Kontakt 2021, 23(3):157-161 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2020.036
Quality of life in post-stroke patientsNursing - Original article
- 1 Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing Care, Slovak Republic
- 2 Hospital with Out-patient Clinic of St. Barbora Rožňava, a. s, Neurological Department, Rožňava, Slovak Republic
- 3 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 4 St. Elizabeth University of Health and Social Sciences Bratislava, n. o., Internal Outpatient Clinic Focusing on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Diseases, Remedium, s.r.o., Bardejovské Kúpele, Slovak Republic
Introduction: Strokes are the third most common cause of hospitalization in Slovakia. This is a serious social and economic problem, because after a stroke almost half of the patients have a persistent neurological deficit. The goal of this research was to assess the quality of life of patients who have had an acute stroke.
Design: Quantitative cross-sectional study.
Methods: The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0) was completed by 80 patients, an average age of 69.9 (± 9.49) years within 28 days after a stroke. The results were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation.
Results: The average score for each SIS 3.0 domain ranged from 48.28 (social participation) to 75.18 (communication). The overall recovery rate was estimated at an average of 54.10 (± 29.19) points. There were no significant differences in the SIS domains by gender, and a worse score in the memory and thinking domain was only identified in women (p ≤ 0.05). Older age significantly correlated with most domains (p ≤ 0.05). The association between overall recovery rate and all SIS domains (p ≤ 0.05), except the emotion domain, was confirmed.
Conclusions: Assessing the consequences of strokes is important for the effective management of healthcare, psychological and social care, respecting the individual needs of the patient.
Keywords: Gender; Quality of life; Stroke; Stroke impact scale
Conflicts of interest:
The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
Received: May 17, 2020; Revised: August 11, 2020; Accepted: September 23, 2020; Prepublished online: October 9, 2020; Published: September 3, 2021 Show citation
References
- Al-Qazzaz NK, Ali SH, Ahmad SA, Islam S, Mohamad K (2014). Cognitive impairment and memory dysfunction after a stroke diagnosis: a post memory assessment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 10: 1677-1691. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S67184. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS, Moreira CM (2008). The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke 39(9): 2477-2484. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Chen CHX, Mao RH, Li AX, Zhao YN, Zhang M (2015). Effect of visual training on cognitive function in stroke patients. IJNS 2(4): 329-333. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.11.002.13. Go to original source...
- Choi SU, Lee HS, Shin JH, Ho SH, Koo MJ, Park KH, et al. (2017). Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version. Ann Rehabil Med 41(3): 387-393. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.387. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Drugdová I, Rogalewicz V, Šrámek M, Kopalová V, Krahula O, Gavurová B, et al. (2020). Health-related quality of life measures for a cost-effectiveness analysis of ischemic stroke therapies. Kontakt 22(2): 128-136. DOI: 10.32725/kont.2020.019. Go to original source...
- Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(7): 950-963. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00035-2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Duncan PW, Lai SM, Tyler D, Perera S, Reker DM, Studenski S (2002). Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 33(11): 2593-2599. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000034395.06874.3e. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ (1999). The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30(10): 2131-2140. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Fadrná T, Školoudík D (2017). Kvalita života u soběstačných pacientů po cévní mozkové příhodě. [Quality of life in self-suffient patients after stroke]. Cesk Slov Neurol 113(3): 323-327. DOI: 10.14735/amcsnn2017csnn.eul. Go to original source...
- Gdovinová Z (2013). Manažment cievnej mozgovej príhody vo svetle súčasných odporúčaní. [Stroke management in the light of current guidelines]. Interná med 13(10): 441-444.
- Gorelick PH (2019). The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling. Lancet Neurol 18(5): 417-418. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30030-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Gurková E (2011). Hodnocení kvality života. Pro klinickou praxi a ošetřovatelský výzkum. [Evaluation of quality of life. For clinical practice and nursing research]. Praha: Grada Publishing, 224 p.
- Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Crocker H, Peters M (2013). The Stroke Impact Scale: validation in a UK setting and development of a SIS short form and SIS index. Stroke 44(9): 2532-2535. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001847. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Johnson CO, Nguyen M., Roth GA, Nichols E, Alam T, Abade D, et al. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 18(5): 439-458. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Kamel A, Ghani A, Zaiton MA, El-Motayam AS, El-Fattah DA (2010). Health related quality of life in stroke survivors measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Egypt J Neurol Psychiat Neurosur 47(2): 267-274.
- Lizáková L, Mrosková S, Novotná Z, Horanská V, Filičková M (2017). The quality of life of dialysis patients in the context of nursing. Aktuality v nefrologii 23(3): 139-144.
- Národné centrum zdravotníckych informácií (2019). Zdravotnícka ročenka Slovenskej republiky 2018. [National Health Information Center in Slovakia]. [online] [cit. 2019-12-04]. Available from: http://www.nczisk.sk/Documents/rocenky/2018/Zdravotnicka_rocenka_Slovenskej_republiky_2018.pdf.
- Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A, Dichgans M, Cordonnier CH, Guekht A, et al. (2018). Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018-2030. Eur Stroke J 3(4): 309-336. DOI: 10.1177/2396987318808719. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Ramos-Lima MJM, Brasileiro IC, Lima TL, Braga-Neto P (2018). Quality of life after stroke: impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 73: e418. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017/e418. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Solgajová A, Vörösová G, Zrubcová D (2017). Determinants of quality of life in patients after stroke. Ošetrovateľstvo: teória, výskum, vzdelávanie 1(1): 34-39.
- Suhonen R, Välimäki M., Leino-Kilpi H (2009). The driving and restraining forces that promote and impede the implementationof individualised nursing care: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 46(12): 1637-1649. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, Nichols D, Rose DK, Yoshida R, et al. (2013). Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: Process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Phys Ther 93(10): 1383-1396. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120492. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Šupínová M, Sklenková G (2018). The quality of life of patients after an acute stroke. Kontakt 20(2): e153-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2018.02.001. Go to original source...
- Szilasiová J (2011). Vybrané kapitoly zo špeciálnej neurológie pre študentov zubného lekárstva. [Select chapters from special neurology for students of dental medicine]. Košice: Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach, 234 p.
- Tóthová V, Bártlová S, Dolák F, Kaas J, Kimmer D, Maňhalová J, et al. (2014). Quality of life in patients with chronic diseases. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 35(Suppl. 1): 11-18. Go to PubMed...
- Törnbom K, Persson HC, Lundälv J, Sunnerhagen KS (2017). Self-Assessed Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional Impact of Stroke at 1 Month: The Importance of Stroke Severity and Participation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 26(1): 57-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.029. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, Dickson VV, Melkus GD, Carod-Artal FJ, et al. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs 30(3): 229-241. DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
- Wolfe A (2001). Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. PPNP 2(3): 233-235. DOI: 10.1177/152715440100200312. Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.