Published online May 31, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2011.64.5.481
Measurement of Trabecular Bone Parameters in Porcine Vertebral Bodies Using Multidetector CT: Evaluation of Reproducibility of 3-Dimensional CT Histomorphometry
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the reproducibility of 3-dimensional histomorphometry for the microarchitecture analysis of trabecular bone parameters using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
Materials and Methods
Thirty-six specimens from porcine vertebral bodies were imaged five times with a 64-detector row MDCT system using the same scan protocols. Locations of the specimens were nearly identical through the scans. Three-dimensional structural parameters of trabecular bone were derived from the five data sets using image analyzing software. The features measured by the analysis programs were trabecular bone volume, trabecular bone volume/tissue volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular separation, trabecular number, trabecular bone pattern factor, structural model index.
Results
The structural trabecular parameters showed excellent reproducibility through repeated scanning. Intraclass correlation coefficients of all seven structural parameters were in the range of 0.998 to 1.000. Coefficients of variation of the six structural parameters, excluding structural model index, were not over 1.6%.
Conclusion
The measurement of the trabecular structural parameters using multidetector CT and three-dimensional histomophometry analysis program was validated and showed excellent reproducibility. This method could be used as a noninvasive and easily available test in a clinical setting.
Fig. 1
Bland-Altman plots of paired results of the three-dimensional structural parameters between the maximum value and minimum value.
Note.─ BV= trabecular bone volume, BVTV= trabecular bone volume/tissue volume, Tb_Th= trabecular thickness, Tb_Sp= trabecular separation, Tb_N= trabecular number, Tb_Pf= trabecular bone pattern factor, SMI= structural model index
Fig. 2
Dispersion of standard deviation versus mean and coefficient of variation versus mean.
Note.─ BV= trabecular bone volume, BVTV= trabecular bone volume/tissue volume, Tb_Th= trabecular thickness, Tb_Sp= trabecular separation, Tb_N= trabecular number, Tb_Pf= trabecular bone pattern factor, SMI= structural model index, SD= standard deviation, CV= coefficient of variation
Table 1
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) of Structural Trabecular Parameters
Table 2
Distribution of Coefficients of Variation for the Structural Parameters Repeatedly Scanned Five Times
This study was supported by grant no 04-2007-046-0 from the SNUH Research Fund
References
-
Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Burghardt A, Haase S, Sedat J, Moss W, et al. Wavelet Based Characterization of vertebral trabecular bone structure from MR images of specimen at 3 tesla compared to microCT measurements. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005;7:7040–7043.
-
-
Link TM, Vieth V, Stehling C, Lotter A, Beer A, Newitt D, et al. High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best? Eur Radiol 2003;13:663–671.
-
-
Trisi P, Rebaudi A, Calvari F, Lazzara RJ. Sinus graft with biogran, autogenous bone, and PRP: a report of three cases with histology and micro-CT. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:113–125.
-
-
Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P. A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc 1997;185:67–75.
-