Next Article in Journal
Spectroscopic Imaging with an Ultra-Broadband (1–4 THz) Compact Terahertz Difference-Frequency Generation Source
Next Article in Special Issue
Compact 2 × 2 Circularly Polarized Aperture-Coupled Antenna Array for Ka-Band Satcom-on-the-Move Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Optimal Multivariable LQR and MPC Controllers for Unmanned Combat Air Systems in Trajectory Tracking
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Polyimide-Based Flexible Monopole Antenna Fed by a Coplanar Waveguide

1
School of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
2
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2021, 10(3), 334; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030334
Submission received: 2 January 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2021 / Accepted: 28 January 2021 / Published: 1 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Integration in Wireless Communications)

Abstract

:
A 2.4 GHz flexible monopole antenna fed by a coplanar waveguide (CPW) was presented on polyimide (PI) as the dielectric substrate, which was fabricated by in situ self-metallization. The technology does not depend on expensive equipment or complex experimental environments, including hydrolysis, ion exchange, and reduction reaction. The measurement results show that the resonance frequency of the proposed antenna is 2.28 GHz, the bandwidth is 2.06–2.74 GHz, and the relative bandwidth is 28.33% under the flat state. The bending and folding test was also carried out. Whether it was flat, bent, or folded, the measured results met the requirements of the antenna. A fatigue test was carried out to illustrate that the prepared film has high mechanical flexibility, which expands the application field of antenna.

1. Introduction

The flexible antennas fed by coplanar waveguides (CPW) have attracted more and more attention for their advantages of convenient integration with other microwave components and easy conforming to the carrier [1,2,3,4]. For example, a flexible antenna fed by a CPW, which has the advantages of low profile, simple structure, small size, cheap production, and without vias or lumped element components was designed in ref 1. In ref 2, flexible flower-shaped CPW-fed antennas for high data wireless applications were proposed. In ref 3, a flexible millimeter-wave (mm-wave) antenna array for fifth generation (5G) wireless networks operating at Ka-band (26.5–40 GHz) was presented. In ref 4, a flexible fractal electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) was fabricated and its performance impact on a wearable CPW antenna in the frequency range 20–40 GHz was evaluated. The research on the performance of flexible CPW antennas under flat and bending conditions has achieved great results; however, the antennas usually need to not only be bent but also be folded in practical applications. Therefore, how to adopt a folding antenna without reducing its performance is one focus of the flexible CPW antenna design.
On the other hand, increasing attention has been paid to flexible substrates of CPW antenna because of the increasing demand for antennas that can be mounted easily on devices having non-flat surfaces [5,6,7]. In ref 5, an M-shaped printed monopole antenna based on a polyimide (PI) substrate was reported. In ref 6, a compact ultrawideband (UWB) antenna printed on a PI substrate was reported. In ref 7, a flexible, ultra-low profile, and compact dual band antenna was reported, which was inkjet-printed on a PI substrate and fed by coplanar waveguide. PI has a trend to be chosen as the substrate because it has more advantages in terms of cost performance, and it exhibits a good balance of physical, chemical, and electrical properties [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Major manufacturing technologies for CPW antennas on PI films include lithography [16] and printing [5,6,7,17,18], which rely on expensive equipment or strict experimental environment requirements [5,6,7,19,20,21,22], and the metal layers fabricated by these proposed methods easily crack and shed [23,24]. The method of in situ self-metallization can resolve these problems mentioned above [24,25]. Highly reflective and conductive metallized polyimide films [24,25], inserting electrode [26], copper electrode [27], and patterned copper circuit [28] have been successfully prepared by in situ self-metallization techniques, and the above work lays a good foundation for the fabrication of the flexible antenna.
In this work, a flexible monopole antenna fed by coplanar waveguide was fabricated on a PI substrate by in situ self-metallization. The CPW feed was selected because it has the advantages of low profile and simple structure, and both the ground planes and the radiators are etched on the same side of the PI substrates, which simplified the fabrication process of the antenna. The measurement results showed that the resonance frequency of the proposed antenna was 2.28 GHz, the bandwidth was 2.06–2.74 GHz, and the relative bandwidth was 28.33% under the flat state. The radiation characteristics of the flexible monopole antenna under different bending and folding states were tested. Whether it was flat, bent, or folded, the measured results met the requirements of the antenna. Fatigue tests were carried out to illustrate that the prepared film has a high mechanical flexibility. The proposed flexible monopole antenna can be suitable for WLAN/WiMax systems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design

