Correction: Garza-Lopez et al. Protocols for Generating Surfaces and Measuring 3D Organelle Morphology Using Amira. Cells 2022, 11, 65
by
, , , , , , add
Show full author list
Edgar Garza-Lopez
1,†, 
Zer Vue
2,†,
Prasanna Katti
3,†,
Kit Neikirk
4,
Michelle Biete
4,
Jacob Lam
5,
Heather K. Beasley
2,6,
Andrea G. Marshall
2,
Taylor A. Rodman
2,
Trace A. Christensen
7,
Jeffrey L. Salisbury
7,8,
Larry Vang
2,
Margaret Mungai
5,
Salma AshShareef
5,
Sandra A. Murray
9,
Jianqiang Shao
10,
Jennifer Streeter
5,11,
Brian Glancy
3,
Renata O. Pereira
5,11,*,‡,
E. Dale Abel
5,11,*,‡ and
Antentor Hinton, Jr.
1,2,*,‡add
Show full author list
1
Hinton and Garza Lopez Family Consulting Company, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA
2
Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
3
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
4
Department of Biology, University of Hawaii at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720, USA
5
Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
6
Department of Biochemistry, Cancer Biology, Neuroscience and Pharmacology, School of Graduate Studies and Research, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
7
Microscopy and Cell Analysis Core Facility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
8
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
9
Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 52013, USA
10
Central Microscopy Research Facility, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
11
Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
These authors share senior authorship.
Cells 2023, 12(10), 1356; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12101356
Submission received: 28 March 2023
/
Accepted: 12 April 2023
/
Published: 10 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Cells—Advances in Cell Techniques)
In the original publication [1], the legend of Figure 3 has the number “405” in the last sentence. This should be disregarded.
In Section 7.4, instead of “Other useful metrics are available in Amira that are not used here which include mitochondrial branching index and is calculated by the following equation: SA3/16π2V2 [23]. Mitochondrial complexity measures the ratio between transverse and longitude tissue surrounding the mitochondria [23]”, it should read “Other useful metrics are available in Amira that are not used here, which include mitochondrial complexity index and is calculated by the following equation: SA3/16π2V2 [23]. Mitochondrial branching index calculates the relative branching between the transverse and longitudinal mitochondrial orientations [23]”.
In Figure 1A,E and Figure 2A, the x- and y- dimensions currently read 10 nm by 10 nm, these should correctly read 10 µm by 10 µm.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Garza-Lopez, E.; Vue, Z.; Katti, P.; Neikirk, K.; Biete, M.; Lam, J.; Beasley, H.K.; Marshall, A.G.; Rodman, T.A.; Christensen, T.A.; et al. Protocols for Generating Surfaces and Measuring 3D Organelle Morphology Using Amira. Cells 2022, 11, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Skeletal muscle specific knockout of OPA1 (OPA1 smKO) in mouse leads to changes in mitochondrial morphology in the mouse. The 3D distribution of single continuous and stationary mitochondria (blue), reconstructed from serial block facing-scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) image stacks of gastrocnemius muscle from OPA1 smKO mouse (A–H). (A) The dimensions of the captured tissue in wild type mouse and (E) OPA1 smKO, (B,F) along with an example ortho slice for each. (C) The overlay of the 3D surface rendering of mitochondria in a wild type mouse, on top of a representative ortho slice and (D) the 3D surface rendering of mitochondria alone. (G) The overlay of the 3D rendering of mitochondria in OPA1 smKO, on top of a representative ortho slice and (H) the 3D surface rendering of mitochondria alone. (I,J) The 3D mitochondrial length and volume decreased (**** p < 0.001) upon OPA1 smKO.
Figure 1.
Skeletal muscle specific knockout of OPA1 (OPA1 smKO) in mouse leads to changes in mitochondrial morphology in the mouse. The 3D distribution of single continuous and stationary mitochondria (blue), reconstructed from serial block facing-scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) image stacks of gastrocnemius muscle from OPA1 smKO mouse (A–H). (A) The dimensions of the captured tissue in wild type mouse and (E) OPA1 smKO, (B,F) along with an example ortho slice for each. (C) The overlay of the 3D surface rendering of mitochondria in a wild type mouse, on top of a representative ortho slice and (D) the 3D surface rendering of mitochondria alone. (G) The overlay of the 3D rendering of mitochondria in OPA1 smKO, on top of a representative ortho slice and (H) the 3D surface rendering of mitochondria alone. (I,J) The 3D mitochondrial length and volume decreased (**** p < 0.001) upon OPA1 smKO.
Figure 2.
6-panel presentation of 3D reconstruction images and ortho slices from wildtype Drosophila flight muscle. This figure is an example of how to present the ortho slices and the 3D reconstruction images. This example shows 3D reconstruction of several organelles in Drosophila flight muscle. (A) On the left, several representative ortho slices are presented. The dimensions and amounts of ortho slices for data acquisition and conversion to 3D models are shown. (B) The raw image of an ortho slice. (C–F) Mitochondria are colored red, ER are colored blue, and MERCs are colored white. These data are best presented in several ways. (C) 3D reconstruction overlaid over the ortho image allows for better visualization of the specific structures in the ortho image that are reconstructed. (D) In contrast, the 3D reconstruction not overlaid on the ortho image allows for better visualization of interactions between the 3D structures. (E,F) Finally, Amira also allows for the graying out of specific structures such that only mitochondria or ER are shown in the 3D reconstruction. This is useful to view otherwise difficult to see areas including MERCs.
Figure 2.
6-panel presentation of 3D reconstruction images and ortho slices from wildtype Drosophila flight muscle. This figure is an example of how to present the ortho slices and the 3D reconstruction images. This example shows 3D reconstruction of several organelles in Drosophila flight muscle. (A) On the left, several representative ortho slices are presented. The dimensions and amounts of ortho slices for data acquisition and conversion to 3D models are shown. (B) The raw image of an ortho slice. (C–F) Mitochondria are colored red, ER are colored blue, and MERCs are colored white. These data are best presented in several ways. (C) 3D reconstruction overlaid over the ortho image allows for better visualization of the specific structures in the ortho image that are reconstructed. (D) In contrast, the 3D reconstruction not overlaid on the ortho image allows for better visualization of interactions between the 3D structures. (E,F) Finally, Amira also allows for the graying out of specific structures such that only mitochondria or ER are shown in the 3D reconstruction. This is useful to view otherwise difficult to see areas including MERCs.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Garza-Lopez, E.; Vue, Z.; Katti, P.; Neikirk, K.; Biete, M.; Lam, J.; Beasley, H.K.; Marshall, A.G.; Rodman, T.A.; Christensen, T.A.; et al. Correction: Garza-Lopez et al. Protocols for Generating Surfaces and Measuring 3D Organelle Morphology Using Amira. Cells 2022, 11, 65. Cells 2023, 12, 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12101356
AMA Style
Garza-Lopez E, Vue Z, Katti P, Neikirk K, Biete M, Lam J, Beasley HK, Marshall AG, Rodman TA, Christensen TA, et al. Correction: Garza-Lopez et al. Protocols for Generating Surfaces and Measuring 3D Organelle Morphology Using Amira. Cells 2022, 11, 65. Cells. 2023; 12(10):1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12101356
Chicago/Turabian StyleGarza-Lopez, Edgar, Zer Vue, Prasanna Katti, Kit Neikirk, Michelle Biete, Jacob Lam, Heather K. Beasley, Andrea G. Marshall, Taylor A. Rodman, Trace A. Christensen, and et al. 2023. "Correction: Garza-Lopez et al. Protocols for Generating Surfaces and Measuring 3D Organelle Morphology Using Amira. Cells 2022, 11, 65" Cells 12, no. 10: 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12101356
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
