J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1503-1504. English.
Published online Jun 23, 2016.
© 2016 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
letter

Letter to the Editor: Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Ilhan Karabicak
    • Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University Medical Faculty, Samsun, Turkey.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

To the Editor:

I have read with interest the study "Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer" by Paik et al. (1). The article shares the experince of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) which authors conclude as preoperative CCRT in LAPC rarely leads to surgical downstaging, and it could lower resectability rates.

In the manuscript, the authors state that "During follow-up, 46 patients (85%) died and the median overall survival was 16.2 (95% CI 12.7-19.7) months. Disease progression was observed in 47 patients (87%) and the median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% CI 4.0-8.8) (Fig. 2B). Among the patients with disease progression, systemic presentations (36 patients, 77%) were more frequent than local progression (11 patients, 23%)."

I have several comments to make on this article. First, I saw in the manuscript that none of the patients had pre-treatment staging either by open or laparoscopic surgery, although 94% of the patients were in Stage 3. Although CT/MR can diagnose apparent metastasis, current axial imaging is limited when it comes to completely visualized potentially small peritoneal and distant tumor deposits (2, 3). Studies have shown that a certain number of Stage 3 patients are diagnosed with minute peritoneal or distant metastasis when a staging laparoscopy is performed (3, 4, 5). In addition, locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients have a high incidence of positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology, which unfortunately has a similar survival rate to that of patients with metastasis if treated locoregionally (6, 7). In particular, some of these patients are actually in Stage 4, but we treat them as Stage in whom chemoradiation therapy would not add any survival benefit.

Second, this study included more systemic presentations (36 patients, 77%) than local progression (11 patients, 23%) among the patients with disease progression. Fig. 2B shows that nearly 60% of the patients had systemic presentations within 6 months, which is really a short period of time to have that number of systemic presentations in Stage 3 though treatment (1). The author's findings also support the possibility that the patients could have minute peritoneal or distant metastasis or that they could have positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology if performed before concurrent chemoradiation therapy.

Third, any patients diagnosed with peritoneal metastasis or positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology can be candidates for intraperitoneal therapy (7).

In conclusion, staging laparoscopy is strictly recommended in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients before accepting these patients as Stage 3 and initiating any locoregional therapy. This will allow accurate therapy and staging.

References

    1. Paik WH, Lee SH, Kim YT, Park JM, Song BJ, Ryu JK. Objective assessment of surgical restaging after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30:917–923.
    1. Coté GA, Smith J, Sherman S, Kelly K. Technologies for imaging the normal and diseased pancreas. Gastroenterology 2013;144:1262–1271.e1.
    1. Contreras CM, Stanelle EJ, Mansour J, Hinshaw JL, Rikkers LF, Rettammel R, Mahvi DM, Cho CS, Weber SM. Staging laparoscopy enhances the detection of occult metastases in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:663–669.
    1. Satoi S, Yanagimoto H, Toyokawa H, Inoue K, Wada K, Yamamoto T, Hirooka S, Yamaki S, Yui R, Mergental H, et al. Selective use of staging laparoscopy based on carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level and tumor size in patients with radiographically defined potentially or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2011;40:426–432.
    1. Hashimoto D, Chikamoto A, Sakata K, Nakagawa S, Hayashi H, Ohmuraya M, Hirota M, Yoshida N, Beppu T, Baba H. Staging laparoscopy leads to rapid induction of chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatobiliary cancers. Asian J Endosc Surg 2015;8:59–62.
    1. Hirabayashi K, Imoto A, Yamada M, Hadano A, Kato N, Miyajima Y, Ito H, Kawaguchi Y, Nakagohri T, Mine T, et al. Positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology is a negative prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective single-center study. Front Oncol 2015;5:182.
    1. Satoi S, Fujii T, Yanagimoto H, Motoi F, Kurata M, Takahara N, Yamada S, Yamamoto T, Mizuma M, Honda G, et al. Multicenter phase II study of intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with peritoneal metastasis. Ann Surg. Forthcoming 2016

Metrics
Share
ORCID IDs
PERMALINK