Event Abstract

Spectral Analysis of Local Field Potentials from Rat Primary Visual Cortex (V1)

  • 1 Bernstein Center Freiburg, Germany
  • 2 Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Germany
  • 3 BCCN Heidelberg/Mannheim, Germany
  • 4 Central Institute for Mental Health, Psychological Research, Germany

In primary visual cortex (V1) of rats, orientation selective neurons do not show topographic organization on a larger scale (Ohki et al., 2005), in contrast to the columnar organization of orientation selective cells in V1 of cat and monkey. Accordingly, while orientation tuning in mass signals like the local field potential (LFP) has been described in recordings from cat V1, it can be assumed to be weak or absent in rodent V1. However, in monkey motor cortex, which also shows no clear columnar organization, information about the direction of the monkey’s hand movement could be extracted from LFP power spectra with high predictive power (Rickert et al., 2005).
To reveal in how far global network tuning properties could be extracted from mass signals of primary sensory areas which do not show clear topographic organization, we performed in vivo multi-electrode recordings in V1 of anesthetized rats while presenting visual stimuli with clear direction information (moving edges and gratings). Spectral analysis of LFP signals from multiple channels was performed using adaptive multivariate auto-regression (AMVAR; Ding et al., 2000) after removing the first two statistical moments (mean and standard deviation across trials) from the signal. This method allows high spectral estimation accuracy with high temporal resolution superior to other methods of time-dependent spectral analysis like multi-tapering (Nalatore & Rangarajan, 2009). Direction tuning was assessed using circular statistical measures.
For moving edges, significant directional tuning in the LFP power spectrum can be found during the onset transient up to 500 ms after stimulus onset. Tuning strength was not distributed evenly across the whole observed spectrum (<200 Hz), however, but limited to mainly two distinct frequency bands centered around ~30 Hz and ~70 Hz. Preliminary analysis of moving grating stimuli did not reveal significant tuning either in the onset transient or the steady state during stimulus presentation. These results suggest that, even in the absence of coarse scale organization of cortical networks with respect to tuning properties, information about the stimulus properties can be inferred with appropriate methods.

Acknowledgements

This project received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grants 01GQ0420 to BCCN Freiburg and 01GQ0830 to BFNT Freiburg-Tübingen)

References

Ding M, Bressler SL, Yang W, Liang H (2000) Short-window Spectral Analysis of Cortical Event-related Potentials by Adaptive Multivariate Autoregressive Modeling: Data Preprocessing, Model Validation, and Variability Assessment. Biol. Cybern. 83, 35-45

Nalatore H, Rangarajan G (2009) Short-window Spectral Analysis Using AMVAR and Multitaper Methods: a Comparison. Biol Cybern. 101:71–80

Ohki K, Chung S, Ch’ng YH, Kara P, Reid RC (2005) Functional Imaging with Cellular Resolution Reveals Precise Microarchitecture in Visual Cortex. Nature 433:597-603

Rickert J, Cardoso de Oliveira S, Vaadia E, Aertsen A, Rotter S, Mehring C (2005) Encoding of Movement Direction in Different Frequency Ranges of Motor Cortical Local Field Potentials. J Neuroscience 25:8815– 8824

Keywords: AMVAR, directional tuning, extracellular recording, Rats, primary visual cortex (V1)

Conference: Bernstein Conference 2012, Munich, Germany, 12 Sep - 14 Sep, 2012.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Data analysis, machine learning, neuroinformatics

Citation: Fucke T, Heining K, Jasper AI, Boucsein C and Aertsen A (2012). Spectral Analysis of Local Field Potentials from Rat Primary Visual Cortex (V1). Front. Comput. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Bernstein Conference 2012. doi: 10.3389/conf.fncom.2012.55.00087

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 11 May 2012; Published Online: 12 Sep 2012.