition.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods11233867/s1, Figure S1: Outline of the Method Used for Extraction of Crude Lipids, Figure S2: Outline of Methods Used for the Hydrolysis and Silylation of Sterols for GC-MS, Figure S3: A characteristic mass fragmentation pattern of β-Sitosterol (trimethylsiloxy (TMS) derivative) observed in the present investigation, Figure S4: The characteristic GC-MS-fragmentation pattern of phytosterols identified in studied GLVs, Table S1: Method analytical and validation parameters for LC-SIM-MS analysis of carotenoids and tocopherols, Table S2: Method analytical and validation parameters for GC-MS analysis of sterols.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K.S., J.-W.Y., M.-H.S. and J.-H.L. (Ji-Ho Lee); methodology, R.K.S., J.-W.Y. and J.-H.L. (Jung-Hoon Lee); software, R.K.S.; validation, R.K.S., J.-H.L. (Ji-Ho Lee) and Y.-S.K.; formal analysis, R.K.S., J.-W.Y., M.-H.S. and H.-Y.A.; investigation, R.K.S., J.-W.Y. and M.-H.S.; resources, J.-H.L. (Ji-Ho Lee) and Y.-S.K.; data curation, R.K.S. and J.-W.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, R.K.S. and M.-H.S.; writing—review and editing, R.K.S.; visualization, R.K.S. and J.-H.L. (Ji-Ho Lee); supervision, Y.-S.K.; project administration, J.-W.Y.; funding acquisition, Y.-S.K. and J.-H.L. (Ji-Ho Lee). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the KU research professor program of Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, P.Y.; Fang, J.C.; Gao, Z.H.; Zhang, C.; Xie, S.Y. Higher intake of fruits, vegetables or their fiber reduces the risk of type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. J. Diabetes Investig. 2016, 7, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aune, D.; Giovannucci, E.; Boffetta, P.; Fadnes, L.T.; Keum, N.; Norat, T.; Greenwood, D.C.; Riboli, E.; Vatten, L.J.; Tonstad, S. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 1029–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Medina-Remón, A.; Kirwan, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M.; Estruch, R. Dietary patterns and the risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, asthma, and neurodegenerative diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 262–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kaulmann, A.; Bohn, T. Carotenoids, inflammation, and oxidative stress—Implications of cellular signaling pathways and relation to chronic disease prevention. Nutr. Res. 2014, 34, 907–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hajizadeh-Sharafabad, F.; Ghoreishi, Z.; Maleki, V.; Tarighat-Esfanjani, A. Mechanistic insights into the effect of lutein on atherosclerosis, vascular dysfunction, and related risk factors: A systematic review of in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro studies. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 149, 104477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Saini, R.K.; Rengasamy, K.R.R.; Mahomoodally, F.M.; Keum, Y.S. Protective effects of lycopene in cancer, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases: An update on epidemiological and mechanistic perspectives. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 155, 104730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elvira-Torales, L.I.; Garcia-Alonso, J.; Periago-Caston, M.J. Nutritional Importance of Carotenoids and Their Effect on Liver Health: A Review. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S.; Daglia, M.; Rengasamy, K.R. Dietary carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy: A review of emerging evidence. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 157, 104830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. AbuMweis, S.S.; Marinangeli, C.P.; Frohlich, J.; Jones, P.J. Implementing phytosterols into medical practice as a cholesterol-lowering strategy: Overview of efficacy, effectiveness, and safety. Can. J. Cardiol. 2014, 30, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Food and Drug Administration. Food labeling health claim; phytosterols and risk of coronary heart disease; proposed rule. 21 CFR Part 101. Fed. Regist. 2010, 75, 76526–76571. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, N.; Wu, X.; Zhuang, W.; Xia, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, C.; Rao, Z.; Du, L.; Zhao, R.; et al. Green leafy vegetable and lutein intake and multiple health outcomes. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 130145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pennington, J.A.T.; Fisher, R.A. Classification of fruits and vegetables. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, S23–S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saini, R.K.; Shang, X.M.; Ko, E.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, D.; Keum, Y.S. Characterization of nutritionally important phytoconstituents in minimally processed ready-to-eat baby-leaf vegetables using HPLC-DAD and GC-MS. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2016, 10, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, D.E.; Shang, X.; Assefa, A.D.; Keum, Y.S.; Saini, R.K. Metabolite profiling of green, green/red, and red lettuce cultivars: Variation in health beneficial compounds and antioxidant potential. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Heymann, T.; Westphal, L.; Wessjohann, L.; Glomb, M.A. Growing and Processing Conditions Lead to Changes in the Carotenoid Profile of Spinach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4960–4967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shi, M.; Gu, J.; Wu, H.; Rauf, A.; Emran, T.B.; Khan, Z.; Mitra, S.; Aljohani, A.S.M.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; Al-Awthan, Y.S.; et al. Phytochemicals, Nutrition, Metabolism, Bioavailability, and Health Benefits in Lettuce&mdash; A Comprehensive Review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1158. [Google Scholar]
  17. Roberts, J.L.; Moreau, R. Functional properties of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) phytochemicals and bioactives. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 3337–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Syed, Q.A.; Rashid, Z.; Ahmad, M.H.; Shukat, R.; Ishaq, A.; Muhammad, N.; Rahman, H.U.U. Nutritional and therapeutic properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2020, 23, 1777–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahmad, A.; Alghamdi, S.S.; Mahmood, K.; Afzal, M. Fenugreek a multipurpose crop: Potentialities and improvements. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Visuvanathan, T.; Than, L.T.L.; Stanslas, J.; Chew, S.Y.; Vellasamy, S. Revisiting Trigonella foenum-graecum L.: Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potentialities. Plants 2022, 11, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hussain, P.R.; Suradkar, P.; Javaid, S.; Akram, H.; Parvez, S. Influence of postharvest gamma irradiation treatment on the content of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 33, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leone, A.; Spada, A.; Battezzati, A.; Schiraldi, A.; Aristil, J.; Bertoli, S. Cultivation, Genetic, Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Moringa oleifera Leaves: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 12791–12835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saini, R.K.; Shetty, N.P.; Prakash, M.; Giridhar, P. Effect of dehydration methods on retention of carotenoids, tocopherols, ascorbic acid and antioxidant activity in Moringa oleifera leaves and preparation of a RTE product. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2176–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Saini, R.K.; Prashanth, K.V.H.; Shetty, N.P.; Giridhar, P. Elicitors, SA and MJ enhance carotenoids and tocopherol biosynthesis and expression of antioxidant related genes in Moringa oleifera Lam. leaves. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 2695–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fahey, J.W.; Olson, M.E.; Stephenson, K.K.; Wade, K.L.; Chodur, G.M.; Odee, D.; Nouman, W.; Massiah, M.; Alt, J.; Egner, P.A.; et al. The Diversity of Chemoprotective Glucosinolates in Moringaceae (Moringa spp.). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kashyap, P.; Kumar, S.; Riar, C.S.; Jindal, N.; Baniwal, P.; Guiné, R.P.F.; Correia, P.M.R.; Mehra, R.; Kumar, H. Recent Advances in Drumstick (Moringa oleifera) Leaves Bioactive Compounds: Composition, Health Benefits, Bioaccessibility, and Dietary Applications. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saini, R.K.; Sivanesan, I.; Keum, Y.S. Phytochemicals of Moringa oleifera: A review of their nutritional, therapeutic and industrial significance. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Padayachee, B.; Baijnath, H. An updated comprehensive review of the medicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Moringa oleifera. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 129, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saucedo-Pompa, S.; Torres-Castillo, J.A.; Castro-López, C.; Rojas, R.; Sánchez-Alejo, E.J.; Ngangyo-Heya, M.; Martínez-Ávila, G.C.G. Moringa plants: Bioactive compounds and promising applications in food products. Food Res. Int. 2018, 111, 438–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, M.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X. Bioactive flavonoids in Moringa oleifera and their health-promoting properties. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 47, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Özcan, M.M. Moringa spp: Composition and bioactive properties. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 129, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lakshminarayana, R.; Raju, M.; Krishnakantha, T.P.; Baskaran, V. Determination of Major Carotenoids in a Few Indian Leafy Vegetables by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2838–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Piironen, V.; Toivo, J.; Puupponen-Pimiä, R.; Lampi, A.-M. Plant sterols in vegetables, fruits and berries. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2003, 83, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Han, J.-H.; Yang, Y.-X.; Feng, M.-Y. Contents of Phytosterols in Vegetables and Fruits Commonly consumed in China. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2008, 21, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S. Significance of Genetic, Environmental, and Pre- and Postharvest Factors Affecting Carotenoid Contents in Crops: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5310–5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Williams, J.P.; Khan, M.U.; Wong, D. Low temperature-induced fatty acid desaturation in Brassica napus: Thermal deactivation and reactivation of the process. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Lipids Lipid Metab. 1992, 1128, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vázquez-León, L.A.; Páramo-Calderón, D.E.; Robles-Olvera, V.J.; Valdés-Rodríguez, O.A.; Pérez-Vázquez, A.; García-Alvarado, M.A.; Rodríguez-Jimenes, G.C. Variation in bioactive compounds and antiradical activity of Moringa oleifera leaves: Influence of climatic factors, tree age, and soil parameters. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1593–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wen Lee, H.; Bi, X.; Jeyakumar Henry, C. Carotenoids, tocopherols and phylloquinone content of 26 green leafy vegetables commonly consumed in Southeast Asia. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saini, R.K.; Moon, S.H.; Gansukh, E.; Keum, Y.S. An efficient one-step scheme for the purification of major xanthophyll carotenoids from lettuce, and assessment of their comparative anticancer potential. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Crupi, P.; Milella, R.A.; Antonacci, D. Simultaneous HPLC-DAD-MS (ESI+) determination of structural and geometrical isomers of carotenoids in mature grapes. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 45, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.-S. Carotenoid extraction methods: A review of recent developments. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cruz, R.; Casal, S.; Mendes, E.; Costa, A.; Santos, C.; Morais, S. Validation of a Single-Extraction Procedure for Sequential Analysis of Vitamin E, Cholesterol, Fatty Acids, and Total Fat in Seafood. Food Anal. Methods 2013, 6, 1196–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shin, J.; Song, M.-H.; Yu, J.-W.; Ko, E.-Y.; Shang, X.; Oh, J.-W.; Keum, Y.-S.; Saini, R.K. Anticancer Potential of Lipophilic Constituents of Eleven Shellfish Species Commonly Consumed in Korea. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Q2 (R1): Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva; Somatek Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  45. Taverniers, I.; De Loose, M.; Van Bockstaele, E. Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2004, 23, 535–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nimalaratne, C.; Sun, C.; Wu, J.; Curtis, J.M.; Schieber, A. Quantification of selected fat soluble vitamins and carotenoids in infant formula and dietary supplements using fast liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Food Res. Int. 2014, 66, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saini, R.K.; Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Carotenoids from fruits and vegetables: Chemistry, analysis, occurrence, bioavailability and biological activities. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 735–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Institute of Medicine Panel on Micronutrients. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wilson, L.M.; Tharmarajah, S.; Jia, Y.; Semba, R.D.; Schaumberg, D.A.; Robinson, K.A. The Effect of Lutein/Zeaxanthin Intake on Human Macular Pigment Optical Density: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 2244–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ma, Z.F.; Ahmad, J.; Zhang, H.; Khan, I.; Muhammad, S. Evaluation of phytochemical and medicinal properties of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) as a potential functional food. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 129, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sagona, W.C.J.; Chirwa, P.W.; Sajidu, S.M. The miracle mix of Moringa: Status of Moringa research and development in Malawi. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 129, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Saini, R.K.; Shetty, N.P.; Giridhar, P. Carotenoid content in vegetative and reproductive parts of commercially grown Moringa oleifera Lam. cultivars from India by LC-APCI-MS. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014, 238, 971–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.-S. Tocopherols and tocotrienols in plants and their products: A review on methods of extraction, chromatographic separation, and detection. Food Res. Int. 2016, 82, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Monsen, E.R. Dietary reference intakes for the antioxidant nutrients: Vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and carotenoids. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2000, 100, 637. [Google Scholar]
  55. Marti, R.; Rosello, S.; Cebolla-Cornejo, J. Tomato as a Source of Carotenoids and Polyphenols Targeted to Cancer Prevention. Cancers 2016, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Koklesova, L.; Liskova, A.; Samec, M.; Buhrmann, C.; Samuel, S.M.; Varghese, E.; Ashrafizadeh, M.; Najafi, M.; Shakibaei, M.; Busselberg, D.; et al. Carotenoids in Cancer Apoptosis-The Road from Bench to Bedside and Back. Cancers 2020, 12, 2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Saini, R.K.; Prasad, P.; Lokesh, V.; Shang, X.; Shin, J.; Keum, Y.-S.; Lee, J.-H. Carotenoids: Dietary Sources, Extraction, Encapsulation, Bioavailability, and Health Benefits&mdash;A Review of Recent Advancements. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 795. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chun, J.; Lee, J.; Ye, L.; Exler, J.; Eitenmiller, R.R. Tocopherol and tocotrienol contents of raw and processed fruits and vegetables in the United States diet. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Szymańska, R.; Kruk, J. Tocopherol content and isomers’ composition in selected plant species. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 46, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ching, L.S.; Mohamed, S. Alpha-Tocopherol Content in 62 Edible Tropical Plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3101–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Goad, L.J.; Akihisa, T. Mass spectrometry of sterols. In Analysis of Sterols; Goad, L.J., Akihisa, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; pp. 152–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Isidorov, V.A. GC-MS of Biologically and Environmentally Significant Organic Compounds: TMS Derivatives; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  63. Song, K.; Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.-S.; Sivanesan, I. Analysis of Lipophilic Antioxidants in the Leaves of Kaempferia parviflora Wall. Ex Baker Using LC–MRM–MS and GC–FID/MS. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S.; Rengasamy, K.R.R. Profiling of nutritionally important metabolites in green/red and green perilla (Perilla frutescens Britt.) cultivars: A comparative study. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 151, 112441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The representative LC-SIM-MS chromatograms of various carotenoids and α-tocopherol identified in studied GLVs.
Figure 1. The representative LC-SIM-MS chromatograms of various carotenoids and α-tocopherol identified in studied GLVs.
Foods 11 03867 g001
Figure 2. The characteristic GC-MS-total ion chromatograms of phytosterols identified in studied GLVs. IS: internal standard. 1, campesterol; 2, stigmasterol; 3, β-sitosterol; 4, α-spinasterol; and 5, 22, 23-dihydrospinasterol. * not a sterol compound.
Figure 2. The characteristic GC-MS-total ion chromatograms of phytosterols identified in studied GLVs. IS: internal standard. 1, campesterol; 2, stigmasterol; 3, β-sitosterol; 4, α-spinasterol; and 5, 22, 23-dihydrospinasterol. * not a sterol compound.
Foods 11 03867 g002
Table 1. LC-SIM-MS parameters used for the analysis of carotenoids and tocols.
Table 1. LC-SIM-MS parameters used for the analysis of carotenoids and tocols.
HPLC System: Nexera 40 Series UHPLC (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan)
Column YMC C30 carotenoid column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 μm; YMC, Wilmington, NC, USA), maintained at 20 °C
Mobile phase 1A- methanol/water (95/5; v/v) with 5 mM ammonium formate
B- methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)/methanol/water (90/7/3, v/v/v), with 5 mM ammonium formate
Gradient program 10 % B (0 min) –100 % B (45 min); 5-min post-run (0 % B)
Flow rate0.5 mL/min
Injection volume2 µL
MS system: LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight (q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan)
Nebulizing gas flow3 L/min
Drying gas flow10 L/min
Interface temperature400 °C
Corona needle voltage 4.0 kv
Heat block Temperature300 °C
DL temperature 300 °C
IonizationAtmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI; Positive mode)
MS programmin- diverter valve to drain
8.0 min- diverter valve to MS
Q1 resolution±20 ppm
Screening modeSingle ion monitoring (SIM)
Data acquisition (sampling)1.85625 Hz
1 used with minor modifications as suggested by the column supplier (YMC, Wilmington, NC, USA) to separate the carotenes and xanthophylls; The MS parameters were optimized to obtain the highest response.
Table 2. The transition (m/z) utilized for selected ion monitoring (SIM) of carotenoids and tocols.
Table 2. The transition (m/z) utilized for selected ion monitoring (SIM) of carotenoids and tocols.
Compound ClassCompoundTransition (m/z) *
Carotenoids(all-E)-violaxanthin601.4276
9-Z-neoxanthin601.4281
(all-E)-luteoxanthin601.4281
(all-E)-lactucaxanthin551.4284
(all-E)-lutein551.4284
(all-E)-zeaxanthin569.4377
(all-E)-β-carotene537.4493
Tocolsδ-tocopherol402.3488
δ-tocotrienol397.3113
γ- tocopherol416.3669
γ- tocotrienol411.3268
δ-tocopherol416.3669
δ-tocotrienol411.3268
α- tocopherol431.3883
α- tocotrienol425.3423
* Selected based on the most prominent protonated precursor ion obtained from the standard compounds.
Table 3. GC-MS conditions used for the analysis of phytosterols.
Table 3. GC-MS conditions used for the analysis of phytosterols.
Gas Chromatograph
Injection temperature260 °C
Column over temperature150 °C
Carrier gas Helium
Injection modesplit
Flow control modeLiner velocity
Total flow8.6 mL/min
Pressure86.5 kPa
Column flow0.93 mL/min
Liner velocity36.7 cm/s
Purge flow3.0 mL/min
Column over temperatureRate (°C/min)Final temperature (°C)Hold time (min)
-1501
2030030
Column DB-5ms (30 m, 0.25 μm, 0.25 mm ID; Agilent Technologies Canada, Inc.
Total program time38.5 min
Mass spectrometer
Interface temperature280 °C
Ion source temperature260 °C
Solvent cut time3 min
Start time and end time 6 min and 38 min
Acquiring modeScan
Event time30 s
Scan speed 2500
Start and end m/z50.00 and 650.00
The GC-MS conditions were adopted from our previous studies [43], with minor modifications.
Table 4. The contents (µg/g FW) of carotenoids and α-tocopherol in studied GLVs.
Table 4. The contents (µg/g FW) of carotenoids and α-tocopherol in studied GLVs.
CompoundsRT (min)Lettuce (Green)Lettuce (Green/Red)Lettuce (Red)MoringaSpinachFenugreek
(all-E)-violaxanthin14.6327.0 ± 0.84 d24.3 ± 1.40 d25.9 ± 1.27 d37.0 ± 0.72 c57.1 ± 1.49 a46.2 ± 4.32 b
9-Z-neoxanthin15.546.73 ± 0.55 e6.23 ± 0.47 e9.23 ± 0.83 d35.8 ± 0.39 a23.2 ± 0.10 b17.9 ± 0.81 c
(all-E)-luteoxanthin *16.303.65 ± 0.65 b3.88 ± 0.23 b3.62 ± 0.41 b2.57 ± 0.33 b0.28 ± 0.05 c11.3 ± 1.97 a
(all-E)-lactucaxanthin18.419.52 ± 0.92 b8.66 ± 0.24 b17.1 ± 1.05 an.d.n.d.n.d.
(all-E)-lutein19.9629.5 ± 2.21 e27.0 ± 1.93 e37.0 ± 1.50 d204.6 ± 1.86 a89.9 ± 0.35 c97.1 ± 4.48 b
(all-E)-zeaxanthin21.433.24 ± 0.24 c2.74 ± 0.32 cd2.46 ± 0.24 cd84.2 ± 1.73 a1.47 ± 0.05 d5.16 ± 0.17 b
(all-E)-β-carotene32.3614.2 ± 0.31 e13.5 ± 0.66 e20.8 ± 1.38 d109.2 ± 5.09 a46.6 ± 3.28 b36.6 ± 1.51 c
Total carotenoids 93.7 ± 5.72 d86.3 ± 5.25 d116.1 ± 5.85 c473.3 ± 5.88 a218.9 ± 1.34 b214.2 ± 9.32 b
α-tocopherol16.9230.1 ± 3.31 c25.1 ± 0.85 d25.18 ± 2.75 d83.7 ± 0.78 a22.0 ± 1.56 d43.6 ± 2.61 b
Values are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of four replicate analyses. The various superscript letters (i.e., a, b, c, d, and e) show statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD) among the different GLVs. RT: Retention time. * calculated contents are (all-E)-violaxanthin equivalent.
Table 5. The phytosterol contents (µg/g FW) in studied GLVs.
Table 5. The phytosterol contents (µg/g FW) in studied GLVs.
PhytosterolsRT (min)Lettuce (Green)Lettuce (Green/Red)Lettuce (Red)MoringaSpinachFenugreek
Campesterol18.49411.9 ± 1.09 cd17.2 ± 1.35 b21.4 ± 1.22 a10.0 ± 3.15 dn.d.14.6 ± 0.79 bc
Stigmasterol19.10740.9 ± 6.43 b65.6 ± 7.12 a40.6 ± 1.23 b20.4 ± 0.63 cn.d.n.d.
β-Sitosterol20.41953.3 ± 5.57 d70.6 ± 7.76 c73.7 ± 5.72 cd175.9 ± 6.22 an.d.85.7 ± 4.63 b
α-Spinasterol20.497n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.83.4 ± 6.05 an.d.
22, 23-Dihydrospinasterol *21.966n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.18.5 ± 2.13 an.d.
Total Phytosterol 106.1 ± 12.0 c153.4 ± 15.8 b135.7 ± 6.24 b206.4 ± 8.27 a101.9 ± 5.48 c100.4 ± 3.85 c
Values are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of four replicate analyses. The various superscript letters (i.e., a, b, c, and d) show statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD) among the different GLVs. * identified based on reference databases, and calculated contents are α-Spinasterol equivalent.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saini, R.K.; Song, M.-H.; Yu, J.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; Ahn, H.-Y.; Keum, Y.-S.; Lee, J.-H. Profiling of Nutritionally Vital Bioactive Compounds in Emerging Green Leafy Vegetables: A Comparative Study. Foods 2022, 11, 3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233867

AMA Style

Saini RK, Song M-H, Yu J-W, Lee J-H, Ahn H-Y, Keum Y-S, Lee J-H. Profiling of Nutritionally Vital Bioactive Compounds in Emerging Green Leafy Vegetables: A Comparative Study. Foods. 2022; 11(23):3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saini, Ramesh Kumar, Min-Ho Song, Ji-Woo Yu, Jung-Hoon Lee, Hui-Yeon Ahn, Young-Soo Keum, and Ji-Ho Lee. 2022. "Profiling of Nutritionally Vital Bioactive Compounds in Emerging Green Leafy Vegetables: A Comparative Study" Foods 11, no. 23: 3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233867

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop