Next Article in Journal
Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) from Corn Stalk: Activation Energy Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Cooperativity of Spin Crossover Complexes: Combining Periodic Density Functional Calculations and Monte Carlo Simulation
Previous Article in Journal
Methodology for Fast and Facile Characterisation of Carbon-Based Electrodes Focused on Bioelectrochemical Systems Development and Scale Up
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spray-Drying to Get Spin-Crossover Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metal-Organic Framework of Lanthanoid Dinuclear Clusters Undergoes Slow Magnetic Relaxation

1
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, 6-3 Aza-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
2
WPI Research Center, Advanced Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(1), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010081
Submission received: 3 December 2016 / Revised: 12 January 2017 / Accepted: 16 January 2017 / Published: 20 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Molecular Magnets and related Phenomena)

Abstract

:
Lanthanoid metal-organic frameworks (Ln-MOFs) can adopt a variety of new structures due to the large coordination numbers of Ln metal ions, and Ln-MOFs are expected to show new luminescence and magnetic properties due to the localized f electrons. In particular, some Ln metal ions, such as Dy(III) and Tb(III) ions, work as isolated quantum magnets when they have magnetic anisotropy. In this work, using 4,4′,4″-s-triazine-2,4,6-triyl-tribenzoic acid (H3TATB) as a ligand, two new Ln-MOFs, [Dy(TATB)(DMF)2] (1) and [Tb(TATB)(DMF)2] (2), were obtained. The Ln-MOFs contain Ln dinuclear clusters as secondary building units, and 1 underwent slow magnetic relaxation similar to single-molecule magnets.

1. Introduction

Lanthanoid (Ln) metal ions with magnetic anisotropy, such as Dy(III) and Tb(III) ions, can work as isolated quantum magnets [1], which in most cases, are single molecules called single-molecule magnets (SMMs). Ln SMMs exhibit functional properties, like magnetic bistability and quantum tunneling of the magnetization (QTM) [2,3,4,5,6], making them useful in high-density magnetic memory devices [7,8], quantum computing [9] and molecular spintronics [10,11,12]. However, in order to use them, it is important to control the coordination environment and tune spin-spin interactions to enhance the magnetic properties of the Ln ions. Thus, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are good candidates for a variety of applications because their structures and coordination environments can be controlled by carefully selecting the ligands [13,14]. In particular, since Ln ions can have large coordination numbers, MOFs can be designed to be flexible and to have sophisticated structures. For example, Dy(III) ions and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate (BTC) have been reported to assemble into a MOF with a highly symmetrical structure, which undergoes reversible slow magnetic relaxation driven by sorption or desorption of terminal coordinated water and guest molecules [15]. The magnetic properties of Ln-MOFs can be enhanced by changing their structures.
In this work, we prepared Ln-MOFs containing the ligand 4,4′,4″-s-triazine-2,4,6-triyl-tribenzoic acid (H3TATB), which has an elongated BTC structure with a triazine unit, to control the structure and coordination environment of the Ln ions. New Ln-MOFs of Dy(III) and Tb(III) ions were obtained by using a solvothermal procedure, and their structures were determined by using single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The Ln-MOFs contained Ln dinuclear moieties as secondary building units. In addition, from magnetic susceptibility measurements, the Dy-MOF underwent slow magnetic relaxation like SMMs do.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Syntheses of Ln-MOFs

H3TATB was synthesized following reported procedures [16,17] and characterized by using 1H NMR and IR spectroscopies (Figures S1–S3). Then it was reacted with DyCl3·6H2O and TbCl3·6H2O under solvothermal conditions with N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and MeOH as solvents (Scheme 1). Ln-MOFs of Dy (1) and Tb (2) were obtained as colorless crystals (Figure S4), which were used for single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The obtained crystals were washed three times by dispersing them in DMF, followed by ultrasonication, and were collected using ultracentrifugation. After drying by heating them in a vacuum, pure white powders were obtained, which were used for the magnetic susceptibility measurements.

2.2. Structural Analyses

From single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies at 110 K, 1 and 2 crystallized in the monoclinic space group C2/c and have similar structures, as shown in Figure 1a, with Ln dinuclear clusters as secondary building units. TATB3− ligands intertwine without π-π stacking to form Ln-MOFs with small pores of less than 3 Å in diameter. The asymmetric units of 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 1b, Figures S5 and S6. The two Ln ions are bridged by four carboxylato groups, and the remaining coordination sites are coordinated by two non-bridging carboxylato groups and four DMF molecules. In 1, each Dy(III) ion is in an 8-fold distorted square-antiprismatic coordination geometry (Figure 1c). In the 8-fold, local D4d symmetry structure, the values of four dihedral angles are 5.6°, 6.3°, 57.3° and 43.5°. These values are slightly different with those of the ideal values for regular square-antiprismatic coordination geometry of 0°, 0°, 52.4° and 52.4°, which is due to the distortion. A drawing of the Dy-Dy unit and Dy-Dy distances of the dinuclear cluster in 1 are shown in Figure 2. The Dy-Dy distance in the dinuclear units in 1 was determined to be 4.13 Å, and the distance between dinuclear units was greater than 8.4 Å, indicating that Dy-Dy interactions in the dinuclear units were dominant in 1. In the Tb(III) dinuclear units of 2, an oxygen atom from two of the bridging carboxylato ligands bridge both Tb(III) ions, giving them a 9-fold distorted monocapped square-antiprismatic coordination geometry (Figure S7). Completing the 9-fold C4h symmetry structure, a μ2 bridging O2 ligand acts as a cap, and the Dy-O2 bond length of 2.795(4) Å is much longer than others in the range of 2.316(3)–2.447(3) Å similar to the other Ln-Ln complexes, which have a 9-fold monocapped square-antiprismatic coordination geometries [18]. The structures of 1 and 2 are totally different from those of other reported Ln-MOFs containing H3TATB [16,19,20]. The reason for this difference is probably due to DMF, which can coordinate to the Ln ions. The crystal data for 1 and 2 are summarized in Table S1. We thought that these Ln-MOFs would exhibit SMM-like behaviour from the viewpoint of the structure because many Ln complexes exhibit SMM properties when they have square-antiprismatic [2,5,6,21,22] or monocapped square-antiprismatic [18,23,24] coordination geometries or when they have carboxylato-bridged dinuclear structures [18,25,26,27].

2.3. Alternating Current Magnetic Measurements

To determine if 1 and 2 act as SMMs, alternating current (AC) magnetic measurements were performed. First, temperature dependent AC magnetic measurements were performed in high-T regions. Figure 3a,b shows plots of the temperature dependence of the in-phase (χ′) and out-of-phase (χ′′) signals of 1 with and without external magnetic field (HDC). In an HDC of 0 Oe, the signals barely depended on the frequency (Figure S8). In an HDC of 3000 Oe, the signals clearly depended on the frequency as shown in Figure 3, meaning that, in an HDC, the Dy(III) dinuclear clusters underwent slow magnetic relaxation, like SMMs. On the other hand, the χ values for 2 were not frequency dependent even in an applied field (Figure S9). This is probably due to the low symmetry of the 9-fold coordination sphere because Tb(III) ions need the higher symmetry of an 8-fold square-prism or square-antiprism geometry to have a magnetic easy axis [2,3,5,6].
Figure 4 shows the results of detailed dynamic magnetic studies on 1. The χ values were measured in an HDC of 3000 Oe. Both χ′ and χ′′ signals were clearly frequency dependent, and peak tops were observed for χ′′. From the plots, the relaxation time (τ) was determined by fitting the data with generalized Debye models (Equations (S1) and (S2)). The obtained τ values are plotted as a function of T−1 in Figure 4b. Considering that the Dy(III) ion (J = 15/2) is a Kramers ion, this plot can be fitted by using the following equation:
τ 1 = A T + B T 9 + τ 0 1   exp ( Δ E / k B T )
where the first, second and third terms give the contributions of one-phonon direct processes, two-phonon Raman processes and thermally-activated Orbach processes, respectively [28,29,30,31]. τ0 is the pre-exponential factor, and ΔE is the activation energy. From Equation (1), τ0 for 1 was determined to be 2.1 × 10–6 s, and ΔE was determined to be 22.5 cm–1. These values are similar to those reported for some Dy(III)-based SMMs [15,18,22], although they are slightly lower due to the distorted coordination environment.

2.4. Direct Current Magnetic Properties and Calculations

To determine the Dy-Dy interactions in the dinuclear cluster of 1, direct current (DC) static magnetic measurements were performed, and molar magnetic susceptibilities (χM), which depended on T and H, were obtained. In χMT-T plots, the χMT value for 1 at 300 K was determined to be 11.92 cm3·K·mol–1, which is lower than that of an isolated Dy(III) ion of 14.2 cm3·K·mol–1 (Figure 5a). This is due to the presence of a large amount of solvent inside the pores, as determined by using thermogravimetric analyses (Figure S10). In the χMT-T plots, the χMT values decreased with a decrease in T, indicating that the Dy-Dy dinuclear cluster has anti-ferromagnetic interactions. From calculations using Magellan magnetic software [32], the Dy(III) ions in 1 were determined to have an anisotropy axis along the coordination direction of the non-bridging carboxylato groups (Figure 5b). Therefore, the spins in the Dy(III) dinuclear moieties are aligned oppositely along the anisotropy axes, as shown in the inset of Figure 5a. A Dy(III) dinuclear SMM having similar antiferromagnetic coupling, in which the antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between the two Dy(III) ions causes a temperature independent decrease in the χ′′ value in the low-T region and step-like features in the hysteresis loops, has been reported [33]. However, in our Dy(III) dinuclear cluster MOF, such features were not observed, as shown in Figure 3a,b and Figure S2 because the Dy-Dy distance in 1 (4.130 Å) is larger than that of the reported SMM (3.768 Å), meaning that the antiferromagnetic interactions are weakened. In addition, the weak interactions are reflected in the lack of clear hysteresis in the M-H curve for 1 (Figure S11). Because the structure of the MOF can be tuned precisely by changing ligands or introducing molecules into the pores, we believe that it is possible to control the Ln-Ln distance and enhance the magnetic properties of this type of Ln-MOFs.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General

All reagents were purchased from Wako chemicals (Osaka, Japan), Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI) (Tokyo, Japan), and Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. Distilled water was obtained from an EYELA STILL ACE SA-2100E deionizer (Tokyo Rikakikai Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). 1H NMR spectra were acquired on a 500 MHz Bruker AV-500 spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA). IR measurements were acquired on a JASCO FT/IR-4200 spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan).

3.2. Synthesis of 4,4′,4″-s-Triazine-2,4,6-Triyl-Tribenzoic Acid (H3TATB)

Syntheses were performed following the literature [16,17]. Trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (3.0 mL) was added slowly to p-tolunitrile (1.5 mL, 7.3 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 18 h, poured on ice and neutralized with ammonia water. The precipitate was collected by filtration and then washed with water and acetone. Recrystallization in toluene gave 2,4,6-tri-p-tolyl-1,3,5-triazine as white crystals (2.43 g, yield: 94.9%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.67 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 6H), 7.39 (m, J = 5.0 Hz, 6H), 2.51 (s, 9H).
The obtained 2,4,6-tri-p-tolyl-1,3,5-triazine (1.54 g, 4.31 mmol) was put into a 300 mL three-necked flask, to which 90 mL of acetic acid and 3.0 mL of H2SO4 were added. Chromium oxide (3.93 g, 25.9 mmol) and 10 mL acetic anhydride were added with stirring while keeping the temperature below 50 °C. The resulting green-brown slurry was stirred overnight, poured into 100 mL of cold water, and the resulting solution was mixed well and filtered. The collected solid was washed with water and dissolved in 200 mL of a 2 N NaOH solution. After the unreacted starting material was removed by filtration, the solution was acidified with HCl to give crude product. Recrystallization from DMF gave pure product as a white solid (1.83 g, Yield: 96.5%). IR (cm–1): 3070 (m), 2665 (w), 2540 (w), 1702 (vs), 1584 (s), 1522 (vs), 1362 (s), 1289 (s), 1017 (m), 829 (m), 764 (s). 1H NMR (500 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 8.22 (m, 6H), 8.88 (m, 6H), 12.9 (br, 3H).

3.3. Synthesis of [Dy(TATB)(DMF)2] (1)

DyCl3·6H2O (19 mg, 0.050 mmol) and H3TATB (21 mg, 0.050 mmol) were dissolved in a DMF/MeOH (10/2.0 mL) in a 20 mL vial at ambient temperature. The reaction mixture in a capped vial was heated in an oven at 80 °C for 3 day. Colorless crystals of 1 were obtained with a yield of 72.3% based on 1.0 mol of H3TATB.

3.4. Synthesis of [Tb(TATB)(DMF)2] (2)

Using the same procedure as that used for 1, except using TbCl3·6H2O (19 g, 0.050 mmol) instead of DyCl3·6H2O, colorless crystals of 2 were obtained with a yield of 86.1% based on 1.0 mol of H3TATB.

3.5. X-ray Crystallography

Single-crystal X-ray analyses for 1 and 2 were carried out on a Rigaku Saturn 724+ CCD diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71069 Å) at T = 110 K, mounted on a loop rod coated with Paratone-N (Hampton Research Corp., Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). An empirical absorption correction based on azimuthal scans of several reflections was applied. The data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically using a least-squares method, and hydrogen atoms were fixed at calculated positions and refined using a riding model. SHELXL-2014/7 [34] was used for structure refinement, and the structure was expanded using Fourier techniques. The weighting scheme was based on counting statistics. Full-matrix least-squares refinements on F2 based on unique reflections with unweighted and weighted agreement factors of R = ∑||Fo| − |Fc||/∑|Fo| (I > 2.00 σ(I)) and wR = [∑w(Fo2Fc2)2/∑w(Fo2)2]1/2 were performed. Visualization and analysis of the crystal structures were simulated from the single crystal data by using Mercury 3.8 [35].

3.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed on a SHIMADZU DTG-60 (Kyoto, Japan) in a nitrogen flow using aluminum oxide powder as a standard material. Several milligrams of sample were put in an aluminum cell, and the cell was heated to 550 °C with a heating rate of 2 °C/min.

3.7. Magnetic Susceptibility Measurement

Magnetic susceptibility measurements were performed on a SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design, model MPMS-XL SQUID magnetometer, San Diego, CA, USA). Samples were placed into gel capsules, and n-eicosane was added to fix the samples during the measurement. Temperature dependent DC measurements were recorded in an HDC of 1000 Oe. T was changed from 300 K to 1.85 K with a sweep rate of 1 K/min. Field dependent DC measurements were performed at 1.85 K with changes in the HDC as follows: 0 Oe → 50 kOe → –50 kOe → 50 kOe. AC measurements were recorded in an HAC of 3 Oe in the frequency range of 1–1500 Hz, in the T range of 10–1.8 K, and in HDC fields of 0 and 3000 Oe. Diamagnetic corrections for the molar magnetic susceptibilities were applied using Pascal’s constants.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we synthesized two Ln-MOFs, [Dy(TATB)(DMF)2] (1) and [Tb(TATB)(DMF)2] (2). The MOFs had similar structures containing lanthanoid dinuclear clusters as secondary building units. We found that 1 underwent slow magnetic relaxation similar to SMMs due to the Dy(III) ions having 8-fold square-antiprismatic coordination geometries, whereas 2 did not due to the 9-fold distorted, low symmetry coordination structure of the Tb(III) ions. Since it should be possible to change the coordinating DMF solvents to other molecules in these MOFs, we are currently studying how to best tune the structure and control their magnetic properties. Furthermore, we are preparing magnetically diluted MOFs by substituting some of the Dy(III) and Tb(III) ions with diamagnetic Y(III) ions, which will lead to a better understanding of their magnetic properties such as the contribution of the depopulation of sublevels of the ground J multiplet split by the CF. Because these MOFs have many advantages, such as the structural flexibility and high thermal stability, enhancement of their magnetic properties and use in applications, such as memory devices, are possible.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/1/81/s1. Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of 2,4,6-tri-p-tolyl-1,3,5-triazine in CDCl3 at 500 MHz on a Bruker AV-500 spectrometer; Figure S2: 1H NMR spectrum of 4,4′,4″-s-triazine-2,4,6-triyl-tribenzoic acid (H3TATB) in CDCl3 at 500 MHz on a Bruker AV-500 spectrometer; Figure S3: IR spectrum of H3TATB; Figure S4: Obtained transparent crystals of (a) 1 and (b) 2; Figure S5: ORTEP drawing of asymmetric unit of 1 with thermal ellipsoid of 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Figure S6: ORTEP drawing of asymmetric unit of 2 with thermal ellipsoid of 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Figure S7: Drawings of (a) Tb(III) dinuclear clusters in 2, and (b) their Tb-Tb distances. The unit of length is Å; Figure S8: Frequency dependences of the (a) χ′ and (b) χ′′ AC magnetic susceptibilities of 1 in an HDC of 0 Oe. The measurements were performed in an HAC of 3 Oe and T range of 10–1.85 K; Figure S9: Temperature dependences of the χ′ and χ′′ AC magnetic susceptibilities of 2 in HDC of (a) 0 and (b) 3000 Oe. The measurements were performed in an HAC of 3 Oe and T range of 10–1.85 K; Figure S10: Thermogravimetric analyses of 1 and 2; Figure S10: Thermogravimetric analyses of 1 and 2; Figure S11: Field dependence of the magnetization of 1 at 1.8 K. Slight hysteresis was observed. Table S1: Crystal structure parameters for 1 and 2. Equations (S1) and (S2): Generalized Debye model.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by CREST, JST, a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (Grant No. 20225003, M.Y.), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (Grant No. 15K05467, K.K.), Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (Grant No. 24750119, K.K.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan (MEXT). R.N. thanks Shorai Foundation for Science and Technology. Y.H. thanks the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for a Research Fellowship for Young Scientists. We thank Goulven Cosquer and Takefumi Yoshida for their help with data analysis and fruitful discussions.

Author Contributions

R.N. and Y.M. conceived and designed the experiments; H.I. and Y.H. performed the experiments; H.I., R.N., Y.H., and K.K. analyzed the data; R.N., B.K.B. and Y.M. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Rinehart, J.D.; Long, J.R. Exploiting single-ion anisotropy in the design of f-element single-molecule magnets. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 2078–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ishikawa, N.; Sugita, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Koshihara, S.-Y.; Kaizu, Y. Lanthanide Double-Decker Complexes Functioning as Magnets at the Single-Molecular Level. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8694–8695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ishikawa, N.; Sugita, M.; Wernsdorfer, W. Quantum Tunneling of Magnetization in Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets: Bis(phthalocyaninato)terbium and Bis(phthalocyaninato)dysprosium Anions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2931–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Woodruff, D.N.; Winpenny, R.E.P.; Layfield, R.A. Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5110–5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Horii, Y.; Katoh, K.; Yasuda, N.; Breedlove, B.K.; Yamashita, M. Effects of f–f Interactions on the Single-Molecule Magnet Properties of Terbium(III)–Phthalocyaninato Quintuple-Decker Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Katoh, K.; Breedlove, B.K.; Yamashita, M. Symmetry of octa-coordination environment has a substantial influence on dinuclear TbIII triple-decker single-molecule magnets. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 4329–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mannini, M.; Pineider, F.; Sainctavit, P.; Danieli, C.; Otero, E.; Sciancalepore, C.; Talarico, A.M.; Arrio, M.-A.; Cornia, A.; Gatteschi, D.; et al. Magnetic memory of a single-molecule quantum magnet wired to a gold surface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Komeda, T.; Isshiki, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Lorente, N.; Katoh, K.; Breedlove, B.K.; Yamashita, M. Observation and electric current control of a local spin in a single-molecule magnet. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Leuenberger, M.N.; Loss, D. Quantum computing in molecular magnets. Nature 2001, 410, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bogani, L.; Wernsdorfer, W. Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Candini, A.; Klyatskaya, S.; Ruben, M.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Affronte, M. Graphene Spintronic Devices with Molecular Nanomagnets. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2634–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Urdampilleta, M.; Klyatskaya, S.; Cleuziou, J.P.; Ruben, M.; Wernsdorfer, W. Supramolecular spin valves. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, H.; Eddaoudi, M.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature 1999, 402, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Furukawa, H.; Ko, N.; Go, Y.B.; Aratani, N.; Choi, S.B.; Choi, E.; Yazaydin, A.Ö.; Snurr, R.Q.; O’Keeffe, M.; Kim, J.; et al. Ultrahigh Porosity in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 2010, 329, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhou, Q.; Yang, F.; Xin, B.; Zeng, G.; Zhou, X.; Liu, K.; Ma, D.; Li, G.; Shi, Z.; Feng, S. Reversible switching of slow magnetic relaxation in a classic lanthanide metal-organic framework system. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8244–8246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Park, Y.K.; Choi, S.B.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.; Won, B.-H.; Choi, K.; Choi, J.-S.; Ahn, W.-S.; Won, N.; Kim, S.; et al. Crystal Structure and Guest Uptake of a Mesoporous Metal–Organic Framework Containing Cages of 3.9 and 4.7 nm in Diameter. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8230–8233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, D.; Ma, S.; Ke, Y.; Collins, D.J.; Zhou, H.-C. An Interweaving MOF with High Hydrogen Uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3896–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Song, Y.-M.; Luo, F.; Luo, M.-B.; Liao, Z.-W.; Sun, G.-M.; Tian, X.-Z.; Zhu, Y.; Yuan, Z.-J.; Liu, S.-J.; Xu, W.-Y.; et al. The application of single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation towards adjustable SMM properties. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1006–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ma, S.; Wang, X.-S.; Yuan, D.; Zhou, H.-C. A Coordinatively Linked Yb Metal–Organic Framework Demonstrates High Thermal Stability and Uncommon Gas-Adsorption Selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4130–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, H.; Li, N.; Tian, C.; Liu, T.; Du, F.; Lin, P.; Li, Z.; Du, S. Unusual High Thermal Stability within a Series of Novel Lanthanide TATB Frameworks: Synthesis, Structure, and Properties (TATB = 4,4′,4″-s-Triazine-2,4,6-triyl-tribenzoate). Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ishikawa, N.; Mizuno, Y.; Takamatsu, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Koshihara, S.-Y. Effects of Chemically Induced Contraction of a Coordination Polyhedron on the Dynamical Magnetism of Bis(phthalocyaninato)disprosium, a Single-4f-Ionic Single-Molecule Magnet with a Kramers Ground State. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 10217–10219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jiang, S.-D.; Wang, B.-W.; Su, G.; Wang, Z.-M.; Gao, S. A Mononuclear Dysprosium Complex Featuring Single-Molecule-Magnet Behavior. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7448–7451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cucinotta, G.; Perfetti, M.; Luzon, J.; Etienne, M.; Car, P.-E.; Caneschi, A.; Calvez, G.; Bernot, K.; Sessoli, R. Magnetic Anisotropy in a Dysprosium/DOTA Single-Molecule Magnet: Beyond Simple Magneto-Structural Correlations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1606–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peng, Y.; Mereacre, V.; Baniodeh, A.; Lan, Y.; Schlageter, M.; Kostakis, G.E.; Powell, A.K. Effect of Ligand Field Tuning on the SMM Behavior for Three Related Alkoxide-Bridged Dysprosium Dimers. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Peng, J.-B.; Ren, Y.-P.; Kong, X.-J.; Long, L.-S.; Huang, R.-B.; Zheng, L.-S. A series of di-, tri- and tetranuclear lanthanide clusters with slow magnetic relaxation for Dy2 and Dy4. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 2084–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Joarder, B.; Chaudhari, A.K.; Rogez, G.; Ghosh, S.K. A carboxylate-based dinuclear dysprosium(iii) cluster exhibiting slow magnetic relaxation behaviour. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 7695–7699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liang, L.; Peng, G.; Li, G.; Lan, Y.; Powell, A.K.; Deng, H. In situ hydrothermal synthesis of dysprosium(iii) single-molecule magnet with lanthanide salt as catalyst. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 5816–5823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Van Vleck, J.H. Paramagnetic Relaxation Times for Titanium and Chrome Alum. Phys. Rev. 1940, 57, 426–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Orbach, R. Spin-Lattice Relaxation in Rare-Earth Salts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1961, 264, 458–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gómez-Coca, S.; Urtizberea, A.; Cremades, E.; Alonso, P.J.; Camón, A.; Ruiz, E.; Luis, F. Origin of slow magnetic relaxation in Kramers ions with non-uniaxial anisotropy. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Horii, Y.; Katoh, K.; Cosquer, G.; Breedlove, B.K.; Yamashita, M. Weak DyIII–DyIII Interactions in DyIII–Phthalocyaninato Multiple-Decker Single-Molecule Magnets Effectively Suppress Magnetic Relaxation. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 11782–11790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chilton, N.F.; Collison, D.; McInnes, E.J.L.; Winpenny, R.E.P.; Soncini, A. An electrostatic model for the determination of magnetic anisotropy in dysprosium complexes. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Long, J.; Habib, F.; Lin, P.-H.; Korobkov, I.; Enright, G.; Ungur, L.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Chibotaru, L.F.; Murugesu, M. Single-Molecule Magnet Behavior for an Antiferromagnetically Superexchange-Coupled Dinuclear Dysprosium(III) Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5319–5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Macrae, C.F.; Edgington, P.R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Shields, G.P.; Taylor, R.; Towler, M.; Streek, J.V.D. Mercury: Visualization and analysis of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2006, 39, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1 and 2. Detailed procedures are given in the Materials and Methods section.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1 and 2. Detailed procedures are given in the Materials and Methods section.
Materials 10 00081 sch001
Figure 1. Drawings of (a) the crystal structures of lanthanoid metal-organic frameworks (Ln-MOFs) 1 and 2; and (b) the asymmetric unit of 1. Hydrogen atoms and crystal solvents are omitted for clarity; (c) Distorted square antiprism coordination polyhedron of the Dy(III) ions in 1.
Figure 1. Drawings of (a) the crystal structures of lanthanoid metal-organic frameworks (Ln-MOFs) 1 and 2; and (b) the asymmetric unit of 1. Hydrogen atoms and crystal solvents are omitted for clarity; (c) Distorted square antiprism coordination polyhedron of the Dy(III) ions in 1.
Materials 10 00081 g001
Figure 2. Drawings of (a) the Dy(III) dinuclear clusters in 1; and (b) the Dy-Dy distances in Å.
Figure 2. Drawings of (a) the Dy(III) dinuclear clusters in 1; and (b) the Dy-Dy distances in Å.
Materials 10 00081 g002
Figure 3. In-phase (χ′) and out-of-phase (χ″) AC magnetic susceptibilities vs. T plots for 1 in HDC of (a) 0 and (b) 3000 Oe. The measurements were performed in an HAC of 3 Oe in the frequency range of 1–1000 Hz.
Figure 3. In-phase (χ′) and out-of-phase (χ″) AC magnetic susceptibilities vs. T plots for 1 in HDC of (a) 0 and (b) 3000 Oe. The measurements were performed in an HAC of 3 Oe in the frequency range of 1–1000 Hz.
Materials 10 00081 g003
Figure 4. (a) Frequency dependence of χ′ and χ″ for 1 in an HDC of 3000 Oe. The measurements were performed in HAC of 3 Oe and T range of 10–1.85 K; (b) Arrhenius plot for 1 using the τ values obtained from AC magnetic susceptibility measurements at several T. The red line is a fit made by using Equation (1) with parameters A = 5.3 × 102 s–1K–1 and B = 3.6 × 10–5 s–1.
Figure 4. (a) Frequency dependence of χ′ and χ″ for 1 in an HDC of 3000 Oe. The measurements were performed in HAC of 3 Oe and T range of 10–1.85 K; (b) Arrhenius plot for 1 using the τ values obtained from AC magnetic susceptibility measurements at several T. The red line is a fit made by using Equation (1) with parameters A = 5.3 × 102 s–1K–1 and B = 3.6 × 10–5 s–1.
Materials 10 00081 g004
Figure 5. (a) χMT-T plots for 1 and (b) drawings of the magnetic easy axes of dinuclear cluster in 1 calculated by using Magellan magnetic software. Inset of (a) is antiferromagnetic spin alignment of the dinuclear clusters in 1.
Figure 5. (a) χMT-T plots for 1 and (b) drawings of the magnetic easy axes of dinuclear cluster in 1 calculated by using Magellan magnetic software. Inset of (a) is antiferromagnetic spin alignment of the dinuclear clusters in 1.
Materials 10 00081 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iwami, H.; Nakanishi, R.; Horii, Y.; Katoh, K.; Breedlove, B.K.; Yamashita, M. Metal-Organic Framework of Lanthanoid Dinuclear Clusters Undergoes Slow Magnetic Relaxation. Materials 2017, 10, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010081

AMA Style

Iwami H, Nakanishi R, Horii Y, Katoh K, Breedlove BK, Yamashita M. Metal-Organic Framework of Lanthanoid Dinuclear Clusters Undergoes Slow Magnetic Relaxation. Materials. 2017; 10(1):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iwami, Hikaru, Ryo Nakanishi, Yoji Horii, Keiichi Katoh, Brian K. Breedlove, and Masahiro Yamashita. 2017. "Metal-Organic Framework of Lanthanoid Dinuclear Clusters Undergoes Slow Magnetic Relaxation" Materials 10, no. 1: 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop