Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods after Refractive Surgery Provided by the ASCRS. |
Soyeon Jung, Jiwon Jung |
Department of Ophthalmology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. panch325@gmail.com |
미국백내장굴절수술학회 제공 공식을 포함한 굴절교정수술 후 백내장수술 환자의 인공수정체 도수 계산 방법 비교 |
정소연⋅정지원 |
인하대학교 의과대학 안과학교실 |
Correspondence:
Jiwon Jung, Email: panch325@gmail.com |
Received: 22 March 2018 • Revised: 25 June 2018 • Accepted: 28 August 2018 |
Abstract |
PURPOSE Methods of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations for cataract surgery after myopic corneal refractive surgery were compared. METHODS: The medical records of 23 eyes from 20 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Five methods - Haigis L and Barrett no history method from Post-Refractive IOL Calculator of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), Shammas no history method, Haigis suite from IOL Master 700, and clinical history method - were used. RESULTS: The Barrette no history method from the ASCRS showed the lowest arithmetic errors, while the Haigis-L from the ASCRS showed the lowest absolute prediction errors (−0.38 ± 0.99 diopters [D] and 0.76 ± 0.68 D, respectively). The percentages of refractive prediction errors within 0.50 D and 1.00 D of the Barrett no history method were 52.2% and 82.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Barrette no history method and Haigis-L from the ASCRS showed the smallest errors in this study. The Barrett no history method showed a high percentage of refractive prediction errors within 0.50 D and 1.00 D. |
Key Words:
American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) intraocular lens (IOL) calculator;Cataract;Corneal refractive surgery;IOL power calculation |