Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation into the Effect of Oil Injection on the Performance of a Variable Speed Twin-Screw Compressor
Previous Article in Journal
A Fuzzy Logical-Based Variable Step Size P&O MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biofuel and Biochemical Analysis of Amphora coffeaeformis RR03, a Novel Marine Diatom, Cultivated in an Open Raceway Pond

by
Muthu Ganesan Rajaram
1,2,
Subramani Nagaraj
1,2,
Manubolu Manjunath
3,
Annakkili Baskara Boopathy
1,4,
Chidambaram Kurinjimalar
1,
Ramasamy Rengasamy
1,
Thanasekaran Jayakumar
2,
Joen-Rong Sheu
2,* and
Jiun-Yi Li
2,5,*
1
Centre for Advanced Studies in Botany, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600025, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Department of Pharmacology, Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
3
Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
4
Department of Biochemistry, Caussanel College of Arts and Science, Ramanathapuram 623523, India
5
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, and Mackay Medical College, Taipei 104, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2018, 11(6), 1341; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061341
Submission received: 29 March 2018 / Revised: 17 May 2018 / Accepted: 22 May 2018 / Published: 25 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Section L: Energy Sources)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: To increase the biochemical productivity and to reduce the production cost of microalgal biodiesel, this study aimed to investigate the effects of CO2 on biomass, fatty acids, carbon-hydrogen, and biochemical accumulation of the marine diatom, Amphora coffeaeformis RR03 (A. coffeaeformis) RR03. (2) Methods: Fatty acid composition of the dry biomass of A. coffeaeformis RR03 was analysed using Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). (3) Results: The results showed that A. coffeaeformis RR03 contained high biomass productivity and biochemical composition in different cultivation conditions. A. coffeaeformis RR03 showed maximum growth of 5.2 × 106/mL on 21st day cultivation under CO2 supply. The bio-crude oil production from A. coffeaeformis RR03 was 36.19 megajoule (MJ). GC-MS analysis found that the dry biomass of A. coffeaeformis RR03 contained maximum of 47.72% fatty acids of 16-octadecanoic acid methyl ester (10:12) and 19.58% pentadecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, and methyl ester (9.24). (4) Conclusion: The results of this study may suggest that a novel diatom of A. coffeaeformis RR03 could be a suitable candidate for biocrude production in order to meet the future demand of energy.

1. Introduction

Marine diatoms, which are the most important eukaryotic phytoplankton for carbon sequestration and the main producers within phytoplankton today, contribute more than 40% of the global oceanic organic carbon production per year and are responsible for up to 25% of the global CO2 fixation [1]. Diatoms produce oil drops that are as a reserve material during the vegetative period of growth, with percentages that vary from 23% to 45% of dry cell weight. Physiological and genetic manipulations have also shown the possibility of increasing the amount of lipids in the cellular mass and re-invigorated studies regarding the potential of affording oil production using these microorganisms [2]. In addition, marine strains showed more resistance to environmental changes in cultivation, as they are adapted to survive in high levels of salinity. For this reason, and due to the large seawater availability, which can be used in microalgae culture, it is expected that these microorganisms may supply the growing biofuel demand, shifting it from petroleum, natural gas, and coal derived fuels to biofuels produced from marine microalgae [3].
In recent years, public awareness has been raised to reduce CO2 emissions around the world. Of the various physical, chemical, and biological methods that can be used to capture CO2, the CO2 biological fixation using microalgae is thought to be one of the most important and effective approaches and is considered as a renewable, energy-saving, and sustainable technology for the reduction of CO2 emissions [4]. A diverse potential of various algal species has been analysed in terms of ecological, economical, and bioenergy production [5]. The biochemical components of algae like protein, carbohydrates, and lipids have been used in different industries of food, cosmetics, and medicines. The dynamics of microalgae growth, as well as inorganic carbon and nutrients uptake, were extensively studied during the pond start-up and semi-continuous feeding conditions [5].
Several strains of microalgae were recently found to be highly tolerant to CO2, because they can grow under high CO2 concentrations (mostly 1–15%) and simultaneously produce a significant amount of lipids for biodiesel production [4]. Microalgae need simple requirements (light, water, CO2, and minerals) for growth and photosynthesis. They can produce promptly large amounts of lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates [6]. These microorganisms accumulate triglycerides as a storage lipid under specific culture conditions. Microalgal lipids are the green oil for sustainable biodiesel production [7]. The increase of growth rate and the improvement of lipid content of microalgal strain have the one challenge to fully exploit this potential [8]. Cyanophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, and Chrysophyceae are the most abundant sources of microalgae biodiesel production [9].
Currently, crops are the common feed stocks in the biodiesel production industry, as well as the food industry; thus, crop-based biofuels production has created increased food prices [10]. A wide variety of microalgae species reach higher lipid productivities than crops, hence becoming potential substrates to alleviate the referred-to “food-versus fuel competition” [9]. Despite the efforts that have been taken, industrial biodiesel production from microalgae is not economically viable nowadays due to the high costs of drying and lipid extraction processes [11]. In the present study, diatom of Amphora coffeaeformis RR03 (A. coffeaeformis) were mass cultivated in 150 L and 1500 L outdoor open raceway ponds. Two distinct types of open bioreactors were used to determine the production of high oil content. The possible contaminating factors were also examined using a non-sterile medium. These results provided new insights to the mass cultivation of new A. coffeaeformis RR03 towards efficient biocrude and biodiesel production.

