Spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity of bacterial keratitis: a retrospective analysis of eight years in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Southwest China
Rui-Qin Guo1† Ji Yang1† Ya-Bin Yang1† Ya-Nan Chen1 Yu-Yuan Xiao1 Ping Xiang2 Meng-Jie Dong1 Min-Fang He1 Yin-Ting Wang1 Yun-Ling Xiao3 Hong-Qin Ke1* 
Hai Liu1*- 1Department of Ophthalmology, Second People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, The Eye Disease Clinical Medical Research Center of Yunnan Province, The Eye Disease Clinical Medical Center of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China
- 2Yunnan Province Innovative Research Team of Environmental Pollution, Food Safety, and Human Health, Institute of Environmental Remediation and Human Health, School of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China
- 3Department of Ophthalmology, Honghe County People’s Hospital, Honghe, China
Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the epidemiological characteristics, distribution of isolates, prevailing patterns, and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial keratitis (BK) in a Tertiary Referral Hospital located in Southwest China.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 660 cases of bacterial keratitis occurring between January 2015 and December 2022. The demographic data, predisposing factors, microbial findings, and antibiotic sensitivity profiles were examined.
Results: Corneal trauma emerged as the most prevalent predisposing factor, accounting for 37.1% of cases. Among these cases, bacterial culture results were positive in 318 cases, 68 species of bacteria were identified. The most common Gram-Positive bacteria isolated overall was the staphylococcus epidermis and the most common Gram-Negative bacteria isolated was Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci accounted for 18.1% of all Gram-Positive bacteria. The detection rate of P. aeruginosa showed an increasing trend over time (Rs=0.738, P=0.037). There was a significant decrease in the percentage of Gram-Negative microorganisms over time (Rs=0.743, P=0.035). The sensitivity of Gram-Positive bacteria to linezolid, vancomycin, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and rifampicin was over 98%. The sensitivity rates of Gram-Negative bacteria to amikacin, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam, ceftazidime, and cefepime were all above 85%. In patients with a history of vegetative trauma, the possibility of BK should be taken into account in addition to the focus on fungal keratitis.
Conclusion: The microbial composition primarily consists of Gram-Positive cocci and Gram-Negative bacilli. Among the Gram-Positive bacteria, S. epidermidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae are the most frequently encountered, while P. aeruginosa is the predominant Gram-Negative bacteria. To combat Gram-Positive bacteria, vancomycin, linezolid, and rifampicin are considered excellent antimicrobial agents. When targeting Gram-Negative pathogens, third-generation cephalosporins exhibit superior sensitivity compared to first and second-generation counterparts. As an initial empirical treatment for severe cases of bacterial keratitis and those unresponsive to fourth-generation fluoroquinolones in community settings, the combination therapy of vancomycin and tobramycin is a justifiable approach. Bacterial keratitis can be better managed by understanding the local etiology and antibacterial drug susceptibility patterns.
Introduction
Bacteria have a wide distribution in soil and water, and they also exist symbiotically with other organisms. The human body carries a substantial amount of bacteria. It is estimated that the total number of bacterial cells in the human body, including the epidermis, is approximately ten times the total number of human cells. Bacteria are ubiquitous, and the healthy ocular surface microbiome can be classified into 12 phyla, 70 genera, and 140 species. Among the species with high relative abundances and high positivity rates on the ocular surface are Streptococcus pyogenes, S. epidermidis, Propionibacterium acnes, and so on (Kang et al., 2021). A healthy ocular surface can live in harmony with symbiotic microorganisms. However, when the corneal epithelial barrier is compromised by trauma, diseases, or medications, external bacteria may invade the cornea and lead to bacterial keratitis (BK).
Bacterial keratitis is a prevalent cause of vision loss (Ung and Chodosh, 2021), causing blindness in up to 2 million eyes worldwide each year (Ung et al., 2019). It is an ophthalmic emergency that necessitates immediate symptomatic management. Bacterial keratitis can manifest as a slowly progressing ulcer or as a septic infection with rapid deterioration of corneal tissue. Poorly controlled infection can result in progressive tissue destruction and severe visual impairment (Durand et al., 2021). Common microorganisms responsible for bacterial keratitis include S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and S. pneumoniae (Prokosch et al., 2012; Ahmed et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022). Corneal ulcers caused by bacterial infestation are often associated with persistent chronic ocular surface diseases, long-term corneal contact lens wear, eye trauma, and systemic or local corneal immunosuppression (Amarasekera et al., 2019; Durrani et al., 2019, 2020; Verner et al., 2020). The spectrum of pathogens can vary depending on the geographical location, local environment, and climatic conditions (Satpathy et al., 2019).
There is a paucity of information regarding a continuous retrospective analysis of the pathogenic spectrum and drug susceptibility of bacterial keratitis in southwest China. Understanding the recent local epidemiological patterns of pathogens and their susceptibility profiles may provide evidence-based guidelines for the successful treatment of bacterial keratitis (Estopinal and Ewald, 2016; Acharya et al., 2020). Thus, this study aims to review the epidemiological characteristics of bacterial keratitis, trends in corneal isolates, and their susceptibility to commonly used antimicrobial drugs over an eight-year period in a tertiary referral hospital in the southwest region.
Materials and methods
Patients
This was a retrospective review of medical case records and microbiological records of all patients from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2022, at Eye Hospital, Yunnan, China. It was commenced after receiving clearance from the Institute Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, ethics approval was given with a waiver for “Informed Consent of the patient”.
We evaluated 2564 patients who had clinical suspicion of corneal ulcerations. A corneal ulcer was defined as a loss of corneal epithelium with a stromal infiltrate and suppuration that are associated with signs of inflammation, with or without hypopyon. A standardized form was filled out for each patient, documenting the patient’s sociodemographic information, the duration of symptoms, predisposing factors, any history of corneal trauma and trauma-causing agents, any associated ocular conditions, other systemic diseases, treatments received before presentation and microbial results.
Clinical examinations
All patients received a slit lamp biomicroscopic and AC-OCT examination by experienced ophthalmologists. Clinical features such as the size and depth of the stromal infiltrate, the size of the ulcer (measured in millimeter), the presence or absence of a hypopyon (measured in millimeters), pre-existing viral keratitis, and chronic corneal disease were noted. Also, we noted the use of contact lenses, history of corneal trauma, previous ocular surgery, as well as other systemic combinations.
Laboratory investigation
Corneal scrapings were obtained using a sterile blade (No. 15), and specimens were sent immediately after collection for corneal ulcer culture plus drug sensitivity and fungal smear examination. A part of the sample was smeared onto a glass slide for Gram staining to check bacteria and Melan stain for detecting fungi. The rest of the samples were immediately inoculated in pediatric bottles on a Bact/Alert3D blood culture instrument, placed in a fully automated incubator, and positive cultures were transferred to, MacConkey agar and Sabro agar for isolation and culture using VITEK-2Compact for strain identification, the cultured microorganisms were identified using standard microbiological procedures.
Drug susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Association’s antibiotic susceptibility testing standards. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bacterial isolates was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method. The antibiotic discs were used as per the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for a particular group of bacteria.
Statistical analyses
Demographic and microbiological details of the cases were entered in Microsoft Excel sheets. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics and means were used for continuous variables; ratios and percentages of categorical variables were used to describe the sample. Cardinality tests were used for data analysis, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to test for trends. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Demographics and predisposing factors
Amongst the cohort of 2,564 keratitis patients admitted to tertiary eye centers between January 2015 and December 2022, a noteworthy subset of 660 individuals (25.7%) were diagnosed with bacterial keratitis (BK). Within this subset, 434 patients (65.8%) presented solely with bacterial infection, while 226 patients (34.2%) exhibited a confluence of bacterial and other types of keratitis. The average age of the participants in this study was 55 years (range: 45-65), with the most prevalent age group falling between 40 and 65 years (373 patients, 56.5%). There were 396 male patients (60.0%) and 264 female patients (40.0%). Notably, farmers constituted the majority of cases at 425 (64.4%), while workers accounted for 16 cases (2.4%), and individuals in various other occupations represented 219 cases (33.2%).
In our study, corneal trauma emerged as the most prevalent risk factor, accounting for 245 cases (37.1%). Among these cases, 70 individuals had a history of recurrent keratitis, 39 had ocular surface disease, and 14 had undergone ophthalmic surgeries such as pterygium surgery, penetrating corneal transplantation, or cataract surgery. Interestingly, only 4 cases had a history of contact lens wear, while the remaining cases did not exhibit any localized risk factors. Additionally, 66 cases reported the presence of systemic risk factors. Specifically, diabetes mellitus was identified in 37 cases, autoimmune diseases in 21 cases, cold-induced keratitis in 6 cases, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity in 2 cases.
Clinical characteristic
Corneal ulcers were observed to have a diameter of ≤2 mm in 32 cases (4.8%), ranging from 2 to 5 mm in diameter in 355 cases (53.8%), and exceeding 5 mm in diameter in 273 cases (41.4%). In terms of depth, 382 cases (57.9%) were classified as deep ulcers, 262 cases (39.7%) as medium-depth ulcers, and 16 cases (2.4%) as superficial ulcers. The severity of bacterial keratitis (BK) patients was graded based on the extent and depth of corneal ulceration. Mild corneal ulceration was identified in only 0.5% (3/660) of patients, moderate corneal ulceration in 32.3% (213/660) of patients, and severe corneal ulceration in the majority, accounting for 67.3% (444/660) of patients. Notably, 48.5% (320/660) of patients exhibited hypopyon, and ulcer perforation was observed in 28.0% (185/660) of patients.
For a comprehensive presentation of the demographic features, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and progression of these keratitis cases, please refer to Table 1.
Table 1 Demographics, Risk Factors, and Clinical Characteristic Features of Patients.
Microbiological culture findings
A microbiological examination was conducted on 632 eye specimens, and 318 (50.3%) of the smears tested positive, resulting in a total of 330 positive strains being detected. Among the 318 patients with positive cultures, 5 cases (1.6%) exhibited co-infection with both Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative bacteria, while 7 cases (2.2%) showed co-infection with only Gram-Positive bacteria. The cultured bacteria encompassed a diverse range of 68 strains, consisting of 260 (78.8%) Gram-Positive strains and 70 (21.2%) Gram-Negative strains. Among these, the predominant strains were 231 (70.0%) Gram-Positive cocci and 69 (20.9%) Gram-Negative bacilli. The Gram-Positive cocci were predominantly identified as Staphylococcus spp., accounting for 139 strains (60.2%), followed by Streptococcus spp. with 70 strains (30.3%). Additionally, Micrococcus spp. was observed in 17 strains (Micrococcus luteus), and Enterococcus spp. was detected in 5 strains. As for the Gram-Negative bacilli, Pseudomonas spp. accounted for the majority with 24 strains (34.8%), followed by Klebsiella spp. with 7 strains (10.1%). Other strains included Escherichia spp. with 6 strains (Escherichia coli), Serratia spp. with 5 strains (Serratia marcescens), Bacillus spp. and Enterobacter spp. with 3 strains each, Bacillus spp. with 2 strains, and single strains of Aspergillus spp. and Moraxella spp. (Table 2).
Table 2 Microbiological Culture Findings.
Among the detected strains, the top 6 most prevalent species were as follows: S. epidermidis (Figures 1A, B) at 20.9% (69/330), S. pneumoniae (Figure 1C) at 12.1% (40/330), P. aeruginosa (Figures 1E, F) at 7.0% (23/330), human Staphylococcus (Figure 1D) and Micrococcus luteus at 5.2% (17/330), and streptococcus mitis at 3.6% (12/330).
Figure 1 (A, B) depict S. epidermidis infection, (C) illustrates S. pneumoniae, (D) showcases human Staphylococcus with fungal infection, (E) displays P. aeruginosa infection, and (F) exhibits P. aeruginosa with S. aureus infection.
Since 2016, S. epidermidis has consistently exhibited the highest detection rate. Notably, the detection rate of P. aeruginosa demonstrated an increasing trend over time (Rs=0.738, P=0.037), while there were no significant changes observed among the other common species (Figure 2).
Figure 2 Annual changes in the composition ratio of common strains.
Throughout the 8-year study period, there was a discernible downward trend in the overall positivity rate of bacterial culture from corneal scrapings (Rs=-0.810, P=0.015). The rate decreased from 55.4% in 2015 to 41.7% in 2022 (Figure 3).
Figure 3 The trend of positive bacterial culture rate from 2015 to 2022.
Concerning the composition of bacterial species, no statistically significant change was observed in the proportion of Gram-Positive cocci (Rs=-0.524, P=0.183). However, there was an evident increasing trend in the proportion of Gram-Negative rods (Rs=0.743, P=0.035) over the course of the study period (Figure 4).
Figure 4 Composition of Gram-Positive cocci and Gram-Negative bacilli in culture-positive specimens from 2015 to 2022.
Antibiotic susceptibility of the bacterial strains isolated from corneal lesions
Sensitivity to antibiotics of Gram-Positive Microorganisms in Table 3. Sensitivity to antibiotics of Gram-Negative Microorganisms in Table 4. The drug susceptibility rates of common Gram-Positive bacteria can be found in Table 5, while the drug susceptibility rates of common Gram-Negative bacteria are also provided in Table 6.
Table 3 Sensitivity to Antibiotics of Gram-Positive Microorganisms [%/(N)].
Table 4 Sensitivity to Antibiotics of Gram-Negative Microorganisms[%/(N)].
Table 5 The antibiotic susceptibility of common Gram-Positive bacteria [%/(N)].
Table 6 The antibiotic susceptibility of common Gram-Negative bacteria [%/(N)].
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci accounted for 18.1% of all Gram-Positive bacteria, 47 patients infected with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci were tested for drug sensitivity. 56.5% (39/69) of S. epidermidis were MRSE and 37.5% (3/8) of S. aureus were MRSA. Among the Staphylococcus spp., 33.8% (47/139) were methicillin-resistant, with 83.0% (39/47) being MRSE and 6.4% (3/47) being MRSA. All Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci isolates demonstrated resistance to penicillin and benzoxicillin, while they were fully susceptible to quinupristin/dalfopristin, tigecycline, linezolid, and vancomycin. Moreover, 63.4% were resistant to levofloxacin, and 48.9% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, Table 7.
Table 7 Sensitivity to Antibiotics of MRSS [%/(N)].
Comparative analysis, as displayed in Table 8, revealed that S. epidermidis exhibited higher resistance rates to levofloxacin (χ2 = 35.144, P<0.001), moxifloxacin (χ2 = 8.872, P=0.008), and ciprofloxacin (χ2 = 16.254, P=0.001) compared to other corneal isolates. These differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). The sensitivity of MRSA, MSSA, MRSE and MSSE to common antibiotics is shown in Table 9.
Table 8 Comparative analysis of the resistance of major isolated bacteria to commonly used quinolones[N/(%)].
Table 9 Sensitivity to Antibiotics of MRSS, MSSA, MRSE, MSSE [%/(N)].
Discussion
The cornea, situated in the foremost region of the eye and in direct contact with the external environment, bears susceptibility to bacterial assaults, injuries, and subsequent corneal infections. Within this study, those involved in agriculture face an elevated risk of keratitis due to occupational-related trauma. Given that adult males form the primary workforce segment, they exhibit a considerably higher likelihood of suffering opportunistic trauma compared to other age groups (Xu et al., 2021). Unfortunately, some patients delayed diagnosis and treatment. As a consequence, a portion of these patients’ vision becomes irreparable by the time they consult an ophthalmologist. Literature reports from rural areas in South America, Asia, and Africa have highlighted such cases (Basak et al., 2005; Kumar et al., 2011; Oladigbolu et al., 2013).
Within this study, a total of 434 patients (65.8%) exhibited solely bacterial infection, while 226 patients (34.2%) presented bacterial co-infection alongside other forms of keratitis. It has been observed that mixed infections can be present in up to 20-30% of cases of keratoconjunctivitis (Pate et al., 2006). These bacterial populations settle on the surface of the cornea, assuming the form of biofilms (Urwin et al., 2020). In certain instances, a mutual symbiotic relationship between specific pathogens and certain fungi, such as Candida albicans, can manifest, facilitating the formation of biofilms. These biofilms create an environment conducive to bacterial co-infections, shielding them from the body’s immune defenses and antibiotic interventions.
In most instances, the transition of bacteria residing on the ocular surface, from harmless commensals to pathogenic invaders, occurs following disruptions in the integrity of the corneal epithelium. This, in turn, leads to altered bacterial ecological niches, an upsurge in local bacterial colonization, and subsequent invasion and infection by harmful microorganisms. Such infection damages the local defensive barriers, including the antimicrobial components of the tear film, resulting in heightened bacterial adhesion and invasion. Ultimately, these processes culminate in stromal necrosis, instigating corneal inflammation, and giving rise to ulcer formation (Singh et al., 2022). While the direct relationship between common colds and physical exertion and the development of BK remains uncertain, these factors may contribute to the disease by temporarily compromising the body’s systemic and local defense mechanisms (Tuft et al., 2022).
In our study, ocular trauma emerged as the most prevalent risk factor (37.1%), followed by a history of previous keratitis (10.6%) and ocular surface disease (5.9%). Similarly, ocular trauma is the most common risk factor for infectious keratitis in other studies by Xu et al. (2021) (Xu et al., 2021) and Oliveira-Ferreira et al. (2019) (Oliveira-Ferreira et al., 2019). The majority of ocular trauma cases and corneal foreign bodies can be attributed to workplace accidents, particularly among manual laborers. Exposure to soil and organic matter without adequate ocular protection significantly increases the risk of bacterial infection, particularly among men aged 30-50 years (Singh et al., 2022). In diabetic patients, ocular surface changes resulting from hyperglycemia heighten the risk of BK. The chronic hyperglycemic state of these patients alters the ocular surface microbiota, promoting the colonization of specific bacteria (Li et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019).
In this study, the distribution of strains was dominated by 231 (70.0%) Gram-Positive cocci and 69 (20.9%) Gram-Negative bacilli. The distribution of bacterial isolates in our study was consistent with those reported in studies of West Anatolia and England (Yilmaz et al., 2007; Tan et al., 2017; Ting et al., 2018), where S. epidermidis (20.9%) and S. pneumoniae (12.1%) are the most common Gram-Positive isolates, with P. aeruginosa (7.0%) being the most common Gram-Negative isolates among the ocular pathogens. Analysis of data from 2015 to 2022 revealed that each year witnessed the highest positive rate for S. epidermidis, with a noticeable upward trend in the proportion of P. aeruginosa, alongside no significant change in the proportion of other species. The most common pathogens for BK remain controversial. Pseudomonas spp. proved to be the most common pathogen in Malaysia (Termote et al., 2018), Iran (Al-Dhaheri et al., 2016) and Taiwan (Gupta and Ram, 2016), while coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) was reported to be the most common in the UK (Tan et al., 2017; Ting et al., 2018) and Australia (Green et al., 2019). The extensive utilization of broad-spectrum antibiotics likely contributes to significant variation in bacterial spectrum and antibiotic resistance over time and across different geographic regions.
It has been suggested that CoNS are opportunistic pathogens, probably because they are a major component of the normal flora of the skin and conjunctival capsule. On one hand, the proximity of these bacteria to the skin may heighten the risk of corneal tissue infection. On the other hand, contamination during corneal scraping sampling can lead to an increased detection rate of CoNS (Termote et al., 2018). The bacterial isolates commonly observed in this study included Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Streptococcus spp. These findings align with research conducted in the United States (Lin et al., 2019), the United Kingdom, and Canada.
The culture-positivity rate observed in this study, reaching 61.04%, fell within the range of previously reported rates, which have ranged from 32.60% to 79.20% (Amatya et al., 2012; Tan et al., 2017). The specific type of pathogenic microorganism can vary depending on the patient’s susceptibility to risk factors and the geographic region. Despite these variations in the causative microorganisms of microbial keratitis (BK) across different locales, one consistent finding is the higher proportion of infections caused by Gram-Positive bacteria (ranging from 48% to 89%) compared to Gram-Negative bacteria (ranging from 11% to 50%) (Ung et al., 2019). Regarding the detection rates of Gram-Positive cocci and Gram-Negative bacilli over time, no significant trend was observed for Gram-Positive cocci, while there was an increasing trend in the detection rate of Gram-Negative bacilli (Rs=0.743, P=0.035). Notably, studies conducted in the UK (Ting et al., 2018) and Iran (Al-Dhaheri et al., 2016) revealed different trends. Specifically, an upward trend in Gram-Positive cocci detection and a downward trend in Gram-Negative bacilli detection were observed. Due to the geographical variances in pathogenic bacterial profiles, continuously monitoring the changes in regional pathogenic bacterial profiles serves as a valuable guide for clinical treatment.
In vitro drug susceptibility tests revealed that Gram-Positive bacteria exhibited high sensitivity to linezolid, vancomycin, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and rifampin, with susceptibility rates exceeding 98%. Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin showed sensitivity rates of 65.0%, 74.1%, and 71.2% respectively. On the other hand, Gram-Negative bacteria demonstrated greater sensitivity to cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, amikacin, ceftazidime, and cefepime, with rates above 85%. However, their sensitivity to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin was 77.6% and 68.8% respectively, with only 16.7% sensitivity to cefazolin and ampicillin. In Southern India, there was a noteworthy increase in fluoroquinolone resistance among S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolated from BK patients from 2002 to 2013, with S. aureus resistance to ofloxacin rising from 11.1% to 66.7% (Lalitha et al., 2017). In the present study, S. epidermidis exhibited significantly higher resistance rates to commonly used quinolones compared to other isolates, and these differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). Two cases of P. aeruginosa resistant to fluoroquinolones were identified, one of which displayed multidrug resistance. The susceptibility of Gram-Negative bacteria to fluoroquinolones in the present study was 74.1%, with Gram-Negative bacteria overall demonstrating a susceptibility rate of 77.6%. This is consistent with the decreasing trend observed worldwide. Notably, the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to fluoroquinolones was 90.9%, aligning with the global average susceptibility (Dinesh, 2018). It is important to acknowledge that resistance to fluoroquinolones does exist, with occasional cases of P. aeruginosa resistance. Fluoroquinolones are widely employed as monotherapy for empiric treatment of BK due to their broad spectrum of activity (Milder et al., 2012). However, the continuous usage has contributed to the emergence of resistance in this class of drugs. A recent study pointed out that the greatest resistance to antibiotics was observed with fluoroquinolones (Sahoo et al., 2023). Ophthalmologists should remain vigilant regarding the evolving trends in pathogenic bacterial distribution and resistance patterns, adapting the diagnosis to local conditions and selecting appropriate antibiotics accordingly.
All isolates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci demonstrated resistance to penicillin and benzoxicillin, while displaying 100% susceptibility to vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and quinupristin/dalfopristin. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), approximately 2 million individuals are infected with drug-resistant microorganisms annually (Austin et al., 2017). When addressing Methicillin- and benzoxicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin has become the primary therapeutic agent (Saillard et al., 2018). The Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular Microorganisms study in April 2020 revealed high rates of methicillin resistance and MDR among S. aureus and CoNS isolates, though oxacillin/methicillin resistance was slightly reduced among S. aureus isolates and unchanged among CoNS isolates (Asbell et al., 2020). Our findings align with previous reports stating that MRSA or MR-CoNS strains may exhibit resistance to multiple drugs. In our study, one in three S. aureus isolates and one in two CoNS isolates demonstrated resistance to methicillin. The data from this study, as well as previous studies, suggest that oral linezolid could be a viable treatment option in cases of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal keratitis progressing to endophthalmitis, due to its potent antibacterial activity against this pathogen.
The present study has certain limitations that should be acknowledged. Firstly, it relied on a retrospective analysis of available medical records, which may have introduced inherent biases and limitations in terms of data collection and accuracy. Secondly, there was a potential bias in the selection of cases, which could have influenced the representation and generalizability of the findings. Given that keratitis is a challenging condition to treat, there was limited improvement observed in the patient’s visual function during their hospital stay. Unfortunately, due to the nature of this study, the final visual acuity of the patient after successful treatment could not be determined. Lastly, it is important to note that some patients with mild symptoms were excluded from the study after receiving empirical topical antibiotic treatment in the outpatient department. These exclusions might have impacted the overall population under investigation and could potentially affect the interpretation of the results. It is crucial for future research to address these limitations and consider prospective study designs to provide more robust and comprehensive insights into the topic at hand.
Conclusions
When dealing with patients who have a history of vegetative trauma, it is crucial to consider the possibility of bacterial keratitis (BK) in addition to focusing on fungal keratitis. The distribution of bacterial strains is primarily comprised of Gram-Positive cocci and Gram-Negative bacilli. Among the Gram-Positive bacteria, the most frequently encountered species are S. epidermidis, whereas P. aeruginosa is the most common Gram-Negative species. When it comes to combating Gram-Positive bacteria, vancomycin, linezolid, and rifampicin prove to be effective antimicrobial agents. In the treatment of Gram-Negative infections, third-generation cephalosporins demonstrate superior sensitivity compared to their first and second-generation counterparts. As an initial empirical treatment for severe cases of bacterial keratitis (BK) and cases that fail to respond to fourth-generation fluoroquinolones in the community, a reasonable approach would be to combine vancomycin and tobramycin. A better management of bacterial keratitis can be achieved through a comprehensive understanding of the local etiology and patterns of antibacterial drug susceptibility.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by The Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University approved the application for waiver of informed consent (No. 2023176). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
RG: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. JY: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. YY: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. YC: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. YX: Investigation, Writing – original draft. PX: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. MD: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. MH: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. YW: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft. YX: Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft. HK: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. HL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Joint fund of Kunming Medical University-Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province [Grant No. 202101AY070001-290, 202101AY070001-291]; Yunnan Young and middle-aged Academic and technical leader Project [Grant No. 202205AC160016]; The Eye Disease Clinical Medical Center of Yunnan province [Grant No. YXZX-2019058].
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Dr. Li-yuan Fan and Lin Chen for participating in the data admission.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Acharya, M., Farooqui, J. H., Gaba, T., Gandhi, A., Mathur, U. (2020). Delhi infectious keratitis study: update on clinico-microbiological profile and outcomes of infectious keratitis. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 32, 249–255. doi: 10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_113_20
Ahmed, N. H., Mishra, D., Rathod, P., Satpathy, G., Titiyal, J. S., Tandon, R., et al. (2022). Spectrum of bacterial keratitis in North India: A retrospective analysis of six years at a tertiary care eye center. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 70, 1982–1989. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2915_21
Al-Dhaheri, H. S., Al-Tamimi, M. D., Khandekar, R. B., Khan, M., Stone, D. U. (2016). Ocular pathogens and antibiotic sensitivity in bacterial keratitis isolates at king khaled eye specialist hospital 2011 to 2014. Cornea 35, 789–794. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000844
Amarasekera, S., Durrani, A. F., Faith, S., Kowalski, R. P., Jhanji, V. (2019). Clinical features of Streptococcus pyogenes keratitis: Case series. Contact Lens Anterio 42, 581–585. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.04.007
Amatya, R., Shrestha, S., Khanal, B., Gurung, R., Poudyal, N., Bhattacharya, S. K., et al. (2012). Etiological agents of corneal ulcer: five years prospective study in eastern Nepal. Nepal Med. Coll. J. 14, 219–222.
Asbell, P. A., Sanfilippo, C. M., Sahm, D. F., Decory, H. H. (2020). Trends in antibiotic resistance among ocular microorganisms in the United States from 2009 to 2018. JAMA Ophthalmol. 138, 439–450. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0155
Austin, A., Lietman, T., Rose-Nussbaumer, J. (2017). Update on the management of infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology 124, 1678–1689. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.012
Basak, S. K., Basak, S., Mohanta, A., Bhowmick, A. (2005). Epidemiological and microbiological diagnosis of suppurative keratitis in Gangetic West Bengal, eastern India. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 53, 17–22. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.15280
Dinesh, S. (2018). Overview of mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pseudomonas aeruginosa : an ocular perspective %. J. Clin. Exp. Optometry 101, 162–171. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12621
Durand, M. L., Barshak, M. B., Chodosh, J. (2021). Infectious keratitis in 2021. Jama-j Am. Med. Assoc. 326, 1319–1320. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0424
Durrani, A. F., Atta, S., Bhat, A. K., Mammen, A., Dhaliwal, D., Kowalski, R. P., et al. (2020). Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis: initial treatment, risk factors, clinical features, and treatment outcomes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 214, 119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.017
Durrani, A. F., Faith, S. C., Kowalski, R. P., Yu, M., Romanowski, E., Shanks, R., et al. (2019). Moraxella keratitis: analysis of risk factors, clinical characteristics, management, and treatment outcomes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 197, 17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.055
Estopinal, C. B., Ewald, M. D. (2016). Geographic disparities in the etiology of bacterial and fungal keratitis in the United States of america. Semin. Ophthalmol. 31, 345–352. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2016.1154173
Green, M., Carnt, N., Apel, A., Stapleton, F. (2019). Queensland microbial keratitis database: 2005-2015. Brit J. Ophthalmol. 103, 1481–1486. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312881
Gupta, P. C., Ram, J. (2016). Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in Taiwan: A 10-year review in a tertiary-care hospital. Cornea 35, e26. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000906
Kang, Y., Lin, S., Ma, X., Che, Y., Chen, Y., Wan, T., et al. (2021). Strain heterogeneity, cooccurrence network, taxonomic composition and functional profile of the healthy ocular surface microbiome. Eye Vis. (Lond) 8, 6. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00228-4
Kumar, A., Pandya, S., Kavathia, G., Antala, S., Madan, M., Javdekar, T. (2011). Microbial keratitis in Gujarat, Western India: findings from 200 cases. Pan Afr Med. J. 10, 48.
Lalitha, P., Manoharan, G., Karpagam, R., Prajna, N. V., Srinivasan, M., Mascarenhas, J., et al. (2017). Trends in antibiotic resistance in bacterial keratitis isolates from South India. Brit J. Ophthalmol. 101, 108–113. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308487
Li, S., Yi, G., Peng, H., Li, Z., Chen, S., Zhong, H., et al. (2019). How ocular surface microbiota debuts in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 9, 202. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00202
Lin, A., Rhee, M. K., Akpek, E. K., Amescua, G., Farid, M., Garcia-Ferrer, F. J., et al. (2019). Bacterial keratitis preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology 126, P1–p55. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.10.018
Milder, E., Vander, J., Shah, C., Garg, S. (2012). Changes in antibiotic resistance patterns of conjunctival flora due to repeated use of topical antibiotics after intravitreal injection. Ophthalmology 119, 1420–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.016
Oladigbolu, K., Rafindadi, A., Abah, E., Samaila, E. (2013). Corneal ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria. Ann. Afr Med. 12, 165–170. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.117626
Oliveira-Ferreira, C., Leuzinger-Dias, M., Tavares-Ferreira, J., Torrão, L., Falcão-Reis, F. (2019). Microbiological profile of infectious keratitis in a portuguese tertiary centre. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 6328058. doi: 10.1155/2019/6328058
Pate, J. C., Jones, D. B., Wilhelmus, K. R. (2006). Prevalence and spectrum of bacterial co-infection during fungal keratitis. Brit J. Ophthalmol. 90, 289–292. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081869
Prokosch, V., Gatzioufas, Z., Thanos, S., Stupp, T. (2012). Microbiological findings and predisposing risk factors in corneal ulcers. Graef Arch. Clin. Exp. 250, 369–374. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1722-9
Sahoo, S., Alluri, H., Mitra, S., Priyadarshini, S., Sahu, S. K., Mohanty, A., et al. (2023). Multidrug-resistant keratitis: challenging yet manageable. Brit J. Ophthalmol. 107, 769–773. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320203
Saillard, J., Spiesser-Robelet, L., Gohier, P., Briot, T. (2018). Bacterial keratitis treated by strengthened antibiotic eye drops: An 18 months review of clinical cases and antibiotic susceptibilities. Ann. Pharm. Fr 76, 107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2017.11.005
Satpathy, G., Ahmed, N. H., Nayak, N., Tandon, R., Sharma, N., Agarwal, T., et al. (2019). Spectrum of mycotic keratitis in north India: Sixteen years study from a tertiary care ophthalmic centre. J. Infect. Public Heal 12, 367–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.12.005
Singh, R. B., Das, S., Chodosh, J., Sharma, N., Zegans, M. E., Kowalski, R. P., et al. (2022). Paradox of complex diversity: Challenges in the diagnosis and management of bacterial keratitis. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 88, 101028. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101028
Tan, S. Z., Walkden, A., Au, L., Fullwood, C., Hamilton, A., Qamruddin, A., et al. (2017). Twelve-year analysis of microbial keratitis trends at a UK tertiary hospital. Eye 31, 1229–1236. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.55
Termote, K., Joe, A. W., Butler, A. L., Mccarthy, M., Blondeau, J. M., Iovieno, A., et al. (2018). Epidemiology of bacterial corneal ulcers at tertiary centres in Vancouver, B.C. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 53, 330–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.11.001
Ting, D. S. J., Settle, C., Morgan, S. J., Baylis, O., Ghosh, S. (2018). A 10-year analysis of microbiological profiles of microbial keratitis: the North East England Study. Eye 32, 1416–1417. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0085-4
Tuft, S., Somerville, T. F., Li, J. O., Neal, T., De, S., Horsburgh, M. J., et al. (2022). Bacterial keratitis: identifying the areas of clinical uncertainty. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 89, 101031. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101031
Ung, L., Bispo, P. J. M., Shanbhag, S. S., Gilmore, M. S., Chodosh, J. (2019). The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance. Surv Ophthalmol. 64, 255–271. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.12.003
Ung, L., Chodosh, J. (2021). Foundational concepts in the biology of bacterial keratitis. Exp. Eye Res. 209, 108647. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108647
Urwin, L., Okurowska, K., Crowther, G., Roy, S., Garg, P., Karunakaran, E., et al. (2020). Corneal infection models: tools to investigate the role of biofilms in bacterial keratitis. Cells 9, null. doi: 10.3390/cells9112450
Verner, A., Durrani, A., Kowalski, R. P., Jhanji, V. (2020). A case of nocardia farcinica keratitis in a pediatric contact lens wearer. Eye Contact Lens 46, e11–e12. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000594
Xu, S., Guo, D., Liu, X., Jin, X., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Ocular pathogens and antibiotic resistance in microbial keratitis over three years in Harbin, Northeast China. Acta Ophthalmol. 99, 909–915. doi: 10.1111/aos.14789
Yilmaz, S., Ozturk, I., Maden, A. (2007). Microbial keratitis in West Anatolia, Turkey: a retrospective review. Int. Ophthalmol. 27, 261–268. doi: 10.1007/s10792-007-9069-2
Zhang, Z., Cao, K., Liu, J., Wei, Z., Xu, X., Liang, Q. (2022). Pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities of global bacterial keratitis: A meta-analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 11, null. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020238
Keywords: bacterial keratitis, retrospective analysis, pathogenesis, drug susceptibility, risk factors
Citation: Guo R-Q, Yang J, Yang Y-B, Chen Y-N, Xiao Y-Y, Xiang P, Dong M-J, He M-F, Wang Y-T, Xiao Y-L, Ke H-Q and Liu H (2024) Spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity of bacterial keratitis: a retrospective analysis of eight years in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Southwest China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14:1363437. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1363437
Received: 30 December 2023; Accepted: 27 February 2024;
Published: 11 March 2024.
Edited by:
Nicole Carnt, University of New South Wales, AustraliaReviewed by:
Dmitri Debabov, AbbVie, United StatesSukhvinder Singh, Wayne State University, United States
Copyright © 2024 Guo, Yang, Yang, Chen, Xiao, Xiang, Dong, He, Wang, Xiao, Ke and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hong-Qin Ke, kehongqin@ynu.edu.cn; Hai Liu, herryhai@ynu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship