Next Article in Journal
Economic and Welfare Impacts of Providing Good Life Opportunities to Farm Animals
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of a Trans-Galactooligosaccharide on Biochemical Blood Parameters and Intestine Morphometric Parameters of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Innate Immune Responses of Skin Mucosa in Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio) Fed a Diet Supplemented with Galactooligosaccharides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aeromonas veronii Infection in Commercial Freshwater Fish: A Potential Threat to Public Health

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Provincial Engineering Research Center of Animal Probiotics, Key Laboratory of Animal Production and Product Quality Safety of Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin 130118, China
2
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
3
College of Life Science, Changchun Sci-Tech University, Shuangyang District, Changchun 130600, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(4), 608; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040608
Submission received: 23 March 2020 / Accepted: 30 March 2020 / Published: 2 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healthy and High-Quality Fish Farming)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Aeromonas veronii is an important aquatic zoonotic agent. In this study, A. veronii was isolated from healthy fish, and the relationship between the pathogenicity and virulence genes of A. veronii was investigated by molecular identification. The aim of this study was to ensure the safety of freshwater products by evaluating the infection status in edible freshwater fish.

Abstract

Aeromonas veronii is an important pathogen causing freshwater fish sepsis and ulcer syndrome. An increasing number of cases have demonstrated its significance as an aquatic zoonotic agent. The purpose of this study was to ensure the safety of freshwater products by evaluating the infection status of edible freshwater fish. In this experiment, we isolated A. veronii from several species of apparently healthy freshwater fish, including Carassius auratus, Cyprinus carpio, Ctenopharyngodon idella, and Silurus asotus. A. veronii was identified through bacterial staining, culture characteristics, and 16S rDNA gene sequence. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to investigate the distribution of seven major virulence genes, including aerolysin (aer: 88.51%), cytotoxic enterotoxin (act: 71.26%), serine proteinase (ser: 54.02%), adhesin (Aha: 40.23%), phospholipase (lip: 45.98%), nuclease (exu: 51.72%), and quorum sensing-controlled virulence factor (LuxS: 59.77%). In total, 496 strains of Aeromonas were isolated, including 87 strains of A. veronii. The isolates of A. veronii were Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria, and the colonies are yellow on Rimler-Shotts (RS) medium and showed greater than 99% homology with A. veronii ATCC35624 according to analyses of the 16S rDNA sequence. Nearly 50% of the A. veronii isolates carried at least four or more virulence genes, 25% of the isolates carried at least five types of virulence genes, and 59.77% isolates carried the LuxS gene, and the isolates carrying more virulence genes were found to be more virulent. These results are of great significance for further improving the food safety assessment of freshwater aquatic products.

1. Introduction

Aeromonas veronii is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, and facultative anaerobic bacterium. A. veronii is widely distributed in nature, with strong environmental adaptability [1]. In recent years, there have been an increasing numbers of cases of large-scale A. veronii outbreaks. It has been reported that A. veronii can infect freshwater fish, amphibians, birds, and red meat animals, resulting in serious losses to the aquaculture industry and threatening food safety [2,3,4]. In addition, A. veronii can also cause human infections, especially in elderly and children with low immunity, causing sepsis, gastroenteritis, and other diseases [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Recent reports suggest that individuals with healthy immune function can be infected [12,13]. In recent years, the development of aquaculturehas been accompanied by an increased incidence of bacterial diseases. The abuse of antibiotics has led to the increased antibiotic resistance of Aeromonas, and the presence of antibiotic residues in aquatic products threatens human health [14]. In recent years, reports of infectious diarrhea and food poisoning caused by pathogenic bacteria have increased [15].
Previous research shows that the pathogenicity of Aeromonas involves many factors that work together. There has been a variety of proven virulence factors, including outer membrane proteins, motility related factors, toxins, proteases, quorum sensing systems, secretion systems, and iron ion acquisition systems, among others [16,17]. Related research demonstrated that hemolytic and cytotoxic activities and pathogenicity were correlated with the presence of virulence genes in Aeromonas strains [4]. Those virulence factors play an important role in the development of disease. In this study, seven important virulence genes (aer, act, Aha, ser, exu, lip, and LuxS) of the isolates were detected by PCR assay.
Carassius auratus, Cyprinus carpio, Ctenopharyngodon idella, and Silurus asotus are some of the most common edible fish in northern China. In 2018, the total output of freshwater fish in China was 25.44 million tons, including 2.77 million tons of Carassius auratus, 2.96 million tons of Cyprinus carpio, 5.50 million tons of Ctenopharyngodon idella, and 0.37 million tons of Silurus asotus (China Fishery Statistical Yearbook, 2019). The production of these four types of fish comprises nearly half of all freshwater fish production. Therefore, ensuring the safety of these aquatic products is vital to protecting consumer health. Hence, the investigation of A. veronii infection is significant from a public health perspective. Healthy freshwater fish of the four common species, available in Changchun City, were used as research materials. A. veronii were isolated from these fish followed by an investigation of virulence genes in the bacterial isolates. The results of this study will be of great significance for further improving the food safety assessment of freshwater aquatic products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Information

In the spring (April to May) and summer (June to August) of 2014, we sampled 203 apparently healthy freshwater fish from five large supermarkets and five aquaculture markets in the city of Changchun. Details regarding the sampling of fish, including Carassius auratus (length 20 ± 2 cm, weight 300 ± 100 g), Cyprinus carpio (length 40 ± 5 cm, weight 1500 ± 500 g), Ctenopharyngodon idella (length 60 ± 5 cm, weight 1500 ± 500 g), and Silurus asotus (length 50 ± 5 cm, weight 2000 ± 500 g) are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. All fish were reared in flow-through aquariums (200 L) at an average temperature of 26 ± 1.0 °C, with a natural photoperiod. Fish were fed with a commercial diet corresponding to an amount of 2% of their body weight twice per day. During the entire experimental period, 30% of the water in each tank was exchanged daily, and the pH was kept at 7.8 ± 0.5, dissolved oxygen at 5.6 ± 0.45 mg/L, nitrate at 0.015 ± 0.003 mg/L, and ammonia at 0.12 ± 0.01 mg/L.

2.2. Ethics Statement

Healthy freshwater fish were purchased from large supermarkets and aquaculture markets in Changchun City in China. Additionally, the mice used for pathogenicity experiments were purchased from the experimental animal center of Jilin University in China (JLAU08201409). All animal protocols were reviewed and approved by the animal administration and ethics committee of Jilin Agricultural University. The study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations set forth in the animal ethics procedures and guidelines of the People’s Republic of China.

2.3. Separation, Purification, and Physiological and Biochemical Test

We performed anesthesia and surface disinfection on the selected fish. Fish intestinal contents were scraped by aseptic cotton buds, inoculated in alkaline peptone water under sterile conditions, and cultured at 28 °C for 6 h. The enriched bacterial cultures were streaked onto RS identification medium (Beijing Bridge Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and cultured at 28 °C for 18 h. Next, 3–5 characteristic colonies were randomly picked for inoculation in nutrient broth (Beijing Landbridge Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and amplified for 18 h. Then, we streaked them out again on RS culture medium, and repeated the process. In addition, the colonies were Gram-stained and microscopically examined. The cultures were stored at 4 °C.
The purified bacteria were inoculated in a microbiological reaction tube (Hangzhou Microbe Reagent Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. We conducted a preliminary identification of strains, and the test results were referenced using the System Identification Manual of Common Bacteria and Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [18,19].

2.4. Molecular Sequencing

The identified strains were initially inoculated in nutrient broth and cultured for amplification. The extraction of bacterial genomic DNA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beijing Solarbio Cable Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), followed by preservation at −20 °C. Then, we searched the 16S rDNA gene sequences of different Aeromonas species in GenBank, using specific primers verified by BLASTn (Table 3) [20]. The PCR system (25 μL) included 0.5 μL template (bacterial genomic DNA), 2.5 μL 10 × PCR Buffer, 0.5 μL 5 U/L TaqDNA polymerase, 2 μL 2mmol/L dNTPs, 10 μM primers (0.5 μL each), and ddH2O. The ATCC35624 genomic DNA (template) of the standard A. veronii strain served as the positive control, and ATCC7966 genome DNA (template) of A. hydrophila represented the negative control. Reaction conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s; 72 °C for 10 min; and a final temperature of 4 °C. The bacterial strain was identified using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The positive strains were identified by the presence of a single positive band of 886 bp, and amplicons were sent to TaKaRa (Dalian, China) for sequencing after purification by gel extraction. The sequencing results were identified using BLAST searching. The accession number of the 16s rDNA gene for reference strain was A. veronii ATCC35624 (X60414.2).

2.5. Virulence Gene Detection

Based on published studies and GenBank sequences, seven pairs of specific primers were designed (Table 3) [21]. To determine the genomic DNA template in the PCR reaction system, we investigated seven virulence genes in 87 strains of A. veronii, with ATCC35624 genomic DNA as the positive control and standard strains serving as the template, and performed PCR followed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR products of different virulence genes in several bacterial isolates were randomly selected. These PCR products were recovered using the DNA gel extraction kit according to the instructions provided by Axygen Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China). Purified products were sent to Takara for sequencing. The sequencing results were analyzed using BLAST to verify the accuracy of the PCR results.

2.6. Pathogenicity Test on Mice

The pathogenic experiments on mice were carried out by randomly selecting strains of A. veronii carrying different virulence genes. Bacteria were isolated from the dead mice and identified to confirm that the pathogenic strain was A. veronii, and the LD50 was calculated using the Reed and Muench Method [22].

3. Results

3.1. Bacterial Separation, Purification, and Physicochemical Identification

Using RS medium for growth, we isolated 496 strains that were round, smooth, and moist, and colored yellow or yellow-green, suggesting that they were Aeromonas strains. Identification based on published methods showed that 91 of these putative isolated Aeromonas strains correspond to strains of A. veronii [23].

3.2. Molecular Identification

We confirmed the identity of any isolates initially suspected to be A. veronii strains through the PCR of 16S rDNA using specifically designed primers, and the strains were determined as potential positive strains if the electrophoretic band appeared at about 886 bp (Figure 1). The positive PCR products were confirmed following gel extraction, purification, sequencing, and sequence comparison with BLASTn. The isolates of A. veronii showed greater than 99% homology with A. veronii ATCC35624(X60414.2) by analysis of the 16S rDNA sequence. Combined with the physiological and biochemical test results (Table S1), we finally identified 87 strains of A. veronii, accounting for 17.54% of the isolated strains.
The separation rate (number of A. veronii isolates/total isolates) of Carassius auratus was the highest, at 23.44%. The separation rates of Cyprinus carpio and Ctenopharyngodon idella were 21.49% and 18.85%, respectively. The separation rate of Silurus asotus was the lowest, at 6.40%. The differences in sampling times and locations, and the conditions of different fish carrying the identified 87 strains are presented in Table 4.

3.3. Detection of Virulence Genes in A. veronii Isolates

In addition to the LuxS gene, the frequencies of the six virulence genes in the 87 strains of A. veronii isolates were as follows: 2.30% (2/87); 21.14% (21/87); 25.29% (22/87); 26.44% (23/87); 14.94% (5/87); 5.75% (5/87); and 1.15% (1/87) of the isolates contained 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0 types of virulence genes, respectively. The number of strains carrying 0 to 4 virulence genes as isolated in summer outnumbered those isolated carrying 0 to 4 virulence genes when in spring. However, there were a higher number of strains that carried 5 to 6 virulence genes when isolated in spring rather than in summer (Table 5). Strains carrying 0 to 1 virulence genes isolated in the supermarkets outnumbered those isolated in aquatic markets. However, a higher number of strains carrying 2–6 virulence genes was isolated in aquatic markets than in supermarkets. Overall, strains isolated in aquatic markets carried a higher number of virulence genes (Table 6) than those isolated in supermarkets. It can be seen from the table that the number of virulence genes carried by A. veronii isolates had no correlation with sampling sites, sampling time, or fish species (Table S2).
Several virulence genes were isolated from A. veronii in Carassius auratus, Ctenopharyngodon idella, and Cyprinus carpio from both supermarkets and aquatic markets, in both spring and summer. However, no virulence genes of A. veronii were isolated from Silurus asotus in the supermarkets. No correlation existed between the virulence genes carried by A. veronii isolates and sampling location, sampling time, nor species of fish. Among the isolated strains, 88.51% (77/87) carried a 431 bp fragment of the aer gene; 71.26% (62/87) carried a 232 bp of the act gene; 40.23% (35/87) carried a 1082 bp fragment of the Aha gene; 54.02% (47/87) carried a 128 bp fragment of the ser gene; 51.72% (45/87) carried a 323 bp fragment of the exu gene; and 45.98% (40/87) carried a 247 bp fragment of the lip gene. LuxS (a marker gene for the synthesis of quorum sensing signal molecule AI-2) was present among 59.77% (52/87) of the isolated strains (Supplementary Figure S1).

3.4. Pathogenicity Test

One strain each of the Aeromonas strains carrying either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 virulence genes was randomly selected for a pathogenicity test to determine the half-lethal dose (LD50) in mice. Of all the strains, CC7282-3 showed no lethality against mice at the tested concentrations. The LD50 of SL7231-1 was 4.51 × 109 CFU (Colony-Forming Units)/mL, the LD50 of CC7281-2 was 3.22 × 108 CFU/mL, and the LD50 of SL7232-1 was 4.27 × 107 CFU/mL. For SJ7231, the LD50 of SJ7231-3 was 1.21 × 107 CFU/mL, the LD50 of SN7252-4 was 6.42 × 106 CFU/mL, and the LD50 of SC4122-5 was 4.17 × 106 CFU/mL (Table 7).

4. Discussion

A. veronii is widely found in the environment, especially in freshwater and estuaries, and demonstrates strong adaptability. Recent reports of infection in diverse aquatic species have prompted investigation into the bacterial pathogenesis in humans, animals, and fish [24,25]. Previously, research has shown that isolates could infect fish in the laboratory [26]. We investigated the burden of A. veronii infection in commercially available fish, including Carassius auratus, Cyprinus carpio, Ctenopharyngodon idella, and Silurus asotus. Carassius auratus and Silurus asotus showed strong resistance when infected in vitro with pathogenic A. veronii isolated from Cyprinus carpio. Although we successfully infected Carassius auratus and Silurus asotus, they eventually recovered without death, suggesting that the pathogenic strains of A. veronii can also exist in vivo in certain fish. In addition, our experimental results also confirmed that A. veronii existed in all of the four above-mentioned commercial fish (total separation rate of 17.84%). At the same time, according to the percentage of A. veronii isolated from these four freshwater fish, it can be seen that the separation rate is not related to the size of fish. Since the four types of freshwater fish are common edible fish in northern China, this investigation into the burden of A. veronii infection is of great public health significance.
The detection of the 16S rDNA gene is a powerful tool for the detection and identification of pathogenic bacteria [27]. The 16S rDNA-specific PCR confirmed the in vivo presence of A. veronii in Carassius auratus and other species, while other researchers also isolated this bacterial strain from American Silurus asotus [28]. The isolation rate of the pathogen in different fish indicated that the infectious burden of Carassius auratus was the highest, which may be associated with the polyphagic and benthic characteristics of Carassius auratus. Cyprinus carpio showed strong anteversion, suggesting the ability to carry a variety of pathogenic bacteria without manifesting disease. The infectious burden of Silurus asotus was the lowest, which was inconsistent with the separation rate of A. veronii in the study of Nawaz, which was probably due to the different sample collection locations and different types of studied Silurus asotus species [29,30,31]. The separation rate of A. veronii in the summer samples showed a specific increase compared with samples collected during spring, which increased the risk of product spoilage; even fresh fish are susceptible to bacterial contamination. The consumption of these aquatic products without appropriate disinfection leads to food poisoning, warranting the monitoring of A. veronii infection in aquatic products during summer. In terms of sampling location, the A. veronii burden in samples collected in the supermarkets was significantly lower than in those collected in the aquatic markets, which was closely related to the adverse environment of fish cultivation, contaminated water, crowded conditions, and fish polyculture. In comparison, the conditions for the preservation of aquatic products in the supermarkets were better, which was due to the good water quality and aeration. Therefore, it is suggested that regulatory authorities should intensify the supervision of aquatic products that are commercially available.
The pathogenesis of A. veronii infection is complex and is currently under active investigation. However, the relationship between the virulence genes and the pathogenicity of bacterial strains is yet to be elucidated [32]. The detection of bacterial virulence genes is essential to determine their potential pathogenicity and prevent possible infectious disease. This study analyzed the carrying status of virulence genes in A. veronii strains isolated from fish intestines to verify their potential pathogenicity. The results showed that 50% of the bacterial strains isolated from fish intestine carried four or more types of virulence genes, suggesting that the aquatic products of commercially available freshwater fish in Changchun may carry pathogenic A. veronii, which was similar to the results of Rahman [24]. This study also confirmed that A. veronii isolated from the intestinal tract of fish was different from that isolated from the aquatic environment. Aerolysin is the main virulent factor in Aeromonas, contributing to bacterial pathogenesis [33,34]. However, in the 1990s, the aerolysin gene had not been detected in any A. veronii isolates [35]. In 2002, Gonzolez-Serrano also confirmed that A. veronii strains isolated from aqueous environment lacked the aerolysin gene [36]. In 2007, Nawaz found that the aer gene existed in 96% of the bacterial strains isolated from Silurus asotus [21]. The results of this study also show that 88.51% of A. veronii isolated from fish intestines carried the aer gene. Whether this contributes to enhanced virulence in the environment still remains to be investigated in additional strains. In addition, serine proteinase affects the activity of extracellular enzymes such as aerolysin, strongly influencing the virulence of bacterial strains. Adhesin and phospholipase play an important role in adhesion and integration, as well as in the pathogenesis of Aeromonas species [37,38,39]. This study found that the carrying rate of the lip gene in Aeromonas strains isolated in spring was obviously higher than in summer. However, whether this is a common phenomenon needs further analysis, as well as the determination of its relationship with pathogenicity. As a virulence factor, nuclease plays an important role in other pathogenic bacteria, although Nawaz did not detect the exu gene in the strains isolated from Silurus asotus [21]. However, this test confirmed that the bacterial isolates carried the exu gene (51.72%), although it was unclear whether this phenomenon was related to the regional differences between strains.
LuxS is the marker gene regulating the synthesis of quorum sensing signal molecule AI-2 [40,41]. The quorum sensing system is associated with bacterial virulence [42,43], and it is closely associated with biofilm production [44,45]. Studies have demonstrated that bacterial biofilm enhances resistance [46]. In this study, 59.77% of the bacterial isolates carried the LuxS gene, suggesting the potential for biofilm formation.
The pathogenicity test showed that the more virulence genes the strain carried, the smaller the LD50 and the stronger the pathogenicity. Thus, we could confirm that the number of virulence genes carried by A. veronii might be positively correlated with the pathogenicity of A. veronii. In summary, our research shows that there were many different strains of A. veronii in the intestinal and aquatic environment of fish, which might potentially cause great harm in terms of public health and safety.
In addition, the relationship between the virulence genes carried by the isolated strains and the samples and their sampling environment is not obvious, which suggests a wide prevalence of pathogenic Aeromonas strains in aquatic products. Due to the diversity of the virulence genes, consumers handling and cooking fresh aquatic products should be aware of any possible A. veronii contamination. Public health authorities should monitor the potential pathogenesis of A. veronii for effective prevention and control measures.

5. Conclusions

The results showed that nearly 50% of the A. veronii isolates carried at least four or more virulence genes, and 25% of the A. veronii isolates carried at least five or more virulence genes. And there was no significant relationship between the type and quantity of virulence genes carried by the isolates and the sampling environment, time and sample type. The A. veronii isolates carrying more virulence genes were found to be more virulent in mice. The commercial fish carrying A. veronii poses potential threat to human health.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/4/608/s1, Figure S1: The detection result of seven major virulence genes (aer, act, Aha, ser, exu, lip, LuxS) of the isolated strains (part). Table S1: Biochemical and physiological characteristic of strains. Table S2: Virulence genes of A. veronii isolated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L. and Y.K.; methodology and investigation, B.Y. and S.H.A.R.; formal analysis and software, T.L. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.L. and B.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.H.A.R.; project administration, W.S., A.Q. and G.W.; funding acquisition, Y.K., C.W. and X.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the 13th Five-Year Science and Technology Research and Planning Project of Education Department of Jilin province (JJKH20190910KJ, JJKH20201294JY), Doctoral Fund of Jilin Agricultural University (201801), Key Laboratory of Healthy Freshwater Aquaculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Key Laboratory of Fish Health and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province; Zhejiang Institute of Freshwater Fisheries (Project No. ZJK202007), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201927), and Youth Talent Promotion Project of Jilin Province (201905).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sayed Haidar Abbas Razad for critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Parte, A.C. LPSN—List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 42, 613–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ghenghesh, K.S.; Abeid, S.S.; Jaber, M.M.; Ben-Taher, S.A. Isolation and haemolytic activity of Aeromonas species from domestic dogs and cats. Comp. Immunol. Microb. 1999, 22, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. D’Aloia, M.A.; Bailey, T.A.; Samour, J.H.; Naldo, J.; Howlett, J.C. Bacterial flora of captive houbara (Chlamydotis undulata), kori (Ardeotis kori) and rufous-crested (Eupodotis ruficrista) bustards. Avian Pathol. 1996, 25, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, D.X.; Kang, Y.H.; Song, M.F.; Shu, H.P.; Guo, S.N.; Jia, J.P.; Tao, L.T.; Zhao, Z.L.; Wang, C.F.; Wang, G.Q.; et al. Identity and virulence properties of Aeromonas isolates from healthy Northern snakehead (Channa argus) in China. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Parker, J.L.; Shaw, J.G. Aeromonas spp. clinical microbiology and disease. J. Infect. 2011, 62, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pablos, M.; Huys, G.; Conckaert, M.; Rodríguez-Calleja, J.M.; Otero, A.; Santos, J.A.; García-López, M.L. Identification and epidemiological relationships of Aeromonas isolates from patients with diarrhea, drinking water and foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 147, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yamada, S.; Matsushita, S.; Dejsirilert, S.; Kudoh, Y. Incidence and clinical symptoms of Aeromonas-associated travellers’ diarrhoea in Tokyo. Epidemiol. Infect. 1997, 119, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Neves, M.S.; Nunes, M.P.; Milhomem, A.M.; Ricciardi, I.D. Production of enterotoxin and cytotoxin by Aeromonas veronii. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 1990, 23, 437–440. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, P.L.; Tsai, P.J.; Chen, C.S.; Lu, Y.C.; Chen, H.M.; Lee, N.Y.; Lee, C.C.; Li, C.W.; Li, M.C.; Wu, C.J.; et al. Aeromonas stool isolates from individuals with or without diarrhea in southern Taiwan: Predominance of Aeromonas veronii. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 48, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Roberts, M.T.M.; Enoch, D.A.; Harris, K.A.; Karas, J.A. Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria bacteraemia with septic arthritis confirmed by 16S rDNA PCR in an immunocompetent adult. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 241–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mencacci, A.; Cenci, E.; Mazzolla, R.; Farinelli, S.; D’Alò, F.; Vitali, M.; Bistoni, F. Aeromonas veronii biovar veronii septicaemia and acute suppurative cholangitis in a patient with hepatitis B. J. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 52, 727–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Chim, H.; Song, C. Aeromonas infection in critically ill burn patients. Burns 2007, 33, 756–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, C.J.; Wu, J.J.; Yan, J.J.; Lee, H.C.; Lee, N.Y.; Chang, C.M.; Shih, H.I.; Wu, H.M.; Wang, L.R.; Ko, W.C. Clinical significance and distribution of putative virulence markers of 116 consecutive clinical Aeromonas isolates in southern Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2007, 54, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Castro-Escarpulli, G.; Figueras, M.J.; Aguilera-Arreola, G.; Soler, L.; Fernandez-Rendon, E.; Aparicio, G.O.; Guarro, J.; Chacon, M.R. Characterisation of Aeromonas spp. isolated from frozen fish intended for human consumption in Mexico. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 84, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stratev, D. Microbiological status of fish products on retail markets in the Republic of Bulgaria. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 64–69. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hossain, S.; De Silva, B.C.J.; Dahanayake, P.S.; Heo, G.J. Characterization of virulence properties and multi-drug resistance profiles in motile Aeromonas spp. isolated from zebrafish (Danio rerio). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, J.; Zhang, X.; Gao, X.; Jiang, Q.; Wen, Y.; Lin, L. Characterization of Virulence Properties of Aeromonas veronii Isolated from Diseased Gibel Carp (Carassius gibelio). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ran, C.; Qin, C.; Xie, M.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, L.; Fu, X.; et al. Aeromonas veronii and aerolysin are important for the pathogenesis of motile aeromonad septicemia in cyprinid fish. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 3442–3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. George, M. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bian, Y.; Qian, H.W.; Meng, Q.F.; He, D.C.; Seduli, B.; Shan, X.F.; Kang, Y.H.; Wang, W.L.; Qian, A.D. Development of duplex PCR for detection of Aeromonas veronii. Chin. J. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 35, 304–307. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nawaz, M.; Khan, S.A.; Khan, A.A.; Sung, K.; Tran, Q.; Kerdahi, K.; Steele, R. Detection and characterization of virulence genes and integrons in Aeromonas veronii isolated from catfish. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reed, L.J.; Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent enpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1938, 27, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kozińska, A.; Figueras, M.J.; Chacon, M.R.; Soler, L. Phenotypic characteristics and pathogenicity of Aeromonas genomospecies isolated from common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 93, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Rahman, M.; Colque-Navarro, P.; Kuhn, I.; Huys, G.; Swings, J.; Mollby, R. Identification and characterization of pathogenic Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria associated with epizootic ulcerative syndrome in fish in Bangladesh. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2002, 68, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Gui, M.; Wu, R.; Liu, L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Li, P. Effects of quorum quenching by AHL lactonase on AHLs, protease, motility and proteome patterns in Aeromonas veronii LP-11. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 252, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, D.X.; Kang, Y.H.; Chen, L.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Wang, C.F.; Qian, A.D.; Shan, X.F. Oral immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus casei expressing OmpAI confers protection against Aeromonas veronii challenge in common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 72, 552–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ottaviani, D.; Parlani, C.; Citterio, B.; Masini, L.; Leoni, F.; Canonico, C.; Sabatini, L.; Bruscolini, F.; Pianetti, A. Putative virulence properties of Aeromonas strains isolated from food, environmental and clinical sources in Italy: A comparative study. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 144, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sung, H.H.; Hwang, S.F.; Tasi, F.M. Responses of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) to challenge by two strains of Aeromonas spp. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2000, 76, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cai, S.H.; Wu, Z.H.; Jian, J.C.; Lu, Y.S.; Tang, J.F. Characterization of pathogenic Aeromonas veronii bv. veronii associated with ulcerative syndrome from chinese longsnout catfish (Leiocassis longirostris Günther). Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Janda, J.M.; Abbott, S.L. The genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 35–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Nawaz, M.; Sung, K.; Khan, S.A.; Khan, A.A.; Steele, R. Biochemical and molecular characterization of tetracycline-resistant Aeromonas veronii isolates from catfish. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2006, 72, 6461–6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Skwor, T.; Shinko, J.; Augustyniak, A.; Gee, C.; Andraso, G. Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas veronii predominate among potentially pathogenic ciprofloxacin- and tetracycline-resistant Aeromonas isolates from Lake Erie. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2014, 80, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kang, Y.H.; Pan, X.; Xu, Y.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Wang, C.F.; Shan, X.F.; Qian, A.D. Complete genome sequence of the fish pathogen Aeromonas veronii TH0426 with potential application in biosynthesis of pullulanase and chitinase. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 227, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Patel, B.; Kumari, S.; Banerjee, R.; Samanta, M.; Das, S. Disruption of the quorum sensing regulated pathogenic traits of the biofilm-forming fish pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila by tannic acid, a potent quorum quencher. Biofouling 2017, 33, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Reyes-Becerril, M.; Sanchez, V.; Delgado, K.; Guerra, K.; Velazquez, E.; Ascencio, F.; Angulo, C. Caspase-1, -3, -8 and antioxidant enzyme genes are key molecular effectors following Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Aeromonas veronii infection in fish leukocytes. Immunobiology. 2018, 223, 562–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. González-Serrano, C.J.; Santos, J.A.; García-López, M.L.; Otero, A. Virulence markers in Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria isolates from freshwater fish and from a diarrhoea case. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 93, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abu-Elala, N.; Abdelsalam, M.; Marouf, S.; Setta, A. Comparative analysis of virulence genes, antibiotic resistance and gyrB-based phylogeny of motile Aeromonas species isolates from Nile tilapia and domestic fowl. Lett. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dong, H.T.; Techatanakitarnan, C.; Jindakittikul, P.; Thaiprayoon, A. Aeromonas jandaei and Aeromonas veronii caused disease and mortality in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). J. Fish Dis. 2017, 40, 1395–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Seppola, M.; Mikkelsen, H.; Johansen, A.; Steiro, K.; Myrnes, B.; Nilsen, I. Ultrapure LPS induces inflammatory and antibacterial responses attenuated in vitro by exogenous sera in Atlantic cod and Atlantic salmon. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 44, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, X.; Schauder, S.; Potier, N.; Van Dorsselaer, A.; Pelczer, I.; Bassler, B.L.; Hughson, F.M. Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature 2002, 415, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chandrarathna, H.P.S.U.; Nikapitiya, C.; Dananjaya, S.H.S.; Wijerathne, C.U.B.; Wimalasena, S.H.M.P.; Kwun, H.J.; Heo, G.J.; Lee, J.; De Zoysa, M. Outcome of co-infection with opportunistic and multidrug resistant Aeromonas hydrophila and A. veronii in zebrafish: Identification, characterization, pathogenicity and immune responses. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 80, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chung, W.O.; Park, Y.; Lamont, R.J.; McNab, R.; Barbieri, B.; Demuth, D.R. Signaling system in Porphyromonas gingivalis based on a LuxS protein. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 3903–3909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Frias, J.; Olle, E.; Alsina, M. Periodontal pathogens produce quorum sensing signal molecules. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 3431–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Azakami, H.; Teramura, I.; Matsunaga, T.; Akimichi, H.; Noiri, Y.; Ebisu, S.; Kato, A. Characterization of autoinducer 2 signal in Eikenella corrodens and its role in biofilm formation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2016, 102, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Learman, D.R.; Yi, H.; Brown, S.D.; Martin, S.L.; Geesey, G.G.; Stevens, A.M.; Hochella, M.F. Involvement of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 LuxS in biofilm development and sulfur metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2009, 75, 1301–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Schauder, S.; Shokat, K.; Surette, M.G.; Bassler, B.L. The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: Biosynthesis of a novel quorum-sensing signal molecule. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 41, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Detection of 16S rDNA gene in isolates by PCR. M: DNA molecular weight standard. 1–16: PCR of 16S rDNA gene in bacteria isolates; 17: positive control; 18: negative control.
Figure 1. Detection of 16S rDNA gene in isolates by PCR. M: DNA molecular weight standard. 1–16: PCR of 16S rDNA gene in bacteria isolates; 17: positive control; 18: negative control.
Animals 10 00608 g001
Table 1. Species, quantity, and origin of fish sampled in spring.
Table 1. Species, quantity, and origin of fish sampled in spring.
Fish
Species
SupermarketAquatic Market
12345Total12345Total
Carassius auratus33243152232312
Ctenopharyngodon idella34233153322414
Cyprinus carpio22343142232312
Silurus asotus202206212218
Total109913950981081146
Table 2. Species, quantity, and origin of fish sampled in summer.
Table 2. Species, quantity, and origin of fish sampled in summer.
Fish
Species
SupermarketAquatic Market
12345Total12345Total
Carassius auratus33332142323414
Ctenopharyngodon idella32333143332314
Cyprinus carpio43322143323415
Silurus asotus32323133232414
Total131012101055111110101557
Table 3. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and target fragment size.
Table 3. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and target fragment size.
Target GenePCR Primer Sequence (5′–3′)Size of Target Fragments
(bp)
Annealing Temperature
(°C)
16S rDNAP1: GGGATAACTACTGGAAACGGTA
P2: GAAGGCACTCCCGTATCTCTA
88656
aerP1: CCTATGGCCTGAGCGAGAAG
P2: CCAGTTCCAGTCCCACCACT
43156
actP1: GAGAAGGTGACCACCAAGAACA
P2: AACTGACATCGGCCTTGAACTC
23260
serP1: CTCCTACTCCAGCGTCGGC
P2: GATCGTCGGTGCGGTTGT
12864
AhaP1: GGCTATTGCTATCCCGGCTCTGTT
P2: CGGTCCACTCGTCGTCCATCTTG
108260.4
lipP1: CACCTGGT(T/G)CCGCTCAAG
P2: GTACCGAACCAGTCGGAGAA
24756
exuP1: AGACATGCACAACCTCTTCC
P2: GATTGGTATTGCC(C/T)TGCAA
32356
LuxSP1: GATCCTCTCCGAGGCGTGG
P2: AGGCTTTTCAGCTTCTCTTCC
36958
Table 4. Distribution of A. veronii isolates.
Table 4. Distribution of A. veronii isolates.
FingerlingSupermarketsAquatic MarketsSeparation RRate
SpringSummerSpringSummer
Carassius auratus3/31 (9.68%)5/30 (16.67%)8/33 (24.24%)14/34 (41.18%)23.44%
Ctenopharyngodon idella3/30 (10.00%)4/32 (12.50%)9/29 (31.03%)10/30 (33.33%)21.49%
Cyprinus carpio3/29 (10.34%)5/31 (16.52%)7/31 (22.58%)8/31 (25.81%)18.85%
Silurus asotus0/33 (0.00%)2/31 (6.45%)2/30 (6.67%)4/31 (12.90%)6.40%
Number of A. veronii isolates/total isolates (separation rate %).
Table 5. Comparison of virulence genes of A. veronii isolates in different seasons.
Table 5. Comparison of virulence genes of A. veronii isolates in different seasons.
SeasonNumber of Species Carrying Virulence Genes
0123456
Spring0 (0.00%)2 (5.71%)4 (11.43%)6 (17.14%)9 (25.71%)12 (34.29%)2 (5.71%)
Summer1 (1.92%)3 (5.77%)9 (17.31%)17 (32.69%)13 (25.00%)9 (17.31%)0 (0.00%)
Table 6. Comparison of virulence genes of A. veronii isolated from different sampling locations.
Table 6. Comparison of virulence genes of A. veronii isolated from different sampling locations.
LocationNumber of Species Carrying Virulence Genes
0123456
Supermarkets1 (3.70%)3 (11.11%)4 (14.81%)8 (29.63%)6 (22.22%)5(18.52%)0 (0.00%)
Aquatic markets0 (0.00%)2 (3.33%)9 (15.00%)15 (25.00%)16 (26.67%)16 (26.67%)2 (3.33%)
Table 7. Pathogenicity test results for mice in subject to A. Veronii infection.
Table 7. Pathogenicity test results for mice in subject to A. Veronii infection.
Strains NameVirulence GenotypeLD50 (CFU·mL−1)
CC7282-3aerseractAhaexulip\
SL7231-1aer+seractAhaexulip4.51 × 109
CC7281-2aer+ser+actAhaexulip3.22 × 108
SL7232-1aer+ser+act+Ahaexulip4.27 × 107
SJ7231-3aer+ser+act+Aha+exulip1.21 × 107
SN7252-4aer+ser+act+Aha+exu+lip6.42 × 106
SC4122-5aer+ser+act+Aha+exu+lip+4.17 × 106

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, T.; Raza, S.H.A.; Yang, B.; Sun, Y.; Wang, G.; Sun, W.; Qian, A.; Wang, C.; Kang, Y.; Shan, X. Aeromonas veronii Infection in Commercial Freshwater Fish: A Potential Threat to Public Health. Animals 2020, 10, 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040608

AMA Style

Li T, Raza SHA, Yang B, Sun Y, Wang G, Sun W, Qian A, Wang C, Kang Y, Shan X. Aeromonas veronii Infection in Commercial Freshwater Fish: A Potential Threat to Public Health. Animals. 2020; 10(4):608. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040608

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Tong, Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza, Bintong Yang, Yufeng Sun, Guiqin Wang, Wuwen Sun, Aidong Qian, Chunfeng Wang, Yuanhuan Kang, and Xiaofeng Shan. 2020. "Aeromonas veronii Infection in Commercial Freshwater Fish: A Potential Threat to Public Health" Animals 10, no. 4: 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040608

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop