J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1505-1506. English.
Published online Jun 23, 2016.
© 2016 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
reply

The Author's Response: Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Woo Hyun Paik,1 and Yong-Tae Kim2
    • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
    • 2Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Response:

Dr. Karabicak raised issue that the enrolled patients in our study may not be the truly locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) (1), and staging laparoscopy is strictly recommended to define LAPC and to exclude minute metastasis. Preoperative diagnostic accuracy to define resectability of pancreatic cancer is important, however, preoperative determination of resectability of pancreatic cancer is still challenging. We totally agree with Dr. Karabicak's opinion that current axial imaging is limited to diagnose minute metastatic lesions (2). It is not sufficient to assess the true response of neoadjuvant therapy, either (3). However, we do not agree with the opinion that staging laparoscopy is strictly recommended to define minute metastasis in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. More than three-quarters of patients experience tumor recurrence even after radical resection of pancreatic cancer (4), and adjuvant chemotherapy has shown survival benefit in pancreatic cancer (5). Based on these findings, we expect that there would be a high probability of micrometastasis even in resectable pancreatic cancer (6). Therefore, we think that staging laparoscopy to identify small metastatic lesions is not essential in pancreatic cancer. NCCN guideline also recommends laparoscopy as optional not mandatory describing that diagnostic staging laparoscopy to rule out metastasis not visible at standard imaging is routinely used in some institutions prior to surgery or chemoradiation. Also, locoregional therapy has limited value in pancreatic cancer, and we conducted systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU, gemcitabine, or capecitabine along with 50.4 Gy of radiotherapy assuming that there would be a high probability of micrometastasis in LAPC. The benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer are as follows; 1) avoid unnecessary operation in the patient with a very aggressive tumor that would not benefit from a resection despite the absence of systemic spread at the time of diagnosis, 2) improvement of R0 resection rates and prevention of local recurrence (4, 7). With the introduction of highly effective chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFIRINOX, the neoadjuvant therapy protocol would be changed (3, 4, 8, 9). In conclusion, we agree with Dr. Karabicak's opinion that there would be a chance of including patients with minute metastasis that means stage IV initially in our study. However, we do not think that staging laparoscopy is essential to identify metastatic lesions in LAPC. In addition, the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis has not been proved and still under investigation (10). The intraperitoneal chemotherapy would require more clinical evidence.

References

    1. Paik WH, Lee SH, Kim YT, Park JM, Song BJ, Ryu JK. Objective assessment of surgical restaging after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30:917–923.
    1. Loehrer AP, Ferrone CR. Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Dig Surg 2016;33:343–350.
    1. Blazer M, Wu C, Goldberg RM, Phillips G, Schmidt C, Muscarella P, Wuthrick E, Williams TM, Reardon J, Ellison EC, et al. Neoadjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced unresectable (LAPC) and borderline resectable (BRPC) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:1153–1159.
    1. Hackert T, Ulrich A, Büchler MW. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett 2016;375:231–237.
    1. Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J, Engebretson A, Hong TS, Maitra A, Mohile SG, Mumber M, Schulick R, Shapiro M, et al. Potentially curable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. Forthcoming 2016
    1. Park DI, Lee JK, Kim JE, Hyun JG, Shim SG, Lee KT, Palk SW, Rhee JC, Choi KW, Lim JH, et al. The analysis of resectability and survival in pancreatic cancer patients with vascular invasion. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001;32:231–234.
    1. Morganti AG, Massaccesi M, La Torre G, Caravatta L, Piscopo A, Tambaro R, Sofo L, Sallustio G, Ingrosso M, Macchia G, et al. A systematic review of resectability and survival after concurrent chemoradiation in primarily unresectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:194–205.
    1. Nanda RH, El-Rayes B, Maithel SK, Landry J. Neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer improves resectability. J Surg Oncol 2015;111:1028–1034.
    1. Christians KK, Tsai S, Mahmoud A, Ritch P, Thomas JP, Wiebe L, Kelly T, Erickson B, Wang H, Evans DB, et al. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreas cancer: a new treatment paradigm? Oncologist 2014;19:266–274.
    1. Satoi S, Fujii T, Yanagimoto H, Motoi F, Kurata M, Takahara N, Yamada S, Yamamoto T, Mizuma M, Honda G, et al. Multicenter phase II study of intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with peritoneal metastasis. Ann Surg. Forthcoming 2016

Metrics
Share
PERMALINK