The proposed flexible monopole antenna is designed to work in the industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) 2.4 GHz band [29,30,31]. Figure 1 shows the geometrical shape and size of the flexible monopole antenna. The yellow part is the PI substrate, and the flexible antenna is fabricated on it. The gray part is silver layer, which was obtained by in situ self-metallization. PI was chosen as the substrate for the antenna because it shows good physical, chemical, and electrical properties with a dielectric constant of 3.5 and a loss tangent of 0.008. Matching at the chosen bands, the flexible monopole antenna consisted of a radiating element and coplanar waveguide having rectangular ground planes. In order to further miniaturize the antenna, an inverted L to the right was selected as the radiating element. The CPW feed was selected because of its simple feeding mode, and both the ground planes and the radiators were etched on the same side of the PI substrate. The ground planes and feed line were designed and optimized to adjust the impedance matching and operating bands of the antenna. The length and width of the L-shaped monopole, in addition to the ground plane size, controlled the resonant frequency of the flexible antenna, which was designed to cover the ISM band.

2.2. Parametric Analysis

To clearly demonstrate the characteristics of the proposed flexible antenna, ANSYS HFSS simulation software was used to carry out parametric analysis, including the length (L3) and width (L4) of the inverted L.
Figure 2a shows the simulated reflection coefficient with length L3 varied from 17.8 to 19.8 mm with 1 mm steps in the range, which other parameters remained the same. As can be seen from the figure, with the increase in the length of L3, the resonant frequency and bandwidth of the antenna gradually moved to the right, which could not meet the design requirements of the flexible antenna.
Figure 2b shows the variation of reflection coefficient with respect to the length L4 (e.g., 2.5 mm, 3.5 mm, and 4.5 mm). Other parameters remained fixed. As can be seen from the figure, with the increase in the length of L4, the resonant frequency of the antenna remained unchanged and the bandwidth increased slightly. When L4 was set at 3.5 mm, the reflection coefficient of the antenna had the maximum value, so 3.5 mm of L4 was the optimal solution.
After a series of simulation optimization, the final antenna size was determined to be: 40.6 mm × 50 mm × 0.075 mm, and specifically as follows: W = 40.6 mm, W1 = 18.3 mm, W2 = 3.6 mm, W3 = 12.1 mm, L = 50 mm, L1 = 24.5 mm, L2 = 24 mm, L3 = 18.8 mm, L4 = 3.5 mm, h = 0.075 mm.

2.3. Fabrication

In situ self-metallization technology requires only simple chemical agents, such as KOH, AgNO3, NH3·H2O and H2O2. The method does not rely on expensive equipment or complex experimental environments, including hydrolysis, ion exchange, and reduction reactions. Figure 3 shows the manufacture process of the antenna that was made in five steps.
Step 1: PI film: The film was cleaned with deionized water to assess whether the film met the standard of antenna preparation;
Step 2: Composite films with K+: One side of the cleaned film was immersed in 4 M KOH solution for 3 h to modify the surface of the film to poly (amic acid) (PAA);
Step 3: Composite films with Ag+: The film was immersed in 0.04 M Ag(NH3)2OH solution for 2 h to form the silver ion-doped layers;
Step 4: Ink-printed films: The dry film was affixed to the paper and a printer was used to print the area outside the antenna structure on the reaction surface;
Step 5: Silvered PI films: The printed film was immersed in 0.1 M H2O2 (30%) solution for 10 s to reduce the silver ions.
After these five steps, the films were cleaned to obtain the antenna. The experiment can be conducted at room temperature, and specific steps can be found in the literature [24,25].

3. Crystal Structures and Morphologies

The prepared silvered PI film was studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Ultima IV). In Figure 4a, the XRD spectra are in good agreement with the data of the standard JCPDS (04-0783), indicating that the surface of the silver-plated PI film is composed of face-centered cubic silver crystal particles.
The surface and cross section of the prepared composite film were identified by scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-6510). In Figure 4b, the silver layer is uniformly dense. The insertion diagram in the upper right corner shows that the thickness of the metallized layer formed was about 7.899 μm, the resistivity of which meets the requirements of antenna radiation according to the literature [25].

4. Flexibility Study

4.1. Simulation

Figure 5a–c show the diagrams of surface current under the flat, bending, and folding states. As can be seen from these diagrams, when the antenna was bent (R = 40 mm) and folded (θ = 150°), the direction of surface current changed relative to the flat state.
Figure 6a–c show the simulated performances of the antenna under the flat, bending, and folding states. In Figure 6a, whether it is flat, bent or folded, the simulated reflection coefficients are similar [32]. Specific performances are listed in Table 1.
Figure 6b shows the simulated radiation patterns in xz planes, which still have omnidirectional radiation patterns after bending and folding. Figure 6c shows the simulated radiation patterns in xy planes, which have obvious changes. The bending and folding lead to changes in the current flow direction of the patch surface, which change the axial direction of the direction graph of xy planes [33].

4.2. Flat Test

The fabricated flexible monopole antenna on the PI film is shown in Figure 7a. A small SubMiniature-A (SMA) connector was used to connect the flexible monopole antenna for testing.
To verify the radiation characteristics of the flexible monopole antenna, the reflection coefficients were tested. As shown in Figure 7b, when the flexible monopole antenna was under the flat state, the measured reflection coefficients were similar to the simulated results. Changes of the performances between simulation and measurement are listed in Table 2.
The far-field radiation patterns were measured inside the anechoic chamber. The antenna under test (AUT) was placed on a swivel table and aligned to a horn antenna. Under the flat state, the simulated and measured radiation patterns are shown in Figure 7c,d. In Figure 7c, the radiation patterns in xz planes have omnidirectional radiation patterns at this frequency (2.28 GHz). Figure 7d shows the radiation patterns in xy planes. The deviation between the measured results and the simulated results are small.

4.3. Bending Test

To study the mechanical flexibility of flexible monopole antenna, the reflection coefficients and radiation patterns were tested under different bending states. As shown in Figure 8a, the antenna is attached to a curved surface. The small image in the lower right is a schematic of the bending antenna, and R is the bending radius (R = 40 mm and R = 60 mm). As shown in Figure 8b, compared with the flat state, its operating frequency band, resonant frequency, and relative bandwidth are almost invariant.
Figure 9 shows the far-field radiation patterns of the antenna under different bending states. In Figure 9a, the radiation patterns in xz planes are shown, which have a great omnidirectional performance. Figure 9b shows the radiation patterns in xy planes. Changes of the xy planes are obvious under the bending state, which is caused by the current flow direction change on the surface.

4.4. Folding Test

Furthermore, the folding effect on the practical reflection coefficients and far-field radiation patterns was also studied. As shown in Figure 10a, the flexible monopole antenna was folded in half to create a crease. The image in the lower right is a schematic of the folding antenna, and θ is the folding angle (θ = 150°). In Figure 10b, compared with the flat state, when there was a crease, its operating frequency band, resonant frequency, and relative bandwidth were almost invariant. Table 3 shows the variations of the measured performance of the antenna under flat and folding states. Figure 10c,d show the far-field radiation patterns under the folding state. In Figure 10c, the radiation patterns in xz planes are shown, which have omnidirectional radiation patterns. Figure 10d shows the radiation patterns in xy planes. The reason for the changes is the same as the bending state.
Figure 11 shows the measured gain and efficiency when the flexible monopole antenna was under the flat, bent, and folded states. In Figure 11a, the measured realized gains of the antenna are shown. It can be seen that the realized gains of the antenna have the same trend, which met the performance requirements. When the antenna was flat, the maximum gain achieved was 2.98 dBi. In Figure 11b, when the antenna was flat, bent (R = 40 mm) and folded (θ = 150°), the efficiencies of the flexible monopole antenna were above 80% in the entire working bandwidth, which had the same trend, and the maximum efficiency achieved was over 90%.

4.5. Fatigue Test

Finally, fatigue test was also studied. The flexible antenna was folded in half 50 times and fixed on the foam for a period of time. Figure 12 shows the measured performance comparison, which indicates that the performance of the antenna did not changed much from that before. It can be seen that the flexible antenna fabricated by in situ self-metallization had stable chemical and mechanical properties.
In Figure 13, top and cross-sectional SEM images are shown when the film was folded in half 50 times. In the left image, the crease is visible. The image on the upper right is the top SEM image, and it can be seen that the silver layer is uniformly dense. The image on the lower right is the cross-sectional SEM image, and it shows that the thickness of the metallized layer formed was about 7.68 μm, which met the requirements of antenna radiation.
As listed in the Table 4, the resistivity values of the films were also measured under the flat and different times of folding, which changed little, and prove that the properties of the thin films fabricated by in situ self-metallization technique are stable under certain deformation.
Screen printing [1,2,6] and inkjet printing [5,7,33,34] are the main techniques for applying antennas on PI films, and comparisons of fabrication methods of flexible antennas on polyimide substrates are listed in the Table 5. It can be seen from the table that whether the antenna fabricated by in situ self-metallization was flat, bent, or folded, the changes of the resonant frequency and bandwidth were relatively small, and the change of printed antennas were bigger than the proposed antenna, which had no folding test. Meanwhile, the measured gain of the proposed antenna was excellent. This shows the superiority of the in situ self-metallization technology and broadens the application scene of flexible antennas.
A comparison of flexible antennas fabricated on different substrates is listed in the Table 6, including polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), Rogers 5880, polytetrafluoroethene (PTFE), felt fabric, and liquid crystal polymer (LCP). It can be found from the table that the measured gain of the flexible antenna proposed in the work is excellent, and the flat, bending, and folding test results were relatively well maintained. In addition, a fatigue test was also performed in this study, which has not been reported in previous work.

5. Conclusions

The flexible monopole antenna was fabricated on 0.075 mm PI films by in situ self-metallization. The technology does not require expensive equipment, and the metal on the surface does not peel easily. The antenna is fed by CPW with a simple structure and stable performances. When the flexible monopole antenna was under the flat state, the measured results showed that the resonance frequency was 2.28 GHz, the −10 dB bandwidth was 2.06–2.74 GHz, and the relative bandwidth was 28.33%. The performances of the antenna meet the necessary requirements after bending and folding. A fatigue test was carried out to illustrate that the prepared film has high mechanical flexibility, which expands the application field of antenna.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W. and D.C.; methodology, Z.W.; software, D.C.; validation, D.C., Z.W. and H.Q.; formal analysis, D.C.; investigation, Z.W.; resources, Z.W.; data curation, D.C.; Writing—Original draft preparation, D.C.; Writing—Review and editing, Z.W.; visualization, Z.W.; supervision, Z.W.; project administration, Z.W.; funding acquisition, Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Nantong Science and technology project (JC2019112), supported by Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University (2020MIP003) and supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. (Corresponding author: Zhiliang Wang).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abutarboush, H.F.; Li, W.W.; Shamim, A. Flexible-Screen-Printed Antenna with Enhanced Bandwidth by Employing Defected Ground Structure. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 1803–1807. [Google Scholar]
  2. Faisal, F.; Amin, Y.; Cho, Y.; Yoo, H. Compact and Flexible Novel Wideband Flower-Shaped CPW-Fed Antennas for High Data Wireless Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2019, 67, 4184–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jilani, S.F.; Munoz, M.O.; Abbasi, Q.H.; Alomainy, A. Millimeter-Wave Liquid Crystal Polymer Based Conformal Antenna Array for 5G Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2019, 18, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lin, X.Y.; Seet, B.C.; Joseph, F.; Li, E. Flexible Fractal Electromagnetic Bandgap for Millimeter-Wave Wearable Antennas. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2018, 17, 1281–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Raad, H.R.; Abbosh, A.I.; AI-Rizzo, H.M. Flexible and Compact AMC Based Antenna for Telemedicine Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2013, 61, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khaleel, H.R.; AI-Rizzo, H.M.; Rucker, D.G. A Compact Polyimide-Based UWB Antenna for Flexible Electronics. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2012, 11, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khaleel, H.K.; AI-Rizzo, H.M.; Abbosh, A.I. A Compact Dual Band Polyimide Based Antenna for Wearable and Flexible Telemedicine Devices. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2016, 63, 153–161. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu, J.; Wu, Z.X.; Tao, K.; Liu, C.; Yang, B.R.; Xie, X.; Lu, X. Rapid-response, reversible and flexible humidity sensing platform using a hydrophobic and porous substrate. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 2063–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cheng, X.Y.; Wu, J.Y.; Blank, R.; Senior, D.E.; Yoon, Y.K. An Omnidirectional Wrappable Compact Patch Antenna for Wireless Endoscope Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2012, 11, 1667–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, X.H.; Huang, Y.; Xie, Z.C. Flexible and Wearable 2.45 GHz CPW-Fed Antenna Using Inkjet-Printing of Silver Nanoparticles on Pet Substrate. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2017, 59, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, S.Y.; Moncion, C.; Zhang, J.W.; Balachandar, L.; Kwaku, D.; Riera, J.J.; Volakis, J.L.; Chae, J. A fully-passive flexible wireless neural recorder for the acquisition of neuropotentials from a rat model. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 3175–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rodrigues, F.; Ribeiro, J.F.; Anacleto, P.; Fouchard, A.; David, O.; Sarro, L.; Mendes, P. Fabrication and characterization of polyimide-based, “smooth” titanium nitride microelectrode arrays for neural stimulation and recording. J. Neural. Eng. 2019, 24, 3067–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pan, T.S.; Dai, L.L.; Chen, S.H.; Yan, Z.C.; Lin, Y. Low-Impedance Flexible Archimedean -Equiangular Spiral Antenna. IEEE Antennas. Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2019, 18, 1789–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chauraya, A.; Whttow, W.G.; Vardaxoglou, J.C. Inkjet Printed Dipole Antennas on Textiles for Wearable Communications. J. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2013, 7, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Guo, X.H.; Huang, Y.; Pan, W.D. Flexible and Deformable Monopole Antenna Based on Silver Nanoparticles for Wearable Electronics. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2017, 9, 1632–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, R.X.; Fang, X.M. A Novel Primary-Embedded On-Chip Transformer for 6-kV-Isolation High-Efficiency DC–DC Conversion. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2019, 40, 586–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sirringhaus, H.; Kawase, T.; Friend, R.H.; Shimoda, T.; Inbasekaran, M.; Wu, W.; Woo, E.P. High-Resolution Inkjet Printing of All-Polymer Transistor Circuits. Science 2000, 290, 2123–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chen, B.L.; Kruse, M.; Xu, B.; Tutika, R.; Zheng, W.; Bartlett, M.D.; Wu, Y.; Claussen, J.C. Flexible thermoelectric generators with inkjet printed bismuth telluride nanowires and liquid metal contacts. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Srifi, M.N.; Podilchak, S.K.; Essaaidi, M. Compact Disc Monopole Antennas for Current and Future Ultrawideband (UWB) Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 59, 4470–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nikolaou, S.; Ponchak, G.E.; Papapolymerou, J. Conformal double exponentially tapered slot antenna (DETSA) on LCP for UWB applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 54, 1663–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, S.; Wu, Z.G.; Hallbjorner, P. Foldable and Stretchable Liquid Metal Planar Inverted Cone Antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2009, 57, 3765–3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shaker, G.; Safavi-Naeini, S.; Sangary, N. Inkjet Printing of Ultrawideband (UWB) Antennas on Paper-Based Substrates. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 10, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Khaleel, H.R. Design and fabrication of compact inkjet printed antennas for integration within flexible and wearable electronics. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2014, 4, 1722–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, Z.P.; Wu, D.Z.; Qi, S.L.; Zhang, T.; Jin, R.G. Preparation of surface conductive and highly reflective silvered polyimide films by surface modification and in situ self-metallization technique. Thin Solid Film. 2005, 493, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Z.P.; Wu, D.Z.; Yang, W.T.; Jin, R.G. Preparation of highly reflective and conductive metallized polyimide films through surface modification, Processing, morphology and properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sang, J.P.; Tae-Jun, K.; Juil, Y. Copper circuit patterning on polymer using selective surface modification and electroless plating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 1678–1684. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yan, W.; Yu, W.; Jin-ju, C. A facile process combined with inkjet printing, surface modification and electroless deposition to fabricate adhesion-enhanced copper patterns on flexible polymer substrates for functional flexible electronics. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 218, 24–31. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang, T.; Yu, Y.Z.; Zhu, L.S. Fabrication of silver interdigitated electrodes on polyimide films via surface modification and ion-exchange technique and its flexible humidity sensor application. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 208, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Yasir, Y.A.; Alkhafaji, M.K.; Alhamadani, A.; Ojaroudi Parchin, N.; Elfergani, I.; Saleh, A.L.; Rodriguez, J.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A. A New and Compact Wide-Band Microstrip Filter-Antenna Design for 2.4 GHz ISM Band and 4G Applications. Electronics 2020, 9, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elfergani, I.; Iqbal, A.; Zebiri, C.; Basir, A.; Rodriguez, J.; Sajedin, M.; de Oliveira Pereira, A.; Mshwat, W.; Abd-Alhameed, R.; Ullah, S. Low-Profile and Closely Spaced Four-Element MIMO Antenna for Wireless Body Area Networks. Electronics 2020, 9, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Guan, C.-E.; Fujimoto, T. Design of a Wideband L-Shape Fed Microstrip Patch Antenna Backed by Conductor Plane for Medical Body Area Network. Electronics 2019, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Li, Y.J.; Lu, Z.Y.; Yang, L.S. CPW-Fed Slot Antenna for Medical Wearable Applications. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 42107–42112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ahmed, S.; Tahir, F.A.; Shamim, A.; Cheema, H.M. A Compact Kapton-Based Inkjet-Printed Multiband Antenna for Flexible Wireless Devices. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 14, 1802–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Li, W.T.; Hei, Y.Q.; Grubb, P.K.; Shi, X.W.; Chen, R.T. Inkjet Printing of Wideband Stacked Microstrip Patch Array Antenna on Ultrathin Flexible Substrates. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 8, 1695–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, C.P.; Chang, C.H.; Cheng, Y.T. Development of a Flexible SU-8/PDMS-Based Antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 1108–1111. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tang, M.C.; Zhou, B.; Ziolkowski, R.W. Flexible Uniplanar Electrically Small Directive Antenna Empowered by a Modified CPW-Feed. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 914–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chaihongsa, W.; Phongcharoenpanich, C. Performance of Textile Antenna using Two Layers of Strip Line and Round-off Circular Patch. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications(CAMA), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 30 November–2 December 2015; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, H.W.; Zhu, S.S.; Wen, P.; Xiao, X.; Chen, W.Q.; Guan, X.H. Flexible CPW-Fed Fishtail-Shaped Antenna for Dual-Band Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 770–773. [Google Scholar]
  39. Du, C.Z.; Li, X.D.; Zhong, S.S. Compact Liquid Crystal Polymer Based TriBand Flexible Antenna for WLAN/WiMAX/5G Applications. IEEE Access 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic view of the proposed antenna.
Figure 1. Schematic view of the proposed antenna.
Electronics 10 00334 g001
Figure 2. Simulated reflection coefficient varies with the parameters: (a) L3; (b) L4.
Figure 2. Simulated reflection coefficient varies with the parameters: (a) L3; (b) L4.
Electronics 10 00334 g002
Figure 3. The manufacture process of the antenna.
Figure 3. The manufacture process of the antenna.
Electronics 10 00334 g003
Figure 4. (a) XRD image. (b) Top and cross-sectional SEM images.
Figure 4. (a) XRD image. (b) Top and cross-sectional SEM images.
Electronics 10 00334 g004
Figure 5. Diagrams of surface current. (a) Flat. (b) Bent. (c) Folded.
Figure 5. Diagrams of surface current. (a) Flat. (b) Bent. (c) Folded.
Electronics 10 00334 g005
Figure 6. Simulated performance of the antenna under the flat, bending, and folding states. (a) Reflection coefficients. Radiation patterns: (b) xz plane; (c) xy plane.
Figure 6. Simulated performance of the antenna under the flat, bending, and folding states. (a) Reflection coefficients. Radiation patterns: (b) xz plane; (c) xy plane.
Electronics 10 00334 g006
Figure 7. (a) Photographs of the fabricated prototype. Simulated and measured characteristics under the flat state. (b) Reflection coefficients. Radiation patterns: (c) xz plane; (d) xy plane.
Figure 7. (a) Photographs of the fabricated prototype. Simulated and measured characteristics under the flat state. (b) Reflection coefficients. Radiation patterns: (c) xz plane; (d) xy plane.
Electronics 10 00334 g007
Figure 8. (a) Photograph. (b) Measured reflection coefficients under the flat and bending states.
Figure 8. (a) Photograph. (b) Measured reflection coefficients under the flat and bending states.
Electronics 10 00334 g008
Figure 9. Measured radiation patterns under the flat and bending states. (a) xz plane. (b) xy plane.
Figure 9. Measured radiation patterns under the flat and bending states. (a) xz plane. (b) xy plane.
Electronics 10 00334 g009
Figure 10. (a) Photograph. Measured characteristics under the flat and folding states. (b) Reflection coefficients. Radiation patterns: (c) xz plane; (d) xy plane.
Figure 10. (a) Photograph. Measured characteristics under the flat and folding states. (b) Reflection coefficients. Radiation patterns: (c) xz plane; (d) xy plane.
Electronics 10 00334 g010
Figure 11. Measurement of the antenna under the flat, bending, and folding states. (a) Realized Gain. (b) Efficiency.
Figure 11. Measurement of the antenna under the flat, bending, and folding states. (a) Realized Gain. (b) Efficiency.
Electronics 10 00334 g011
Figure 12. Comparison of measured performance of fatigue tests.
Figure 12. Comparison of measured performance of fatigue tests.
Electronics 10 00334 g012
Figure 13. Top and cross-sectional SEM images of the film (folded).
Figure 13. Top and cross-sectional SEM images of the film (folded).
Electronics 10 00334 g013
Table 1. Simulated performance comparison of the antenna under the flat, bending, and folding states.
Table 1. Simulated performance comparison of the antenna under the flat, bending, and folding states.
Resonant Frequency (GHz)S11 (dB)Bandwidth (GHz)
Flat2.32−17.352.10–2.70 (25.00%)
R = 40 mm2.34−18.752.15–2.61 (19.33%)
θ = 150°2.34−16.262.11–2.69 (24.16%)
Table 2. Simulated and measured performance comparison of the antenna under the flat state.
Table 2. Simulated and measured performance comparison of the antenna under the flat state.
Resonant Frequency (GHz)S11 (dB)Bandwidth (GHz)
Simulation2.32−17.352.10–2.70 (25.00%)
Measurement (Flat)2.28−17.642.06–2.74 (28.33%)
Table 3. Measured performance comparison of the antenna under the flat and folding states.
Table 3. Measured performance comparison of the antenna under the flat and folding states.
AngleResonant Frequency (GHz)S11 (dB)Bandwidth (GHz)
Flat (0°)2.28−17.642.06–2.74 (28.33%)
Fold (150°)2.32−16.602.05–2.75 (29.16%)
Table 4. Resistivity values of the films under the flat and different times of folding.
Table 4. Resistivity values of the films under the flat and different times of folding.
TimesResistivity Values (10−5 Ω·cm)
0 (Flat)4.85
14.85
104.85
304.86
504.87
Table 5. Comparison of different fabrication methods of flexible antennas on polyimide substrates.
Table 5. Comparison of different fabrication methods of flexible antennas on polyimide substrates.
Ref.MethodsTotal Size
L × W × H mm3
Gain (dBi)Rad. 1Resonant Frequency (GHz)Bandwidth (GHz)
FlatBendFoldFlatBendFold
[1]Screen-printed55 × 40 × 0.1255.9Omn. 24.364.345 (20) 3NA 41.77–6.951.83–6.94 (20)NA
[2]Screen-printed20 × 28 × 0.0252.81Omn.4.854.84 (25)NA3.44–6.263.33–6.36 (25)NA
[5]Inkjet-printed40 × 30 × 0.05084.8Omn.2.52.35 (27)NA2.25–2.752.23–2.65 (27)NA
[6]Screen-printed47× 33 × 0.05085.3Omn.3.753.80 (10)NA2.2–14.32.15–14.35 (10)NA
[7]Inkjet-printed31 × 34 × 0.05081.68Omn.2.462.4 (7)NA2.136–2.7842.12–2.88 (7)NA
[33]Inkjet-printed70 × 70 × 0.112.1Omn.1.21.23 (78)NA0.87–1.520.86–1.5 (78)NA
[34]Inkjet-printed30 × 26 × 0.1254.5Uni. 54.834.84 (50)NA4.79–5.044.76–5.08 (50)NA
proposedIn the work40.6 × 50 × 0.0752.98Omn.2.282.29 (40)2.322.06–2.742.08–2.78 (40)2.05–2.75
1 Rad. = radiation pattern; 2 Omn. = omnidirectional; 3 antenna bending radius; 4 NA = not available; 5 Uni. = unidirectional.
Table 6. Comparison of flexible antennas fabricated on different substrates.
Table 6. Comparison of flexible antennas fabricated on different substrates.
Ref.SubstrateTotal Size
L × W × H mm3
Gain (dBi)Rad. 1Resonant Frequency (GHz)Bandwidth (GHz)
FlatBendFoldFlatBendFold
[35]SU-8/PDMS20 × 46.4 × 0.552.17Uni.26.306.25 (50) 3NA 46.2–6.46.15–6.38 (50)NA
[36]Rogers 588052 × 43 × 0.1273.57Uni.1.5741.567 (40)NA1.56–1.591.54–1.58 (40)NA
[37]Felt fabric26 × 47 × 11.6Omn. 52.392.42 (25)NA2.16–2.632.14–2.65 (15)NA
[38]PTFE25 × 50 × 0.127NAOmn.3.503.90 (80)NA3.4–3.63.6–3.9 (50)NA
[39]LCP20 × 32 × 0.10.31Omn.2.632.3 (50)NA2.38–2.792.2–2.53 (50)NA
proposedPI40.6 × 50 × 0.0752.98Omn.2.282.29 (40)2.322.06–2.742.08–2.78 (40)2.05–2.75
1 Rad. = radiation pattern; 2 Uni. = unidirectional; 3 antenna bending radius; 4 NA = not available; 5 Omn. = omnidirectional.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cang, D.; Wang, Z.; Qu, H. A Polyimide-Based Flexible Monopole Antenna Fed by a Coplanar Waveguide. Electronics 2021, 10, 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030334

AMA Style

Cang D, Wang Z, Qu H. A Polyimide-Based Flexible Monopole Antenna Fed by a Coplanar Waveguide. Electronics. 2021; 10(3):334. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cang, Dingyong, Zhiliang Wang, and Huiwen Qu. 2021. "A Polyimide-Based Flexible Monopole Antenna Fed by a Coplanar Waveguide" Electronics 10, no. 3: 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop