Next Article in Journal
Impact of Polypharmacy for Chronic Ailments in Colon Cancer Patients: A Review Focused on Drug Repurposing
Next Article in Special Issue
Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell (pDC) Infiltration Correlate with Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Cancer Immunity, and Better Survival in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) More Strongly than Conventional Dendritic Cell (cDC)
Previous Article in Journal
Epstein–Barr Virus Infection of Pseudostratified Nasopharyngeal Epithelium Disrupts Epithelial Integrity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Targeting Innate Immunity to Treat Cancer

Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, WWW211B, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(10), 2723; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102723
Submission received: 14 September 2020 / Accepted: 16 September 2020 / Published: 23 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting Innate Immunity to Treat Cancer)
In recent years, it has become clear that the immune system plays a critical role in rejecting malignant cells. Through the complex interplay between multiple cell types from both the adaptive and innate immune systems, immune cells are able to identify and destroy tumor cells. Multiple mechanisms of escape from immune surveillance have been characterized and are being harnessed for therapeutic benefit. Proposed mechanisms include, but are not limited to, alteration of surface antigens [1,2], down-regulation of necessary components for antigen presentation [3], secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines by tumor cells or cells in the tumor micro-environment [4], and upregulation of expression of immune inhibitory molecules [5]. Drugs that target these immune-evasion mechanisms and successfully re-invigorate the immune response include inhibitors of PD-1, its ligand PDL-1, and CTLA-4, all of which have dramatically revolutionized cancer care [6,7,8]. Other classes of immune therapies that have been approved by the food and drug administration include CAR-T and natural killer (NK) cellular therapies [9], cytokine therapies [10], oncolytic viruses [11] and dendritic cell therapies, such as sipuleucel-T [12]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are thought to primarily work by activation of cytotoxic T cells [13], are the most widely used; however, they are only active in a subset of cancer patients.
To overcome resistance to therapies that manipulate adaptive immunity, pre-clinical and clinical studies are also focusing on the critical role played by innate immune cells in tumor rejection. The innate immune system recognizes pathogen-associated molecular patterns present on microbes and virus-infected cells, but not in otherwise healthy host tissue. The innate immune response relies on natural physical barriers, the complement system, inflammation, and several key cell types including mast cells, macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, basophils, dendritic cells and natural killer (NK) cells. Macrophages and neutrophils are primarily responsible for phagocytosing pathogens, releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which in part, upregulate adhesion molecules on endothelial cells to induce leukocyte extravasation. Dendritic cells serve as a critical bridge between the innate and adaptive immune response by generating and presenting peptide antigens to T cells. NK cells function in a manner very similar to cytotoxic T cells but lack rearranging receptors and depend on a complex interplay between a plethora of stimulatory and inhibitory receptors for activation.
Innate immune cells play important roles in cancer biology. Tumor-associated macrophages have functionally diverse phenotypes [14], and polarization of macrophages toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype is being studied to treat cancer. NK cells have the potential to recognize and kill malignant cells and can be harnessed for cancer therapy [15]. Dendritic cell activation has been widely studied as an adjuvant to T cell activating therapies or as a single modality to enhance antigen presentation, such as with the use of sipuleucel-T [12].
In this Special Issue, we review new and emerging approaches to activate innate immunity in cancer patients and present some primary research data. These approaches are being studied alone and in combination with methods to target adaptive immunity. Both pre-clinical and clinical studies are highlighted. Finally, we discuss cutting edge technologies that can further our understanding of complex immune interactions at the cellular level.

References

  1. Donia, M.; Andersen, R.; Kjeldsen, J.W.; Fagone, P.; Munir, S.; Nicoletti, F.; Andersen, M.H.; Thor Straten, P.; Svane, I.M. Aberrant Expression of MHC Class II in Melanoma Attracts Inflammatory Tumor-Specific CD4+ T- Cells, Which Dampen CD8+ T-cell Antitumor Reactivity. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 3747–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Johnsen, A.K.; Templeton, D.J.; Sy, M.; Harding, C.V. Deficiency of transporter for antigen presentation (TAP) in tumor cells allows evasion of immune surveillance and increases tumorigenesis. J. Immunol. 1999, 163, 4224–4231. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Catalan, E.; Charni, S.; Jaime, P.; Aguiló, J.I.; Enríquez, J.A.; Naval, J.; Pardo, J.; Villalba, M.; Anel, A. MHC-I modulation due to changes in tumor cell metabolism regulates tumor sensitivity to CTL and NK cells. Oncoimmunology 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Guo, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Mok, S.C.; Xue, F.; Zhang, W. CXCL12/CXCR4: A symbiotic bridge linking cancer cells and their stromal neighbors in oncogenic communication networks. Oncogene 2016, 35, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tumeh, P.C.; Harview, C.L.; Yearley, J.H.; Shintaku, I.P.; Taylor, E.J.; Robert, L.; Chmielowski, B.; Spasic, M.; Henry, G.; Ciobanu, V.; et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 2014, 515, 568–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hodi, F.S.; O’Day, S.J.; McDermott, D.F.; Weber, R.W.; Sosman, J.A.; Haanen, J.B.; Gonzalez, R.; Robert, C.; Schadendorf, D.; Hassel, J.C.; et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ascierto, P.A.; Long, G.V.; Robert, C.; Brady, B.; Dutriaux, C.; Di Giacomo, A.M.; Mortier, L.; Hassel, J.C.; Rutkowski, P.; McNeil, C.; et al. Survival Outcomes in Patients With Previously Untreated BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy: Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Larkin, J.; Chiarion-Sileni, V.; Gonzalez, R.; Grob, J.J.; Rutkowski, P.; Lao, C.D.; Cowey, C.L.; Schadendorf, D.; Wagstaff, J.; Dummer, R.; et al. Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1535–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Schuster, S.J.; Svoboda, J.; Chong, E.A.; Nasta, S.D.; Mato, A.R.; Anak, Ö.; Brogdon, J.L.; Pruteanu-Malinici, I.; Bhoj, V.; Landsburg, D.; et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Refractory B-Cell Lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2545–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Berraondo, P.; Sanmamed, M.F.; Ochoa, M.C.; Etxeberria, I.; Aznar, M.A.; Pérez-Gracia, J.L.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.E.; Ponz-Sarvise, M.; Castañón, E.; Melero, I. Cytokines in clinical cancer immunotherapy. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Andtbacka, R.H.; Kaufman, H.L.; Collichio, F.; Amatruda, T.; Senzer, N.; Chesney, J.; Delman, K.A.; Spitler, L.E.; Puzanov, I.; Agarwala, S.S.; et al. Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 2780–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kantoff, P.W.; Higano, C.S.; Shore, N.D.; Berger, E.R.; Small, E.J.; Penson, D.F.; Redfern, C.H.; Ferrari, A.C.; Dreicer, R.; Sims, R.B.; et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Das, R.; Verma, R.; Sznol, M.; Boddupalli, C.S.; Gettinger, S.N.; Kluger, H.; Callahan, M.; Wolchok, J.D.; Halaban, R.; Dhodapkar, M.V.; et al. Combination therapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 leads to distinct immunologic changes in vivo. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 950–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Komohara, Y.M.; Jinushi, M.T. Clinical significance of macrophage heterogeneity in human malignant tumors. Cancer Sci. 2014, 105, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kohrt, H.E.; Thielens, A.; Marabelle, A.; Sagiv-Barfi, I.; Sola, C.; Chanuc, F.; Fuseri, N.; Bonnafous, C.; Czerwinski, D.; Rajapaksa, A.; et al. Anti-KIR antibody enhancement of anti-lymphoma activity of natural killer cells as monotherapy and in combination with anti-CD20 antibodies. Blood 2014, 123, 678–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Austin, M.; Kluger, H. Targeting Innate Immunity to Treat Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 2723. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102723

AMA Style

Austin M, Kluger H. Targeting Innate Immunity to Treat Cancer. Cancers. 2020; 12(10):2723. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102723

Chicago/Turabian Style

Austin, Matthew, and Harriet Kluger. 2020. "Targeting Innate Immunity to Treat Cancer" Cancers 12, no. 10: 2723. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102723

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop