Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This research programme concluded that good cancer care is experienced irrespective of where young people are treated and found no improvement to quality of life associated with greater exposure to specialist care.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Rachel M Taylor 1, Lorna A Fern 2,3, Julie Barber 4, Faith Gibson 5,6, Sarah Lea 2, Nishma Patel 7, Stephen Morris 8, Javier Alvarez-Galvez 9, Richard Feltbower 10, Louise Hooker 11, Ana Martins 2, Dan Stark 12, Rosalind Raine 7, Jeremy S Whelan 2,*

1 Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Profession Led Research, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
3 National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
4 Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
5 School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
6 Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children’s Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
7 Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
8 Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
9 Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
10 Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
11 Wessex Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Service, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
12 Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
* Corresponding author Email: jeremy.whelan@nhs.net

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions