In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration

Esra Ozyurt; Hacer Deniz Arisu; Emin Turkoz

doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847

Research Article

Year 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 253 - 260, 30.09.2019

Esra Ozyurt Hacer Deniz Arisu Emin Turkoz

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847

Cited By: 1

Abstract

References

1. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: new perspectives on an old problem. International Dental Journal. 2002;52(5):367-75.
2. Addy M, Dowell P. Dentine hypersensitivity--a review. Clinical and in vitro evaluation of treatment agents. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10(4):351-63.
3. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin H. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(4):221-6.
4. Pashley DH. How can sensitive dentine become hypersensitive and can it be reversed? Journal of Dentistry. 2013;41:S49-S55.
5. Porto IC, Andrade AK, Montes MA. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci. 2009;51(3):323-32.
6. Addy M, Pearce N. Aetiological, predisposing and environmental factors in dentine hypersensitivity. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39 Suppl:33S-8S
7. KEMALOĞLU H, TÜRKÜN LŞ. Dentin Hypersensitivity-Physiology Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Restorative Dentistry-Special Topics. 2015;1(1):8-15.
8. Bamise CT, Esan TA. Mechanisms and treatment approaches of dentine hypersensitivity: a literature review. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 2011;9(4).
9. Yilmaz HG, Bayindir H, Cengiz E, Berberoglu A. Dentin hypersensitivity and treatment methods Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2012;15(1):71-82.
10. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(7):990-8; quiz 1028-9.
11. Bartold PM. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(3):212-8; quiz 76.
12. Corona SAM, Do Nascimento TN, Catirse ABE, Lizarelli RFZ, Dinelli W, Palma-DIBB RG. Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2003;30(12):1183-9.
13. Markowitz K, Pashley DH. Discovering new treatments for sensitive teeth: the long path from biology to therapy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008;35(4):300-15.
14. Askar H, Lausch J, Dorfer CE, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Penetration of micro-filled infiltrant resins into artificial caries lesions. Journal of Dentistry. 2015;43(7):832-8.
15. Gelani R, Zandona AF, Lippert F, Kamocka MM, Eckert G. In Vitro Progression of Artificial White Spot Lesions Sealed With an Infiltrant Resin. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):481-8.
16. Cal-Neto JP, de Miranda MS, Dias KR. Comparative SEM evaluation of penetration of adhesive systems in human dentin with a non-rinse conditioner and a self-etching primer. Braz Dent J. 2004;15(1):19-25.
17. Moradi S, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Penetration after the Use of Dentin Bonding Agent as a Root Canal Sealer. J Endodont. 2009;35(11):1563-6.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
19. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endodont. 2002;28(1):17-9.
20. Pereira JC, Segala AD, Gillam DG. Effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin subjected to different surface pre-treatments-an in vitro study. Dental Materials. 2005;21(2):129-38.
21. ERSÖZ E, ÖZYURT P. The effect of various acids in different concentrationson the dentin surface: a sem study. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Dental Sciences. 1999;5(1):55-9.
22. Sauro S, Toledano M, Aguilera FS, Mannocci F, Pashley DH, Tay FR, et al. Resin–dentin bonds to EDTA-treated vs. acid-etched dentin using ethanol wet-bonding. dental materials. 2010;26(4):368-79.
23. Sancaklı HŞ. Dentin bonding systems and hybridization. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2010;44(3):189.
24. Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. Journal of dental research. 2003;82(2):141-5.
25. Ünlü İ, Bala O. The clinical evaluation of different materials used in treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Acta Odontologica Turcica. 2008;25(2):13.
26. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
27. Goncalves F, Kawano Y, Pfeifer C, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites. European journal of oral sciences. 2009;117(4):442-6.
28. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. International Dental Journal. 1998;48(1):3-16.
29. Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P. The elastic moduli across various types of resin/dentin interfaces. Dental Materials. 2008;24(8):1102-6.
30. Kim JS, Cho Bh Fau - Lee I-B, Lee Ib Fau - Um C-M, Um Cm Fau - Lim B-S, Lim Bs Fau - Oh M-H, Oh Mh Fau - Chang C-G, et al. Effect of the hydrophilic nanofiller loading on the mechanical properties and the microtensile bond strength of an ethanol-based one-bottle dentin adhesive. (1552-4973 (Print)).
31. Tay FR, Moulding Km Fau - Pashley DH, Pashley DH. Distribution of nanofillers from a simplified-step adhesive in acid-conditioned dentin. (1461-5185 (Print)).
32. Araujo GS, Sfalcin RA, Araujo TG, Alonso RC, Puppin-Rontani RM. Evaluation of polymerization characteristics and penetration into enamel caries lesions of experimental infiltrants. J Dent. 2013;41(11):1014-9.
33. Griffiths B, Watson T, Sherriff M. The influence of dentine bonding systems and their handling characteristics on the morphology and micropermeability of the dentine adhesive interface. Journal of dentistry. 1999;27(1):63-71.

In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration

Year 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 253 - 260, 30.09.2019

Esra Ozyurt Hacer Deniz Arisu Emin Turkoz

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and
compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive and a resin infiltration system used with two
different surface treatments.

Methods: Dentin specimens were obtained from 42
impacted lower right wisdom tooth, 2 of these specimens were used to detect the
effects of surface treatments. Two different surface treatments (37% phosphoric
acid and 17% EDTA) were applied to the samples to compare the dentin tubule
penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive –which had been using for
treatment of dentin hypersensitivity- (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M, Germany) and a
resin infiltration system (ICON, DMG, Germany). Scanning electron microscopy
was used to investigate the tubule penetration effectiveness. For statistical
analysis, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U and
One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests were used.

Results: ICON
had shown significantly more resin penetration intensity and more resin
penetration depth than Adper Single Bond 2 (p<0.05). Phosphoric acid
treatment groups had shown significantly more penetration intensity than EDTA
treated groups (p=0.001).

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it
can be concluded that tubuler penetration effectivenes of ICON resin
infiltration system is better than Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive system.

Keywords

dentin sensitivity, resins, adhesives, microscopy

References

1. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: new perspectives on an old problem. International Dental Journal. 2002;52(5):367-75.
2. Addy M, Dowell P. Dentine hypersensitivity--a review. Clinical and in vitro evaluation of treatment agents. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10(4):351-63.
3. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin H. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(4):221-6.
4. Pashley DH. How can sensitive dentine become hypersensitive and can it be reversed? Journal of Dentistry. 2013;41:S49-S55.
5. Porto IC, Andrade AK, Montes MA. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci. 2009;51(3):323-32.
6. Addy M, Pearce N. Aetiological, predisposing and environmental factors in dentine hypersensitivity. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39 Suppl:33S-8S
7. KEMALOĞLU H, TÜRKÜN LŞ. Dentin Hypersensitivity-Physiology Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Restorative Dentistry-Special Topics. 2015;1(1):8-15.
8. Bamise CT, Esan TA. Mechanisms and treatment approaches of dentine hypersensitivity: a literature review. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 2011;9(4).
9. Yilmaz HG, Bayindir H, Cengiz E, Berberoglu A. Dentin hypersensitivity and treatment methods Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2012;15(1):71-82.
10. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(7):990-8; quiz 1028-9.
11. Bartold PM. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(3):212-8; quiz 76.
12. Corona SAM, Do Nascimento TN, Catirse ABE, Lizarelli RFZ, Dinelli W, Palma-DIBB RG. Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2003;30(12):1183-9.
13. Markowitz K, Pashley DH. Discovering new treatments for sensitive teeth: the long path from biology to therapy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008;35(4):300-15.
14. Askar H, Lausch J, Dorfer CE, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Penetration of micro-filled infiltrant resins into artificial caries lesions. Journal of Dentistry. 2015;43(7):832-8.
15. Gelani R, Zandona AF, Lippert F, Kamocka MM, Eckert G. In Vitro Progression of Artificial White Spot Lesions Sealed With an Infiltrant Resin. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):481-8.
16. Cal-Neto JP, de Miranda MS, Dias KR. Comparative SEM evaluation of penetration of adhesive systems in human dentin with a non-rinse conditioner and a self-etching primer. Braz Dent J. 2004;15(1):19-25.
17. Moradi S, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Penetration after the Use of Dentin Bonding Agent as a Root Canal Sealer. J Endodont. 2009;35(11):1563-6.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
19. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endodont. 2002;28(1):17-9.
20. Pereira JC, Segala AD, Gillam DG. Effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin subjected to different surface pre-treatments-an in vitro study. Dental Materials. 2005;21(2):129-38.
21. ERSÖZ E, ÖZYURT P. The effect of various acids in different concentrationson the dentin surface: a sem study. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Dental Sciences. 1999;5(1):55-9.
22. Sauro S, Toledano M, Aguilera FS, Mannocci F, Pashley DH, Tay FR, et al. Resin–dentin bonds to EDTA-treated vs. acid-etched dentin using ethanol wet-bonding. dental materials. 2010;26(4):368-79.
23. Sancaklı HŞ. Dentin bonding systems and hybridization. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2010;44(3):189.
24. Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. Journal of dental research. 2003;82(2):141-5.
25. Ünlü İ, Bala O. The clinical evaluation of different materials used in treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Acta Odontologica Turcica. 2008;25(2):13.
26. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
27. Goncalves F, Kawano Y, Pfeifer C, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites. European journal of oral sciences. 2009;117(4):442-6.
28. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. International Dental Journal. 1998;48(1):3-16.
29. Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P. The elastic moduli across various types of resin/dentin interfaces. Dental Materials. 2008;24(8):1102-6.
30. Kim JS, Cho Bh Fau - Lee I-B, Lee Ib Fau - Um C-M, Um Cm Fau - Lim B-S, Lim Bs Fau - Oh M-H, Oh Mh Fau - Chang C-G, et al. Effect of the hydrophilic nanofiller loading on the mechanical properties and the microtensile bond strength of an ethanol-based one-bottle dentin adhesive. (1552-4973 (Print)).
31. Tay FR, Moulding Km Fau - Pashley DH, Pashley DH. Distribution of nanofillers from a simplified-step adhesive in acid-conditioned dentin. (1461-5185 (Print)).
32. Araujo GS, Sfalcin RA, Araujo TG, Alonso RC, Puppin-Rontani RM. Evaluation of polymerization characteristics and penetration into enamel caries lesions of experimental infiltrants. J Dent. 2013;41(11):1014-9.
33. Griffiths B, Watson T, Sherriff M. The influence of dentine bonding systems and their handling characteristics on the morphology and micropermeability of the dentine adhesive interface. Journal of dentistry. 1999;27(1):63-71.

There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Subjects	Health Care Administration
Journal Section	Articles
Authors	Esra Ozyurt 0000-0003-4118-0450 Hacer Deniz Arisu This is me 0000-0003-0249-8968 Emin Turkoz This is me
Publication Date	September 30, 2019
Submission Date	May 21, 2018
Published in Issue	Year 2019 Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Cite

APA	Ozyurt, E., Arisu, H. D., & Turkoz, E. (2019). In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 9(3), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847
AMA	Ozyurt E, Arisu HD, Turkoz E. In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. September 2019;9(3):253-260. doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847
Chicago	Ozyurt, Esra, Hacer Deniz Arisu, and Emin Turkoz. “In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 9, no. 3 (September 2019): 253-60. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847.
EndNote	Ozyurt E, Arisu HD, Turkoz E (September 1, 2019) In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 9 3 253–260.
IEEE	E. Ozyurt, H. D. Arisu, and E. Turkoz, “In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration”, Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 253–260, 2019, doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847.
ISNAD	Ozyurt, Esra et al. “In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 9/3 (September 2019), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847.
JAMA	Ozyurt E, Arisu HD, Turkoz E. In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2019;9:253–260.
MLA	Ozyurt, Esra et al. “In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, 2019, pp. 253-60, doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847.
Vancouver	Ozyurt E, Arisu HD, Turkoz E. In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2019;9(3):253-60.

Cited By

Assessment of the Potential Ability to Penetrate into the Hard Tissues of the Root of an Experimental Preparation with the Characteristics of a Dental Infiltratant, Enriched with an Antimicrobial Component—Preliminary Study

Materials

https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195654

Download Cover Image

Article Files

Full Text