2. Results

2.1. Mass Cultivation of A. coffeaeformis RR03

The dry biomass of about 0.05 g on the initial day was gradually increased up to 0.56 g L−1 on 6th day. Thereafter, the dry biomass was increased to a maximum of 0.81 g L−1 on 15th day. The alga exhibited maximum cell number of 2.5 × 106 cells/mL on 15th day when it was grown in the modified Central Food Technological Research Institute- Rajaram A. coffeaeformis (CFTRI-RRAC I) medium as shown in Figure 1a,b. The alga grown in another pond in F/2 medium (control) inoculated with 0.05 g L−1 of dry biomass was gradually increased to a maximum of 0.79 g L−1 on 18th day, which was similar to the dry biomass recorded in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium on 15th day. A. coffeaeformis RR03 showed the biomass productivities of 0.054 g, and 0.043 g L−1 d−1 in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I and F/2 medium, respectively. The volumetric and areal productivity of biomass were 0.031 and 0.029 g L−1 d−1 and 4.65 and 4.35 g L−1 m2 d−1, respectively. At the end of study period (21st day), 0.192 kg and 0.161 kg dry biomass were harvested from the alga grown in modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium and F/2 medium, respectively, as shown in Table 1.

2.2. Biochemical Parameter Study on 1.0 m2 in Open Pond

The maximum concentrations of 5.18 and 6.09 mg L−1 chlorophyll-a were grown in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I and F/2 medium, respectively, on 15th day (Figure 1c). A. coffeaeformis RR03 had maximum total lipid content of 149 mg L−1 with 2.51 × 106 cells/mL on 15th day, when it was grown in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium. At the above condition, it exhibited 18.39% of total lipid/dry biomass and 23.83% total lipid/ash free biomass. Further, this alga showed the total lipid and ash free biomass of 9.93 ± 0.05 mg L−1 d−1 and 21.35%, respectively. However, the alga grown in F/2 medium (control) showed maximum total lipid content of 145 mg L−1 with 1.98 × 106 cells/mL on 18th day, as shown in Figure 1d. The results of biomass and lipid production are given in Table 1.

2.3. Effect of CO2 Supplementation on A. coffeaeformis RR03

2.3.1. Biomass Production and Biochemical Study in 10.0 m2 Open Pond

A. coffeaeformis RR03 grown under CO2 supplementation had maximum concentrations of biomass (1.5 ± 0.10 g L−1) and Chlorophyll-a (13.18 mg L−1) on 21st day, as shown in Figure 2a,b. The lipid content of A. coffeaeformis RR03 grown under CO2 supplementation was 114 mg L−1, with 4.03 × 106 cells/mL on 15th day, as shown in Figure 2d. The total cell number and lipid content of the alga in ash-free biomass under with CO2 also increased (Figure 2c,d). Similar trend of lipid productivity of 7.60 ± 0.05 and 21.88 ± 0.15 mg L−1 d−1 was noticed in the presence or absence of CO2, respectively (Table 1). In case of control medium, the alga had a maximum lipid accumulation of 197 mg L−1 with 1.49 × 106 cells/mL on 9th day.
The 1.0 m2 open raceway ponds contained 135 L of the modified CFTRI - RRAC I medium and F/2 medium (control) separately, and were inoculated with 15 L of optimally grown culture of A. coffeaeformis RR03, which revealed the following observations, as shown in Figure 3a,b. The 10.0 m2 raceway pond, which contained 1350 L of modified CFRTRI-RRAC I medium inoculated with optimally grown 150 L of A. coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 supplementation, revealed the following observations, as shown in Figure 3c–f. The initial biomass of 0.12 g L−1 was gradually increased up to 0.78 g L−1 on 12th day, and it further increased to 1.5 ± 0.10 g L−1 on 21st day. The above biomass productivity was more than 50% of that of control (without CO2 supplementation). The alga cultivated in the pond supplemented with CO2 had a maximum cell number of 5.2 × 106 cell/mL on 21st day, as shown in Figure 2a,b. The alga showed the biomass productivity 0.071 g L−1 d−1, and volumetric and areal productivity of 0.065 g L−1 d−1 and 9.75 g m2 d−1, respectively.
The culture without CO2 supplementation (control) showed a biomass productivity of 0.046 g L−1 d−1and a volumetric and areal productivity of biomass of 0.028 g L−1 d−1 and 4.2 g L−1 m2 d−1, correspondingly. In the CO2-supplemented pond, the pH of the algal culture was maintained between 8.0 and 8.5, whereas in the pond without CO2 supplementation, the initial pH of 8.12 was raised to 9.18 on 9th day and 9.85 on 21st day. At the end of study period, 2.250 and 1.395 kg of dry biomass were harvested in the ponds supplemented with CO2 and without CO2 supplementation, respectively (Figure 3g,h), and as shown in Table 1.

2.3.2. Electro-Clarification

A volume of 1500 L (per batch) withdrawn from the experimental ponds had a biomass concentration from 0.05 to 0.15% dry wt. The culture was treated for ~3.5 to 4.0 h with a flow rate of 600 L h−1 at the voltage (V) and Ampere (A) from 1.8 V and 111 A, and gave a biomass concentration of up to 1.1 to 2.4%. The culture was then pumped to the blending tank and treated with 1 ppm of polyelectrolyte (automated dosing pump). The polyelectrolyte-treated culture was overflowed into a 250 L clarifier, in which the algal flocs settled at the bottom of the clarifier, as shown in Figure 4a. The supernatant was overflowed through the outlet. The biomass recovery efficiency was calculated before and after addition of polyelectrolyte addition up to 79.13 to 94.54%, and 91.62 to 99.57%, respectively.

2.3.3. Dewatering of Biomass

Pressure filtration system was used to dewater from the algal slurry, which comprised a filter press. The algal slurry obtained through electro clarification (1.1 to 2.3%) was pumped into filter press with a flow rate of 10 L per min, as shown in Figure 4b. Biomass recovery efficiency in this process was 99.5%. Solid percentage ranged from 14.0 to 25.0%. The harvested biomass after pressure filtration was dried under solar radiation for further study, as shown in Figure 4c,d.

2.4. Hydro Thermochemical Liquefaction Process (HTL)

2.4.1. Effect of Different Temperatures, Durations, and Pressures on Biocrude Yield of A. coffeaeformis RR03

The algal biomass of 80 g added with 400 mL of distilled water (1:5 w/v) at different conditions revealed that increasing temperatures, durations, and pressures enhanced the biocrude yield of A. coffeaeformis RR03 (Figure 4e,f). A maximum yield of 39.40%/ash free biomass was achieved at 350 °C, for 15 min at 171.1 psi (Table 2).

2.4.2. Elemental Analysis and C:N Ratio of Dry Biomass

An attempt was made for the analysis of C, H, N, S, O, and C:N ratio of dry biomass of A. coffeaeformis RR03. In this study, A. coffeaeformis RR03 biomass obtained in the open raceway ponds, the diatom grown in F/2 medium, and modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium had maximum energy values of 3.48 and 4.72 Mega Joules (MJ). Similarly, the levels of Carbon and Hydrogen were maximums of 16.36, 14.86% and 3.28, 3.03%, respectively (Table 3).

2.4.3. Elemental Analysis and C:N Ratio of Biocrude from Diatoms at Different Conditions

The bio crude samples required different element analyses such as (Corban, Hydrogen, Nitrogen Sulfer, and Oxygen) C, H, N, S, O, and C:N ratio. Energy values as Mega Joules (MJ) were also calculated and presented. Biocrude of A. coffeaeformis RR03 obtained from F/2 medium and modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium showed the energy values of 31.70 and 36.19 Mega Joules, respectively (Table 4).

2.4.4. Fatty Acid Contents

The fatty acid composition of FAME obtained from the chloroform extracted dry biomass was analysed under GC-MS. It contained a maximum of 47.72% 16. octadecanoic acid methyl ester (10:12), followed by pentadecanoic acid, 13 methyl esters (9:24) of 19.58%, and minimum of 7.95% n-Hexadecanoic acid methyl esters (14:52) (Figure 4g) of the organism suitable for biofuel production.

3. Discussion

The present investigation has demonstrated the cultivation of marine diatom on a large scale in artificial seawater medium with minimum expenditure. Improved algal growth was ultimately obtained in the laboratory under optimal conditions. The results of this study show that a novel diatom of A. coffeaeformis RR03 could be a suitable candidate for biocrude production: it could meet the future demand of energy, because it contains high amount of biomass.
The mass culture of marine algae is dependent on natural seawater, both in open tanks and in closed controlled systems [12]. Many algae species have high lipid content and they grow on non-arable land using alternative seawater [13]. In the present study, mass cultivation trials of A. coffeaeformis RR03 in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium were made; the diatom that was cultivated in 1.0 m2 open raceway pond without CO2 supplementation showed that the alga attained a maximum of 0.81 g L−1 with 2.51 × 106 cells/mL on the 15th day. A modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium optimized in the present attempt is supported by the organism for a maximum accumulation of 149 mg L−1 of lipid content on 15th day. It was more than the alga grown in F/2 medium (control). The alga A. coffeaeformis RR03 showed maximum lipid productivity of 9.93 mg L−1 d−1 in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium. The concentration of chlorophyll-a maximum of 6.09 mg L−1 on 15th day when grown in modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium was higher than in the control (F/2 medium). James and Al-Khars [14] have also found similar high yield of Nannochloropsis sp. and Chlorella in a lucent vertical air-lift photobioreactor and obtained maximum productivities of 26 to 20 g m2 d −1 on a dry weight basis.
The mass cultivation of A. coffeaeformis RR03 in modified CFRTRI-RRAC I medium in 10.0 m2 open raceway pond supplemented with CO2 and the pH was maintained in a range of 8.0–8.5, whereas the culture without CO2 supplementation of the pH was raised up to 9.16. The reduction of pH in CO2-supplemented culture could be due to the dissolution of CO2 into carbonic acid. CO2 supplementation enhanced biomass productivity when compared to that of control (without CO2 supplementation), thus indicating the possible utilization of CO2 as carbon source for increase biomass of 1.5 g L−1 on 21st day. However, CO2 supplementation decreased accumulation of lipid content of the alga.
Carbon dioxide supplementation in modified CFRTRI-RRAC I medium supported the diatom for maximum accumulation of Chlorophyll-a content of 13.18 mg L−1 on 21st day. The growth rates, biomass, and lipid content of microalgae are manifestly enhanced by freshening with essential for levels of CO2 [15]. Addition of extra CO2 can increase growth rates, which has been demonstrated by various experiments with large amounts of microalgae cultivation in carbon sequestration. The dissolved CO2 can spontaneously change to carbonic acid to form bicarbonate, and carbonate makes CO2 dissolve in the medium. However, it lowers the pH, which reduces growth for most species. The pH of medium under CO2 supplementation was not allowed to be lower than pH 8.0, but was maintained between 8.0 and 8.5, which supported the organism for achieving maximum biomass productivity.
Low broth of algae generally accumulate heavily, whereas the cells normally carry negative charge and contain excess of algogenic organic matters to their immovability in a circulated condition [16]. The harvesting technique charges the properties of microalgae such as algal density, size, and value of the desired products [17]. Bioflocculation and electroclarification were followed by harvest diatoms biomass. Flocculation is one of the chemical technologies in the microalgae harvesting. The chamber using a filter press in the absorption of 245 could be attained for the large microalga C. proboscideum to produce a cake with 27% solids [18]. In the present attempt, diatom slurry samples were successfully obtained through pressure filtration system. The algal slurry was then exposed to solar radiation for a day and stored under room temperature. The ventilation promotes dewatering process that was also categorized by solid content and recovery time. In the all-purpose, the solid content after the harvested biomass can easily exceed 90%, while the recovery rate can reach 95%.
Harvested algae contained 97–99% of water. The removals of excessive water are necessary for the long-term storage of algae feedstock and are also required for many downstream processes. To maintain microalgae from long-lasting microbial growth, the moisture level of harvested algae was kept below 7%. Drying is an energy-intensive process and it describes total production costs of up to 30%. Natural drying (solar and wind) is the most economical method; however, it is weather-dependent and requires large space [19].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Collection and Isolation of Microalgae

Seawater samples were collected from different coastal regions of Tamil Nadu, India, during August and September 2009. Different seawater samples were collected along the coast of Kanyakumari; Tuticorin; Rameswaram; and Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India using phytoplankton net of 25 μm. In addition, saltpan samples were collected from Kovelong near Chennai, India. The samples were brought to the laboratory and inoculated in the F/2 medium [20]. Fast growing microalgae strains were isolated and purified using serial dilution technique with spread plate method on 2% F/2 agar medium. The isolated microalgae were cultured in the basal medium.

4.2. Identification of Microalgal Isolates

The algal isolates were identified based on their morphological characteristics observed under compound microscope using standard monographs. Bacillariophyceae members (Diatoms) were identified based on the description given by Al-Kandari et al. [21]. All the isolated diatom samples were treated with concentrated Nitric acid (HNO3) overnight to remove organic material from the cell. The samples were centrifuged at 1000 g; the pellet was washed with distilled water several times to remove the nitric acid, and then the samples were used for identification. All the isolated microalgae were made into unialgal cultures and maintained in the basal medium under laboratory conditions at 22 ± 2 °C in a thermostatically controlled room, illuminated with cool white fluorescent lamps at an intensity of 30 μEm−2 s −1, with a 12:12 h of light: dark regime.

4.3. Mass Cultivation of Amphora Coffeaeformis RR03 in an Open Raceway Pond

The diatoms of A. coffeaeformis RR03 were grown in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium in an open raceway pond. The modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium was prepared by mixing urea (200 mg/L), super phosphate (40 mg/L), potash (100 mg/L), sodium silicate (35 mg/L), magnesium sulphate (250 mg/L), sodium bicarbonate (250 mg/L), ferric chloride (10 mg/L), and salinity (30 ppt) in a litre of artificial seawater and adjusted pH 8.0. The culture was grown in 150 L and 1500 L open raceway pond. The 30 mL of optimally grown algal samples was inoculated in 270 mL of the basal medium of 500 Erlenmeyer flask and kept in an outdoor condition for a period of 21 days. Every 3 days, the number of diatom cells was recorded and expressed as 10−6 cells/mL [22], chlorophyll-a, [23], and dry biomass [24]; total lipid [25] were also recorded.

4.4. Details of Raceway Ponds

The raceway ponds of 1.0 m2 with 150 L capacity and 10.0 m2 of 1500 L at the premises of the Aban Infrastructure Pvt Ltd., Biotechnology Division, Chennai, India were used to conduct the field trail. The details of the raceway ponds are summarised in the Table 1. The concrete pond raceway floors are coated with FRP material (fibre-reinforced polymer) and RP (reinforced polymer). The raceway ponds were provided with a paddle wheel system for aeration at 10 rpm. During the experimental period, the evaporation loss of the medium was compensated with bore well water. An outlet was also provided in each pond at the bottom to enable cleaning whenever required. The raceway ponds are protected from dust, etc., on the top with transparent polythene sheet. The raceway ponds are also connected with carbonation column. The raceway floors are coated with FRP material and designed as length inner 2.22, 7.00; width inner 0.50, 1.50; depth (m) 0.26, 0.26; partition wall length 1.79, 5.55; partition wall width 0.20, 0.22, bottom area 0.76, 9.30; and the total working volume of 200 L and 2000 L

4.5. Sterilization of Medium

The 1.0 m2 and 10.0 m2 raceway ponds were added with 135 L and 1350 L medium, respectively, and added about 10 ppm of sodium hypochlorite and aerated overnight using the paddle wheel at 10 rpm. Subsequently, 0.285 ppm of sodium thiosulphate was added to neutralize the medium. The level of free chlorine was checked using Hach spectrophotometer (DR 2700, Hach, Düsseldorf, Germany), and if there was any chlorine, it was neutralized by adding sufficient amount of sodium thiosulphate until nil chlorine in the medium was recorded.

4.6. Determination of Chlorine

The samples were filtered through 0.2 μm membrane, and the filtrates were collected for the analysis. To 10 mL of the sample, one DPD-free chlorine powder pillow was added and vortexed. Development of the colour pink indicated the presence of chlorine and colourlessness indicated absence of chlorine.

4.7. Preparation of Inoculum in 1.0 m2 and 10.0 m2 Raceway Pond

Fifteen litres of optimally grown alga culture were obtained from the laboratory condition and transferred to the 1.0 m2 open raceway pond containing 135 L medium. The inoculum was raised in the following order: optimally grown 15 L of diatom culture was collected under laboratory conditions and transferred into the 1.0-m2 raceway pond containing 135 L medium and maintained for 10 days. Then, the culture (150 L) was transferred to 10.0 m2 raceway pond contained 1350 L of medium. This medium was used for mass cultivation outdoor condition.

4.8. Harvesting of Biomass

The raceway ponds (1.0 m−2) containing 135 L medium were inoculated with 15 L of optimally grown culture of A. coffeaeformis RR03. This experiment was conducted for a period of 21 days during the month of June-2013. At the end of the study period, the diatom biomass were harvested using electroclarification process and filter press technique. The algal culture from the experimental pond was pumped into the collection/storage tank and subjected to electroclarification process. The culture was circulated at a flow rate of ~600 L h−1 via the reaction chamber. The volume of the chamber was of 50 L with one stainless steel electrode placed at the centre (0.5 sq.m). The retention time inside the reaction chamber was 25 min. The reaction was carried out at Voltages 1.8 and 111 Amperes. The culture in the reaction chamber was continuously agitated at 100 rpm and added 1.0 ppm of polyelectrolyte using a dosing pump. The polyelectrolyte-treated culture was then overflow into a 250 L clarifier, in which the algal slurry settled at the bottom of the clarifier was taken for further processing. The supernatant was continuously overflowed through the outlet placed just 15.0 cm from the top of the clarifier. Subsequently, dewatering of biomass was made using filter press. The pressure filtration system comprised a filter press. It contained 15 plates and 15 frames, over which plankton material of 5 μm was placed. The plates and frames were tightened using a manual hydraulic closing system at 250 kg/cm2 pressure. There were two inlets and two outlets (lower and upper) for pumping of algal slurry and collection of supernatant, respectively. There were also individual outlets in each of the frames for cross-checking the filtration efficiency of the filter cloth material inside the frame. A suitable provision was made for recirculation of the excess slurry from the inlet by means of a bypass valve. After filtration of the slurry, air compressor was used to dry the slurry inside the frames, which also aided in the formation of wet algal cakes. Then, the frames were separated; the algal cakes were scraped off manually and made into dry algal flakes by drying under sun light for 3 days.

4.9. Hydro Thermochemical Liquefaction (HTL)

The biomass of diatoms collected in this study was subjected for the reaction of hydro thermochemical liquefaction. Hydro thermochemical liquefaction process was conducted using 1.1 L capacity Inconel high-pressure reactor (reliance, floor stand model). After adding the algal slurry to the reaction vessel, the reactor was tightly closed and conducted the experiment at different temperatures, pressures, and durations. An impeller type of agitation device at 250 rpm stirred the reaction mixture to ensure homogeneous reactions.
At the end of reaction, the samples were cooled to room temperature and collected in a separating funnel, and the biocrude was allowed to settle. The solid phase at the bottom of the separating funnel was collected and extracted three times washed with water in dichloromethane (1:1 v/v) and recovered hydrocarbons. The dichloromethane fractions were pooled and evaporated using a distillation setup at 39 °C to obtain biocrude. The yield of biocrude fraction was expressed as percentage and estimated for its elemental composition such as C, H, N, O, and S using Elemental Analyzer (Vario EL III, Elementar India Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram-122002, Haryana, India). The Gross Calorific Value/Higher Heating Value (HHV) was calculated according to Dulong’s formula [26]. HHV (MJ/kg) = 0.338C + 1.428 (H O/8) + 0.095.

4.10. Effect of Different Temperatures, Durations, and Pressure on Biocrude Yield of A. coffeaeformis RR03

The biomass of A. coffeaeformis RR03 obtained from 10.0 m2 openraceway pond (without CO2 supplementation being taken, 80 g of dry biomass was added with 400 mL distilled water (1:5 w/v) and kept at different temperatures such as, 280, 300, 330, and 350 °C; duration of each 15 min: and pressures such as, 70.6, 97.5, 141.1, and 171.1 psi, respectively, and subjected to hydro thermochemical liquefaction process. The values of biocrude were expressed in terms of percentage /ash free biomass).

4.11. Direct Biomass Acid Transesterification

Direct transesterification was carried out as per the method described by Johnson and Wen [27]. Dry algal biomass of 100 g was added with 3.4 mL g−1 of methanol and 0.6 mL g−1 of sulphuric acid. To this sample, 4.0 mL g−1 of each methanol, chloroform: methanol (2:1 v/v), followed by hexane and petroleum ether, was added. The reaction mixture was kept at 90 °C in a water bath for 40 min, and it was thoroughly mixed intermittently during heating. Then, the mixture was allowed to cool at room temperature, 2.0 mL g−1 distilled water was added and mixed for 45 s, and the samples were allowed for separation of different phase. The biodiesel (FAME) was separated in the solvent layer, which was collected and transferred to a pre weighed glass vial. The solvent was evaporated using liquid N2, and the quantified amount of biodiesel gravimetrically and its fatty acid composition were analysed by GC-MS.

5. Conclusions

The results showed that a newly identified marine diatom A. coffeaeformis RR03 was highly produced on the 21st day with CO2 supply. The bio-crude oil production in this alga was about 36.19 megajoule. The most favourable concentration of C/N ratios and energy was noticed when the algae were nurtured under our own culture medium of CFTRI-RRAC I. GC-MS analysis revealed that A. coffeaeformis RR03 contained 47.72% 16-octadecanoic acid methyl ester and 19.58% pentadecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, and methyl ester, which might be suitable for the production of good-quality biofuel. The results of this study may suggest that the diatom A. coffeaeformis RR03 could be a suitable candidate for succeeding biofuel.

Author Contributions

M.G.R. and R.R. conceived and designed the experiments. M.G.R. performed the experiments, S.N. and M.M analyzed the data, A.B.B. and C.K. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, and R.R. and T.J wrote the paper. J.-R.S. and J.-Y.L. contributed interpretations and assistance to the manuscript. All authors were involved in editing the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We are extremely thankful to the Director, CAS in Botany for providing the laboratory facility and the Aban Infrastructure for extending the necessary facility to carry out the research work. M.G.R. is thankful to the UGC (GCCO/A2/UGC/RR/CASB/MER-Fellow/2009/1481), New Delhi for financial support. We also acknowledge the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST103-2320-B-038-017, MOST104-2622-B-038-003, MOST 104-2320-B-038-045-MY2).

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zeng, X.; Danquah, M.K.; Chen, X.D.; Lu, Y. Microalgae bioengineering: From CO2 fixation to biofuel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 3252–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hildebrand, M.; Davis, A.K.; Smith, S.R.; Traller, J.C.; Abbriano, R. The place of diatoms in the biofuels industry. Biofuels 2012, 3, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. De Bhowmick, G.; Subramanian, G.; Mishra, S.; Sen, R. Raceway pond cultivation of a marine microalga of indian origin for biomass and lipid production: A case study. Algal Res. 2014, 6, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lam, M.K.; Lee, K.T.; Mohamed, A.R. Current status and challenges on microalgae-based carbon capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2012, 10, 456–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, V.; Karela, R.P.; Korstad, J.; Kumar, S.; Srivastava, R.; Bauddh, K. Ecological, Economical and Life Cycle Assessment of Algae and Its Biofuel. In Algal Biofuels; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 451–466. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brennan, L.; Owende, P. Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 557–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sakthivel, R. Microalgae lipid research, past, present: A critical review for biodiesel production, in the future. J. Exp. Sci. 2011, 2, 10. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sforza, E.; Bertucco, A.; Morosinotto, T.; Giacometti, G. Vegetal oil from microalgae: Species selection and optimization of growth parameters. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2010, 20, 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  9. Alcaine, A.A. Biodiesel from microalgae. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Escola Universitàriad’Enginyeria Tècnica Industrial d’Igualada; ET Industrial, especialitat en Química Industrial: Barcelona, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rawat, I.; Kumar, R.R.; Mutanda, T.; Bux, F. Biodiesel from microalgae: A critical evaluation from laboratory to large scale production. Appl. Energy 2013, 103, 444–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kwietniewska, E.; Tys, J. Process characteristics, inhibition factors and methane yields of anaerobic digestion process, with particular focus on microalgal biomass fermentation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 34, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ansell, A.; Raymont, J.; Lander, K.; Crowley, E.; Shackley, P. Studies on the mass culture of Phaeodactylum. Ii. The growth of Phaeodactylum and other species in outdoor tanks. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1963, 8, 184–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Borowitzka, M.A. Commercial production of microalgae: Ponds, tanks, tubes and fermenters. J. Biotechnol. 1999, 70, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. James, C.M.; Al-Khars, A. An intensive continuous culture system using tubular photobioreactors for producing microalgae. Aquaculture 1990, 87, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Riebesell, U. Effects of CO2 enrichment on marine phytoplankton. J. Oceanogr. 2004, 60, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Uduman, N.; Qi, Y.; Danquah, M.K.; Forde, G.M.; Hoadley, A. Dewatering of microalgal cultures: A major bottleneck to algae-based fuels. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2010, 2, 012701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Danquah, M.K.; Ang, L.; Uduman, N.; Moheimani, N.; Forde, G.M. Dewatering of microalgal culture for biodiesel production: Exploring polymer flocculation and tangential flow filtration. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 1078–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, F.C.; Cheng, L.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H. Technologies of microalgal harvesting and lipid extraction. Prog. Chem. 2012, 24, 2062–2072. [Google Scholar]
  19. Becker, E.W. Microalgae: Biotechnology and Microbiology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guillard, R.R.; Ryther, J.H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana hustedt, and Detonulaconfervacea (cleve) gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 1962, 8, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Al-Kandari, M.; Al-Yamani, F.; Al-Rifaie, K. Marine phytoplankton atlas of Kuwait waters. In Marine Phytoplankton Atlas; Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research: Safat, Kuwait, 2009; ISBN 99906–99941. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sournia, A. Phytoplankton Manual; UNESCO: Paris, French, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jeffrey, S.T.; Humphrey, G. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen 1975, 167, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moheimani, N.R. The Culture of Coccolithophorid Algae for Carbon Dioxide Bioremediation. Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  25. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Sloane Stanley, G. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Q.; Du, W.; Liu, D. Perspectives of microbial oils for biodiesel production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Johnson, M.B.; Wen, Z. Production of biodiesel fuel from the microalga Schizochytrium limacinum by direct transesterification of algal biomass. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 5179–5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Amphora coffeaeformis RR03 cultivated in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium and F/2 control medium at different intervals in 1.0 m2 open raceway pond was subjected to the analysis of (a) dry biomass, (b) cell number, (c) chlorophyll-a, and (d) total lipid content.
Figure 1. Amphora coffeaeformis RR03 cultivated in the modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium and F/2 control medium at different intervals in 1.0 m2 open raceway pond was subjected to the analysis of (a) dry biomass, (b) cell number, (c) chlorophyll-a, and (d) total lipid content.
Energies 11 01341 g001
Figure 2. (a) Dry biomass of Amphora coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 and without CO2-modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium at different intervals in 10.0 m2 open raceway pond. (b) Cell count of A. coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 and without CO2-modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium at different intervals in 10.0 m2 open raceway pond. (c) Chlorophyll-a content of A. coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 and without CO2-modified CFTRI RRAC I medium at different intervals in 10.0 m2 open raceway pond. (d) Total lipid content of A. coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 and without CO2-modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium at different intervals 10.0 m2 open raceway pond.
Figure 2. (a) Dry biomass of Amphora coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 and without CO2-modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium at different intervals in 10.0 m2 open raceway pond. (b) Cell count of A. coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 and without CO2-modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium at different intervals in 10.0 m2 open raceway pond. (c) Chlorophyll-a content of A. coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 and without CO2-modified CFTRI RRAC I medium at different intervals in 10.0 m2 open raceway pond. (d) Total lipid content of A. coffeaeformis RR03 with CO2 and without CO2-modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium at different intervals 10.0 m2 open raceway pond.
Energies 11 01341 g002
Figure 3. (a) Growth for F/2 medium. (b) Modified CFTRI-RRACI medium. (c,d) Different days of growth for modified CFTRI-RRAC-I medium in outdoor cultivation.
Figure 3. (a) Growth for F/2 medium. (b) Modified CFTRI-RRACI medium. (c,d) Different days of growth for modified CFTRI-RRAC-I medium in outdoor cultivation.
Energies 11 01341 g003
Figure 4. (a) Culture collection of clarifier. (b) Filter press. (c) Fresh biomass under sun dried. (d) Dry biomass. (e) Separated for bio-crude. (f) Bio-crude oil.
Figure 4. (a) Culture collection of clarifier. (b) Filter press. (c) Fresh biomass under sun dried. (d) Dry biomass. (e) Separated for bio-crude. (f) Bio-crude oil.
Energies 11 01341 g004
Table 1. Biomass, lipids, volumetric, and areal productivity of A. coffeaeformis RR03 cultivated in 1.0 m2 and 10.0 m2 open raceway ponds.
Table 1. Biomass, lipids, volumetric, and areal productivity of A. coffeaeformis RR03 cultivated in 1.0 m2 and 10.0 m2 open raceway ponds.
A. coffeaeformis RR03 Cultivation ConditionsBiomass Productivity (g L−1 d−1)Lipid Productivity (mg L−1 d−1)Lipid (%) Content in Ash Free BiomassBiomass (g L−1)Vol. Productivity (g L−1 d−1)Areal Productivity (g L−1 m2 d−1)Drybiomass (Kg)
Modified RRAC I medium in 1.0 m2 pond0.054 ± 0.019.93 ± 0.0523.83 ± 3.360.81 ± 0.030.0314.650.192
F/2 medium in 1.0 m2 pond0.043 ± 0.0315.88 ± 0.0821.35 ± 2.440.79 ± 0.010.0294.350.161
Modified RRAC I medium in 10.0 m2 pond with (CO2)0.071 ± 0.017.60 ± 0.0536.16 ± 2.541.5 ± 0.100.0659.752.250
Modified RRAC I medium in 10.0 m2 pond (without CO2)0.046 ± 0.0221.88 ± 0.1518.68 ± 3.360.93 ± 0.020.0284.201.395
Table 2. Effect of different temperatures, time durations, and pressures on bio-crude yield of A. coffeaeformis RR03 biomass obtained from 10.0 m2 open raceway pond without CO2 supplementation.
Table 2. Effect of different temperatures, time durations, and pressures on bio-crude yield of A. coffeaeformis RR03 biomass obtained from 10.0 m2 open raceway pond without CO2 supplementation.
Dry Biomass (g)Ash Free Biomass (g)Distilled Water (mL)Temp. (°C)Duration (min)Pressure (psi)Biocrude Yield/Ash Free Biomass (%)
8030.964002801070.629.39
8030.964003001597.533.26
8030.9640033010141.130.36
8030.9640035015171.139.40
Table 3. Percentage of C, H, N, S, O, and C/N ratio of dry biomass of A. coffeaeformis RR03 under different conditions.
Table 3. Percentage of C, H, N, S, O, and C/N ratio of dry biomass of A. coffeaeformis RR03 under different conditions.
Experimental ConditionCHNSOC/N RatioEnergy Value (Mega Joules)
A. coffeaeformis RR03 in F/2 medium 1.0 m2 pond16.363.281.991.0577.328.223.48
A. coffeaeformis RR03 in modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium in 1.0 m2 pond14.863.031.780.9579.388.354.72
Table 4. Percentage of C, H, N, S, and O of bio crude of A. coffeaeformis RR03 under different conditions.
Table 4. Percentage of C, H, N, S, and O of bio crude of A. coffeaeformis RR03 under different conditions.
Experimental ConditionCHNSOC/N RatioEnergy (Mega Joules)
A. coffeaeformis RR03 in F/2 medium 1.0 m2 open raceway pond condition: 350 °C for 15 min at 171.1 psi75.878.932.390.3012.5131.7431.70
A. coffeaeformis RR03 grown in modified CFTRI-RRAC I medium in 1.0 m2 raceway pond: 350 °C for 15 min at 171.1 psi77.366.824.361.539.9317.7436.19

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rajaram, M.G.; Nagaraj, S.; Manjunath, M.; Boopathy, A.B.; Kurinjimalar, C.; Rengasamy, R.; Jayakumar, T.; Sheu, J.-R.; Li, J.-Y. Biofuel and Biochemical Analysis of Amphora coffeaeformis RR03, a Novel Marine Diatom, Cultivated in an Open Raceway Pond. Energies 2018, 11, 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061341

AMA Style

Rajaram MG, Nagaraj S, Manjunath M, Boopathy AB, Kurinjimalar C, Rengasamy R, Jayakumar T, Sheu J-R, Li J-Y. Biofuel and Biochemical Analysis of Amphora coffeaeformis RR03, a Novel Marine Diatom, Cultivated in an Open Raceway Pond. Energies. 2018; 11(6):1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rajaram, Muthu Ganesan, Subramani Nagaraj, Manubolu Manjunath, Annakkili Baskara Boopathy, Chidambaram Kurinjimalar, Ramasamy Rengasamy, Thanasekaran Jayakumar, Joen-Rong Sheu, and Jiun-Yi Li. 2018. "Biofuel and Biochemical Analysis of Amphora coffeaeformis RR03, a Novel Marine Diatom, Cultivated in an Open Raceway Pond" Energies 11, no. 6: 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop