Next Article in Journal
Association of TP53 Alteration with Tissue Specificity and Patient Outcome of IDH1-Mutant Glioma
Next Article in Special Issue
Ocular Neurodegenerative Diseases: Interconnection between Retina and Cortical Areas
Previous Article in Journal
Selective Autophagy in Hyperglycemia-Induced Microvascular and Macrovascular Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Rho-Associated Kinase Inhibitor and Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Medium on Corneal Endothelial Cell Senescence and Proliferation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/cells10082115
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cognitive Impairment in Frail Hypertensive Elderly Patients: Role of Hyperglycemia

by
Pasquale Mone
1,2,3,*,
Jessica Gambardella
3,4,
Antonella Pansini
1,
Antonio de Donato
2,
Giuseppe Martinelli
5,
Eugenio Boccalone
6,
Alessandro Matarese
7,
Salvatore Frullone
1 and
Gaetano Santulli
3,4,8,*
1
ASL Avellino, 83100 Avellino, Italy
2
Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80121 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Fleischer Institute for Diabetes and Metabolism (FIDAM), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
4
International Translational Research and Medical Education Consortium (ITME), University “Federico II” of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
5
ASL Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy
6
ASL Caserta, 81100 Caserta, Italy
7
Cardarelli Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
8
Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Einstein Institute for Aging Research, Einstein-Sinai Diabetes Research Center (ES-DRC), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(8), 2115; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10082115
Submission received: 8 June 2021 / Revised: 11 August 2021 / Accepted: 13 August 2021 / Published: 17 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cellular Senescence in Age-Related Diseases: Molecular Bases and Therapeutic Interventions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Endothelial dysfunction is a key hallmark of hypertension, which is a leading risk factor for cognitive decline in older adults with or without frailty. Similarly, hyperglycemia is known to impair endothelial function and is a predictor of severe cardiovascular outcomes, independent of the presence of diabetes. On these grounds, we designed a study to assess the effects of high-glucose and metformin on brain microvascular endothelial cells (ECs) and on cognitive impairment in frail hypertensive patients. We tested the effects of metformin on high-glucose-induced cell death, cell permeability, and generation of reactive oxygen species in vitro, in human brain microvascular ECs. To investigate the consequences of hyperglycemia and metformin in the clinical scenario, we recruited frail hypertensive patients and we evaluated their Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, comparing them according to the glycemic status (normoglycemic vs. hyperglycemic) and the use of metformin. We enrolled 376 patients, of which 209 successfully completed the study. We observed a significant correlation between MoCA score and glycemia. We found that hyperglycemic patients treated with metformin had a significantly better MoCA score than hyperglycemic patients treated with insulin (18.32 ± 3.9 vs. 14.94 ± 3.8; p < 0.001). Our in vitro assays confirmed the beneficial effects of metformin on human brain microvascular ECs. To our knowledge, this is the first study correlating MoCA score and glycemia in frail and hypertensive older adults, showing that hyperglycemia aggravates cognitive impairment.

1. Introduction

Hypertension is one of the most common comorbidities, and is a recognized leading risk factor for cognitive decline [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Hypertension leads to chronic endothelial dysfunction, disrupting the integrity of endothelial cells (ECs) and contributing to oxidative stress, inflammation, and atherosclerosis [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
Hyperglycemia (HG) is common in patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases [17], is an established independent predictor of severe outcomes, even in absence of frank diabetes mellitus (DM) [18,19], and has been proposed to exacerbate endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive subjects [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
Frailty is a multidimensional condition due to reserve loss leading to both physical and cognitive impairment [33,34]. Frail older adults present a high-risk of adverse events including disability, hospitalization, and mortality [35]. Hence, it is very important to evaluate comorbidities and complications in order to reduce the incidence of cognitive and physical impairment; a thorough clinical assessment remains among the main strategies to obtain an early diagnosis (as well as a timely treatment) of cognitive impairment [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
Metformin is an oral antidiabetic drug and its potential role in contrasting endothelial dysfunction and cognitive impairment currently represents a hot topic [44,45,46,47]; a recent trial on 80 subjects with mild cognitive impairment has shown significant improvements in verbal memory scores [48]; other investigators have underlined its beneficial effects, especially in older adults [47,49,50,51,52].
On these grounds, we aim to investigate the effects of HG and metformin on cognitive impairment in frail hypertensive patients and, in vitro, on human brain ECs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

We enrolled consecutive frail hypertensive elderly patients presenting to the ASL (local health providers managed by the Italian Ministry of Health) located in Avellino, Caserta, and Naples, Italy from April 2019 to April 2021. The following inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied:
Inclusion criteria:
  • A previous diagnosis of hypertension with no clinical or laboratory evidence of secondary causes;
  • Age > 65 years;
  • A frail status.
Exclusion criteria:
  • Age < 65 years;
  • Absence of frail status;
  • Absence of hypertension;
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <25%, previous myocardial infarction, previous revascularization, or previous fibrinolytic therapy.
All patients underwent blood pressure measurement and blood analysis to assess glycemia. HG was defined by values ≥ 140 mg/dL, according to the American Diabetes Association [53]. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mm Hg, and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg on repeated measurements, or chronically treated hypertension with antihypertensive medications [54].
Based on glycemic values and medical treatment, we divided our population in the following four groups:
-
Normoglycemic (NG) patients without DM (n: 51)
-
NG patients with DM (n: 55)
-
Metformin-treated HG patients (n: 53)
-
Insulin-treated HG patients (n: 50)

2.2. Assessment of Cognitive Function

Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test, which has been shown to be specific for the evaluation of cognitive domains (attention, concentration, memory, language, calculation, orientation and executive functions), and is generally considered one of the best tests to detect mild cognitive impairment [55,56,57].

2.3. Frailty Evaluation

A physical frailty assessment was performed following the Fried criteria [34,37]. A diagnosis of frailty status was made with at least three of the following five points:
-
Weight loss (unintentional loss of ≥ 4.5 kg in the past year);
-
Weakness (handgrip strength in the lowest 20% quintile at baseline, adjusted for sex and body mass index (BMI);
-
Exhaustion (poor endurance and energy, self-reported);
-
Slowness (walking speed under the lowest quintile adjusted for sex and height);
-
Low physical activity level (lowest quintile of kilocalories of physical activity during the past week).

2.4. In Vitro Experiments

Human brain microvascular ECs were obtained from Neuromics (Minneapolis, MN, USA; catalog number: #HEC02). Cells were cultured in a standard humidified atmosphere (37 °C) containing 5% CO2, as we described [58]. In some experiments, cells were treated with metformin (0.1, 0.5, and 1 mM), adding glucose at 5 or 25 mM, or mannitol 20 mM as osmotic control, for 48 h.
The endothelial permeability assay was performed as we described and validated [58,59], using fibronectin-coated transwell filters (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA).
Levels of mitochondrial and cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were assessed using MitoSOX and CM-H2DCFDA dyes, respectively, as we previously described [60,61].
Cell death was evaluated using a Caspase-Glo® 3/7 assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA; catalog number: #G6321), as we described [62]. All reagents were from Millipore-Sigma (Burlington, MA, USA), unless otherwise stated. All experiments were conducted at least in triplicate by blinded investigators.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SD. In an a priori power analysis, we calculated the number of patients required for the study to reject the null hypothesis 95% of the time (i.e., with a one-tailed type II error rate of 0.05) and with a two-tailed type I error at a 0.05 level of significance; sample size was calculated using the G-POWER software, yielding a minimum n of 50/group.
We applied a dispersion model correlating MoCA score and glycemia; we performed a linear regression analysis with MoCA score as dependent variable to explore the impact of comorbidities. For the in vitro assays, we applied the two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test.
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and calculations were computed using SPSS 26 and GraphPad Prism 9.1.1.

3. Results

3.1. Population of Frail Hypertensive Patients

We evaluated a total of 316 frail patients with hypertension; 31 patients were unwilling to provide clinical information, and 76 subjects did not fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria (Figure 1). Hence, 209 patients entered the study: 106 NG and 103 HG subjects.
There were no significant differences in mean age, BMI, sex distribution, smoking habits, and comorbidities between the two groups (Table 1). All patients were taking antihypertensive drugs; the use of diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptors blockers, beta-blockers, and calcium blockers was similar between the two groups (Table 1). Comorbidities are reported in Table 1, as well.

3.2. Glycemia Correlates with the MoCA Score in Frail Hypertensive Patients

Comparing NG and HG patients, we observed a significantly compromised cognitive function in the latter group in terms of MoCA score (NG: 19.95 ± 3.6 vs. HG: 15.78 ± 4.5; p < 0.05). Furthermore, as depicted in Figure 2, we found a strong correlation between the MoCA score and blood glucose levels (r: −0.611; p: <0.001).
To evaluate the impact of comorbidities on these findings, we performed a linear regression analysis using the MoCA score as dependent variable (Table 2). We observed a significant effect of age, diabetes, and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) (p < 0.001), alongside chronic kidney disease (p: 0.025).

3.3. The MoCA Score Is Significantly Higher in HG Patients Treated with Metformin Than in HG Patients Treated with Insulin

In order to evaluate the effect of metformin treatment on the MoCA score, we divided our patients according to their glycemic status and drug treatment, as follows: metformin-treated HG patients (MoCA score: 18.32 ± 3.9), insulin-treated HG patients (MoCA score: 14.94 ± 3.8), NG patients with DM (MoCA score: 17.45 ± 3.1), and NG patients without DM (MoCA score: 20.11 ± 3.3).
We found that the MoCA score in metformin-treated HG patients was significantly different from insulin-treated HG patients (p < 0.001, Figure 3).

3.4. In Vitro Assays

High glucose concentrations have been shown to elicit a leak of the endothelial permeability barrier [63,64] and to increase ROS generation in ECs [23,65]. To test whether metformin could actually mitigate endothelial leakage and oxidative stress triggered by HG, we performed a series of in vitro dose-response experiments on human brain microvascular ECs. We found that metformin significantly attenuated the HG-induced endothelial leakage (Figure 4), reduced both mitochondrial (Figure 5A) and cellular (Figure 5B) ROS production, and prevented high-glucose-induced EC apoptosis (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Our results indicate that HG subjects have a lower MoCA score than the NG ones. These data must be contextualized in a frailty condition with hypertension, in which cognitive impairment has a strong impact on functional disability and loss of independence [66,67]. The management of frailty in older adults is extremely challenging [68,69,70] and comorbidities such as hypertension play an instrumental role in increasing the risk of mortality, hospitalization, and disability [71,72]. In this scenario, such a delicate balance is heavily disturbed by HG.
Herein, we analyzed the relationship between the MoCA score and glycemia observing a strong correlation (r: −0.611; p < 0.001). To further confirm these results, we performed a linear regression analysis to verify the impact of comorbidities, using the MoCA score as a dependent variable; we found a significant association for age, diabetes, and CVD. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the achievement of an optimal glycemic control could reduce cognitive impairment in frail and hypertensive older adults.
In this scenario, metformin-treated HG patients presented a better cognitive function than insulin-treated HG patients. These results are consistent with previous reports confirming the beneficial effects of metformin in cognitive impairment [47,73,74,75]. Other studies have instead shown no significant action [76] or even a detrimental effect [77] of metformin on cognition, although the mechanisms underlying such findings were not explored. These contrasting results could be attributed to several factors, including the disparities in the studied populations. Of note, in our population there were no significant differences between metformin-treated HG patients and NG patients with diabetes, and this aspect strengthens the pivotal role of metformin in counteracting cognitive impairment in our population. Our in vitro results showing a dose-dependent beneficial action of metformin on high-glucose- induced endothelial leakage, oxidative stress, and cell death, provide a molecular mechanism underlying our clinical observations. Of note, these findings are consistent with previous reports [78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87].
Hypertension determines alterations of the endothelium causing oxidative stress, increased vascular permeability, and atherosclerosis [88,89,90,91]. We hypothesized that metformin treatment, among its numerous pleiotropic effects [92,93], could attenuate endothelial dysfunction caused by HG, a crucial feature in hypertensive older adults with frailty [94,95,96]. Furthermore, metformin may modulate and reduce the pathologic mechanisms triggered by insulin resistance [79,97,98]. Indeed, metformin has been proposed to be an anti-aging drug and has been associated with a lower risk of frailty in community-dwelling veterans [99,100].

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to correlate MoCA score and glycemia in frail and hypertensive older adults, showing that HG significantly exacerbates cognitive impairment in this class of patients. Although we found beneficial effects of metformin treatment, future dedicated studies with larger samples and longer follow-up are required to confirm our results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.M., A.P., and G.S.; methodology, P.M., J.G., A.P.; and G.S.; validation, P.M.; formal analysis, P.M., J.G., and G.S.; investigation, P.M., A.P., A.d.D., G.M., E.B., A.M., S.F., and G.S.; data curation, P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, P.M.; writing—review and editing, G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Santulli’s Lab is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH: R01-DK123259, R01-HL159062, R01-DK033823, R01-HL146691, R56-AG066431, T32-HL144456, and R00-DK107895, to G.S.), by the Irma T. Hirschl and Monique Weill-Caulier Trusts (to G.S.) and by the American Heart Association (AHA-20POST35211151 to J.G.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved (#268) by the Institutional Review Board (Campania University). The Ethical approval has been obtained on 30 September 2016.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Iadecola, C.; Duering, M.; Hachinski, V.; Joutel, A.; Pendlebury, S.T.; Schneider, J.A.; Dichgans, M. Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Jacc Scientific Expert Panel. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 3326–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mantovani, E.; Zucchella, C.; Schena, F.; Romanelli, M.G.; Venturelli, M.; Tamburin, S. Towards a Redefinition of Cognitive Frailty. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 76, 831–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ruan, Q.; D’Onofrio, G.; Sancarlo, D.; Greco, A.; Lozupone, M.; Seripa, D.; Panza, F.; Yu, Z. Emerging biomarkers and screening for cognitive frailty. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 29, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Satizabal, C.L.; Beiser, A.; Chouraki, V.; Chêne, G.; Dufouil, C.; Seshadri, S. Incidence of Dementia over Three Decades in the Framingham Heart Study. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Santisteban, M.M.; Ahn, S.J.; Lane, D.; Faraco, G.; Garcia-Bonilla, L.; Racchumi, G.; Poon, C.; Schaeffer, S.; Segarra, S.G.; Körbelin, J.; et al. Endothelium-Macrophage Crosstalk Mediates Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction in Hypertension. Hypertension 2020, 76, 795–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Montgolfier, O.; Pinçon, A.; Pouliot, P.; Gillis, M.-A.; Bishop, J.; Sled, J.G.; Villeneuve, L.; Ferland, G.; Lévy, B.I.; Lesage, F.; et al. High Systolic Blood Pressure Induces Cerebral Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction, Neurovascular Unit Damage, and Cognitive Decline in Mice. Hypertension 2019, 73, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Panza, F.; Seripa, D.; Solfrizzi, V.; Tortelli, R.; Greco, A.; Pilotto, A.; Logroscino, G. Targeting Cognitive Frailty: Clinical and Neurobiological Roadmap for a Single Complex Phenotype. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015, 47, 793–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wallace, L.M.K.; Theou, O.; Godin, J.; Andrew, M.K.; A Bennett, D.; Rockwood, K. Investigation of frailty as a moderator of the relationship between neuropathology and dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: A cross-sectional analysis of data from the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wallace, S.M.; Yasmin; McEniery, C.M.; Maki-Petaja, K.M.; Booth, A.D.; Cockcroft, J.R.; Wilkinson, I.B. Isolated Systolic Hypertension Is Characterized by Increased Aortic Stiffness and Endothelial Dysfunction. Hypertension 2007, 50, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Panza, J.A.; Quyyumi, A.A.; Brush, J.E., Jr.; Epstein, S.E. Abnormal Endothelium-Dependent Vascular Relaxation in Patients with Essential Hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 323, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Santulli, G.; Cipolletta, E.; Sorriento, D.; Del Giudice, C.; Anastasio, A.; Monaco, S.; Maione, A.S.; Condorelli, G.; Puca, A.; Trimarco, B.; et al. CaMK4 Gene Deletion Induces Hypertension. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2012, 1, e001081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Gambardella, J.; Coppola, A.; Izzo, R.; Fiorentino, G.; Trimarco, B.; Santulli, G. Role of Endothelial miR-24 in COVID-19 Cerebrovascular Events. Crit. Care 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Moreno, P.R.; Purushothaman, K.R.; Fuster, V.; O’Connor, W.N. Intimomedial Interface Damage and Adventitial Inflammation Is Increased beneath Disrupted Atherosclerosis in the Aorta: Implications for Plaque Vulnerability. Circulation 2002, 105, 2504–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Santulli, G.; Trimarco, B.; Iaccarino, G. G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 and Hypertension: Molecular Insights and Pathophysiological Mechanisms. High Blood Press Cardiovasc. Prev. 2013, 20, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Shimbo, D.; Muntner, P.; Mann, D.; Viera, A.J.; Homma, S.; Polak, J.F.; Barr, R.G.; Herrington, D.; Shea, S.J.C. Endothelial Dysfunction and the Risk of Hypertension: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Hypertension 2010, 55, 1210–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Yuan, Q.; Yang, J.; Santulli, G.; Reiken, S.R.; Wronska, A.; Kim, M.M.; Osborne, B.W.; Lacampagne, A.; Yin, Y.; Marks, A.R. Maintenance of Normal Blood Pressure Is Dependent on Ip3r1-Mediated Regulation of Enos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 8532–8537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Duckworth, W.C. Hyperglycemia and cardiovascular disease. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2001, 3, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Petrie, J.R.; Guzik, T.J.; Touyz, R.M. Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Insights and Vascular Mechanisms. Can. J. Cardiol. 2018, 34, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mone, P.; Gambardella, J.; Minicucci, F.; Lombardi, A.; Mauro, C.; Santulli, G. Hyperglycemia Drives Stent Restenosis in Stemi Patients. Diabetes Care 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Avogaro, A.; Albiero, M.; Menegazzo, L.; De Kreutzenberg, S.; Fadini, G.P. Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetes: The role of reparatory mechanisms. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, S285–S290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Parrinello, C.M.; Hua, S.; Carnethon, M.; Gallo, L.C.; Hudson, B.; Goldberg, R.B.; Delamater, A.M.; Kaplan, R.C.; Isasi, C.R. Associations of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance with biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in Hispanic/Latino youths: Results from the Hispanic Community Children’s Health Study/Study of Latino Youth (SOL Youth). J. Diabetes Complicat. 2017, 31, 836–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Adams, J.A.; Lopez, J.R.; Banderas, V.; Sackner, M.A. A single arm trial using passive simulated jogging for blunting acute hyperglycemia. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meza, C.A.; La Favor, J.D.; Kim, D.-H.; Hickner, R.C. Endothelial Dysfunction: Is There a Hyperglycemia-Induced Imbalance of NOX and NOS? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Price, K.D.; Price, C.S.; Reynolds, R.D. Hyperglycemia-induced ascorbic acid deficiency promotes endothelial dysfunction and the development of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2001, 158, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jafar, N.; Edriss, H.; Nugent, K. The Effect of Short-Term Hyperglycemia on the Innate Immune System. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 351, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tanaka, J.; Qiang, L.; Banks, A.S.; Welch, C.L.; Matsumoto, M.; Kitamura, T.; Ido-Kitamura, Y.; DePinho, R.; Accili, M. Foxo1 Links Hyperglycemia to LDL Oxidation and Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Dysfunction in Vascular Endothelial Cells. Diabetes 2009, 58, 2344–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ye, L.; Guo, H.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Yang, M.; Wang, L. Exosomal circEhmt1 Released from Hypoxia-Pretreated Pericytes Regulates High Glucose-Induced Microvascular Dysfunction via the NFIA/NLRP3 Pathway. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Loader, J.; Montero, D.; Lorenzen, C.; Watts, R.; Meziat, C.; Reboul, C.; Stewart, S.; Walther, G. Acute Hyperglycemia Impairs Vascular Function in Healthy and Cardiometabolic Diseased Subjects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 2060–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jankauskas, S.S.; Gambardella, J.; Sardu, C.; Lombardi, A.; Santulli, G. Functional role of miR-155 in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Noncoding RNA 2021, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nieuwdorp, M.; Van Haeften, T.W.; Gouverneur, M.C.L.G.; Mooij, H.L.; Van Lieshout, M.H.P.; Levi, M.; Meijers, J.C.M.; Holleman, F.; Hoekstra, J.B.L.; Vink, H.; et al. Loss of Endothelial Glycocalyx During Acute Hyperglycemia Coincides With Endothelial Dysfunction and Coagulation Activation In Vivo. Diabetes 2006, 55, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Stirban, A.; Negrean, M.; Stratmann, B.; Gawlowski, T.; Horstmann, T.; Götting, C.; Kleesiek, K.; Mueller-Roesel, M.; Koschinsky, T.; Uribarri, J.; et al. Benfotiamine Prevents Macro- and Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress Following a Meal Rich in Advanced Glycation End Products in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 2064–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hung, Y.-J.; Lee, C.-H.; Chu, N.-F.; Shieh, Y.-S. Plasma Protein Growth Arrest-Specific 6 Levels Are Associated With Altered Glucose Tolerance, Inflammation, and Endothelial Dysfunction. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 1840–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wleklik, M.; Uchmanowicz, I.; Jankowska, E.A.; Vitale, C.; Lisiak, M.; Drozd, M.; Pobrotyn, P.; Tkaczyszyn, M.; Lee, C. Multidimensional Approach to Frailty. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mone, P.; Gambardella, J.; Pansini, A.; Rizzo, M.; Mauro, C.; Minicucci, F.; Santulli, G. Impact of thrombus aspiration in frail STEMI patients. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2021, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, D.H.; Buth, K.J.; Martin, B.-J.; Yip, A.; Hirsch, G.M. Frail Patients Are at Increased Risk for Mortality and Prolonged Institutional Care After Cardiac Surgery. Circulation 2010, 121, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Solfrizzi, V.; Scafato, E.; Lozupone, M.; Seripa, D.; Schilardi, A.; Custodero, C.; Sardone, R.; Galluzzo, L.; Gandin, C.; Baldereschi, M.; et al. Biopsychosocial frailty and the risk of incident dementia: The Italian longitudinal study on aging. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2019, 15, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M146–M157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Clegg, A.; Hassan-Smith, Z. Frailty and the endocrine system. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018, 6, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Clegg, A.; Young, J.; Iliffe, S.; Rikkert, M.O.; Rockwood, K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013, 381, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rockwood, K.; Stadnyk, K.; MacKnight, C.; McDowell, I.; Hébert, R.; Hogan, D. A brief clinical instrument to classify frailty in elderly people. Lancet 1999, 353, 205–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hanlon, P.; I Nicholl, B.; Jani, B.D.; Lee, D.; McQueenie, R.; Mair, F.S. Frailty and pre-frailty in middle-aged and older adults and its association with multimorbidity and mortality: A prospective analysis of 493 737 UK Biobank participants. Lancet Public Health 2018, 3, e323–e332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mone, P.; Pansini, A. Gait Speed Test and Cognitive Decline in Frail Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 360, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pedone, C.; Costanzo, L.; Cesari, M.; Bandinelli, S.; Ferrucci, L.; Incalzi, R.A. Are Performance Measures Necessary to Predict Loss of Independence in Elderly People? J. Gerontol. Ser. A Boil. Sci. Med. Sci. 2015, 71, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Chaudhari, K.; Reynolds, C.D.; Yang, S.-H. Metformin and cognition from the perspectives of sex, age, and disease. GeroScience 2020, 42, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Melissa, A.Y.; Maruschak, N.; Mansur, R.; Carvalho, A.F.; Cha, D.S.; McIntyre, R.S. Metformin: Repurposing Opportunities for Cognitive and Mood Dysfunction. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2015, 13, 1836–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nafisa, A.; Gray, S.G.; Cao, Y.; Wang, T.; Xu, S.; Wattoo, F.H.; Barras, M.; Cohen, N.; Kamato, D.; Little, P.J. Endothelial function and dysfunction: Impact of metformin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 192, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Ng, T.P.; Feng, L.; Yap, K.B.; Lee, T.S.; Tan, C.H.; Winblad, B. Long-Term Metformin Usage and Cognitive Function among Older Adults with Diabetes. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2014, 41, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Luchsinger, J.A.; Perez, T.; Chang, H.; Mehta, P.; Steffener, J.; Pradabhan, G.; Ichise, M.; Manly, J.; Devanand, D.P.; Bagiella, E. Metformin in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results of a Pilot Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016, 51, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Samaras, K.; Makkar, S.; Crawford, J.D.; Kochan, N.A.; Wen, W.; Draper, B.; Trollor, J.N.; Brodaty, H.; Sachdev, P.S. Metformin Use Is Associated With Slowed Cognitive Decline and Reduced Incident Dementia in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 2691–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tumminia, A.; Vinciguerra, F.; Parisi, M.; Frittitta, L. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Alzheimer’s Disease: Role of Insulin Signalling and Therapeutic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Cioce, M.; Pulito, C.; Strano, S.; Blandino, G.; Fazio, V.M. Metformin: Metabolic Rewiring Faces Tumor Heterogeneity. Cells 2020, 9, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yarchoan, M.; Arnold, S.E. Repurposing Diabetes Drugs for Brain Insulin Resistance in Alzheimer Disease. Diabetes 2014, 63, 2253–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Buse, J.B.; Wexler, D.J.; Tsapas, A.; Rossing, P.; Mingrone, G.; Mathieu, C.; D’Alessio, D.A.; Davies, M.J. 2019 Update To: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (Ada) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (Easd). Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Unger, T.; Borghi, C.; Charchar, F.; Khan, N.A.; Poulter, N.R.; Prabhakaran, D.; Ramirez, A.; Schlaich, M.; Stergiou, G.S.; Tomaszewski, M.; et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2020, 75, 1334–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Pinto, T.C.C.; Machado, L.; Bulgacov, T.M.; Rodrigues-Júnior, A.L.; Costa, M.L.G.; Ximenes, R.C.C.; Sougey, E.B. Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in the elderly? Int. Psychogeriatr. 2018, 31, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. O’Driscoll, C.; Shaikh, M. Cross-Cultural Applicability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A Systematic Review. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 58, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nasreddine, Z.S.; Phillips, N.A.; Bédirian, V.; Charbonneau, S.; Whitehead, V.; Collin, I.; Cummings, J.L.; Chertkow, H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mone, P.; Gambardella, J.; Wang, X.; Jankauskas, S.S.; Matarese, A.; Santulli, G. miR-24 Targets the Transmembrane Glycoprotein Neuropilin-1 in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Non-Coding RNA 2021, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gambardella, J.; Sorriento, D.; Bova, M.; Rusciano, M.; Loffredo, S.; Wang, X.; Petraroli, A.; Carucci, L.; Mormile, I.; Oliveti, M.; et al. Role of Endothelial G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 in Angioedema. Hypertension 2020, 76, 1625–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Santulli, G.; Xie, W.; Reiken, S.R.; Marks, A.R. Mitochondrial Calcium Overload Is a Key Determinant in Heart Failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11389–11394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Xie, W.; Santulli, G.; Reiken, S.R.; Yuan, Q.; Osborne, B.W.; Chen, B.X.; Marks, A.R. Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress Promotes Atrial Fibrillation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Amgalan, D.; Garner, T.P.; Pekson, R.; Jia, X.F.; Yanamandala, M.; Paulino, V.; Liang, F.G.; Corbalan, J.J.; Lee, J.; Chen, Y.; et al. A small-molecule allosteric inhibitor of BAX protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 1, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hempel, A.; Maasch, C.; Heintze, U.; Lindschau, C.; Dietz, R.; Luft, F.C.; Haller, H. High glucose concentrations increase endothelial cell permeability via activation of protein kinase C alpha. Circ. Res. 1997, 81, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Meredith, M.E.; Qu, Z.-C.; May, J.M. Ascorbate reverses high glucose- and RAGE-induced leak of the endothelial permeability barrier. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 445, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kida, T.; Oku, H.; Osuka, S.; Horie, T.; Ikeda, T. Hyperglycemia-induced VEGF and ROS production in retinal cells is inhibited by the mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Aliberti, M.J.R.; Szlejf, C.; Lima-Costa, M.F.; de Andrade, F.B.; Alexandre, T.S.; Ferri, C.P.; Suemoto, C.K. Frailty Modifies the Association of Hypertension With Cognition in Older Adults: Evidence From the ELSI-Brazil. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Boil. Sci. Med. Sci. 2021, 76, 1134–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, J.S.W.; Auyeung, T.-W.; Leung, J.; Kwok, T.; Leung, P.-C.; Woo, J. Physical frailty in older adults is associated with metabolic and atherosclerotic risk factors and cognitive impairment independent of muscle mass. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2011, 15, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Quach, L.T.; Primack, J.; Bozzay, M.; Madrigal, C.; Erqou, S.; Rudolph, J.L. The Intersection of Physical and Social Frailty in Older Adults. Rhode Isl. Med. J. 2021, 104, 16–19. [Google Scholar]
  69. Rezaei-Shahsavarloo, Z.; Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, F.; Gobbens, R.J.J.; Ebadi, A.; Harouni, G.G. The impact of interventions on management of frailty in hospitalized frail older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2020, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Negm, A.; Kennedy, C.C.; Thabane, L.; Veroniki, A.-A.; Adachi, J.D.; Richardson, J.; Cameron, I.D.; Giangregorio, A.; Petropoulou, M.; Alsaad, S.M.; et al. Management of Frailty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2019, 20, 1190–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Camafort, M.; Kario, K. Hypertension, heart failure, and frailty in older people: A common but unclear situation. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2020, 22, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Liu, P.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Mesbah, S.E.; Ji, T.; Ma, L. Frailty and hypertension in older adults: Current understanding and future perspectives. Hypertens. Res. 2020, 43, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lin, Y.; Wang, K.; Ma, C.; Wang, X.; Gong, Z.; Zhang, R.; Zang, D.; Cheng, Y. Evaluation of Metformin on Cognitive Improvement in Patients with Non-Dementia Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Abnormal Glucose Metabolism. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Zhang, Q.Q.; Li, W.S.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.L.; Ba, Y.G.; Zhang, R.X. Metformin Therapy and Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Medicine 2020, 99, e19378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Koenig, A.M.; Mechanic-Hamilton, D.; Xie, S.X.; Combs, M.F.; Cappola, A.R.; Xie, L.; Detre, J.A.; Wolk, D.A.; Arnold, S.E. Effects of the Insulin Sensitizer Metformin in Alzheimer Disease: Pilot Data from a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2017, 31, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Luchsinger, J.; Ma, Y.; Christophi, C.A.; Florez, H.; Golden, S.H.; Hazuda, H.; Crandall, J.; Venditti, E.; Watson, K.; Jeffries, S.; et al. Metformin, Lifestyle Intervention, and Cognition in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 958–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Moore, E.M.; Mander, A.G.; Ames, D.; Kotowicz, M.A.; Carne, R.P.; Brodaty, H.; Woodward, M.; Boundy, K.; Ellis, K.A.; Bush, A.I.; et al. Increased Risk of Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Diabetes Is Associated With Metformin. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 2981–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Ahmed, F.W.; Rider, R.; Glanville, M.; Narayanan, K.; Razvi, S.; Weaver, J.U. Metformin improves circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells in type 1 diabetes: MERIT study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2016, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Apostolova, N.; Iannantuoni, F.; Gruevska, A.; Muntane, J.; Rocha, M.; Victor, V.M. Mechanisms of action of metformin in type 2 diabetes: Effects on mitochondria and leukocyte-endothelium interactions. Redox Biol. 2020, 34, 101517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Arunachalam, G.; Samuel, S.M.; Marei, I.; Ding, H.; Triggle, C. Metformin modulates hyperglycaemia-induced endothelial senescence and apoptosis through SIRT. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 171, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Diaz-Morales, N.; Rovira-Llopis, S.; Bañuls, C.; Lopez-Domenech, S.; Escribano-Lopez, I.; Veses, S.; Jover, A.; Rocha, M.; Hernandez-Mijares, A.; Victor, V. Does Metformin Protect Diabetic Patients from Oxidative Stress and Leukocyte-Endothelium Interactions? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 27, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Detaille, D.; Guigas, B.; Chauvin, C.; Batandier, C.; Fontaine, E.; Wiernsperger, N.; Leverve, X. Metformin Prevents High-Glucose-Induced Endothelial Cell Death Through a Mitochondrial Permeability Transition-Dependent Process. Diabetes 2005, 54, 2179–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Batchuluun, B.; Inoguchi, T.; Sonoda, N.; Sasaki, S.; Inoue, T.; Fujimura, Y.; Miura, D.; Takayanagi, R. Metformin and liraglutide ameliorate high glucose-induced oxidative stress via inhibition of PKC-NAD(P)H oxidase pathway in human aortic endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 2014, 232, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bharath, L.P.; Agrawal, M.; McCambridge, G.; Nicholas, D.A.; Hasturk, H.; Liu, J.; Jiang, K.; Liu, R.; Guo, Z.; Deeney, J.; et al. Metformin Enhances Autophagy and Normalizes Mitochondrial Function to Alleviate Aging-Associated Inflammation. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Salvatore, T.; Pafundi, P.C.; Galiero, R.; Rinaldi, L.; Caturano, A.; Vetrano, E.; Aprea, C.; Albanese, G.; Di Martino, A.; Ricozzi, C.; et al. Can Metformin Exert as an Active Drug on Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetic Subjects? Biomedicines 2020, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cheang, W.S.; Tian, X.Y.; Wong, W.T.; Lau, C.W.; Lee, S.S.; Chen, Z.Y.; Yao, X.; Wang, N.; Huang, Y. Metformin Protects Endothelial Function in Diet-Induced Obese Mice by Inhibition of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress through 5’ Adenosine Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase-Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Delta Pathway. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 830–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Tao, L.; Fan, X.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Z. Metformin Prevented High Glucose-Induced Endothelial Reactive Oxygen Species Via Ogg1 in an Ampkalpha-Lin-28 Dependent Pathway. Life Sci. 2021, 268, 119015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Touyz, R.M.; Rios, F.J.; Alves-Lopes, R.; Neves, K.B.; Camargo, L.D.L.; Montezano, A.C. Oxidative Stress: A Unifying Paradigm in Hypertension. Can. J. Cardiol. 2020, 36, 659–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Buford, T.W. Hypertension and aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2016, 26, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Watson, T.; Goon, P.K.; Lip, G.Y. Endothelial Progenitor Cells, Endothelial Dysfunction, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress in Hypertension. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2008, 10, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chaudhary, P.; Pandey, A.; Azad, C.S.; Tia, N.; Singh, M.; Gambhir, I.S. Association of oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. Anal. Biochem. 2020, 590, 113535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Barzilai, N.; Crandall, J.P.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; Espeland, M.A. Metformin as a Tool to Target Aging. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Novelle, M.G.; Ali, A.; Diéguez, C.; Bernier, M.; De Cabo, R. Metformin: A Hopeful Promise in Aging Research. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a025932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Benetos, A.; Petrovic, M.; Strandberg, T. Hypertension Management in Older and Frail Older Patients. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Gambardella, J.; Khondkar, W.; Morelli, M.B.; Wang, X.; Santulli, G.; Trimarco, V. Arginine and Endothelial Function. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Alonso-Bouzón, C.; Carcaillon, L.; Garcia-Garcia, F.J.; Amor-Andrés, M.S.; El Assar, M.; Rodríguez-Mañas, L. Association between endothelial dysfunction and frailty: The Toledo Study for Healthy Aging. Age 2014, 36, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Espinoza, S.; Musi, N.; Wang, C.-P.; Michalek, J.; Orsak, B.; Romo, T.; Powers, B.; Conde, A.; Moris, M.; Bair-Kelps, D.; et al. Rationale and Study Design of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Metformin to Prevent Frailty in Older Adults With Prediabetes. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Boil. Sci. Med. Sci. 2020, 75, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Wang, C.-P.; Lorenzo, C.; Habib, S.L.; Jo, B.; Espinoza, S.E. Differential effects of metformin on age related comorbidities in older men with type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2017, 31, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Glossmann, H.H.; Lutz, O.M. Metformin and Aging: A Review. Gerontology 2019, 65, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Baskaran, D.; Aparicio-Ugarriza, R.; Ferri-Guerra, J.; Milyani, R.; Florez, H.; Ruiz, J.G. Is There an Association Between Metformin Exposure and Frailty? Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2020, 6, 2333721420924956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 10 02115 g001 550
Figure 1. Study Flow Diagram. DM: diabetes mellitus; HG: hyperglycemic; NG: normoglycemic.
Figure 1. Study Flow Diagram. DM: diabetes mellitus; HG: hyperglycemic; NG: normoglycemic.
Cells 10 02115 g001
Cells 10 02115 g002 550
Figure 2. Correlation between MoCA score and glycemia.
Figure 2. Correlation between MoCA score and glycemia.
Cells 10 02115 g002
Cells 10 02115 g003 550
Figure 3. MoCA score in normoglycemic subjects without diabetes mellitus (No-DM), normoglycemic patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperglycemic patients treated with insulin, and hyperglycemic patients treated with metformin. The number within each bar indicates the number of patients/group. Data are means ± SD; *: p < 0.05.
Figure 3. MoCA score in normoglycemic subjects without diabetes mellitus (No-DM), normoglycemic patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperglycemic patients treated with insulin, and hyperglycemic patients treated with metformin. The number within each bar indicates the number of patients/group. Data are means ± SD; *: p < 0.05.
Cells 10 02115 g003
Cells 10 02115 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of metformin on endothelial permeability. We assessed the dose-response relationship of metformin on the leakage of human brain microvascular endothelial cells, cultured at the indicated conditions (Glu: glucose; Mann: mannitol); *: p < 0.05 vs. Glu 5 mM; #: p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle.
Figure 4. Effects of metformin on endothelial permeability. We assessed the dose-response relationship of metformin on the leakage of human brain microvascular endothelial cells, cultured at the indicated conditions (Glu: glucose; Mann: mannitol); *: p < 0.05 vs. Glu 5 mM; #: p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle.
Cells 10 02115 g004
Cells 10 02115 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of metformin on the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We evaluated the effects of increasing doses of metformin on the production of mitochondrial (A) and cellular (B) ROS in human brain microvascular endothelial cells cultured at the indicated conditions (Glu: glucose; Mann: mannitol). *: p < 0.05 vs. Glu 5 mM; #: p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle.
Figure 5. Effects of metformin on the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We evaluated the effects of increasing doses of metformin on the production of mitochondrial (A) and cellular (B) ROS in human brain microvascular endothelial cells cultured at the indicated conditions (Glu: glucose; Mann: mannitol). *: p < 0.05 vs. Glu 5 mM; #: p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle.
Cells 10 02115 g005
Cells 10 02115 g006 550
Figure 6. Metformin attenuates high-glucose-induced cell death. By using a luminogenic Caspase-Glo® 3/7 assay, we evaluated the effects of increasing concentrations of metformin on the apoptosis of human brain microvascular endothelial cells induced by high-glucose (Glu: glucose; Mann: mannitol). The experiments were performed in triplicate. Box plots indicate upper/lower quartiles, the line in the middle of each box is the mean, and the whiskers represent the 5th–95th percentile range of values; *: p < 0.05 vs. Glu 5 mM; #: p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle.
Figure 6. Metformin attenuates high-glucose-induced cell death. By using a luminogenic Caspase-Glo® 3/7 assay, we evaluated the effects of increasing concentrations of metformin on the apoptosis of human brain microvascular endothelial cells induced by high-glucose (Glu: glucose; Mann: mannitol). The experiments were performed in triplicate. Box plots indicate upper/lower quartiles, the line in the middle of each box is the mean, and the whiskers represent the 5th–95th percentile range of values; *: p < 0.05 vs. Glu 5 mM; #: p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle.
Cells 10 02115 g006
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of our population.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of our population.
NG PatientsHG Patients
N106103
Mean age (years)75.0 ± 6.576.0 ± 6.1
BMI (kg/m2)27.1 ± 1.927.3 ± 1.8
SBP (mmHg)128.9 ± 12.4129.2 ± 11.8
DBP (mmHg)78.8 ± 6.679.2 ± 6.3
Heart rate (bpm)87.5 ± 8.388.2 ± 8.2
Comorbidities
Diabetes, n (%)56 (52.0)103 (100)
Dyslipidemia, n (%)66 (63.0)66 (64.0)
CVD, n (%)29 (30.0)31 (30.5)
COPD, n (%)38 (36.5)39 (38.0)
CKD n (%)43 (41.0)44 (43.0)
Current smokers, n (%)44 (41.5)41 (40.0)
Active treatments
β-blockers, n (%)61 (58.0)57 (56.0)
ACE inhibitors, n (%)73 (69.0)70 (68.0)
Angiotensin receptor blockers, n (%)35 (33.0)33 (32.0)
Calcium inhibitors, n (%)24 (23.0)28 (27.0)
Statins, n (%)57 (54.0)54 (53.0)
Diuretics, n (%)8 (8.0)11 (11.0)
Aspirin, n (%)46 (44.0)50 (49.0)
Laboratory analyses
Plasma glucose (mg/dL)124.6 ± 11.8207.3 ± 18.6
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)193.9 ± 19.8192.6 ± 20.2
Creatinine (mg/dL)1.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.1
ACE: angiotensin converting enzyme; BMI: body mass index; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CVD: cardiovascular disease; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; HG: hyperglycemic; NG: normoglycemic; SBP: systolic blood pressure.
Table
Table 2. Linear regression analysis with the MoCA score as dependent variable.
Table 2. Linear regression analysis with the MoCA score as dependent variable.
BStandard ErrorBetatp
Age−0.2470.042−0.340−5.893<0.001
Diabetes−4.3060.544−0.427−7.923<0.001
CVD−4.3490.505−0.469−8.615<0.001
Hyperlipidemia−0.6190.483−0.065−1.2810.202
CKD−1.2130.537−0.128−2.2570.025
COPD1.8610.5220.1973.5660.050
COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CVD: cardiovascular disease.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mone, P.; Gambardella, J.; Pansini, A.; de Donato, A.; Martinelli, G.; Boccalone, E.; Matarese, A.; Frullone, S.; Santulli, G. Cognitive Impairment in Frail Hypertensive Elderly Patients: Role of Hyperglycemia. Cells 2021, 10, 2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10082115

AMA Style

Mone P, Gambardella J, Pansini A, de Donato A, Martinelli G, Boccalone E, Matarese A, Frullone S, Santulli G. Cognitive Impairment in Frail Hypertensive Elderly Patients: Role of Hyperglycemia. Cells. 2021; 10(8):2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10082115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mone, Pasquale, Jessica Gambardella, Antonella Pansini, Antonio de Donato, Giuseppe Martinelli, Eugenio Boccalone, Alessandro Matarese, Salvatore Frullone, and Gaetano Santulli. 2021. "Cognitive Impairment in Frail Hypertensive Elderly Patients: Role of Hyperglycemia" Cells 10, no. 8: 2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10082115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop