Indexed in MEDLINE, SCI & KoreaMed
pISSN 1011-8934   eISSN 1598-6357
Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Weekly
    J Korean Med Sci. 2022 May 02;37(17):e138. English.
    Published online Apr 25, 2022.
    https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e138
    © 2022 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
    Original Article

    Predictive Factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare After Switching From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Formulation of Tocilizumab in Real-World Practice

    Soo Min Ahn,1,* Ji Seon Oh,2,* Hyun Mi Heo,1 Seokchan Hong,1 Chang-Keun Lee,1 Bin Yoo,1 and Yong-Gil Kim1
      • 1Department of Rheumatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
      • 2Department of Information Medicine, Big Data Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
    • Address for Correspondence: Yong-Gil Kim, MD, PhD. Department of Rheumatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea. Email: bestmd2000@amc.seoul.kr

      *Soo Min Ahn and Ji Seon Oh contributed equally to this work.
    Received January 12, 2022; Accepted April 04, 2022.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Background

    To evaluate the incidence and related factors of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flares after switching from intravenous tocilizumab (TCZ-IV) to subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) injection in stable RA patients.

    Methods

    We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of stable RA patients who used TCZ-IV for more than 6 months and switched to TCZ-SC between January 2013 and April 2020. RA flare was defined as an increase of more than 1.2 in the RA disease activity as assessed by the disease activity score in 28 joints. The factors associated with RA flare were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.

    Results

    Among 106 patients treated with TCZ-IV for > 6 months, 37 patients were switched to TCZ-SC after the acquisition of remission or low disease activity. RA flares occurred in 11 (29.7%) of patients who switched TCZ-SC. Results from the multivariable logistic analysis revealed that the dose of TCZ-IV per weight at switching (odds ratio [OR], 20.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22–192.84; P = 0.008) and methotrexate (MTX) non-use (OR, 8.53; 95% CI, 1.21–60.40; P = 0.032) were associated with the risk of RA flares after switching to TCZ-SC. Interestingly, most patients who switched back to TCZ-IV had their RA activity controlled again.

    Conclusion

    MTX non-use and high dose of TCZ-IV per weight were associated with a risk of RA flare after switching to TCZ-SC. RA patients with these factors need to be carefully observed for flare after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC.

    Graphical Abstract

    Keywords
    Rheumatoid Arthritis; Tocilizumab; Subcutaneous Injections; Drug Administration Routes

    INTRODUCTION

    Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a key role in inflammatory and immune responses.1, 2 The levels of IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptors in the serum and synovial fluid of the affected joint are elevated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and are correlated with disease activities.3, 4 Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody of the IL-6 receptor that inhibits IL-6-mediated signaling.5 TCZ is available as an intravenous (IV) formulation (TCZ-IV) and subcutaneous (SC) formulation (TCZ-SC).6

    The route of drug administration is an important factor in the patient’s drug adherence.7 The SC formulation can be self-administered, and many patients prefer the SC formulation over IV administration.8, 9 The dose of TCZ-IV (8 mg/kg) can be increased according to body weight, while the dose of TCZ-SC is fixed at 162 mg once every other week for those weighing less than 100 kg.

    Many randomized clinical trials have shown that the effectiveness is maintained even when switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC.10, 11, 12 However, in real-world practice, it is reported that symptoms worsened in half of RA patients who switched TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC during the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.13 Thus, the effect of switching TCZ-SC from TCZ-IV is still controversial. Moreover, overweight was reported to be related to RA flare, but the characteristics of patients with RA flare after switching the TCZ-SC from TCZ-IV have not been evaluated and the risk factors are not well-defined.10, 14 Furthermore, there were no studies to date have examined the effect of changing back to TCZ-IV on RA flare after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC. The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for RA flares after switching to TCZ-SC in stable RA patients as TCZ-IV.

    METHODS

    Study population

    In our historical cohort, we analyzed RA patients who had treatment initiation with TCZ treatment between January 2013 and April 2020 at a tertiary referral hospital in Seoul, Korea. Patients with improved RA disease activity evaluated by disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) during the use of TCZ-IV and reaching below low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) were included. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) patients who started TCZ with SC formulation; 2) patients who discontinued TCZ-IV before 6 months due to loss of follow-up, no efficacy, or adverse events.

    TCZ-IV was administered every 4 weeks at a dosage of 8 mg/kg and subsequently 162 mg every two weeks after the TCZ-SC changed. At the time of conversion to TCZ-SC, patients were instructed by a single clinical nurse specialist on the use of TCZ-SC and monitored to ensure that TCZ-SC was injected correctly at every subsequent outpatient visit. Data of the following variables were collected from the electronic medical records: demographic information (sex, age, body mass index [BMI], and body surface area), comorbid diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and interstitial lung disease), TCZ dosage, previous biologic diseases modifying anti-rheumatic drug exposure, concomitant methotrexate (MTX), use of corticosteroids and daily dosage, DAS28-ESR score, and baseline laboratory data (white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelet counts, ESR, and C-reactive protein).

    The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of RA flare after switching TCZ-SC from TCZ-IV. RA flare was defined as an increase in the DAS28-ESR > 1.215 within 6 months after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC.12 We defined “SC ineffective group” as patients with RA flare and “SC effective group” as patients with stable RA after TCZ-SC switched.

    Statistical analysis

    The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical data. Continuous values are expressed as means (standard deviations) or as median (interquartile range) and were calculated using Student’s t-test for parametric data or the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Logistic regression analysis with a stepwise backward elimination procedure was performed to identify risk factors for RA flare after switching TCZ from IV to SC and reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Variable that had a P value of < 0.1 on univariable analysis were selected for multivariable analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

    Ethics statement

    This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (approval No. 2021-0742). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design of this study.

    RESULTS

    Clinical characteristics of the study population

    As shown in Fig. 1, TCZ was initiated in 229 patients with RA, of whom 135 patients started the treatment with TCZ-IV. Of them, 29 patients were excluded due to follow-up loss or discontinuation of treatment within 6 months of initiation. Finally, 106 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 69 maintained TCZ-IV treatment without switching to TCZ-SC and 37 switched to TCZ-SC upon remission or low disease activity assessed by the DAS28-ESR according to their preference, and after discussion with attending physicians.

    Fig. 1
    Flowchart of the patient selection process.
    TCZ = tocilizumab, SC = subcutaneous, IV = intravenous, F/U = follow-up.

    There were 11 (29.7%) patients who experienced RA flare after switching to TCZ-SC (SC ineffective group), and the remaining 26 (70.3%) patients maintained the activity of RA stably even after switching to TCZ-SC (SC effective group). Nine patients in the SC ineffective group were re-administered TCZ-IV, and 8 patients except one acquired low disease activity again within 6 months of re-administration.

    Table 1 was compared the clinical characteristics between TCZ-SC changed group and TCZ-IV continued group. The DAS28-ESR score was lower in the TCZ-SC changed group (measured at switching) than in the TCZ-IV continued group (measured at 6 months after initiation) (2.26 vs. 2.69, P = 0.008). All patients had significant improvement in disease activity at follow-up (decrease of DAS28-ESR 1.2 or greater), with none of the patients in the TCZ-SC changed group showing disease activity higher than low disease activity; however, 36.2% of patients in the TCZ-IV continued group had moderate disease activity.

    Table 1
    Clinical characteristics of TCZ-SC changed group vs. TCZ-IV continued group

    The baseline characteristics of TCZ-SC changed patients are shown in Table 2. The mean age was 58.7 years and 32 (86.5%) patients were female. All patients were positive for rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody. The median duration of the use of TCZ as an IV formulation before switching to the SC formulation was 9 months in the SC ineffective group and 13.5 months in the SC effective group. At the time of RA flare in the SC ineffective group and 6 months after SC switch in SC effective group, the mean DAS28-ESR score was significantly higher in the SC ineffective group (5.0 vs. 1.7, P < 0.001). The TCZ dose per body weight at SC change was significantly higher in the SC ineffective group than in the SC effective group (8.2 mg/kg vs. 7.7 mg/kg, P = 0.001). The proportion of patients using concomitant MTX at the TCZ-SC change was significantly higher in the SC effective group than in the SC ineffective group (84.6% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.038). There was no difference in the number of exposures to the previous biological agents. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, comorbidities, BMI and, baseline DAS28-ESR. The mean time interval between the TCZ-SC transition and RA flares in the SC ineffective group was 3.2 months. More than half (6/11 [54.5%]) of the patients in the SC ineffective group developed an RA flare within 2 months after SC switching. These six patients had significantly higher DAS28-ESR scores at the time of switch compared with the SC effective group (2.80 vs. 2.17, P = 0.018).

    Table 2
    Clinical characteristics of the study patients (n = 37) with rheumatoid arthritis at the time of switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC

    Clinical factors associated with RA flare in patients who switched TCZ from IV to SC formulation

    The results of the logistic regression analysis for factors associated with RA flares after switching TCZ from IV to SC are presented in Table 3. The results of the univariable analysis showed that the dose per weight of TCZ-IV at switching, MTX non-use, and steroid use were associated with an increased risk of RA flares after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC. Obesity and previous use of 2 or more biologics were not associated with the risk of RA flare in TCZ-SC switched from TCZ-IV. Multivariable analysis revealed that the dose per weight of TCZ-IV at switching (OR, 20.70; 95% CI, 2.22–192.84; P = 0.008) and MTX non-use (OR, 8.53; 95% CI, 1.21–60.40; P = 0.032) were significantly associated with an increased risk of RA flare events.

    Table 3
    Factors associated with rheumatoid arthritis flare after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC

    DISCUSSION

    The present study showed RA flares in patients after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC frequently, with a crude rate of 29.7% (11/37). Notably, we also found that at the time of switching to TCZ-SC, high dose of TCZ-IV and concomitant MTX non-use was significantly associated with an RA flare after SC switching.

    TCZ is widely used in the treatment of RA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis and cytokine release syndrome.16 The recommended initial dosage for TCZ-IV in RA patients differs in the European Union (EU) and the United States.17 The recommended initial dosage of TCZ-IV is 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks in the EU, whereas a starting dosage of 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks followed by an increase to 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks based on clinical response is recommended in the United States.17 In the present study, according to EU standards, TCZ-IV was started at 8 mg/kg and the average dose per body weight of TCZ at the time of SC change actually used was 7.8 mg/kg, which was higher in the SC ineffective group than in the SC effective group (8.2 mg/kg vs. 7.7 mg/kg, P = 0.001). However, when TCZ was changed to a SC formulation, the DAS28-ESR and disease activity categories assessed by DAS28-ESR did not differ between the two groups. Therefore, higher dose of TCZ-IV required to stably maintain the RA activity is considered as a risk factor for the flare after TCZ-SC change. Especially, patients who are being treated with > 8 mg/kg of TCZ-IV should consider the risk of flare when switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC.

    Many randomized clinical trials have shown that the effectiveness is maintained even after switching TCZ from IV to SC formulation.10, 11, 12 However, looking at the subgroup, switching to TCZ-SC in patients with RA remission with TCZ-IV worsens the RA by 22%.10 Also, there are two real-world studies that the effect was maintained after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC, but one study include patients who used 4 mg/kg in TCZ-IV dose and another study used 8 mg/kg, but the actual dose was not described.14, 18 In addition, in a small study of RA patients that switched TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, almost half (7 out of 16) of the patients had worsening symptoms after 3 months and most patients (14 out of 16) wanted to re-change to TCZ-IV.13 In a previous study, obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) or high body weight (more than 60 kg or 70 kg) has been reported as a factor associated with RA flare after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC.10, 14 In our study, RA flare occurred in 11 (29.7%) of 37 patients who switched TCZ from IV to SC formulation, and overweight or obesity was not associated with the worsening of RA activity. Notably, eight of nine (88.9%) patients whose RA flare after switching TCZ-SC had improved RA activity after re-switching to the TCZ-IV. Our data suggest that TCZ-IV controls RA activity more effectively in these patients than TCZ-SC.

    The results of several reports comparing the efficacy of TCZ monotherapy and TCZ combination with MTX in RA are controversial. Many studies have shown that there is no significant difference in the clinical or radiologic response between TCZ alone and MTX combination therapy in RA.19, 20, 21 By contrast, other studies have reported that the combination of TCZ and MTX is clinically and radiographically superior to TCZ monotherapy and is important in achieving remission.22, 23 In this present study, MTX non-using was significantly associated with RA flares after TCZ-SC change. These findings cautiously suggest that when switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC, the concomitant use of MTX is may be beneficial for sustaining the drug efficacy.

    The present study had some limitations. First, this study may have been affected by a selection bias inherent to its retrospective and single-center cohort design. Second, the number of patients who switched from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC in this study was small, resulting in a wide range of CIs and ORs. Therefore, multicenter research with more patients is required. Third, all patients were prescribed TCZ-IV based on 8 mg per body weight; however, the infused dosage per body weight may not be administered in the same manner because the unit of vial was produced only in 80 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg doses, respectively. Despite these limitations, this is the first real-world study investigating the factors that are associated with RA flares after switching TCZ from IV formulation to SC formulation and whether the effectiveness of TCZ is maintained after re-switching to the TCZ-IV.

    In conclusion, our study showed that RA flares occasionally occur after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC. RA patients treated with a high dose of TCZ or concomitant MTX non-user might experience RA flares after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC; thus, it is necessary to consider these factors when switching to TCZ-SC.

    Notes

    Funding:This work was supported by a grant to Kim YG from the Asan Institute for Life Sciences (grant No. 2021IL0015).

    Disclosure:The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    Author Contributions:

    • Conceptualization: Ahn SM, Kim YG.

    • Data curation: Ahn SM, Heo HM.

    • Formal analysis: Ahn SM, Oh JS.

    • Funding acquisition: Kim YG.

    • Investigation: Ahn SM, Oh JS.

    • Methodology: Hong S, Kim YG.

    • Project administration: Kim YG.

    • Resources: Ahn SM, Oh JS, Hong S, Lee CK, Yoo B, Kim YG.

    • Software: Ahn SM.

    • Supervision: Lee CK, Yoo B.

    • Validation: Hong S, Lee CK, Yoo B.

    • Visualization: Ahn SM.

    • Writing - original draft: Ahn SM.

    • Writing - review & editing: Oh JS, Kim YG.

    References

      1. Unver N, McAllister F. IL-6 family cytokines: key inflammatory mediators as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2018;41:10–17.
      1. Baek HJ, Lim MJ, Park W, Park SH, Shim SC, Yoo DH, et al. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in Korean patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Korean J Intern Med 2019;34(4):917–931.
      1. Houssiau FA, Devogelaer JP, Van Damme J, de Deuxchaisnes CN, Van Snick J. Interleukin-6 in synovial fluid and serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory arthritides. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31(6):784–788.
      1. Robak T, Gladalska A, Stepień H, Robak E. Serum levels of interleukin-6 type cytokines and soluble interleukin-6 receptor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators Inflamm 1998;7(5):347–353.
      1. Lee JS, Oh JS, Hong S, Lee CK, Yoo B, Kim YG. Tocilizumab-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheum Dis 2019;26(3):186–190.
      1. Burmester GR, Rubbert-Roth A, Cantagrel A, Hall S, Leszczynski P, Feldman D, et al. A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study). Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73(1):69–74.
      1. Malaviya AP, Ostör AJ. Drug adherence to biologic DMARDS with a special emphasis on the benefits of subcutaneous abatacept. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012;6:589–596.
      1. Barton JL. Patient preferences and satisfaction in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic therapy. Patient Prefer Adherence 2009;3:335–344.
      1. Vavricka SR, Bentele N, Scharl M, Rogler G, Zeitz J, Frei P, et al. Systematic assessment of factors influencing preferences of Crohn’s disease patients in selecting an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent (CHOOSE TNF TRIAL). Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18(8):1523–1530.
      1. Ogata A, Atsumi T, Fukuda T, Hirabayashi Y, Inaba M, Ishiguro N, et al. Sustainable efficacy of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67(10):1354–1362.
      1. Burmester GR, Rubbert-Roth A, Cantagrel A, Hall S, Leszczynski P, Feldman D, et al. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional DMARDs in patients with RA at week 97 (SUMMACTA). Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75(1):68–74.
      1. Darloy J, Segaud N, Salmon JH, Eschard JP, Goëb V, Deprez X, et al. Tocilizumab effectiveness after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous route in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the RoSwitch study. Rheumatol Ther 2019;6(1):61–75.
      1. Gupta R, Shipa M, Yeoh SA, Buck P, Ehrenstein MR. An unfavourable outcome following switching intravenous abatacept and tocilizumab to subcutaneous forms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;60(2):977–979.
      1. Iwamoto N, Fukui S, Umeda M, Nishino A, Nakashima Y, Suzuki T, et al. Evaluation of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 2016;26(5):662–666.
      1. van der Maas A, Lie E, Christensen R, Choy E, de Man YA, van Riel P, et al. Construct and criterion validity of several proposed DAS28-based rheumatoid arthritis flare criteria: an OMERACT cohort validation study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72(11):1800–1805.
      1. Rubbert-Roth A, Furst DE, Nebesky JM, Jin A, Berber E. A review of recent advances using tocilizumab in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol Ther 2018;5(1):21–42.
      1. Abdallah H, Hsu JC, Lu P, Fettner S, Zhang X, Douglass W, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of subcutaneous tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from 2 randomized, controlled trials: SUMMACTA and BREVACTA. J Clin Pharmacol 2017;57(4):459–468.
      1. Stojanović S, Stamenković B, Nedović J, Aleksić I, Cvetković J.. Effectiveness of tocilizumab after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single-centre experience. Acta Fac Med Naissensis 2021;38(3):247–256.
      1. Dougados M, Kissel K, Sheeran T, Tak PP, Conaghan PG, Mola EM, et al. Adding tocilizumab or switching to tocilizumab monotherapy in methotrexate inadequate responders: 24-week symptomatic and structural results of a 2-year randomised controlled strategy trial in rheumatoid arthritis (ACT-RAY). Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72(1):43–50.
      1. Bijlsma JW, Welsing PM, Woodworth TG, Middelink LM, Pethö-Schramm A, Bernasconi C, et al. Early rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab, methotrexate, or their combination (U-Act-Early): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, strategy trial. Lancet 2016;388(10042):343–355.
      1. Burmester GR, Rigby WF, van Vollenhoven RF, Kay J, Rubbert-Roth A, Blanco R, et al. Tocilizumab combination therapy or monotherapy or methotrexate monotherapy in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomised, placebo-controlled FUNCTION trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76(7):1279–1284.
      1. Kojima T, Yabe Y, Kaneko A, Takahashi N, Funahashi K, Kato D, et al. Importance of methotrexate therapy concomitant with tocilizumab treatment in achieving better clinical outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity: an observational cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;54(1):113–120.
      1. Kaneko Y, Atsumi T, Tanaka Y, Inoo M, Kobayashi-Haraoka H, Amano K, et al. Comparison of adding tocilizumab to methotrexate with switching to tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate: 52-week results from a prospective, randomised, controlled study (SURPRISE study). Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75(11):1917–1923.
    Cited by
    Crossref 3
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 1
    Scopus 3
    Web of Science 3
    MeSH Terms
    Arthritis, Rheumatoid*
    Drug Administration Routes
    Humans
    Incidence
    Injections, Subcutaneous
    Joints
    Logistic Models
    Medical Records
    Methotrexate
    Retrospective Studies
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Figures
    slide

    1 / 1

    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    ORCID IDs
    Funding Information
    PERMALINK