Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This intervention increased 12-month step counts by about 660 steps per day and increased time in moderate to vigorous physical activity by about 34 minutes per week, with similar effects seen with or without nurse support.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Tess Harris 1,*, Sally Kerry 2, Christina Victor 3, Steve Iliffe 4, Michael Ussher 1, Julia Fox-Rushby 5, Peter Whincup 1, Ulf Ekelund 6,7, Cheryl Furness 1, Elizabeth Limb 1, Nana Anokye 5, Judith Ibison 1, Stephen DeWilde 1, Lee David 8, Emma Howard 1, Rebecca Dale 1, Jaime Smith 1, Rebecca Normansell 1, Carole Beighton 1, Katy Morgan 2, Charlotte Wahlich 1, Sabina Sanghera 5, Derek Cook 1

1 Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
2 Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
3 Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University London, London, UK
4 Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
5 Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, London, UK
6 Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
7 Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
8 10 Minute CBT, Devonshire Business Centre, Letchworth Garden City, UK
* Corresponding author Email: tharris@sgul.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document