Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 03 April 2019
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders

The Prevalence of Anti-Hexokinase-1 and Anti-Kelch-Like 12 Peptide Antibodies in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis Is Similar in Europe and North America: A Large International, Multi-Center Study

\r\nGary L. Norman*Gary L. Norman1*Anna ReigAnna Reig2Odette ViasOdette Viñas3Michael MahlerMichael Mahler1Ewa WunschEwa Wunsch4Piotr Milkiewicz,Piotr Milkiewicz4,5Mark G. SwainMark G. Swain6Andrew MasonAndrew Mason7Laura M. StintonLaura M. Stinton6Maria Belen AparicioMaria Belen Aparicio8Maria Jose AldegundeMaria Jose Aldegunde8Marvin J. FritzlerMarvin J. Fritzler6Albert ParsAlbert Parés2
  • 1Department of Research and Development, Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, United States
  • 2Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • 3Immunology Department, Hospital Clínic, Centre Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
  • 4Translational Medicine Group, Pomeranian Medicine University, Szczecin, Poland
  • 5Liver and Internal Medicine Unit, Department General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • 6Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
  • 7Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • 8Laboratorio Autoimmunidad, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, is present worldwide. Autoantibodies, in particular anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) detected by indirect immunofluorescence assays or newer solid phase immunoassays can detect most, but not all individuals with PBC. Detection of antibodies to the anti-nuclear antigens sp100 and gp210 can identify additional PBC patients, but some seronegative patients remain, often resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. Antibodies to kelch-like 12 (KLHL12) and hexokinase 1 (HK-1) were recently identified as new biomarkers for PBC and notably identify patients who are negative for conventional autoantibodies. To become globally adopted, it is important to validate these new biomarkers in different geographic areas. In the present study we evaluated the prevalence of anti-KLHL12 (measured by a KLHL12-derived peptide referred to as KL-p) and anti-HK-1 antibodies by ELISA at five sites within Europe and North America and demonstrated the presence of these antibodies in patients with PBC in all geographies.

Introduction

For over 50 years, the detection of anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) on rodent tissue sections has remained the primary diagnostic biomarker for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in many laboratories, and when performed and interpreted at expert centers, the assay is highly sensitive and specific for PBC (13). It is clear however, that up to 15% of patients with clinically-proven PBC are AMA-negative by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) (47). Using recombinant proteins such as M2 (MIT3), which incorporates the three immunodominant epitopes recognized by AMA, namely the E2 subunits of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC-E2), the branched chain 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex (BCOADC-E2), and the 2-oxo-glutareate dehydrogenase complex (OGDC-E2), can result in increased sensitivity and the ability to detect additional, but still not all, AMA-negative PBC patients (4, 8, 9). While additional AMA-negative PBC patients can be identified by the presence of anti-sp100 corresponding to the multiple nuclear dot pattern by IIF on HEp-2 cells (AC-6 according to International Consensus of ANA patterns, ICAP), anti-gp210 punctate nuclear envelope by IIF on HEp-2 cells (AC-12 according to ICAP), and anti-p62 antibodies, some PBC patients remain seronegative, potentially resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment (1014).

Autoantibodies to kelch-like 12 protein (KLHL12) and to hexokinase 1 (HK-1) were recently identified as novel biomarkers in patients with PBC (15, 16). In a cohort of 366 patients with PBC, ~40 and 45% of 277 AMA-positive patients were positive for anti-KLHL12 or anti-HK-1 antibodies respectively, while in 89 AMA-negative patients 53 and 42% were positive for anti-KLHL12 or anti-HK-1 antibodies, respectively. The specificities of both antibodies was 96–97% (15).

KLHL12 is part of a large, evolutionarily conserved superfamily consisting of 66 KLHL genes (17). The various Kelch proteins appear to be involved in multiple cellular functions including cell structure, cellular communication, transcriptional regulation, collagen export, and ubiquitination of proteins through interaction with the E3-ligase cullin (17, 18). HK-1 is an enzyme which localizes to the outer membrane of mitochondria and phosphorylates glucose to yield glucose-6-phosphate, as well as modulating cellular susceptibility to apoptosis (19).

Although difficult to clearly establish, it appears that the prevalence of PBC is increasing worldwide (2022). While AMA has a similar prevalence in PBC patients from different geographies, the prevalence of anti-KLHL12 and anti-HK-1 antibodies in different geographic areas has not been reported. To address this issue, we examined PBC sera collected from patients in Eastern Europe, Western Europe, and Canada for the presence of anti-KLHL12 and anti-HK-1 antibodies.

Materials and Methods

Sera from a total of 487 patients with clinically documented PBC or PBC/AIH overlap diagnosed according to European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines were collected at five expert clinical sites (Barcelona, Spain; Salamanca, Spain; Calgary, Canada; Edmonton, Canada; Warsaw, Poland) and tested for the presence of autoantibodies to HK-1 and a KLHL12-derived immunodominant peptide, referred to as “KL-p,” using research use only ELISA kits (QUANTA Lite®, Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA). All sera were also tested for anti-M2 (MIT3) antibodies (subsequently referred to as anti-MIT3 for simplicity) by ELISA (QUANTA Lite® ELISA, Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA). Specificity was assessed by testing 127 sera from patients without PBC, including patients with primary sclerosis cholangitis (PSC, n = 41), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH, n = 20), AIH/PSC overlap (n = 12), various infectious diseases (n = 20), colorectal cancer (n = 14), and healthy controls (n = 20).

Differences between the five cohorts was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Krustal-Wallis test and between specific geographic chorts using Mann-Whitney non-parametric two-tailed t-test (Graphpad ver 5.03, San Diego, CA). P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Testing for anti-MIT3 antibodies showed that each cohort had different frequencies of anti-MIT3 negative individuals (Calgary, 7.2%; Barcelona, 12.9%, Edmonton, 16.3%; Salamanca, 23.8%, and Warsaw, 36.6%) (p = 0.0002). Overall anti-HK-1 antibodies were found in 36.6–52.4% and anti-KL-p antibodies in from 22.0–33.3% of the cohorts. The specific prevalence of anti-HK-1 and KL-p antibodies at each site is summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Frequency of anti-HK-1, anti-KL-p, and anti-HK-1 and/or anti-KL-p in each geographic cohort and in a combined cohort including all patients.

As a result of the apparent heterogeneity of the cohorts, we proceeded to examine the performance of the two biomarkers after specimens were stratified by anti-MIT3 positivity. Anti-HK-1 antibody positivity in anti-MIT3-positive individuals ranged from 38.5–56.3% as detailed in Table 1. While the groups were statistically different overall (ANOVA p = 0.0006), there was no difference between some of the sites, for example Barcelona and Edmonton (p = 0.8169). When all specimens from the five cohorts were combined, anti-HK-1 antibody was positive in 45.7% (189/414) of the anti-MIT3-positive specimens, with a specificity of 94.5% (120/127). Of the seven non-PBC specimens that tested positive, four had a diagnosis of AIH, two colorectal cancer, and one was an apparently healthy control. The likelihood ratio (LR)+, LR-, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Odds Ratio (OR) of anti-HK-1 antibodies for the combined cohort of all anti-MIT3-positive specimens was 8.28, 0.58, 0.96, 0.35, and 14.40.

Anti-KL-p antibody positivity in the anti-MIT3-positive specimens ranged from 18.8–25.6% (Table 1). Overall, when all specimens were combined, anti-KL-p antibody was positive in 24.9% (103/414) of the anti-MIT3-positive specimens with a specificity of 95.3% (121/127). As with anti-HK-1 antibodies, while the groups were statistically different overall (ANOVA p < 0.0001), several showed no statistical difference, again for example Barcelona-Edmonton, Barcelona-Warsaw, Edmonton-Warsaw (p = 0.9973, 0.4333, and 0.0868 respectively). The LR+, LR-, PPV, NPV, and OR for anti-KL-p antibodies for the combined cohort of anti-MIT3-positive specimens was 4.60, 0.79, 0.96, 0.18, and 5.80.

Examination of anti-MIT3-negative PBC patients in the five cohorts showed a prevalence of anti-HK-1 antibodies ranging from 11.8–40.0% and anti-KL-p antibodies from 10.3 to 80.0% (Table 1). Among all anti-MIT3-negative specimens from the 5 sites, anti-HK-1 antibodies were found in 18/73 (24.7%) and anti-KL-p in 14/73 (19.2%) of the patients. Employing both markers to examine the anti-MIT3-negative patients increased the sensitivity to 38.4% (28/73) with a small decrease in specificity to 91.3%.

The overlap of anti-MIT3, anti-HK-1, and anti-KL-p antibodies is illustrated using a Venn diagram in Figure 1. The addition of anti-HK-1 and anti-KL-p antibody testing to anti-MIT3 antibody results increased the sensitivity from 85.0% for anti-MIT3 alone to 90.8% for the combination of anti-MIT3, anti-HK-1, and anti-KL-p for the total study cohort.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Prevalence of anti-HK-1 (A), anti-KL-p (B), and combined anti-HK-1/KL-p antibodies (C) in cohorts from five individual sites and combined cohort consisting of all specimens tested (both anti-MIT3-positive and negative PBC specimens). Frequency in anti-MIT3-negative patients indicated by black diamonds and frequency in anti-MIT3-positive patients by black dots. Venn diagram (D) showing overlap of anti-MIT3, anti-HK-1, and anti-KL-p antibodies. The cohort (n = 487) contains patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC, n = 474), PBC-autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) overlap (n = 13), including both anti-MIT3-positive (n = 414) and anti-MIT3-negative (n = 73) PBC samples.

Discussion

The incidence of PBC, like many other autoimmune diseases, appears to be increasing worldwide (2022). Environmental factors have been suggested as one potential contributing cause of the increasing incidence of PBC (3). In addition, better diagnostics and better recognition of the disease, especially during the often long asymptomatic phase, are also likely involved in the apparent increased prevalence (23, 24). The availability of new therapeutics such as obeticholic acid provides an additional rationale to identify patients with PBC early in the disease course, so that treatment and monitoring that might slow, or ideally prevent progression can be instituted (22). New biomarkers to help identify AMA or anti-MIT3-negative PBC patients who may otherwise remain unrecognized, are particularly important to help achieve this goal.

Despite the regular description of new biomarkers in the literature, only a few contribute additional actionable clinical value and are incorporated into routine clinical practice. We have previously shown that anti-HK-1 and anti-KL-p antibodies are present in both AMA-positive and, importantly, AMA-negative patients (15). Our current results demonstrate that the general prevalence of these autoantibodies is similar in 5 different sites examined from North America and Europe. The pooled prevalence of anti-HK-1 antibodies was 45.7% in anti-MIT3-positive patients and 24.7% in anti-MIT3-negative patients. Anti-KL-p antibodies were detected in 24.9% of the anti-MIT3-positive patients and 19.2% of the anti-MIT3-negative patients. Combined testing for both antibodies found 58.0% of the anti-MIT3-positive and 38.4% of the anti-MIT3-negative patients seropositive for one or both of the new antibodies. The new biomarkers therefore may help to close the serological gap in PBC patients. The prevalence of the markers appeared more similar in the anti-MIT3-positive patients from the different sites compared to the anti-MIT3-negative patients. This is reasonable since the anti-MIT3-positive patients are likely a more clinically homogeneous group compared to the anti-MIT3-negative group, which may have a more heterogeneous phenotype. The small sample size of several of the cohorts is also a clear limitation of the study and likely contributes to some of the perceived differences between cohorts. The higher prevalence of anti-HK-1 antibodies compared to anti-KL-p antibodies could be related to the presence of HK-1 on the mitochondrial membrane, similar to other PBC-related antigens. In contrast, explanation why antibodies to KLHL12 are increased in patients with PBC remains intriguing, but still unclear at present.

Early treatment of patients with PBC appears beneficial and, therefore, addition of anti-KL-p and anti-HK-1 autoantibody testing has the potential to decrease delays in diagnosis and treatment (22). Although we did not examine the prevalence of the antibodies in Asian and South American populations, these studies are currently being organized. A key question remaining is whether, in addition to their value in diagnosis, these antibodies can be shown to be associated with particular clinical phenotypes or outcomes. Preliminary results, so far only presented in abstract form, suggest this may be the case for anti-HK-1 antibodies, where the presence of these antibodies at diagnosis was associated with significantly increased levels of alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransaminase, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase compared to anti-HK-1 negative patients, as well as with shorter transplant-free survival time (25). These results are potentially of important clinical interest, however additional validation and studies are now needed to confirm their significance.

Author Contributions

GN, MM, AP, MS, AM, PM, MF, and AR contributed to the design of the study. OV, EW, MBA, MJA, and LS contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data. GN wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the publication of the content.

Conflict of Interest Statement

GN, MM are employees of Inova Diagnostics, Inc.

MF and AP have received speaking and consulting honoraria from Inova Diagnostics, Inc. and Werfen International.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Portions of this study were presented September 2017 at the 13th Dresden Symposium on Autoantibodies, Dresden, Germany (26). We thank Zakera Shums, Jay Milo, Susan Encabo, Chelsea Bentow, Silvia Ruiz-Gaspà, Maria Antonia Romera, Mila Garcia, and Natalia Baeza for technical assistance with specimen handling and antibody measurements. We thank Carlos Melus for his assistance with preparation of figures.

References

1. Walker JG, Doniach D, Roitt IM, Sherlock S. Serological tests in diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet. (1965) 1:827–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(65)91372-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Beuers U, Gershwin ME, Gish RG, Invernizzi P, Jones DE, Lindor K, et al. Changing nomenclature for PBC: from 'cirrhosis' to 'cholangitis'. Hepatology. (2015) 62:1620–2. doi: 10.1002/hep.28140

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hirschfield GM, Gershwin ME. The immunobiology and pathophysiology of primary biliary cirrhosis. Annu Rev Pathol. (2013) 8:303–30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020712-164014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Miyakawa H, Tanaka A, Kikuchi K, Matsushita M, Kitazawa E, Kawaguchi N, et al. Detection of antimitochondrial autoantibodies in immunofluorescent AMA-negative patients with primary biliary cirrhosis using recombinant autoantigens. Hepatology. (2001) 34:243–8. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.26514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Muratori P, Muratori L. Autoantibodies in antimitochondrial antibody negative primary biliary cholangitis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. (2017) 41:e47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.04.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Muratori P, Muratori L, Gershwin ME, Czaja AJ, Pappas G, MacCariello S, et al. 'True' antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis, low sensitivity of the routine assays, or both? Clin Exp Immunol. (2004) 135:154–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02332.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Invernizzi P, Selmi C, Ranftler C, Podda M, Wesierska-Gadek J. Antinuclear antibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis. (2005) 25:298–310. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Moteki S, Leung PS, Coppel RL, Dickson ER, Kaplan MM, Munoz S, et al. Use of a designer triple expression hybrid clone for three different lipoyl domain for the detection of antimitochondrial autoantibodies. Hepatology. (1996) 24:97–103. doi: 10.1002/hep.510240117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Milkiewicz P, Buwaneswaran H, Coltescu C, Shums Z, Norman GL, Heathcote EJ. Value of autoantibody analysis in the differential diagnosis of chronic cholestatic liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2009) 7:1355–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chan EKL, Damoiseaux J, Carballo OG, Conrad K, de Melo Cruvinel W, Francescantonio PLC, et al. Report of the first international consensus on standardized nomenclature of antinuclear antibody HEp-2 cell patterns 2014-2015. Front. Immunol. (2015) 6:412. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00412

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sebode M, Weiler-Normann C, Liwinski T, Schramm C. Autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease-clinical and diagnostic relevance. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:609. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tartakovsky F, Worman HJ. Detection of gp210 autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis using a recombinant protein containing the predominant autoepitope. Hepatology. (1995) 21:495–500.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Wesierska-Gadek J, Penner E, Battezzati PM, Selmi C, Zuin M, Hitchman E, et al. Correlation of initial autoantibody profile and clinical outcome in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. (2006) 43:1135–44. doi: 10.1002/hep.21172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Liu H, Norman GL, Shums Z, Worman HJ, Krawitt EL, Bizzaro N, et al. PBC screen: an IgG/IgA dual i sotype ELISA detecting multiple mitochondrial and nuclear autoantibodies specific for primary biliary cirrhosis. J Autoimmun. (2010) 35:436–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2010.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Norman GL, Yang CY, Ostendorff HP, Shums Z, Lim MJ, Wang J, et al. Anti-kelch-like 12 and anti-hexokinase 1: novel autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis. Liver Int. (2015) 35:642–51. doi: 10.1111/liv.12690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hu CJ, Song G, Huang W, Liu GZ, Deng CW, Zeng HP, et al. Identification of new autoantigens for primary biliary cirrhosis using human proteome microarrays. Mol Cell Proteomics. (2012) 11:669–80. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015529

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gupta VA, Beggs AH. Kelch proteins: emerging roles in skeletal muscle development and diseases. Skeletal Muscle. (2014) 4:11–2. doi: 10.1186/2044-5040-4-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Dhanoa BS, Cogliati T, Satish AG, Bruford EA, Friedman JS. Update on the Kelch-like (KLHL) gene family. Hum Genomics. (2013) 7:13. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-7-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Robey RB, Hay N. Mitochondrial hexokinases: guardians of the mitochondria. Cell Cycle. (2005) 4:654–8. doi: 10.4161/cc.4.5.1678

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Cheung K-S, Seto W-K, Fung J, Lai C-L, Yuen M-F. Epidemiology and natural history of primary biliary cholangitis in the Chinese: a territory-based study in Hong Kong between 2000 and 2015. Clin Translat Gastro. (2017) 8:e116. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.43

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Boonstra K, Beurers U, Ponsioen CY. Epidemiology of primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review. J Hepatol. (2012):1181–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.10.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lu M, Zhou Y, Haller IV, Romanelli RJ, VanWormer JJ, Rodriguez CV, et al., Increasing Prevalence of primary biliary cholangitis and reduced mortality with treatment. Clin Gast Hepatol. (2018) 16:1342–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Dahlqvist G, Gaouar F, Carrat F, Meurisse S, Chazouilleres O, Poupon R, et al. Large- scale characterization study of patients with antimitochondrial antibodies but nonestablished primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology. (2017) 65:152–63. doi: 10.1002/hep.28859

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Prince M, Chetwynd A, Newman W, Metcalf JV, James OF. Survival and symptom progression in a geographically based cohort of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: follow-up for up to 28 years. Gastroenterology. (2002) 123:1044–51. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.36027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Reig A, Garcia M, Shums Z, Milo J, Encabo S, Bentow C, et al. The Novel Hexokinase (HK-1) antibodies are useful for diagnosis and associated with bad prognosis in primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol. (2017) 66(Suppl. 1):S355–6. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8278(17)31049-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Norman GL, Shums Z, Ruiz-Gaspà S, Reig A, Romera MA, Vi-as O, et al. Similar geographic prevalence of anti-hexokinase and anti-kelch like peptide antibodies in patients with primary biliary cholangitis-A large international multi-center study. In: Conrad K, Andrade LEC, Chan EKL, Fritzler MJ, Pruijn JM, Shoenfeld Y, et al editors. Immunodeficiency, Infection and Autoimmune Diseases. Autoantigens, Autoantibodies, Autoimmunity, Vol. 11. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers (2017). p. 459–60.

Keywords: primary biliary cholangitis, autoantibodies, anti-mitochondrial antibodies, AMA-negative, hexokinase-1, kelch-like 12

Citation: Norman GL, Reig A, Viñas O, Mahler M, Wunsch E, Milkiewicz P, Swain MG, Mason A, Stinton LM, Aparicio MB, Aldegunde MJ, Fritzler MJ and Parés A (2019) The Prevalence of Anti-Hexokinase-1 and Anti-Kelch-Like 12 Peptide Antibodies in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis Is Similar in Europe and North America: A Large International, Multi-Center Study. Front. Immunol. 10:662. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00662

Received: 17 December 2018; Accepted: 11 March 2019;
Published: 03 April 2019.

Edited by:

Laurence Morel, University of Florida, United States

Reviewed by:

Weici Zhang, University of California, Davis, United States
Pietro Invernizzi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy

Copyright © 2019 Norman, Reig, Viñas, Mahler, Wunsch, Milkiewicz, Swain, Mason, Stinton, Aparicio, Aldegunde, Fritzler and Parés. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Gary L. Norman, glnorman@inovadx.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.