Next Article in Journal
Different Withering Times Affect Sensory Qualities, Chemical Components, and Nutritional Characteristics of Black Tea
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Glucosinolates in the Nutraceutical Potential of Selected Cultivars of Brassica rapa
Previous Article in Journal
Hepatoprotective Effects of Sweet Cherry Extracts (cv. Saco)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Health-Promoting Properties of Borage Seed Oil Fractionated by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening for Innovative Sources of Carotenoids and Phenolic Antioxidants among Flowers

by
Antonio J. Meléndez-Martínez
1,
Ana Benítez
1,
Mireia Corell
2,3,
Dolores Hernanz
4,*,
Paula Mapelli-Brahm
1,
Carla Stinco
1 and
Elena Coyago-Cruz
5
1
Food Colour and Quality Laboratory, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain
2
Department Ciencias Agroforestales, Universidad de Sevilla, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Carrera de Utrera Km1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
3
Unidad Asociada al CSIC de Uso Sostenible del Suelo y el Agua en la Agricultura (US-IRNAS), Crta. De Utrera Km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
4
Department Química Analítica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain
5
Carrera de Ingeniería en Biotecnología de los Recursos Naturales, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Sede Quito, Campus El Girón, Av. 12 de Octubre, 170517 Quito, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(11), 2625; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112625
Submission received: 20 September 2021 / Revised: 21 October 2021 / Accepted: 24 October 2021 / Published: 29 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutraceutical Components of Plants and Plant Seeds)

Abstract

:
Flowers have been used for centuries in decoration and traditional medicine, and as components of dishes. In this study, carotenoids and phenolics from 125 flowers were determined by liquid chromatography (RRLC and UHPLC). After comparing four different extractants, the carotenoids were extracted with acetone: methanol (2:1), which led to a recovery of 83%. The phenolic compounds were extracted with 0.1% acidified methanol. The petals of the edible flowers Renealmia alpinia and Lantana camara showed the highest values of theoretical vitamin A activity expressed as retinol activity equivalents (RAE), i.e., 19.1 and 4.1 RAE/g fresh weight, respectively. The sample with the highest total phenolic contents was Punica granatum orange (146.7 mg/g dry weight). It was concluded that in most cases, flowers with high carotenoid contents did not contain high phenolic content and vice versa. The results of this study can help to develop innovative concepts and products for the industry.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Flowers have long held an important place in human societies. They have been used for ornamental purposes as well as in diverse dishes, mainly due to their appealing and diverse colors [1]. In addition, flowers have been used in traditional medicine [2]. More specifically, the use of flowers in the diet or as medicine dates back at least to 4000 BC, as documented in the Mesopotamic and Egyptian cultures [3]. Their traditional use in other cultures (Roman, Greek, Chinese, Indian, and European) is also well-known [4].
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the study from different points of view of the health-promoting secondary metabolites present in flowers, including carotenoids and phenolics [5,6,7]. Indeed, the study of agronomic practices that can enhance the levels of these compounds in flowers or non-conventional technologies for their extraction are timely topics [8,9]. Carotenoids (carotenes and xanthophylls) are widespread and versatile compounds in nature, where they are important in processes including photosynthesis, the communication within and between species, the protection against oxidizing agents, and the modulation of membrane properties [10]. They are responsible for the red, yellow and orange colors of many flowers [11], which are important for pollination [12]. One of the main differences between carotenoids relative and other bioactive compounds is that some of them can be converted into vitamin A, which is an essential micronutrient. Apart from their key role in combating vitamin A deficiency and as natural food colors, carotenoids are important in health promotion. In fact, these compounds can help to enhance the immune system and reduce the risk of developing some diseases, including cancers (prostate, breast, cervical, ovarian, and colorectal), cardiovascular disease, bone, skin, and eye disorders. Although the possible health-promoting actions of carotenoids are commonly attributed to their antioxidant capacity, they can act through other mechanisms, such as the modulation of signaling pathways (with antioxidant, detoxifying and antiinflamatory effects), the enhancement of intercellular communication, or the protection against light [13]. Due to their versatility, carotenoids have applications not only in the food industry (colorants, ingredients, source of vitamin A), but also in cosmetics [14], feeds [15], pharmaceuticals [16], and even as textile dyes [17].
Phenolic compounds are, like carotenoids, widespread compounds in nature in general and in plants in particular. They can be categorized as extractable or non-extractable. Phenolic acids (benzoic and hydroxycynnamic acids), flavonoids (flavonols, flavones, flavanols, isoflavones, flavanones, and anthocyanidins), estilbenes, extractable proanthocyanidins, and hydrolyzed tannins belong to the first group. Non-extractable proanthocyanidins (or condensed tannins) and hydrolysable phenolics are groups of non-extractable phenolics [18]. These compounds also elicit great interest due to their health-promoting activities, which are usually attributed to antioxidant activity, although there is also evidence that they could exhibit antiviral, anticarcinogenic, antiinflamatory or antimicrobial activities, among others [19].
Depending on their fitness for human consumption, flowers are classified as edible or inedible, which depends on factors including the levels of inherent toxic compounds and/or those of fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides that can be dangerous for human health [20]. Edible flowers are normally used as flavor enhancers, relishes, vegetables, or dish decorations [21]. Common examples are roses (Rosa spp.) in Italy, dandelions (Taraxacum officinale) in Europe, and violets (Viola tricolor) in USA [22]. All in all, there is an increased market demand for edible flowers [1], increasing the need to further study the presence of compounds with nutritional interest in them. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the carotenoids and phenolics of 125 flowers through liquid chromatography,

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Standards

The methanol, hexane, acetone, petroleum ether, dichloromethane, and hydrochloric acid were of analytical grade and were purchased from Labscan (Dublin, Ireland). The HPLC-grade methanol, HPLC-grade acetonitrile, HPLC–grade ethyl acetate, formic acid, sodium chloride, and potassium hydroxide were obtained from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). The β-Carotene, all-trans-β-apo-8′-carotenal, α-carotene, phytoene, violaxanthin, lutein, β-cryptoxanthin, and lycopene were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany) and the antheraxanthin from DHI (Hørsholm, Denmark). The lutein epoxide, luteoxanthin, zeinoxanthin, 9-cis-antheraxanthin, 9-cis-violaxanthin, 13-cis-violaxanthin, and 9-cis-lutein were obtained as described elsewhere [23,24,25,26,27]. The gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, syringic acid, caffeic acid, m-coumaric, p-coumaric, chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, naringin, naringenin, ethyl galate, quercetin, kaempferol, crisin, vanillic acid, and myricetin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). The quercitrin was obtained from Extrasynthese (Genay, France). All the aqueous solutions were prepared with purified water in a NANOpure DlamondTM system (Barnsted Inc., Dubuque, IO, USA).

2.2. Plant Materials

The petals of one hundred twenty-five fresh flowers from 52 different families and 102 species were collected from a botanical garden (Real Jardín Botánico de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain) and local greenhouses in Madrid and Seville (Spain). These places ensure the traceability in the growth of the floral species by providing identification. After measuring the color of the petals, the samples were freeze-dried (Cryodos-80, Telstar, Terrasa, Spain) and the humidity was calculated.

2.3. Color Analysis

The colors were measured using a CM-700d colorimeter (Minollta, Japan). Illuminant D65 and 10° observer were considered as references. The color parameters corresponding to the uniform color space CIELAB were obtained. The categorization of the samples by color (white, yellow, orange, red, pink, lilac and blue) was performed considering clusters of points in the a*b* plane. Thus, the samples were separated into three groups. Group A included white, yellow, and orange flowers, group B contained red and pink flowers, and group C included lilac and blue flowers. The color of some flowers could not be assessed instrumentally because of their small sizes.

2.4. Analysis of Carotenoids

2.4.1. Extraction and Saponification

The micro-extractions were performed under dim light and in triplicate. The best extraction mixture was selected after evaluating different extraction mixtures (hexane: acetone (v/v) (1:1), methanol: acetone: dichloromethane (v/v/v) (1:1:2), acetone: methanol (v/v) (2:1), and ethyl acetate: methanol: petroleum ether (v/v/v) (1:1:1)). For this purpose, the petals of Calendula × hybrid were used. Approximately 20 mg of homogenized freeze-dried powder was mixed with 1 mL of the appropriate solvent mixture and then vortexed, sonicated for 2 min and centrifuged at 14,000× g for 3 min. After recovering the colored fraction, the extraction was repeated with aliquots of 500 μL of the solvent mixture until color exhaustion. The organic colored fractions were combined and evaporated to dryness in a vacuum concentrator at a temperature below 30 °C. Calendula × hybrid is known to possess high amounts of esterified carotenoids, so the extracts were de-esterified by saponification [28]. For this purpose, the dry extracts were re-dissolved in 500 μL of methanolic potassium hydroxide (30%, w/v) and the mixtures were stirred for one hour in a nitrogen atmosphere at 25 °C. Next, 500 μL of dichloromethane and 800 μL of 5% aqueous NaCl (w/v) were added. The samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 14,000× g for 3 min and then the aqueous phase was removed. The carotenoid-containing phase was washed with water until neutrality of the wastewater. The colored phase was evaporated to dryness in a vacuum concentrator at a temperature below 30 °C and stored in a nitrogen atmosphere at −20 °C until the analysis.
The extraction mixture leading to the highest recovery of carotenoids was selected for the extraction of carotenoids from all the samples. All-trans-β-apo-8´-carotenal was used as an internal standard.

2.4.2. Spectrophotometric Analysis

The total carotenoid contents (TCC) of petroleum ether extracts of each flower were quantified by spectrophotometry by considering the absorbance reading at 450 nm and the molar absorptivity value of β-carotene in the solvent (εmol = 2592). The results were reported as μg/g dry weight (DW) [29].

2.4.3. Rapid Resolution Liquid Chromatography (RRLC) Analysis

The dry extracts were re-dissolved in 20 μL of ethyl acetate prior to their analysis by RRLC. The analysis was carried out using the method reported by [30] on an Agilent 1260 system equipped with a diode-array detector and a C18 Poroshell 120 column (2.7 μm, 5 cm × 4.6 mm) (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The injection volume was 5 μL, the flow rate was 1 mL/min, and the temperature of the column was set at 30 °C. A mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile, methanol, and ethyl acetate was used with a linear gradient elution [30]. The chromatograms were monitored at 285, 350, and 450 nm for the quantification of phytoene, phytofluene, and the rest of the carotenoids (lutein epoxide, luteoxanthin, antheraxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, cis-antheraxanthin, lycopene, zeinoxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, β-carotene, and α-carotene), respectively. UV–Vis spectra were recorded from 250 to 750 nm. The individual carotenoids were identified with their corresponding standards and quantified using external calibration curves made with them whenever possible. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were calculated as three and ten times, respectively; the relative standard deviation of the analytical blank values were calculated from the calibration curve, using Microcal Origin ver. 3.5 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). The LODs and LOQs ranged from 0.002 µg in phytoene to 0.070 µg in lycopene and from 0.007 µg in phytoene to 0.232 µg in lycopene, respectively. The LOD and LOQ were established on the basis of signal to noise (S/N) ratio of 3 and 10, respectively. The samples were analyzed in duplicate with double sample injection. The concentrations were expressed in μg/g DW and the TCC contents were calculated by adding up all the individual carotenoids.

2.5. Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

2.5.1. Extraction

The protocol described by [31] was adapted for the extraction of smaller amounts of samples. Briefly, 1.5 mL of 0.1% acidified methanol was added to approximately 50 mg of freeze-dried petals, and the mixture was vortexed, sonicated for 2 min, and centrifuged at 4190× g for 7 min and at 4 °C; the supernatant was collected and the residue was submitted to the same extraction process twice with only 0.5 mL of the acidified methanol. The combined supernatant was stored at −20 °C until the analysis.

2.5.2. Spectrophotometric Analysis

The extract obtained was used for the determination of the total phenolic content (TPC) using the Folin–Ciocalteu assay, as described by [31], with slight modifications. Briefly, 50 μL of extract, 0.25 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, 0.75 mL of a solution of sodium carbonate (20%), and 3.95 mL of distilled water were mixed and left to stand for 2 h for the reaction to take place. Gallic acid was employed as a calibration standard and the absorbance was read at 765 nm with a Hewlett-Packard UV-vis HP8453 spectrophotometer (Palo Alto, CA, USA). The results were expressed as mg of equivalents of gallic acid per g of dry weight (mg GAE/ g DW) and allowed to define the injection volumes for the quantification by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC).

2.5.3. Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) Analysis

Prior to the injection, the extracts were concentrated to dryness, re-dissolved in 20 μL of 0.01% formic acid, and centrifuged at 4190× g for 7 min and at 4 °C. The UHPLC method was previously reported by [31]. An Agilent 1290 chromatograph equipped with a diode-array detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) set between 220 and 500 nm and an Eclipse Plus C18 column (1.8 um, 2.1 × 5 mm) were used. The column was kept at 30 °C, the injection volumes were in a range between 0.3 and 1.5 μL, the flow rate was 1 mL/min, and a linear gradient was used. Open lab ChemStation software was used for data acquisition and processing. The identification of the phenolic compounds was performed through a comparison of their retention times and UV-vis spectra, within the range 250–750 nm, with those of the available standards [31]. The chromatograms were monitored at 280 for the benzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, flavones, and flavanones, and at 320 nm for the flavonols. Their quantification was carried out using external calibration curves of each of the compounds analyzed. The LODs and LOQs ranged from 0.006 µg in chlorogenic acid to 0.012 µg in p-hydroxybenzoic acid and 0.014 µg in chlorogenic acid to 0.041 µg in p-hydroxybenzoic acid, respectively. The LOD and LOQ were established on the basis of signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The samples were analyzed in duplicate with double sample injection. The TPC was calculated by adding up all the individual phenolics.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were performed in triplicate with double injection, and the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The mean separation was made via Tukey’s test. Differences were considered statistically significant for p values ≤0.01. The statistical analysis was performed using the STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVII software.

3. Results

3.1. Color Parameters and Other Characteristics

The color parameters, humidity values, and culinary uses of the flowers are presented in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.

3.2. Carotenoids

Selection of the Extraction Solvents

Four different extraction solvents were tested for the extraction of carotenoids in Calendula × hybrid (Figure 1). Acetone: methanol (v/v) (2:1) and ethyl acetate: methanol: petroleum ether (v/v/v) (1:1:1) showed the highest carotenoid extraction yields and there was no statistically significant difference between the two mixtures. The recovery of carotenoids obtained with this mixture, using all-trans-β-apo-8′-carotenal as internal standard, was 83%.
In addition, quantitative data on individuals and TCC, assessed by liquid chromatography, are presented in Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6. An example of the resulting chromatogram is presented in Figure 2, and the frequency, mean contents, and standard deviations of carotenoids and major sources are presented in Figure 3, sections A, B, and C.

3.3. Phenolic Compounds

The quantitative data on individuals and TPC assessed by chromatographic analysis are presented in Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9. In addition, an example of the resulting chromatogram is presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5 sections A, B, and C show the frequency, mean contents, and standard deviations of the phenolics and major sources.

4. Discussion

4.1. Color Parameters and Other Characteristics

The great majority of the flowers were edible (n = 111, i.e., 89%); 70% of the families studied (52 families) included edible flowers. For example, the families Asteraceae and Lamiaceae contained six and seven edible species, respectively [20]. Concerning their uses, the most frequent were in salads (31.3% of the total use of the flowers) and infusions (28.9%), followed by teas (15.7%), desserts (13.3%) and others, including as garnishes and colorants (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). The different culinary uses of flowers depend to some extent on their size, shape, and color, as suggested by other authors [4]. These characteristics varied considerably among the samples surveyed in the present study. Different shapes were found, such as tubular (e.g., Russelia equisetiformis Schltdl. Et Cham.), bilabial (e.g., Rosmarinus officinalis L.), flared (e.g., Punica granatum L.), and flowers that form part of a cluster (e.g., Plantago major L., Salvia splendens Sellow ex Schylt., Vitex agnus-castus L., Allium schoenoprasum L., and Lantana camara L.). On the other hand, the flowers showed a great variety of colors (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3), such as white (e.g., Portulaca oleracea L.), yellow (e.g., Anthemis tinctoria L.), orange (e.g., Punica granatum L.), pink (e.g., Diantuhus caryophyllus L.), red (e.g., Pelargonium × hortorum), lilac (e.g., Petunia hybrid), and blue (e.g., Lavandula angustifolia Mill.). The color parameters ranged between 14.2 and 87.1, −9.2 and 57.2, −25.7 and 88.6, 2.9 and 89.9, and 3.4 and 359.6 for L* (lightness), a* (ranging from green to red), b* (ranging from blue to yellow), C*ab (chroma, the quantitative expression of color), and hab (hue angle, the qualitative expression of color), respectively. The variety of colors found in the petals of flowers under study can be explained by the different contents of carotenoids and phenolics, which are usually the main contributors to the color of these structures [34,35].
The humidity of the petals ranged between 54.5 and 99.7%, a wider interval compared to that recently reported by other authors (70 and 95%) [4].

4.2. Carotenoids

4.2.1. Selection of the Extraction Solvents

Regarding the quantification of carotenoids in flowers, there are several studies that use different extraction solvents; however, the mixtures acetone: methanol (2:1) and ethyl acetate: methanol: petroleum ether (1:1:1) in this study presented the highest extraction percentage. Acetone: methanol (2:1) was selected as the extraction solvent for the studied flowers due to its slightly higher yield and its simplicity of preparation.

4.2.2. Carotenoid Levels

At this point it is important to notice that saponification, which simplifies the identification of carotenoids, has the disadvantage that it leads to carotenoid losses [30], so the information provided must be interpreted with this in mind. This fact has been observed in the TCC levels of red and lilac flowers of Catharanthus roseus (3.7 µg/g DW and not detectable, respectively) and Pelargonium × hortorum (3.5 µg/g DW and not detectable, respectively). Although the TCC levels measured in non-saponified extracts by spectrophotometry showed values of 185, 132, and 100 µg/g DW, respectively, no individual carotenoids were detected by RRLC after the saponification of the extracts (data not shown).
On the other hand, flowers of the same family but different species presented different profiles in most cases. At this point it is important to notice that the profiles of the secondary metabolites of plants in general and carotenoids and phenolics in particular are dependent on different factors, including genotype as one of the most important, along with ambient/seasonal (light quality and quantity, temperature), and agronomic factors (irrigation, fertilization, etc.), among others [36,37,38].
Lutein (31.7%), β-cryptoxanthin (16.6%), and β-carotene (15.4%) were the most frequent carotenoids (Figure 3, section A). These three carotenoids are, along with zeaxanthin, α-carotene, lycopene, phytoene, and phytofluene, the major carotenoids in human tissues and fluids, all of which are thought to promote health [13]. All of them, except phytofluene, were identified in the set of samples, as well as others not reported in humans, such as lutein epoxide, antheraxanthin, violaxanthin, zeinoxanthin, luteoxanthin, and neochrome (Figure 3, section A).
Figure 3, section B, presents the mean contents and standard deviations of the individual carotenoids. The levels of the colorless carotenoid phytoene ranged between 2.8 (Trifolium cernuum) and 126.4 µg/g DW (Guzmania hybrid). The concentrations of lutein ranged from 0.7 to 1204.0 µg/g DW. The best source by far was Senna papillosa yellow (1204.0 µg/g DW), followed by Portulaca oleracea yellow (334.9 µg/g DW) and Aphelandra squarrosa red (209.0 µg/g DW), in descending order. The levels of lutein epoxide ranged from 2.9 to 75.8 µg/g DW. The highest amounts were found in Lantana camara yellow (75.8 µg/g DW), Mentha suaveolens white (38.5 µg/g DW), Solanum lycopersicum yellow (31.9 µg/g DW), and Mentha × piperita lilac (23.4 µg/g DW). The concentrations of luteoxanthin fell in an interval of 1.1–98.7 µg/g DW, and the main sources were Brownea macrophylla red (98.7 µg/g DW), Mentha suaveolens white (6.9 µg/g DW), and Mentha × piperita lilac (5.9 µg/g DW). On the other hand, the concentrations of antheraxanthin ranged from 1.8 to 18.3 µg/g DW. Capsicum annuum white (18.3 µg/g DW), Campanula shetleri white (11.4 µg/g DW), and Rosa hybrid pink (9.6 µg/g DW) were the flowers with the highest contents. The 9-Cis-antheraxanthin concentration values fluctuated between 5.4 and 433.4 µg/g DW. The highest levels were detected in Portulaca oleracea yellow (433.4 µg/g DW) and pink (355.2 µg/g DW) petals. The concentrations of violaxanthin ranged from 4.0 to 258.8 µg/g DW. Drymonia brochidodroma orange (258.8 µg/g DW), Aphelandra squarrosa red (140 µg/g DW), and Senna papillosa yellow (86.0 µg/g DW) were the best sources. The concentrations of the carotenoid identified as zeinoxanthin varied between 4.5 and 1311.9 µg/g DW. The best sources were Senna papillosa yellow (1311.9 µg/g DW) and, to a much lesser extent, Portulaca oleracea yellow (239.8 µg/g DW). The levels of the provitamin A carotenoid β-cryptoxanthin ranged from 4.2 to 33.4 µg/g DW; the highest amounts were found in Brownea macrophylla red (33.4 µg/g DW) and Lavandula angustifolia blue (19.3 µg/g DW). The amounts of the provitamin A carotenoid α-carotene were in the interval of 12.3–1451.9 µg/g DW. Renealmia alpinia orange (1451.9 µg/g DW) and, to a lesser extent, Lantana camara yellow (731.5 µg/g DW) and Spathiphyllum montanum white (82.0 µg/g DW) stood out as the main sources.
Britton and Khachik proposed a criterion through which to classify food sources according to their carotenoid content expressed in mg/100 g fresh weight. According to this criterion, the contents of a specific carotenoid can be classified as low (0–0.1 mg/100 g), moderate (0.1–0.5 mg/100 g), high (0.5–2 mg/100 g), or very high (>2 mg/100 g).
Using this criterion to categorize carotenoid sources, the petals with high (0.5–2 mg/100 g) or very high (>2 mg/100 g) carotenoid levels are Renealmia alpinia (15.0 mg/100 g FW), Senna papillosa (4.5 mg/100 g FW), Sophora japonica, Brownea macrophylla (2.6 mg/100 g FW) (β-carotene), Tecoma capensis (0.5 mg/100 g FW) (β-cryptoxanthin), Senna papillosa (31.8 mg/100 g FW), Aphelandra squarrosa (5.6 mg/100 g FW), Portulaca oleracea (4.7 mg/100 g FW) (lutein), Lantana camara (1.7 mg/100 g FW)(zeaxanthin), and Lantana camara (0.6 mg/100 g FW) (phytoene).
On the other hand, the maximum daily intakes of carotenoids reported in recent reviews were 4.1 (lutein + zeaxanthin), 1.4 (β-cryptoxanthin), 2.4 (α-carotene), 8.8 (β-carotene), 9.4 (lycopene), 2.0 (phytoene), and 0.7 mg (phytofluene) [13]. These intakes could be obtained with 87.2 g FW of Portulaca oleracea (lutein + zeaxanthin), 280 g FW of Tecoma capensis (β-cryptoxanthin), 15.2 g FW of Renealmia alpinia (α-carotene), 58.7 g FW of Renealmia alpinia (β-carotene), and 153.8 g FW of Guzmania hibrid (phytoene). These data indicate that the consumption of just a few grams of petals of some flowers (for instance, Portulaca oleracea or Renealmia alpinia) can be useful to increase considerably the intakes of health-promoting carotenoids.
The petals of the edible flowers Renealmia alpinia (15.0 mg/100 g FW of β-carotene and 15.8 mg/100 g FW of α-carotene) and Lantana camara (0.6 mg/100 g FW of β-carotene and 8.6 mg/100 g FW of α-carotene) showed the highest values of provitamin A carotenoids. The values of vitamin A activity of the samples can be expressed in terms of retinol activity equivalents (RAE), considering the equivalences 1 RAE = 12 μg of all-trans-β-carotene = 24 μg of other provitamin A carotenoids [39]. Thus, the RAE per gram of fresh weight of Renealmia alpinia and Lantana camara are 19.1 and 4.1, respectively. Given that 1 RAE equals two retinol equivalent (RE), it can be estimated that 10 g of fresh flowers from Renealmia alpinia would provide 381.2 retinol equivalents (RE), which is approximately half the daily recommendation of vitamin A for adults (750 RE/day) by FAO and OMS [40].
The TCC values obtained as the sum of the levels of individual carotenoids ranged from 1.7 (Aloysia citriodora, pink) to 3044.7 µg/g DW (Renealmia alpinia, orange). The flowers with the highest TCC levels were Renealmia alpinia orange (3044.7 µg/g DW), Senna papillosa yellow (2772.2 µg/g DW), Lantana camara yellow (2056.0 µg/g DW), and Portulaca oleracea yellow (1012.4 µg/g DW). The TCC content of R. alpinia was outstanding, as it was 23 times higher than the mean TCC of all the flowers. Foods with high or very high carotenoid levels are: green vegetables, apricot, carrot, mango, palm oil, buriti, and sweet potato (β-carotene); persimmon, pitanga, papaya, pumpkin, and tangerines (β-cryptoxanthin); green vegetables, pumpkin, sastra, and egg yolk (lutein); Chinese wolfberry, sastra, corozo, sapote, quince, orange, and red peppers (zeaxanthin); tomato, watermelon, red grapefruit, and papaya (lycopene); tomato, apricot, red pepper, carrot, and red grapefruit (phytoene and phytofluene) [5,15,17,28].

4.3. Phenolic Compounds

The most frequent phenolic compounds in the set of flowers evaluated were m-coumaric acid (a phenolic acid), quercitrin, and quercetin (flavonoids) (Figure 5, section A), which agrees well with the information reported by other authors indicating that phenolic acids and flavonoids are the predominant phenolic compounds in flowers [41]. On the other hand, values between 4.83 and 222.00 mg GAE/g DW of total phenolics have been described in 23 edible flowers elsewhere [4].
Flowers of the same species with different colors showed different profiles of phenolics, as opposed to what was observed in the case of carotenoids. Flowers of different species also exhibited different phenolic patterns. This may have been due to the fact that, as already mentioned, the contents of phenolic compounds and other secondary metabolites in plants are dependent on genetic factors, as well as climatic and agronomic conditions, among others [37,38].
In addition, the influence of different methods on the extraction efficiency of different compounds (in this case not only phenolics but also carotenoids), and therefore on their, quantification must be taken into account.

4.3.1. Benzoic Acids

Gallic acid displayed ranges between 0.1 and 38.1 mg/g DW. Pelargonium × hortorum red (38.1 mg/g DW), pink (24.5 mg/g DW), lilac (27.7 mg/g DW), and Pelargonium domesticum lilac (18.6 mg/g DW) were the samples with the highest contents. The content of p-Hydroxybenzoic acid ranged from 0.1 to 21.1 mg/g DW. The highest values were found in Plumbago auriculata white (21.1 mg/g DW), Chlorophytum comosum white (8.4 mg/g DW), Dahlia coccinea yellow (6.9 mg/g DW), and Vitex agnus castus lilac (6.5 mg/g DW). The m-coumaric acid values showed ranges between 0.04 and 19.5 mg/g DW. Verbena × hybrid pink (19.5 mg/g DW), Dianthus caryophyllus red (15.5 mg/g DW), Vitex agnus-castus lilac (15.5 mg/g DW), and Hydrangea petiolaris pink (12.3 mg/g DW) exhibited the most significant m-coumaric acid concentrations. The p-coumaric acid values oscillated between 0.1 and 17.6 mg/g DW. Catharanthus roseus red (17.6 mg/g DW) and Punica granatum orange (10.1 mg/g DW) were the samples surveyed with the highest values of p-coumaric acid. The levels of vanillic acid fell in an interval of 0.1–1.6 mg/g DW. This compound was detected only in a few species, such as Dianthus caryophyllus red (1.6 mg/g DW), Vitex agnus castus lilac (0.6 mg/g DW), Nerium oleander pink (0.5 mg/g DW), Celosia argentea red (0.1 mg/g DW), and Aglaonema commutatum yellow (0.1 mg/g DW). The Syringic acid totals ranged from 0.1 to 3.0 mg/g DW. Lagerstroemia indica pink (3.0 mg/g DW) and Pelargonium domesticum lilac (2.4 mg/g DW) were the flowers with the highest concentrations.

4.3.2. Hydroxycinnamic Acids

The concentrations of caffeic acid ranged from 0.1 to 34.2 mg/g DW. Hydrangea petiolaris pink (34.2 mg/g DW), Salvia splendens red (4.3 mg/g DW), and Convolvus althaeoides blue (4.2 mg/g DW) were the richest sources of this compound. The chlorogenic acid content ranged between 0.1 and 8.4 mg/g DW. Its main sources were Punica granatum orange (8.4 mg/g DW), Nerium oleander pink (7.9 mg/g DW) and red (7.3 mg/g DW), Anthemis tinctoria yellow (6.8 mg/g DW), and Hydrangea petiolaris pink (6.6 mg/g DW). The ferulic acid levels oscillated between 0.1 and 3.3 mg/g DW. Convolvulus althaeoides blue (3.3 mg/g DW), Nerium oleander pink (1.2 mg/g DW), Petunia hybrida lilac (0.9 mg/g DW), and Dahlia pinnata yellow (0.9 mg/g DW) were its main sources.

4.3.3. Flavonols

The quercitrin concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 39.5 mg/g DW. The main sources of this flavanol were Punica granatum orange (39.5 mg/g DW), Fragaria × ananassa white (24.2 mg/g DW), Plantago major yellow (21.2 mg/g DW), Hibiscus syriacus lilac (19.9 mg/g DW), and Gypsophila paniculata white (19.4 mg/g DW). The quercetin levels oscillated between 0.1 and 23.8 mg/g DW. Its major sources were Plumbago auriculata white (23.8 mg/g DW), Punica granatum orange (23.1 mg/g DW), and Fragaria × ananassa white (19.3 mg/g DW). Myricetin was present in the set of samples at concentrations in the range 0.4 - 8.2 mg/g DW and was only detected in Pelargonium × hortorum pink (8.2 mg/g DW) and red (3.8 mg/g DW), Dianthus caryophyllus pink (1.5 mg/g DW), Pelargonium domesticum lilac (1.0 mg/g DW), and Fallopia aubertii lilac (0.8 mg/g DW) and yellow (0.4 mg/g DW). The levels of kaempferol in the set of flowers were in an interval of 0.6–16.1 mg/g DW. Catharanthus roseus lilac (16.1 mg/g DW), Saintpaulia ionantha blue (11.4 mg/g DW), and Rosa hybrid red (6.6 mg/g DW) were the best sources.

4.3.4. Flavones

Crisin was detected only in a few samples, at concentrations between 0.1 and 21.2 mg/g DW. Saintpauli ionantha blue (21.2 mg/g DW), Cuphea hyssopifolia pink (11.3 mg/g DW), and Lantana camara (Verbenaceae family) white (3.4 mg/g DW) displayed the highest values.

4.3.5. Flavanones

The naringin values were between 0.2 and 20.1 mg/g DW and Pelargonium × hortorum pink (20.1 mg/g DW) and red (18.6 mg/g DW) and Pelargonium peltatum red (8.4 mg/g DW) exhibited the highest values.

4.3.6. Total Phenolic Compounds

TPC demonstrated ranges between 0.2 (Ocimum basilicum white) and 146.7 mg/g DW (Punica granatum orange) (Figure 3, section C). The TPC in Punica granatum was noteworthy as it was 15 times higher than the mean of TPC in the entire set of flowers. Punica granatum orange (147.0 mg/g DW), Pelargonium × hortorum red (65.5 mg/g DW) and pink (59.7 mg/g DW), Hydrangea petiolaris pink (62.6 mg/g DW), and Plumbago auriculata white (62.5 mg/g DW) showed the highest values of TPC in the flowers under study. Other authors found similar values of TPC in Pelargonium × hortorum (i.e., 50.4 mg GAE/g DW using the same humidity as this study) [42]. Anthemis tinctoria with chlorogenic acid (6.8 mg/g DW) as the major compound and 11.5 mg/g DW of TPC, Mirabilis jalapa with p-hydroxybenzoic acid (4.5 mg/g) and 9.5 mg/g of TPC, Limonium sinuatum with kaempferol (1.0 mg/g DW) and 1.8 mg/g DW of TPC, Euonymus japonicus with quercitrin (0.8 mg/g DW) and 1.9 mg/g DW of TPC, and Gardenia jasminoides with ferulic acid and naringin (0.6 mg/g DW both) and 1.9 mg/g DW of TPC are used as food additives and natural colorants [43,44,45]. Other authors have reported values of 9.06 mg/100 g DW, 19.06 mg/100g DW, and 190.8 mg GAE/100 g DW for gallic acid, quercetin, and total phenolic, respectively, in Gardenia jasminoides [46]. Furthermore, other authors reported that Mirabilis jalapa is a good source of flavonoids and phenolic acids (ferulic acid and caffeic acid as major compounds) [47]. The aforementioned flowers, despite being used as coloring agents, did not stand out for their TPC in the present study.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the carotenoids and phenolic compounds of 125 flowers were evaluated. Flowers with high TCC levels (assessed by liquid chromatography) were pinpointed, such as Renealmia alpinia orange (whose TCC levels was 23 times higher than the media), Senna papillosa yellow, Lantana camara yellow, and Portulaca oleracea yellow. The petals of the edible flowers Renealmia alpinia and Lantana camara stood out for their high content of provitamin A carotenoid. The main sources of the different carotenoids detected were Guzmania hybrid (phytoene), Senna papillosa (lutein), Renealmia alpinia (β-carotene), Lantana camara yellow (lutein epoxide), Brownea macrophylla red (luteoxanthin), Capsicum annuum white (antheraxanthin), Portulaca oleracea yellow and pink petals (9-cis-antheraxanthin), Drymonia brochidodroma orange (violaxanthin), Senna papillosa yellow (zeinoxanthin), Brownea macrophylla red (β-cryptoxanthin), and Renealmia alpinia orange (α-carotene).
Some petals are indeed highly concentrated sources of carotenoids, including provitamin A carotenoids. As an example, it has been estimated that 10 g fresh weight of the petals of Renealmia alpinia can provide 381.2 ER, which is approximately half the daily recommendation of vitamin A for adults (750 ER/day).
The samples with the highest TPC (assessed by liquid chromatography) were Punica granatum orange, Pelargonium × hortorum red and pink, and Hydrangea petiolaris pink and Plumbago auriculata white). The TPC in Punica granatum was approximately 15 times higher than the mean.
The main sources of the different phenolics detected were Pelargonium × hortorum red, pink, and lilac (gallic acid), Plumbago auriculata white (p-hydroxybenzoic acid), Verbena × hybrid pink (m-coumaric acid), Catharanthus roseus red (p-coumaric acid), Dianthus caryophyllus red and lilac (vanillic acid), Lagerstroemia indica pink (syringic acid), Hydrangea petiolaris pink (caffeic acid), Punica granatum orange (chlorogenic acid), Convolvulus althaeoides blue (ferulic acid), Punica granatum orange (quercitrin), Plumbago auriculata white (quercetin), Pelargonium × hortorum pink and red (myricetin), Catharanthus roseus lilac (kaempferol), Saintpauli ionantha blue (crisin), and Pelargonium × hortorum pink and red (naringin).
In summary, several petal matrices with interesting carotenoid or phenolic profiles (either by their total content or their levels of specific carotenoids or phenolics) were pinpointed. The information provided can help to design breeding programs aimed at producing flowers with increased carotenoid and/or phenolic levels and can be useful for the provision of natural colors for the agro-food or textile industries, as well as for the provision of beneficial compounds for the functional foods, nutricosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.; methodology, C.S.; software, A.B.; validation, P.M.-B.; formal analisis and writing-review and editing, E.C.-C.; investigation, D.H.; resources, supervision and project administration A.J.M.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by SENESCYT-Ecuador; the Corporación Ecuatoriana para el Desarrollo de la Investigación y Academia (CEDIA); the Spanish State Secretariat of Research, Development and Innovation (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, project ref. AGL2012-37610, co-funded by FEDER), E.C.-C., D.H., A.B., C.S.; the Ibero-American Programme for Science, Technology and Development (CYTED, http://www.cyted.org) for the funding of the IBERCAROT network (http://carotenoides.us.es/ref.112RT445); the Carotenoid Network: from microbial and plants to food and health (BIO2015-71703-REDT); and CaRed: Red española de carotenoides (BIO2017-90877-REDT), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Inovación (SENESCYT) and the Corporación Ecuatoriana para el Desarrollo de la Investigación y Academia (CEDIA), Ecuador, for its financial support; Real Botanic Garden from Córdoba-Spain for the provision of flowers; and the technical staff of the Biology Service (SGI, Universidad de Sevilla) for the services offered. A.J.M.-M. acknowledges funding from the Spanish State Secretariat of Research, Development and Innovation (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, project ref. AGL2012-37610, co-funded by FEDER). E.C.-C., D.H., A.B., C.S., and A.J.M.-M. thank the Ibero-American Programme for Science, Technology and Development (CYTED, http://www.cyted.org) for the funding of the IBERCAROT network (http://carotenoides.us.es/ref.112RT445). A.J.M.-M. acknowledges funding from the Carotenoid Network: from microbial and plants to food and health (BIO2015-71703-REDT) and CaRed: Red española de carotenoides (BIO2017-90877-REDT), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wongwattanasathien, O.; Kangsadalampai, K.; Tongyonk, L. Antimutagenicity of some flowers grown in Thailand. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 1045–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Lin, W.; Chu, C.; Chou, F.; Tseng, T. Protective effect of Hibiscus anthocyanins against tert -butyl hydroperoxide-induced hepatic toxicity in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leonti, M.; Verpoorte, R. Traditional mediterranean and european herbal medicines. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 199, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fernandes, L.; Casal, S.; Pereira, J.A.; Saraiva, J.A.; Ramalhosa, E. Edible flowers: A review of the nutritional, antioxidant, antimicrobial properties and effects on human health. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 60, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahrazem, O.; Diretto, G.; Argandoña Picazo, J.; Fiore, A.; Rubio-Moraga, Á.; Rial, C.; Varela, R.M.; Macías, F.A.; Castillo, R.; Romano, E.; et al. The specialized roles in carotenogenesis and apocarotenogenesis of the phytoene synthase gene Family in Saffron. Front. Plant. Sci. 2019, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ohmiya, A. Review: Diversity of carotenoid composition in flower petals. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 2011, 45, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pires, T.; Dias, M.; Barros, L.; Ricardo, C.; Alves, M.; Oliveira, M.; Ferreira, I. Edible flowers as sources of phenolic compounds with bioactive potential. Food Res. Int. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Onofrei, V.; Teliban, G.C.; Burducea, M.; Lobiuc, A.; Sandu, C.B.; Tocai, M.; Robu, T. Organic foliar fertilization increases polyphenol content of Calendula officinalis L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 109, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fu, X.Q.; Ma, N.; Sun, W.P.; Dang, Y.Y. Microwave and enzyme co-assisted aqueous two-phase extraction of polyphenol and lutein from marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) flower. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 123, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meléndez-Martínez, A. Carotenoides en Agroalimentación y Salud; CYTED: Cambridge, UK, 2017; ISBN 978-84-15413-35-6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Esteban, R.; Moran, J.; Becerril, J.; García-Plazaola, J. Versatility of carotenoids: An integrated view on diversity, evolution, functional roles and environmental interactions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 119, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schaefer, H.M.; Schaefer, V.; Levey, D. How plant-animal interactions signal new insights in communication. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Meléndez-Martínez, A. An overview of carotenoids, apocarotenoids and vitamin A in agro-food, nutrition, health and disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Meléndez-Martínez, A.; Stinco, C.; Mapelli-Brahm, P. Skin carotenoids in public health and nutricosmetics. The emerging roles and applications of the UV light-absorbing colourless carotenoids phytoene and phytofluene. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Breithaupt, D.E. Modern application of xanthophylls in animal feeding—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goralczyk, R.; Wertz, K. Skin photoprotection by carotenoids. In Carotenoids. Volume 5. Nutrition and Health; Britton, G., Liaaen-Jensen, S., Pfander, H., Eds.; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2009; pp. 335–362. ISBN 978-3-7643-7501-0. [Google Scholar]
  17. Baaka, N.; El Ksibi, I.; Mhenni, M.F. Optimisation of the recovery of carotenoids from tomato processing wastes: Application on textile dyeing and assessment of its antioxidant activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shahidi, F.; Ambigaipalan, P. Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects—A review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 820–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Granado-Loreiro, F.; Hernández-Alvarez, E. Functional foods and health effects: A nutritional biochemistry perspective. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016, 23, 2929–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, B.; Li, M.; Yin, R. Phytochemical content, health benefits, and toxicology of common edible flowers: A review (2000-2015). Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 56, S130–S148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fan, J.; Zhu, W.; Kang, H.; Ma, H.; Tao, G. Flavonoid constituents and antioxidant capacity in flowers of different Zhongyuan tree penoy cultivars. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kaisoon, O.; Siriamornpun, S. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of edible flowers from Thailand. J. Funct. 2011, 3, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meléndez-Martínez, A.; Britton, G.; Vicario, I.M.; Heredia, F.J. The complex carotenoid pattern of orange juices from concentrate. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meléndez-Martínez, A.; Paulino, M.; Stinco, C.; Mapelli-Brahm, P.; Wang, X.-D. Study of the time-course of cis/trans (Z/E) isomerization of lycopene, phytoene, and phytofluene from tomato. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 12399–12406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meléndez-Martínez, A.; Britton, G.; Vicario, I.; Heredia, F. Identification of isolutein (lutein epoxide) as cis-antheraxanthin in orange juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9369–9373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Meléndez-Martínez, A.; Vicario, I.; Heredia, F. Geometrical isomers of violaxanthin in orange juice. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meléndez-Martínez, A.; Britton, G.; Vicario, I.; Heredia, F. Identification of zeinoxanthin in orange juices. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 6362–6367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bakó, E.; Deli, J.; Tóth, G. HPLC study on the carotenoid composition of Calendula products. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2002, 53, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kimura, M.; Rodriguez-amaya, D.B. A scheme for obtaining standards and HPLC quantification of leafy vegetable carotenoids. Food Chem. 2002, 78, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stinco, C.; Benítez-González, A.; Hernanz, D.; Vicario, I.; Meléndez-Martínez, A. Development and validation of a rapid resolution liquid chromatography method for the screening of dietary plant isoprenoids: Carotenoids, tocopherols and chlorophylls. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1370, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jara-Palacios, M.J.; Hernanz, D.; González-Manzano, S.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Escudero-Gilete, M.L.; Heredia, F.J. Detailed phenolic composition of white grape by-products by RRLC/MS and measurement of the antioxidant activity. Talanta 2014, 125, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Coyago-Cruz, E.; Corell, M.; Meléndez-Martínez, A. Estudio Sobre el Contenido en Carotenoides y Compuestos Fenólicos de Tomates y Flores en el Contexto de la Alimentación Funcional; Rojo, P., Ed.; Universida. Punto Rojo Libros, S.L.: Sevilla, Spain, 2017; ISBN 9788417148096. [Google Scholar]
  33. The-Plant-List. A Working List of All Plant Species. 2017. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed on 12 December 2017).
  34. Zhu, C.; Bai, C.; Sanahuja, G.; Yuan, D.; Farré, G.; Naqvi, S.; Shi, L.; Capell, T.; Christou, P. The regulation of carotenoid pigmentation in flowers. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 504, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pan, Q.; Dai, Y.; Nuringtyas, R.; Mustafa, R. Investigation of the chemomarkers correlated with flower colour in different organs of Catharanthus roseus using NMR-based metabolomics. Phytochem. Anal. 2014, 25, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dias, M.; Borge, G.; Kljak, K.; Mandić, A.; Mapelli-Brahm, P.; Olmedilla-Alonso, B.; Pintea, A.; Ravasco, F.; Saponjac, V.; Sereikaité, J.; et al. European database of carotenoid levels in foods. Factors affecting carotenoid content. Foods 2021, 912, 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  37. Poiroux-Gonord, F.; Bidel, L.P.R.; Fanciullino, A.L.; Gautier, H.; Lauri-Lopez, F.; Urban, L. Health benefits of vitamins and secondary metabolites of fruits and vegetables and prospects to increase their concentrations by agronomic approaches. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 12065–12082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Coyago-Cruz, E.; Corell, M.; Moriana, A.; Hernanz, D.; Benítez-González, A.; Stinco, C.; Meléndez-Martínez, A. Antioxidants (carotenoids and phenolics) profile of cherry tomatoes as influenced by deficit irrigation, ripening and cluster. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 870–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. National-Academies-Press. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001; ISBN 0-309-07279-4. [Google Scholar]
  40. Latham, M. Vitaminas; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  41. Naczk, M.; Shahidi, F. Extraction and analysis of phenolics in food. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1054, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, A.N.; Li, S.; Li, H.B.; Xu, D.P.; Xu, X.R.; Chen, F. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities of 51 edible and wild flowers. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 6, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, D.P.; Li, Y.; Meng, X.; Zhou, T.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, J.J.; Li, H.B. Natural antioxidants in foods and medicinal plants: Extraction, assessment and resources. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Eser, F.; Yaglioglu, A.S.; Dolarslan, M.; Aktas, E.; Onal, A. Dyeing, fastness, and cytotoxic properties, and phenolic constituents of Anthemis tinctoria var. tinctoria (Asteraceae). J. Text. Inst. 2016, 5000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Uddin, R.; Saha, M.R.; Subhan, N.; Hossain, H.; Jahan, I.A.; Akter, R. HPLC-Analysis of polyphenolic compounds in Gardenia jasminoides and determination of antioxidant activity by using free radical scavenging assays. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 4, 273–281. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen, F.; Yao, Q.; Tian, J. Review of ecological restoration technology. Eng. Rev. 2016, 36, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  47. Singh, M.; Kumar, V.; Singh, I.; Gauttam, V.; Nath, A. Anti-inflammatory activity of aqueous extract of Mirabilis jalapa Linn. leaves. Pharmacogn. Res. 2011, 2, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Carotenoid content recoveries (mg/100 g DW) after extraction of Calendula × hybrid using four different extraction solvents. H-A (1:1), hexane: acetone (v/v) (1:1); M-A-D (1:1:2), methanol: acetone: dichloromethane (v/v/v) (1:1:2); A-M (2:1), acetone: methanol (v/v) (2:1); AE-M-PE (1:1:1), ethyl acetate: methanol: petroleum ether (v/v/v) (1:1:1). Different letters among bars of the same carotenoid indicate significant differences by ANOVA test (p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Carotenoid content recoveries (mg/100 g DW) after extraction of Calendula × hybrid using four different extraction solvents. H-A (1:1), hexane: acetone (v/v) (1:1); M-A-D (1:1:2), methanol: acetone: dichloromethane (v/v/v) (1:1:2); A-M (2:1), acetone: methanol (v/v) (2:1); AE-M-PE (1:1:1), ethyl acetate: methanol: petroleum ether (v/v/v) (1:1:1). Different letters among bars of the same carotenoid indicate significant differences by ANOVA test (p < 0.01).
Foods 10 02625 g001
Figure 2. Chromatogram of Lavandula angustifolia at 450 nm (C18 column). 1. Lutein; 2. Zeinoxanthin; 3. β-Cryptoxanthin; 4. α-Carotene; 5. β-Carotene.
Figure 2. Chromatogram of Lavandula angustifolia at 450 nm (C18 column). 1. Lutein; 2. Zeinoxanthin; 3. β-Cryptoxanthin; 4. α-Carotene; 5. β-Carotene.
Foods 10 02625 g002
Figure 3. Frequency, mean contents, and standard deviations of carotenoids and major sources. Frequency (A), mean contents of individual carotenoids (B), total carotenoid content (C), and list of species with high concentrations of carotenoids. Number within the figures represent the sample under study.
Figure 3. Frequency, mean contents, and standard deviations of carotenoids and major sources. Frequency (A), mean contents of individual carotenoids (B), total carotenoid content (C), and list of species with high concentrations of carotenoids. Number within the figures represent the sample under study.
Foods 10 02625 g003
Figure 4. Chromatogram of lilac Catharanthus roseus phenolics at 280 nm (A) and 320 nm (B). 1. p-Hydroxybenzoic acid, 2. m-Coumaric acid, 3. Chlorogenic acid, 4. Quercitrin, 5. Quercetin, 6. Kaempferol.
Figure 4. Chromatogram of lilac Catharanthus roseus phenolics at 280 nm (A) and 320 nm (B). 1. p-Hydroxybenzoic acid, 2. m-Coumaric acid, 3. Chlorogenic acid, 4. Quercitrin, 5. Quercetin, 6. Kaempferol.
Foods 10 02625 g004
Figure 5. Frequency, mean contents and standard deviations of phenolics and major sources. Frequency (A), mean contents of individual phenolics (B), total phenolics content (C), and list of species with high concentrations of phenolics. Number within the figures represent the sample under study.
Figure 5. Frequency, mean contents and standard deviations of phenolics and major sources. Frequency (A), mean contents of individual phenolics (B), total phenolics content (C), and list of species with high concentrations of phenolics. Number within the figures represent the sample under study.
Foods 10 02625 g005
Table 1. Mean color parameter values, humidity, and culinary uses (according to Coyago, et al., (2017) [32] and The-Plant-List, (2019) [33]) of white, yellow, and orange flowers.
Table 1. Mean color parameter values, humidity, and culinary uses (according to Coyago, et al., (2017) [32] and The-Plant-List, (2019) [33]) of white, yellow, and orange flowers.
SamplesFamilySpeciesCommon NameCulinary UsesHumidity (%)L*a*b*C*abhab
White flowers
1AraceaeSpathiphyllum montanum GrayumPeace flowerNon edible89.767 ± 0.22557.200 ± 6.263−9.210 ± 0.67624.800 ± 1.49526.456 ± 0.709110.333 ± 0.697
2AgavaceaeChlorophytum comosum (Thunb.) JacquesBad motherInfusion99.130 ± 0.701nanananana
3AmaryllidaceaeAgapanthus africanus (L.) HoffmannsAfrican lilyInfusion76.112 ± 0.30673.517 ± 0.804−1.213 ± 0.2114.557 ± 0.8724.727 ± 0.798105.413 ± 3.107
4ApiaceaeCoriandrum sativum L.CorianderSalad, garrison95.853 ± 0.027nanananana
5ApocynaceaeNerium oleander L.Flower laurelNon edible79.493 ± 0.66677.800 ± 3.581−2.627 ± 0.3167.637 ± 0.3018.092 ± 0.268109.291 ± 3.447
6ApocynaceaeTrachelospermum jasminoides (Lind.) Len.Starry jasmineInfusion95.800 ± 0.325nanananana
7BoraginaceaeHeliotropium arborescens L.VanillaInfusion86.012 ± 0.152nanananana
8BrassicaceaeMatthiola incana (L.) R. Br.White violetInfusion99.718 ± 0.52587.123 ± 0.023−1.740 ± 0.01721.623 ± 0.32321.693 ± 0.12494.558 ± 0.023
9CampanulaceaeCampanula shetleri HeckardGreen bellna93.548 ± 0.01167.010 ± 0.0010.730 ± 0.00114.050 ± 0.00114.050 ± 0.00187.070 ± 0.000
10CaryophyllaceaeDianthus chinensis L.DiantusSalad, tea94.444 ± 0.92280.793 ± 1.819−3.137 ± 0.11011.687 ± 2.20112.106 ± 0.156105.231± 2.077
11CaryophyllaceaeGypsophila paniculata L.VeilInfusion88.312 ± 1.542nanananana
12ConvolvulaceaeConvolvulus pseudoscammonia C. Koch L.Meadow bellInfusion89.878 ± 0.80883.093 ± 4.473−1.800 ± 0.1715.767 ± 1.1406.043 ± 0.120107.501 ± 1.604
13IridaceaeGladiolus communis L.GladiolusSalad, garrison79.592 ± 0.34967.010 ± 0.0010.730 ± 0.00114.051 ± 0.00814.069 ± 0.00287.070 ± 0.001
14LamiaceaeMentha suaveolens Ehrh.Mentha suaveolensInfusion79.771 ± 0.902nanananana
15MagnoliaceaeMagnolia grandiflora L.MagnoliaTea82.151 ± 0.27283.093 ± 4.473−1.800 ± 0.1715.767 ± 0.1406.043 ± 0.410107.501 ± 0.764
16OleaceaeJasminum sambac (L.) AitonJasmine of ArabiaSalad, tea84.826 ± 0.10483.987 ± 2.450−2.927 ± 0.40116.497 ± 0.90116.757 ± 0.918100.059 ± 0.129
17OrchidaceaePhalaenopsis aphrodite Rchb. f.Orchidna98.172 ± 0.06370.063 ± 1.67010.030 ± 2.044−7.103 ± 1.07912.297 ± 2.201325.161 ± 1.368
18PlumbaginaceaePlumbago auriculata Lam.CelestineInfusion26.895 ± 0.87254.340 ± 1.8061.530 ± 0.041−16.017 ± 0.15416.208 ± 0.157275.041 ± 0.289
19RosaceaeFragaria × Duchesne ex RozierStrawberryna94.215 ± 0.57967.010 ± 0.0010.730 ± 0.02014.050 ± 0.00114.069 ± 0.03187.070 ± 0.011
20RosaceaeRosa hybrid Vill.RoseSalad, desserts79.739 ± 0.88886.353 ± 0.9150.030 ± 0.04114.207 ± 0.05914.207 ± 0.02489.924 ± 0.005
21SolanaceaeCapsicum annuum L.Pepperna98.960 ± 0.921nanananana
22SolanaceaeSolanum laxum SprengelFalse jasminena85.197 ± 1.50850.783 ± 2.10011.903 ± 1.0508.620 ± 0.21914.798 ± 1.20335.636 ± 0.832
23VerbenaceaeAloysia citriodora PalauCedrónTea98.118 ± 0.847nanananana
24VerbenaceaeLantana camara L.LantanaTea86.986 ± 0.18364.770 ± 0.1432.703 ± 0.24617.780 ± 1.36217.991 ± 1.32681.447 ± 1.244
Yellow flowers
25AraceaeAglaonema commutatum SchottAglaonemaNon edible91.958 ± 0.90066.330 ± 1.411−0.627 ± 0.05528.877 ± 1.86428.884 ± 0.18691.205 ± 0.180
26AsteraceaeAnthemis tinctoria L.Golden DaisyColorant78.726 ± 0.17260.770 ± 2.46321.140 ± 0.65487.357 ± 2.32689.878 ± 0.74076.436 ± 0.139
27AsteraceaeDahlia coccinea Cav.DahliaSalad87.788 ± 0.18461.363 ± 0.7192.133 ± 0.20166.667 ± 0.54066.713 ± 0.28188.181 ± 0.133
28AsteraceaeDahlia pinnata Cav.DahliaSalad74.519 ± 0.00167.290 ± 0.64616.523 ± 0.01875.780 ± 0.54677.561 ± 0.57277.739 ± 0.060
29BrassicaceaeDiplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC.RuculaSalad87.218 ± 0.528nanananana
30CannabaceaeCannabis sativa L.CannabisNon edible76.200± 0.914nanananana
31CelastraceaeEuonymus japonicus Thunb.Burning bushColorant92.000 ± 1.028nanananana
32FabaceaeSophora japonica L.Acacia JapanInfusion73.629 ± 0.38479.180 ± 1.871−6.573 ± 0.11622.023 ± 0.73322.984 ± 0.107106.592 ± 0.582
33FabaceaeSenna papillosa H.S. Irwin & BarnebySennaNon edible73.823 ± 0.32658.420 ± 4.26511.060 ± 2.26538.370 ± 4.09940.000 ± 5.91174.380 ± 4.294
34JuglandaceaePterocarya stenoptera C. DC.Chinese fresnoNon edible84.572 ± 0.61173.000 ± 1.279−5.970 ± 0.21432.910 ± 1.25533.455 ± 1.245100.342 ± 0.283
35LamiaceaeOcimum basilicum L.BasilSalad, tea94.680 ± 1.52580.893 ± 3.409−7.227 ± 0.65732.187 ± 1.41932.990 ± 0.712102.602 ± 0.691
36MalvaceaeGossypium arboreum L.CottonNon edible81.410 ± 0.11480.873 ± 3.412−7.243 ± 0.71332.201 ± 1.40333.120 ± 0.725102.612 ± 0.743
37PlantaginaceaePlantago major L.PlantainInfusion85.714 ± 0.200nanananana
38PolygonaceaeFallopia aubertii (L.Henry) HolubGabriela falloppiona92.411 ± 0.332nanananana
39PortulacaceaePortulaca oleracea L.PurslaneSalad98.092 ± 0.66171.643 ± 0.9654.887 ± 0.24029.533 ± 0.39729.906 ± 0.40180.624 ± 0.311
40RubiaceaeGardenia jasminoides J. EllisGardeniaColorant82.213 ± 0.28384.253 ± 3.8333.453 ± 0.11646.923 ± 0.47047.050 ± 0.16185.833 ± 0.179
41SolanaceaeSolanum lycopersicum L.Tomatona87.255 ± 0.26177.200 ± 1.001−4.500 ± 0.12122.034 ± 0.70423.036 ± 0.111106.603 ± 0.612
42VerbenaceaeLantana camara L.LantanaTea88.122 ± 0.70650.570 ± 0.87518.403 ± 0.43148.440 ± 0.12851.823 ± 0.13569.101 ± 1.018
Orange flowers
43AcanthaceaeJusticia aurea Schltdl. na94.207 ± 0.18468.817 ± 1.3994.123 ± 0.45688.640 ± 3.32688.736 ± 3.43387.386 ± 0.191
44BignoniaceaeTecoma capensis (Thunb.) Lindl.Cape honeysuckleInfusion72.225 ± 0.50653.233 ± 2.26640.633 ± 2.05334.833 ± 2.04853.572 ± 0.29940.635 ± 3.084
45GesneriaceaeDrymonia affinis (Mansf.) WiehlerDrymoniana73.209 ± 0.17249.510 ± 1.24724.983 ± 0.58232.520 ± 0.96341.010 ± 1.06352.490 ± 0.519
46GesneriaceaeDrymonia brochidodroma WiehlerDrymoniana91.041 ± 0.70346.622 ± 1.20725.043 ± 0.60432.511 ± 1.00041.002 ± 1.33352.512 ± 1.302
47LythraceaePunica granatum L.PomegranateInfusion69.105 ± 0.43743.093 ± 2.76547.340 ± 0.35636.738 ± 0.21759.743 ± 0.13338.153 ± 0.375
48ZigniberaceaeRenealmia alpinia (Rottb.) MaasHoneyy bractSpice89.126 ± 1.33352.111 ± 0.22442.175 ± 0.12635.101 ± 0.24354.872 ± 0.30239.825 ± 2.126
na, not available.
Table 2. Mean color parameter values, humidity, and culinary uses (according to Coyago et al., (2017) [32] and The-Plant-List, (2019) [33]) of red and pink flowers.
Table 2. Mean color parameter values, humidity, and culinary uses (according to Coyago et al., (2017) [32] and The-Plant-List, (2019) [33]) of red and pink flowers.
SamplesFamilySpeciesCommon NameCulinary UseHumidity (%)L*a*b*C*abhab
Red flowers
49AcanthaceaeAphelandra squarrosa NeesZebra plantna73.202 ± 3.18430.847 ± 1.25949.437 ± 0.94232.257 ± 0.54159.030 ± 1.02833.142 ± 0.339
50AmaranthaceaeCelosia argentea L.Cockscombna71.704 ± 0.12636.837 ± 2.87823.600 ± 2.946−2.833 ± 0.34223.817 ± 2.999352.621 ± 0.629
51ApocynaceaeCatharanthus roseus (L.) G. DonVinca roseaNon-edible96.519 ± 0.01546.001 ± 0.01249.863 ± 0.285−7.123 ± 0.08150.370 ± 0.270351.865 ± 0.137
52ApocynaceaeNerium oleander L.Flower laurelNon-edible89.739 ± 3.62167.077 ± 1.69319.380 ± 1.4273.250 ± 0.65819.810 ± 1.58310.429 ± 1.409
53AraceaeAnthuriumandraeanum Linden exAnusNon-edible94.096 ± 1.52550.630 ± 0.40432.917 ± 1.16511.283 ± 1.58534.814 ± 1.22618.895 ± 2.255
54BalsaminaceaeImpatiens balsamina L.Joy of homeSalad, desserts91.049 ± 0.21141.543 ± 2.46647.893 ± 4.68623.887 ± 3.36753.528 ± 4.75826.449 ± 1.238
55BalsaminaceaeImpatiens walleriana Hook. F.My dearSalad, desserts85.202 ± 0.98450.287 ± 2.22857.220 ± 2.57319.490 ± 2.55660.463 ± 2.62618.770 ± 1.556
56BegoniaceaeBegonia cavaleriei H. Lév.Begoniana76.748 ± 0.25354.793 ± 4.34419.460 ± 2.89912.267 ± 0.49823.311 ± 2.38133.935 ± 3.613
57BegoniaceaeBegonia cucullata Willd.Sugar flowerSalad, desserts59.290 ± 0.12737.443 ± 0.87336.870 ± 2.31515.157 ± 2.17139.931 ± 2.94221.995 ± 1.802
58BegoniaceaeBegonia × tuberhybrida VossBegoniaSalad, desserts99.736 ± 0.83432.067 ± 1.39153.383 ± 2.03633.483 ± 1.01463.018 ± 2.13432.121 ± 0.720
59CaryophyllaceaeDianthus caryophyllus L.CarminationFruit salad95.775 ± 0.10639.863 ± 4.49550.847 ± 3.67421.403 ± 3.63355.206 ± 3.75122.762 ± 2.616
60EricaceaeRhododendron simsii Planch.AzaleaNon-edible41.527 ± 2.57241.543 ± 2.46647.893 ± 3.46823.887 ± 3.36753.528 ± 1.26526.449 ± 1.238
61EscalloniaceaeEscallonia rubra Pers.Escalloniaceana82.780 ± 0.427nanananana
62EuphorbiaceaeEuphorbia milii Des Moul.Crown of christNon-edible98.893 ± 0.16540.683 ± 2.67832.693 ± 2.35613.493 ± 1.15235.384 ± 1.76522.483 ± 2.048
63FabaceaeBrownea macrophylla LindenPanama flame treena87.209 ± 0.217nanananana
64GeraniaceaePelargonium peltatum (L.) L´Hér.Gitanillana96.390 ± 0.02814.157 ± 0.33717.037 ± 0.4911.823 ± 0.16117.135 ± 0.4726.124 ± 0.694
65GeraniaceaePelargonium x hortorum H. BaileyGeraniumSalad, desserts86.548 ± 0.28130.353 ± 2.16846.593 ± 2.43127.520 ± 2.09554.119 ± 2.40830.563 ± 0.945
66LamiaceaeSalvia splendens Sellow ex Schult.Red sageGarrison72.018 ± 0.16438.813 ± 2.18924.673 ± 1.40121.833 ± 0.13233.424 ± 1.12142.183 ± 1.443
67MalvaceaeMalvaviscus arboreus Cav.MarshmallowInfusion86.152 ± 0.90940.990 ± 1.67647.580 ± 2.98425.150 ± 3.28953.833 ± 3.01527.789 ± 1.699
68OnagraceaeFuchsia magellanica Lam.FuchsiaTea81.264 ± 0.00944.210 ± 2.18734.773 ± 0.9173.037 ± 0.70334.980 ± 1.0535.963 ± 0.856
69RosaceaeRosa hybrid Vill.RoseSalad, desserts78.682 ± 0.32528.440 ± 1.59146.303 ± 0.28017.863 ± 1.01349.635 ± 0.35621.100 ± 1.027
70PapaveraceaePapaver rhoeas L.Wheat poppyGarrison72.111 ± 0.26340.683 ± 2.67832.693 ± 3.56613.493 ± 1.52035.384 ± 3.65322.483 ± 2.048
71RubiaceaeWarszewiczia coccinea KlotzschChaconiaTea83.000 ± 1.38134.253 ± 1.36346.237 ± 2.90812.033 ± 0.52647.777 ± 2.94414.607 ± 0.316
72ScrophulariaceaeAntirrhinum majus L.Dragon mouthSalad94.967 ± 0.28824.040 ± 1.15218.920 ± 0.59315.050 ± 1.28324.201 ± 0.36738.489 ± 3.222
73ScrophulariaceaeRusselia equisetiformis Schltdl. &RuseliaInfusion89.257 ± 0.12941.543 ± 2.46647.893 ± 4.68623.887 ± 3.36753.528 ± 4.76526.449 ± 1.238
74SolanaceaePetunia hybrida Vilm.PetuniaSalad, desserts90.986 ± 5.42534.253 ± 1.36346.237 ± 2.90812.033 ± 0.52647.777 ± 2.94414.607 ± 0.316
75VerbenaceaeLantana camara L.LantanaTea83.774 ± 2.18233.210 ± 0.43938.610 ± 2.38430.187 ± 0.33549.124 ± 0.28238.024 ± 0.478
76VerbenaceaeVerbena × hybrid GroenlandVerbenaSalad, garrison85.436 ± 0.02326.913 ± 0.67436.787 ± 3.85214.537 ± 0.87239.560 ± 3.86821.641 ± 1.176
Pink flowers
77AmaranthaceaeCelosia argentea L.Cockscombna72.421 ± 0.18419.443 ± 2.28634.023 ± 1.4794.120 ± 1.08534.286 ± 1.5386.948 ± 2.004
78ApocynaceaeNerium oleander L.Flower laurelNon-edible82.058 ± 0.32758.847 ± 3.27929.247 ± 4.101−2.743 ± 0.14529.387 ± 4.139354.364 ± 0.711
79BegoniaceaeBegonia argentea LindenBegoniana91.547 ± 1.522nanananana
80BromeliaceaeGuzmania hybridGuzmaniana89.651 ± 0.00146.660 ± 0.23315.770 ± 0.8859.340 ± 0.52418.343 ± 0.48830.703 ± 2.838
81CaryophyllaceaeDianthus caryophyllus L.CarminationFruit salad84.678 ± 0.32543.320 ± 1.50134.690 ± 0.4363.987 ± 0.12734.918 ± 0.4476.558 ± 0.126
82CaryophyllaceaeSaponaria officinalis L.Soap flowerNon-edible81.110 ± 0.20268.560 ± 0.2913.883 ± 0.946−3.333 ± 0.8185.133 ± 0.760318.436 ± 5.235
83EricaceaeRhododendron simsii Planch.Azalea indicaNon-edible74.579 ± 0.29982.190 ± 1.6695.943 ± 0.4218.860 ± 0.73910.686 ± 0.39656.081 ± 4.033
84FabaceaeTrifolium cernuum Brot.Four leaf cloverSalad, tea81.411 ± 0.30350.783 ± 1.42111.903 ± 0.8508.620 ± 1.39714.798 ± 0.20335.636 ± 5.324
85GentianaceaeEustoma grandiflorum G. DonEustomana92.072 ± 0.09966.407 ± 4.4934.067 ± 0.6685.233 ± 0.4866.630 ± 0.79252.333 ± 2.000
86GeraniaceaePelargonium domesticum BaileyReal geraniumSalad, desserts85.698 ± 0.78515.783 ± 1.53216.793 ± 1.5611.757 ± 0.87517.147 ± 1.67512.053 ± 1.4800
87GeraniaceaePelargonium × hortorum BaileyGeraniumSalad, desserts75.523 ± 0.18552.563 ± 0.19829.107 ± 0.2332.177 ± 0.43729.200 ± 0.2344.016 ± 0.172
88HydrangeaceaeHydrangea petiolaris S. & Zucc.HydrangeaInfusion74.361 ± 0.72558.440 ± 1.43924.807 ± 1.436−3.767 ± 0.37225.092 ± 1.463351.369 ± 0.558
89LythraceaeCuphea hyssopifolia KunthFalse brecciaInfusion95.948 ± 0.811nanananana
90LythraceaeLagerstroemia indica L.Jupiter treeTea87.561 ± 0.34747.777 ± 0.12827.050 ± 0.622−4.687 ± 0.06327.456 ± 0.622350.173 ± 0.302
91MalvaceaeGossypium arboreum L.CottonNon-edible82.733 ± 5.42151.887 ± 5.48410.090 ± 0.6179.913 ± 0.58814.162 ± 0.07844.522 ± 3.431
92NyctaginaceaeMirabilis jalapa L.Night DondiegoColorant85.593 ± 0.20653.100 ± 1.81515.547 ± 0.2137.133 ± 0.44517.175 ± 0.14324.759 ± 1.630
93OrchidaceaePhalaenopsis aphrodite Rchb. F.Orchidna92.271 ± 0.35850.783 ± 2.10011.903 ± 0.8058.620 ± 1.32114.798 ± 0.12035.636 ± 3.024
94PortulacaceaePortulaca oleracea L.PurslaneSalad85.529 ± 3.67435.780 ± 0.34418.983 ± 0.14427.170 ± 0.26533.145 ± 0.13655.085 ± 0.466
95RosaceaeRosa hybridRoseSalad, desserts89.769 ± 0.10547.763 ± 3.95155.923 ± 5.39019.007 ± 0.67959.088 ± 5.04518.886 ± 1.936
96VerbenaceaeVerbena × hybrid G. & RümplerVerbenaSalad, garrison84.040 ± 0.03741.467 ± 3.15319.337 ± 0.1402.330 ± 0.43719.486 ± 0.1536.793 ± 1.117
na, not available.
Table 3. Mean color parameter values, humidity, and culinary uses (according to Coyago et al., (2017) [32] and The-Plant-List, (2019) [33]) of lilac and blue flowers.
Table 3. Mean color parameter values, humidity, and culinary uses (according to Coyago et al., (2017) [32] and The-Plant-List, (2019) [33]) of lilac and blue flowers.
SamplesFamilySpeciesCommon nameCulinary useHumidity (%)L*a*b*C*abhab
Lilac flowers
97AmaryllidaceaeAllium schoenoprasum L.ChivesSalad, garrison74.820 ± 0.22220.333 ± 3.5022.915 ± 0.126−0.147 ± 0.0012.983 ± 0.119359.606 ± 0.012
98ApocynaceaeCatharanthus roseus L.Vinca roseaNon-edible87.648 ± 1.29154.233 ± 2.57330.217 ± 2.145−18.707 ± 1.69235.553 ± 2.139328.223 ± 1.971
99AsteraceaeCentaurea seridis L.Spiny broomna93.516 ± 0.883nanananana
100AsteraceaeCichorium intybus L.Chicory of BrusselsSalad, tea98.378 ± 0.283nanananana
101AsteraceaeOsteospermun fruticosum Norl.Cape margaritaTea82.523 ± 0.31747.673 ± 2.09129.153 ± 0.459−15.303 ± 0.11032.927 ± 0.379332.286 ± 0.488
102BrassicaceaeAlyssum montanum L.Garlic herbInfusion81.159 ± 0.395nanananana
103CampanulaceaeCampanula carpatica Jacq.Little bellna85.496 ± 0.152nanananana
104GeraniaceaePelargonium domesticum BaileyReal geraniumSalad, desserts92.894 ± 0.80058.660 ± 4.03825.157 ± 1.518−12.213 ± 0.31931.101 ± 1.325335.566 ± 1.634
105GeraniaceaePelargonium × hortorum BaileyCommon geraniumSalad, desserts83.186 ± 0.00138.290 ± 2.73653.403 ± 1.538−11.497 ± 0.67854.633 ± 1.355167.827 ± 1.051
106LamiaceaeMentha ×piperita L.PeppermintSalad, garrison94.503 ± 0.063nanananana
107LamiaceaeOcimum basilicum L.BasilSalad, tea89.677 ± 1.22241.423 ± 1.1206.436 ± 0.311−4.879 ± 0.9218.124 ± 0.343322.701 ± 4.206
108MalvaceaeHibiscus syriacus L.Rose of SyriaSalad, tea70.778 ± 0.74753.743 ± 0.28218.460 ± 1.136−12.697 ± 0.61622.407 ± 1.202325.356 ± 0.302
109NyctaginaceaeBougainvillea spectabilis Willd.BougainvilleaInfusion86.967 ± 1.55850.753 ± 0.7416.963 ± 1.0021.790 ± 0.3107.309 ± 0.91116.291 ± 3.413
110PlumbaginaceaeLimonium sinuatum (L.) MillerAlways aliveAdditive91.656 ± 0.184nanananana
111PolygonaceaeFallopia aubertii (L. Henry) HolubGabriela falloppiona99.350 ± 1.200nanananana
112SolanaceaePetunia hybrida Vilm.PetuniaSalad, desserts86.068 ± 0.31569.300 ± 0.5669.533 ± 1.230−4.087 ± 1.28710.390 ± 0.346337.496 ± 1.963
113SolanaceaeSolanum rantonnetti CarrièreBlue flower solanoInfusion83.018 ± 0.126nanananana
114VerbenaceaeVerbena × hybrid G. & RümplerVerbenaSalad, garrison84.238 ± 1.28241.367 ± 1.0866.397 ± 0.303−4.913 ± 0.9498.081 ± 0.379322.707 ± 4.156
115VerbenaceaeVitex agnus-castus L.Chilli pepperInfusion82.257 ± 0.66633.417 ± 1.2469.887 ± 1.320−14.997 ± 2.53917.967 ± 2.844303.628 ± 1.419
Blue flowers
116AmaryllidaceaeAgapanthus africanus HoffmannsAfrican lilyInfusion82.523 ± 5.40157.173 ± 2.1734.543 ± 0.162−15.723 ± 1.03016.367 ± 0.233286.099 ± 0.508
117ConvolvulaceaeConvolvulus althaeoides L.Bell of the virginNon-edible89.100 ± 0.17261.887 ± 1.98012.333 ± 1.512−3.312 ± 0.00112.709 ± 1.520345.099 ± 1.657
118GesneriaceaeSaintpaulia ionantha WendlandAfrican violetSalad89.577 ± 0.065nanananana
119GoodeniaceaeScaevola aemula R. BronwFlower fanInfusion93.812 ± 0.27336.913 ± 1.7708.497 ± 0.6190.539 ± 0.0168.431 ± 0.6233.380 ± 0.521
120LamiaceaeAgastachefoeniculum KuntzeAnise hyssopSalad, desserts79.731 ± 0.288nanananana
121LamiaceaeLavandula angustifolia Mill.LavenderInfusion88.511 ± 0.17337.582 ± 1.6078.8977 ± 0.639−12.101 ± 0.81215.026 ± 0.922306.212 ± 0.144
122LamiaceaeRosmarinus officinalis L.RosemaryGarrison, desserts89.483 ± 0.211nanananana
123PassiofloraceaePassiflora × belottiFlower of the passionTea97.826 ± 0.742nanananana
124PolygonaceaePolygala vulgaris L.Common sparrowInfusion88.391 ± 0.36449.780 ± 1.11317.963 ± 1.319−10.847 ± 2.04321.006 ± 1.320329.058 ± 3.214
125SolanaceaePetunia × hybrida Vilm.PetuniaSalad, desserts83.425 ± 0.77923.210 ± 1.45823.027 ± 1.216−25.717 ± 1.19734.519 ± 1.703311.811 ± 0.177
na, not available.
Table 4. Carotenoid contents (μg/g dry weight) of white, yellow, and orange flowers and retinol activity equivalents.
Table 4. Carotenoid contents (μg/g dry weight) of white, yellow, and orange flowers and retinol activity equivalents.
SpeciesPhytoeneLutein EpoxideLuteoxanthinAntheraxanthin9-Cis-ViolaxanthinViolaxanthinLutein9-Cis-AnteraxanthinZeinoxanthinβ-Caroteneα-CaroteneTOTALRetinol Activity Equivalents FW
White flowers
1S. montanum 47.724 ± 0.63396.839 ± 1.304 32.235 ± 2.52582.001 ± 0.789258.863 ± 0.8430.629 ± 0.123
2C. comosum 14.816 ± 0.003 79.101 ± 2.045 93.917 ± 1.7000.059 ± 0.018
3A. africanus 3.648 ± 0.460 4.478 ± 0.373 8.125 ± 0.069
4C. sativum 141.747 ± 0.50122.734 ± 2.594 103.121 ±1.176 267.601 ± 1.2380.352 ± 0.023
5N. oleander 2.748 ± 0.3122 2.748 ± 0.3122
6T.jasminoides 3.581 ± 0.527 3.581 ± 0.527
7H. arborescens 26.995 ± 2.084 3.745 ± 0.251 30.740 ± 0.1950.044 ± 0.015
8M. incana 2.523 ± 0.411 2.523 ± 0.411
9C. shetleri 11.357 ± 0.434 11.675 ± 0.446 23.033 ± 0.068
10D. chinensis nd
11G. paniculata 6.649 ± 0.855 9.124 ± 0.930 18.801 ± 0.232 33.854 ± 0.31680.980 ± 0.029
12C. scammonia 5.989 ± 0.770 5.929 ± 0.235 11.918 ± 0.077
13G. communis 3.146 ± 0.107 3.146 ± 0.107
14M. suaveolens 38.523 ± 2.6216.901 ± 0.415 21.677 ± 1.93671.278 ± 0.439 11.611 ± 0.001 149.990 ± 0.6870.195 ± 0.001
15M. grandiflora20.359 ± 1.259 20.359 ± 1.259
16J. sambac 4.877 ± 0.136 4.877 ± 0.136
17P. aphrodite 1.901 ± 0.411 6.822 ± 0.330 8.273 ± 0.1250.063 ± 0.023
18P. auriculata nd
19F. ×ananassa nd
20Rosa hybrid16.801 ± 0.001 6.418 ± 0.546 9.970 ± 0.702 33.249 ± 0.153
21C. annuum 20.435 ± 0.642 18.313 ± 0.576 16.199 ±0.50976.460 ± 0.468 8.272 ± 0.161 139.680 ± 0.6180.141 ± 0.066
22S. laxum 10.427 ± 0.360 3.734 ± 0.101 4.730 ± 0.163 6.682 ± 0.944 25.572 ± 0.8450.028 ± 0.015
23A. citriodora 1.741 ± 0.264 1.741 ± 0.264
24L. camara*44.352 ± 1.586 6.914 ± 0.23813.515 ± 0.32164.782 ± 0.4200.148 ± 0.011
*13-Cis-violaxanthin (43.503 ± 0.722); 9-Cis-lutein (140.712 ± 0.586); Zeaxanthin (147.8 ± 2.502); β-Cryptoxanthin (361.422 ± 7.638); α-Cis-anteraxanthin (232.215 ± 12.126).
Yellow flowers
25A. commutatu 10.424 ± 0.162 13.040 ± 0.20343.188 ± 0.462 12.028 ± 0.245 78.680 ± 0.4020.085 ± 0.024
26A. tinctoria 9.338 ± 0.574 10.240 ± 0.630 19.578 ± 0.093
27D. coccinea nd
28D. pinnata 19.521 ± 0.613 20.492 ± 0.644 40.013 ± 0.0970.208 ± 0.044
29D. tenuifolia 17.464 ± 0.549 33.122 ± 3.642 41.066 ± 1.291 13.755 ± 0.432 105.408 ± 0.4550.021 ± 0.021
30C. sativa 16.949 ± 0.585 2.878 ± 0.099 19.826 ± 0.0570.057 ± 0.035
31E. japonicus 31.441 ± 0.946 31.441 ± 0.946
32S. japonica 38.878 ± 1.341 100.347 ± 3.461 139.225 ± 0.3692.208 ± 0.010
33S. papillosa 86.001 ± 0.0211204.010 ± 0.062 1311.876 ± 0.052170.316 ± 0.001 2772.202 ± 0.0563.477 ± 0.027
34P. stenoptera 3.623 ± 0.8031.130 ± 0.226 3.991 ± 0.59323.966 ± 1.709 32.709 ± 0.278
35O. basilicum 7.293 ± 0.106 7.992 ± 0.124205.176 ± 1.318 284.137 ± 1.924 504.597 ± 2.8951.255 ± 0.030
36G. arboreum 5.150 ± 0.362 5.150 ± 0.362
37P. major 31.395 ± 0.489136.768 ± 3.277 168.162 ± 0.314
38F. aubertii 3.725 ± 0.394 3.725 ± 0.394
39P. oleracea 334.85 ± 8.972433.409 ± 0.182239.780 ± 3.7204.357 ± 0.685 1012.431 ± 7.8600.051 ± 0.041
40G. jasminoides6.895 ± 0.150 6.895 ± 0.150
41S. lycopersicum 31.885 ± 0.609 20.207 ± 1.75235.960 ± 1.748 88.052 ± 0.738
42L. camaraa12.744 ± 0.64875.829 ± 2.937 92.465 ± 0.82343.500 ± 0.30763.792 ± 3.42154.906 ± 2.379 50.828 ± 0.461731.514 ± 7.6312056.065 ± 7.1484.796 ± 1.027
Orange flowers
43J. aurea 47.880 ± 0.071 47.880 ± 0.071
44T. capensis 6.595 ± 0.751 1.844 ± 0.260 6.320 ± 0.4066.621 ± 0.426 37.646 ± 0.2410.188 ± 0.015
45D. affinis 22.283 ± 0.00330.403 ± 0.01343.261 ± 0.001 16.277 ± 0.034 112.225 ± 0.0260.364 ± 0.007
46D. brochidodroma 97.582 ± 0.011258.828 ± 0.07876.733 ± 0.022 433.144 ± 0.080
47P. granatum 24.981 ± 0.309 8.891 ± 0.279 33.872 ± 0.2600.229 ± 0.075
48R. alpinia 220.643 ± 0.061372.181 ± 0.0011451.916 ± 0.0033044.739 ± 2.12019.058 ± 0.019
nd, not detectable.
Table 5. Carotenoid contents (μg/g dry weight) of red and pink flowers and retinol activity equivalents.
Table 5. Carotenoid contents (μg/g dry weight) of red and pink flowers and retinol activity equivalents.
SpeciesReactionPhytoeneLutein EpoxideAntheraxanthin9-Cis-ViolaxanthinViolaxanthinLutein9-Cis-AnteraxanthinZeinoxanthinβ-Cryptoxanthinβ-Caroteneα-CaroteneTotalOthers CarotenoidsRetinol Activity Equivalents FW
Red flowers
49A. squarrosaS 140.001 ± 0.001208.963 ± 0.012 32.298 ± 0.001 381.262 ± 0.003
50C. argenteaS 2.518 ± 0.556 8.205 ± 0.6378.452 ± 0.893 2.900 ± 0.286 22.074 ± 0.151 0.068 ± 0.084
51C. roseus 3.691 ± 0.721 3.691 ± 0.721
52N.oleander 3.431 ± 0.439 3.431 ± 0.439
53A. andraeanum 11.101 ± 0.109 3.041 ± 0.490 14.142 ± 0.122 0.015 ± 0.070
54I. balsamina 2.890 ± 0.209 2.890 ± 0.209
55I. walleriana 2.908 ± 0.196 2.908 ± 0.196
56B. cavalerieiS 3.689 ± 0.119 21.277 ± 0.092Lycopene
(17.588 ± 0.567)
0.072 ± 0.042
57B. andraeanumS3.950 ± 0.114 3.950 ± 0.114
58B. × tuberhybridaS 8.719 ± 0.910 8.719 ± 0.910
59D. caryophyllus 15.862 ± 0.408 15.862 ± 0.408
60R. simsiiS 79.036 ± 0.063 79.036 ± 0.063
61E. rubra 5.163 ± 0.224 5.163 ± 0.224
62E. milii 7.357 ± 0.103 7.357 ± 0.103
63B. macrophyllaS 17.165 ± 0.02333.391 ± 0.072203.433 ± 0.001 377.425 ± 0.009Luteoxanthin
(98.725 ± 0.001); 9-Cis-β-cryptoxanthin
(24.704 ± 0.011)
2.385 ± 0.001
64P. peltatum 3.280 ± 0.108 3.280 ± 0.108
65P. × hortorum 3.521 ± 0.491 3.521 ± 0.491
66S. splendensS 5.548 ± 0.234 5.548 ± 0.234
67M. arboreusS 140.300 ± 0.0047.074 ± 0.295 147.374 ± 0.023
68F. magellanica 5.269 ± 0.537 6.497 ± 0.001 11.766 ± 0.045
69Rosa hybrid 6.800 ± 0.303 6.800 ± 0.303 0.122 ± 0.016
70P. rhoeasS 66.753 ± 0.823 66.753 ± 0.823
71W. coccineaS 97.236 ± 0.001 97.236 ± 0.001
72A. majus nd
73R. equisetiformisS 9.144 ± 0.732 140.300 ± 0.001 4.252 ± 0.3404.085 ± 0.106 161.976 ± 0.164Neochrome
(4.252 ± 0.340)
0.055 ± 0.001
74Petunia × hybrid 6.019 ± 0.111 6.019 ± 0.111
75L. camara 33.946 ± 1.469 25.415 ± 2.76846.326 ± 1.26736.794 ± 0.95925.694 ± 0.315 55.198 ± 1.2671.542 ± 0.4605.587 ± 0.287304.721 ± 0.183 0.021 ± 0.000
76Verbena × hybrid 30.303 ± 0.52511.906 ± 1.70058.361 ± 0.0049.303 ± 0.002 26.972 ± 0.011 106.289 ± 0.01715-Cis-violaxanthin (11.711 ± 1.600); 9-Cis-lutein
(32.001 ±1.229)
0.328 ± 0.001
Pink flowers
77C. argentea 15.714 ± 0.421100.672± 2.836 116.324± 0.303
78N. oleander 0.972 ± 0.003 0.972 ± 0.003
79B. argenteaS 182.793± 0.734 43.165 ± 0.18115.310 ± 0.194241.268± 0.594 0.803 ± 0.003
80Guzmania hybrid 126.450 ± 0.8522.912 ± 0.129 7.763 ± 0.107 13.867 ± 0.782 150.992± 0.859 0.119 ± 0.006
81D. caryophyllus 1.662 ± 0.004 1.662 ± 0.004
82S. officinalis 9.544 ± 0.984 9.544 ± 0.984
83R.simsii 0.718 ± 0.074 0.718 ± 0.074
84T. cernuum 2.776 ± 0.304 2.041 ± 0.022 4.817 ± 0.041
85E. grandiflorum 0.966 ± 0.039 0.966 ± 0.039
86P. domesticum 2.078 ± 0.120 2.078 ± 0.120
87P. × hortorum nd
88H. petiolaris 7.3 ± 0.2 7.3 ± 0.0
89C. hyssopifolia 19.298 ± 1.331 60.944 ± 1.83411.306 ± 0.780 61.105 ± 0.421 157.029 ± 0.638Luteoxanthin
(4.375 ± 0.132)
0.209 ± 0.004
90L. indica 4.385 ± 0.308 8.476 ± 0.595 12.861 ± 0.069 0.088 ± 0.000
91G. arboreum 0.700 ± 0.001 0.700 ± 0.001
92M. jalapaS 4.147 ± 0.328 4.147 ± 0.328
93P. aphrodite 6.858 ± 0.510 8.376 ± 0.8028.742 ± 0.837 20.361 ± 1.252 44.338 ± 0.284 0.131 ± 0.002
94P. oleracea 156.999 ± 3.163355.241 ± 3.700120.763 ± 5.221 632.974 ± 6.136
95Rosa hybrid 6.718 ± 0.846 9.657 ± 0.102 14.962 ± 0.1885.379 ± 0.678 27.610 ± 0.205 64.238 ± 0.531 0.235 ± 0.002
96Verbena × hybrid 10.142 ± 1.038 2.544 ± 0.048 12.685 ± 0.127 0.034 ± 0.001
S, saponified; nd, not detectable.
Table 6. Carotenoid contents (μg/g dry weight) of lilac and blue flowers and retinol activity equivalents.
Table 6. Carotenoid contents (μg/g dry weight) of lilac and blue flowers and retinol activity equivalents.
SpeciesReactionPhytoeneLutein EpoxideLuteoxanthinAntheraxanthin9-Cis-ViolaxanthinViolaxanthinLutein9-Cis-AnteraxanthinZeinoxanthinβ-Cryptoxanthinβ-Caroteneα-CaroteneTotalRetinol Activity Equivalents FW
Lilac flowers
97A. schoenoprasum 14.146 ± 1.27710.807 ± 0.97636.072± 3.256 9.041 ± 0.081 70.066 ± 0.4210.190 ± 0.001
98C. roseusS nd
99C. seridis nd
100C. intybus 2.096 ± 0.105 2.096 ± 0.105
101O. fruticosum 3.892 ± 0.815 3.892 ± 0.815
102A. montanumS 10.610 ± 0.97445.785± 0.420 24.954 ± 0.222 81.349 ± 0.5750.100 ± 0.001
103C. carpatica 6.957 ± 0.012 8.320 ± 0.001 20.323 ± 0.007 35.600 ± 0.0640.020 ± 0.000
104Pelargonium × domesticum 0.739 ± 0.071 0.739 ± 0.071
105Pelargonium × hortorumS nd
106Mentha × piperitaS 23.427 ± 0.4155.907 ± 0.113 9.493 ± 0.18270.580± 0.664 38.600 ± 0.141 148.008 ± 0.9430.177 ± 0.002
107O. basilicum 16.781 ± 1.0225.105 ± 1.026 7.611 ± 0.10037.663 ± 2.341 22.492 ± 0.864 88.873 ± 0.6110.294 ± 0.007
108H. syriacusS 3.869 ± 0.481 3.869 ± 0.481
109B. spectabiliS 12.183 ± 1.01033.282 ± 0.820 45.465 ± 0.141
110L. sinuatum 3.231 ± 0.152 3.231 ± 0.01520.240 ± 0.004
111F. aubertii 5.407 ± 0.107 5.407 ± 0.107
112Petunia × hybrida 9.113 ± 0.126 9.113 ± 0.126
113S. rantonnetti 8.307 ± 0.7757.797 ± 0.538 7.299 ± 0.50334.080 ± 2.350 21.228 ± 1.464 78.711 ± 0.4330.301 ± 0.001
114Verbena × hybrid 25.007 ± 1.13748.224 ± 2.2006.914 ± 0.426 22.666 ± 1.051 102.689 ± 0.4240.297 ± 0.005
115V. agnus- castus 4.909 ± 0.103 2.582 ± 0.153 7.491 ± 0.0920.038 ± 0.001
Blue flowers
116A. africanus 3.648 ± 0.460 4.478 ± 0.373 8.125 ± 0.069
117C. althaeoides nd
118S. ionantha 1.911 ± 0.145 1.911 ± 0.145
119S. aemula 18.220 ± 1.227 3.139 ± 0.152 4.112 ± 0.27716.117 ± 1.085 41.588 ± 0.228
120A. foeniculum 47.885 ± 3.833 35.877 ± 2.872 83.763 ± 0.5160.607 ± 0.003
121L. angustifoliaS17.478 ± 0.822 19.190 ± 0.893 4.540 ± 0.37319.347 ± 0.22459.506 ± 1.49212.258 ± 0.841132.320± 0.5130.722 ± 0.001
122R. officinalisS 14.888 ± 1.021 14.888± 1.021
123Passiflora × belotti 4.818 ± 0.454 7.122 ± 0.580 21.554 ± 2.03215.638 ± 0.21649.133± 0.4360.196 ± 0.003
124P. vulgaris 1.736 ± 0.412 1.736 ± 0.412
125Petunia × hybrida 23.061± 1.631 16.645 ± 0.021 39.707± 0.1360.230 ± 0.000
S, saponified; nd, not detectable.
Table 7. Phenolic compound contents (mg/g dry weight) of white, yellow, and orange flowers.
Table 7. Phenolic compound contents (mg/g dry weight) of white, yellow, and orange flowers.
SpeciesGallicp-Hydroxybe.m-Coumaricp-CoumaricVanillicCaffeicSyringicChlorogenicFerulicNaringinCrisinQuercitrinMyricetinQuercetinKaempferolTotal
White flowers
1S. montanum nd
2C. comosum 7.868 ± 0.7182.802 ± 0.053 4.061 ± 0.092 0.475 ± 0.0394.249 ± 0.03821.110 ± 1.393
3A. africanus 8.648 ± 0.934 2.032 ± 0.081 1.444 ± 0.2490.890 ± 0.02213.013 ± 1.287
4C. sativum0.242 ± 0.0230.560 ± 0.0081.185 ± 0.0420.372 ± 0.020 0.089 ± 0.001 2.448 ± 0.094
5N. oleander0.103 ± 0.003 2.999 ± 0.031 3.091 ± 0.0520.443 ± 0.0200.215 ± 0.014 3.428 ± 0.372 3.339 ± 0.029 13.618 ± 0.521
6T. jasminoides 1.719 ± 0.0140.398 ± 0.085 0.990 ± 0.001 0.323 ± 0.0036 0.802 ± 0.154 4.132 ± 0.028
7H. arborescens0.476 ± 0.013 0.456 ± 0.001 0.227 ± 0.020 1.158 ± 0.163
8M. incana 5.710 ± 1.153 5.710 ± 1.153
9C. shetleri 2.329 ± 0.0790.218 ± 0.020 1.338 ± 0.107 0.248 ± 0.004 4.133 ± 0.092
10D. chinensis 5.655 ± 0.601 3.870 ± 0.253 9.525 ± 0.016
11G. paniculata 4.277 ± 0.467 17.930 ± 2.552 22.208 ± 0.132
12C.s scammonia 0.844 ± 0.0531.611 ± 0.274 0.146 ± 0.004 1.472 ± 0.242 0.438 ± 0.0904.884 ± 0.0539.598 ± 0.073
13G. communis 0.688 ± 0.085 0.123 ± 0.009 0.577 ± 0.0100.587 ± 0.009 2.390 ± 0.129
14M. suaveolens 0.601 ± 0.035 1.337 ± 0.028 1.247 ± 0.013 3.863 ± 0.704
15M. grandiflora 0.168 ± 0.0010.575 ± 0.035 0.744 ± 0.036
16J. sambac 5.913 ± 0.2170.290 ± 0.003 0.146 ± 0.005 2.211 ± 0.040 0.261 ± 0.016 9.219 ± 0.028
17P. aphrodite1.063 ± 0.054 0.201 ± 0.010 6.565 ± 0.214 7.954 ± 0.886
18P. auriculata 19.895 ± 2.118 17.592 ± 0.561 22.356 ± 0.618 59.843 ± 0.252
19F. ×ananassa 0.472 ± 0.011 24.183 ± 0.625 16.983 ± 0.321 41.628 ± 0.127
20Rosa hybrid4.033 ± 0.199 1.302 ± 0.029 1.499 ± 0.351 12.501 ± 1.098
21C. annuum 0.358 ± 0.068 0.737 ± 0.106 1.372 ± 0.069 1.162 ± 0.0440.545 ± 0.007 4.978 ± 0.057 0.547 ± 0.010 9.699 ± 0.0877
22S. laxum 0.213 ± 0.0760.301 ± 0.001 0.099 ± 0.001 0.953 ± 0.052 1.266 ± 0.132
23A. citriodora 1.944 ± 0.036 2.869 ± 0.028 3.748 ± 0.068 4.401 ± 0048 15.643 ± 0.001
24L. camara 7.556 ± 0.026 3.402 ± 0.020 2.170 ± 0.1155.922 ± 0.17319.051 ± 0.033
Yellow flowers
25A. commutatum 0.084 ± 0.022 0.220 ± 0.009 0.121 ± 0.034 0.162 ± 0.032 0.588 ± 0.097
26A. tinctoria 2.345 ± 0.013 6.767 ± 0.2280.495 ± 0.041 1.309 ± 0.013 0.152 ± 0.004 11.066 ± 0.615
27D. coccinea 6.902 ± 0.0274.738 ± 0.227 1.325 ± 0.303 0.721 ± 0.0783.570 ± 0.248815.733 ± 0.0774
28D. pinnata0.340 ± 0.022 1.402 ± 0.081 1.325 ± 0.1300.721 ± 0.078 0.597 ± 0.037 0.824 ± 0.1394.475 ± 0.5429.685 ± 0.012
29D. tenuifolia 2.186 ± 0.006 3.075 ± 0.4382.439 ± 0.3887.701 ± 0.083
30C. sativa 0.239 ± 0.014 1.719 ± 0.130 0.233 ± 0.010 2.192 ± 0.155
31E. japonicus0.245 ± 0.090 0.190 ± 0.001 0.225 ± 0.0310.649 ± 0.010 0.251 ± 0.006 1.858 ± 0.0218
32S. japonica 0.813 ± 0.0390.179 ± 0.0070.409 ± 0.018 0.427 ± 0.006 3.395 ± 0.146 0.972 ± 0.0352.669 ± 0.3479.167 ± 0.742
33S. papillosa nd
34P. stenoptera12.605 ± 1.193 1.220 ± 0.0191.529 ± 0.134 0.505 ± 0.068 0.131 ± 0.027 18.078 ± 0.119
35O. basilicum 0.207 ± 0.013 0.328 ± 0.032 0.640 ± 0.0050
36G. arboreum 0.4360 ± 0.025 0.308 ± 0.002 5.621 ± 0.766 1.507 ± 0.029 7.872 ± 0.011
37P. major 0.751 ± 0.051 0.856 ± 0.058 21.226 ± 1.503 22.833 ± 0.161
38F. aubertii0.806 ± 0.028 0.091 ± 0.006 0.191 ± 0.0240.399 ± 0.0180.136 ± 0.018 1.725 ± 0.089
39P. oleracea 1.302 ± 0.1012.425 ± 0.0010.125 ± 0.007 0.457 ± 0.049 4.276 ± 0.053
40G. jasminoides 0.600 ± 0.0260.316 ± 0.0010.407 ± 0.023 0.311 ± 0.004 1.956 ± 0.025
41S. lycopersicum 1.849 ± 0.297 0.435 ± 0.009 0.620 ± 0.072 0.691 ± 0.059 3.395 ± 0.436
42L. camara 1.034 ± 0.1072.665 ± 0.043 1.175 ± 0.122 2.412 ± 0.003 2.126 ± 0.0401.634 ± 0.01110.862 ± 0.072
Orange flowers
43J. aurea nd
44T. capensis 0.350 ± 0.070 0.773 ± 0.117 0.208 ± 0.005 1.331 ± 0.019
45D.a affinis nd
46D. brochidodroma nd
47P. granatum 9.103 ± 0.53310.080 ± 0.358 8.421 ± 0.159 56.464 ± 2.298 22.133 ± 1.821 146.937 ± 0.669
48R. alpinia nd
nd, not detectable.
Table 8. Phenolic compound contents (mg/g dry weight) of red and pink flowers.
Table 8. Phenolic compound contents (mg/g dry weight) of red and pink flowers.
SpeciesGallicp-Hydroxybe.m-Coumaricp-CoumaricVanillicCaffeicSyringicChlorogenicFerulicNaringinCrisinQuercitrinMyricetinQuercetinKaempferolTotal
Red flowers
49A. squarrosa nd
50C. argentea0.654 ± 0.0261.660 ± 0.0070.665 ± 0.007 0.079 ± 0.0040.098 ± 0.013 0.179 ± 0.002 3.558 ± 0.286 0.251 ± 0.0080.572 ± 0.0187.715 ± 0.044
51C.s roseus 1.190 ± 0.56016.458 ± 1.017 0.691 ± 0.069 0.953 ± 0.004 0.791 ± 0.0566.029 ± 0.25426.476 ± 2.014
52N. oleander 4.114 ± 0.118 6.622 ± 0.3070.764 ± 0.057 1.347 ± 0.013 4.388 ± 0.0414546 ± 0.38521.781 ± 1.893
53A. andraeanum 0.361 ±0.051 6.192 ± 0.177 7.664 ± 0.258
54I. balsamina 1.503 ± 0.285 0.133 ± 0.0281.394 ± 0.1903.244 ±0.052
55I. walleriana 3.120 ± 0.145 1.195 ± 0.145 3.611 ± 0.0048.428 ± 0.384
56B. cavaleriei1.311 ± 0.060 0.265 ± 0.0130.641 ± 0.030 1.417 ± 0.071 4.330 ± 0.213
57B. andraeanum0.360 ± 0.0460.273 ± 0.0190.414 ± 0.0480.207 ± 0.001 1.984 ± 0.013 2.217 ± 0.0994.191 ± 0.0499.646 ± 0.274
58Begonia × tuberhybrida 1.650 ± 0.2423.306 ± 0.0690.642 ± 0.0392.730 ± 0.2058.693 ± 0.874
59D. caryophyllus 13.167 ± 0.241 1.512 ± 0.095 0.331 ± 0.031 0.396 ± 0.071 15.405 ± 2.662
60R. simsii 0.279 ± 0.057 0.138 ± 0.013 0.361 ± 0.003 0.131 ± 0.003 1.142 ± 0.010
61E. rubra 0.042 ± 0.002 0.238 ± 0.068 0.326 ± 0.050 0.600 ± 0.122
62E. milii4.882 ± 0.502 0.347 ± 0.018 0.724 ± 0.035 0.167 ± 0.018 7.414 ± 0.062
63B. macrophylla nd
64P. peltatum14.741 ± 0.122 2.216 ± 0.0111.103 ± 0.102 0.248 ± 0.001 0.440 ± 0.012 8.415 ± 0.012 32.452 ± 0449
65Pelargonium × hortorum7.142 ± 2.789 2.011 ± 0.0031.406 ± 0.147 1.371 ± 0.185 18.655 ± 0.296 3.081 ± 0.032 68.975 ± 4.079
66S. splendens 1.182 ± 0.0140.683 ± 0.008 4.311 ± 0.053 0.213 ± 0.0030.801 ± 0.100 7.245 ± 0.078
67M. arboreus 3.440 ± 0.450 3.429 ± 0.3340.510 ± 0.071 6.166 ± 0.41214.824 ± 1.379
68F. magellanica4.327 ± 0.154 11.080 ± 0.105 1.555 ± 0.022 23.538 ± 0.242 42.488 ± 1.335
69Rosa hybrid3.194 ± 0.642 4.989 ± 0.065 0.793 ± 0.015 0.970 ± 0.075 1.065 ± 0.2486.339 ± 0.02919.201 ± 1.513
70P. rhoeas nd
71W. coccinea nd
72A. majus 0.911 ± 0.0022.443 ± 0.312 0.146 ± 0.0194.354 ± 0.1978.962 ± 0.106
73R. equisetiformis 2.577 ± 0.193 0.137 ± 0.032 4.795 ± 0.061
74Petunia × hybrid 11.005 ± 0.795 2.724 ± 0.123 13.729 ± 0.191
75L. camara 9.204 ± 0.120 0.911 ± 0.0031.001 ± 0.021 0.603 ± 0.0035.833 ± 0.804 2.306 ± 0.0112.642 ± 0.33322.478 ± 0.301
76Verbena × hybrid 2.493 ± 0.1761.373 ± 0.001 0.949 ± 0.139 1.187 ± 0.0819.888 ± 0.148 4.310 ± 0.214 21.283 ± 0.834
Pink flowers
77C. argentea1.635 ± 0.0686.172 ± 0.254 0.239 ± 0.022 0.218 ± 0.001 0.634 ± 0.0134.615 ± 0.07413.765 ± 0.437
78N. oleander 5.514 ± 0.513 0.384 ± 0.086 7.902 ± 0.0901.123 ± 0.101 0.464 ± 0.069 0.290 ± 0.045 15.677 ± 0.904
79B. argentea 0.214 ± 0.021 0.274 ± 0.029 0.488 ± 0.051
80G. hybrid 0.491 ± 0.0650.473 ± 0.003 0.118 ± 0.019 1.229 ± 0.097
81D. caryophyllus 8.479 ± 0.385 0.714 ± 0.0321.527 ± 0.0690.087 ± 0.004 10.807 ± 0.049
82S. officinalis 1.733 ± 0.160 8.728 ± 0.943 10.461 ± 1.103
83R. simsii 0.279 ± 0.057 0.138 ± 0.013 0.361 ± 0.003 0.131 ± 0.003 1.142 ± 0.102
84T. cernuum 0.279 ± 0.0050.166 ± 0.004 1.354 ± 0.079 0.605 ± 0.031 2.674 ± 0.187
85E. grandiflorum 0.257 ± 0.0080.338 ± 0.086 1.713 ± 0.141 3.105 ± 0.271
86P. domesticum15.733 ± 0.120 6.495 ± 0.1520.310 ± 0.011 1.345 ± 0.086 3.485 ± 0.484 32.678 ± 2.198
87Pelargonium × hortorum22.520 ± 1.7283.162 ± 0.0703.704 ± 0.073 19.506 ± 1.375 6.291 ± 2.100 55.183 ± 5.346
88H. petiolaris 10.889 ± 0.114 34.229 ± 2.096 6.566 ± 0.175 3.183 ± 0.162 4.350 ± 0.224 2.154 ± 0.115 61.371 ± 4.260
89C. hyssopifolia 11.312 ± 0.867 11.312 ± 0.867
90L. indica 0.424 ± 0.006 2.667 ± 0.395 3.091 ± 0.484
91G. arboreum0.367 ± 0.0102.762 ± 0.326 0.545 ± 0.036 0.862 ± 0.073 0.741 ± 0.034 5.276 ± 0.479
92M. jalapa 4.530 ± 0.0482.230 ± 0.022 0.729 ± 0.0440.369 ± 0.012 0.332 ± 0.013 0.373 ± 0.0090.922 ± 0.1239.485 ± 0.271
93P. aphrodite 10.146 ± 0.3491.614 ± 0.049 17.202 ± 0.282 3.136 ± 0.020 39.969 ± 1.073
94P. oleracea 0.402 ± 0.1114.008 ± 0.1600.125 ± 0.007 0.347 ± 0.050 4.389 ± 0.021
95Rosa hybrid 5.799 ± 0.424 0.333 ± 0.014 0.351 ± 0.050 7.770 ± 0.033
96Verbena ×hybrid 18.240 ± 1.965 1.470 ± 0.1696.890 ± 0.668 0.198 ± 0.014 26.797 ± 2.816
nd, not detectable.
Table 9. Phenolic compound contents (mg/g dry weight) of lilac and blue flowers.
Table 9. Phenolic compound contents (mg/g dry weight) of lilac and blue flowers.
SpeciesGallicp-Hydroxybe.m-Coumaricp-CoumaricVanillicCaffeicSyringicChlorogenicFerulicNaringinCrisinQuercitrinMyricetinQuercetinKaempferolTotal
Lilac flowers
97A. schoenoprasum 2.156 ± 0.02442.736 ± 0.2740.190 ± 0.007 0.031 ± 0.006 0.894 ± 0.003 1.284 ± 0.0101.978 ± 0.1259.269 ± 0.670
98C. roseus 1.680 ± 0.0947.023 ± 0.685 2.263 ± 0.169 1.021 ± 0.058 2.525 ± 0.15014.559 ± 1.22329.137 ± 3.556
99C. seridis 0.987 ± 0.1380.544 ± 0.030 0.532 ± 0.024 1.087 ± 0.001 7.465 ± 0.1740.288 ± 0.0192.044 ± 0.1363.055 ± 0.61216.001 ± 2.364
100C. intybus 1.433 ± 0.1233.938 ± 0.1750.388 ± 0.069 0.512 ± 0.004 0.911 ± 0.0610.446 ± 0.0140.415 ± 0.053 9.891 ± 0.848
101O. fruticosum 0.898 ± 0.182 0.658 ± 0.071 0.561 ± 0.0940.729 ± 0.1333.051 ± 0.501
102A. montanum 0.105 ± 0.024 0.871 ± 0.098 0.191 ± 0.023 1.677 ± 0.253
103C. carpatica 4.031 ± 0.349 0.621 ± 0.008 4.785 ± 0.501
104P. domesticum17.440 ± 1.088 10.666 ± 0.513 2.397 ± 0.088 2.434 ± 0.121 0.711 ± 0.0591.045 ± 0.1161.297 ± 0.015 37.965 ± 0.125
105P.×hortorum27.709 ± 0.061 6.280 ± 0.4371.537 ± 0.219 1.672 ± 0.002 2.599 ± 0.125 39.797 ± 0.096
106M.× piperita 0.062 ± 0.003 0.083 ± 0.004 0.210 ± 0.013 0.133 ± 0.007 0.488 ± 0.027
107O. basilicum 0.197 ± 0.008 0.197 ± 0.008
108H. syriacus 10.489 ± 0.107 19.139 ± 1.870 0.318 ± 0.036 29.946 ± 2.013
109B. spectabili 3.844 ± 0.218 0.352 ± 0.015 7.161 ± 0.409 4.422 ± 0.269 15.779 ± 1.334
110L. sinuatum0.393 ± 0.077 0.350 ± 0.008 0.120 ± 0.0300.972 ± 0.0732.036 ± 0.171
111F. aubertii0.749 ± 0.011 0.160 ± 0.010 0.377 ± 0.0220.711 ± 0.0920.388 ± 0.130 2.659 ± 0.276
112Petunia×hybrida 0.197 ± 0.010 0.683 ± 0.0820.187 ± 0.020 0.846 ± 0.052 0.647 ± 0.020 1.322 ± 0.1020.909 ± 0.0354.791 ± 0.320
113S. rantonnetti 1.213 ± 0.083 0.612 ± 0.0170.685 ± 0.072 0.391 ± 0.002 0.278 ± 0.002 3.180 ± 0.177
114Verbena×hybrid 6.323 ± 0.1430.504 ± 0.029 1.467 ± 0.056 0.925 ± 0.022 1.282 ± 0.1583.519 ± 0.355 8.950 ± 0.526 24.044 ± 2.346
115V.agnus- castus 5.337 ± 0.33715.534 ± 0.790 0.564 ± 0.010 5.344 ± 0.1681.580 ± 0.035 0.363 ± 0.030 28.994 ± 2.552
Blue flowers
116A. africanus 6.751 ± 0.339 1.452 ± 0.069 1.032 ± 0.0893.663 ± 0.17113.687 ± 0.736
117C. althaeoides 0.029 ± 0.004 3.938 ± 0.309 0986 ± 0.1272.995 ± 0.387 1.568 ± 0.2039.516 ± 1.231
118S. ionantha 1.519 ± 0.03719.628 ± 2.4882.940 ± 0.062 1.641 ± 0.20010.830 ± 0.42837.201 ± 3.850
119S. aemula 2.659 ± 0.1280.534 ± 0.010 0.529 ± 0.078 0.851 ± 0.0641.322 ± 0.048 0.837 ± 0.171 7.257 ± 0.525
120A. foeniculum 3.469 ± 0.258 0.648 ± 0.013 6.628 ± 0.470
121L. angustifolia 1.614 ± 0.235 1.666 ± 0.231 1.207 ± 0.067 0.413 ± 0.029 5.634 ± 0.834
122R. officinalis 1.634 ± 0.050 4.981 ± 0.490 1.035 ± 0.020 7.651 ± 0.560
123P.× belotti 6.005 ± 0.614 0.359 ± 0.024 6.364 ± 1.475
124P. vulgaris 4.490 ± 0.097 4.490 ± 0.097
125Petunia×hybrida 2.300 ± 0.2510.578 ± 0.013 0.554 ± 0.050 2.966 ± 0.0050.948 ± 0.0417.850 ± 0.048
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meléndez-Martínez, A.J.; Benítez, A.; Corell, M.; Hernanz, D.; Mapelli-Brahm, P.; Stinco, C.; Coyago-Cruz, E. Screening for Innovative Sources of Carotenoids and Phenolic Antioxidants among Flowers. Foods 2021, 10, 2625. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112625

AMA Style

Meléndez-Martínez AJ, Benítez A, Corell M, Hernanz D, Mapelli-Brahm P, Stinco C, Coyago-Cruz E. Screening for Innovative Sources of Carotenoids and Phenolic Antioxidants among Flowers. Foods. 2021; 10(11):2625. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112625

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meléndez-Martínez, Antonio J., Ana Benítez, Mireia Corell, Dolores Hernanz, Paula Mapelli-Brahm, Carla Stinco, and Elena Coyago-Cruz. 2021. "Screening for Innovative Sources of Carotenoids and Phenolic Antioxidants among Flowers" Foods 10, no. 11: 2625. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112625

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop