Kontakt 2021, 23(3):157-161 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2020.036

Quality of life in post-stroke patientsNursing - Original article

Lucia Dimunová1, *, Mária Sováriová Soósová1, Kinga Kardosová2, Martin Červený3, Mária Belovičová4
1 Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing Care, Slovak Republic
2 Hospital with Out-patient Clinic of St. Barbora Rožňava, a. s, Neurological Department, Rožňava, Slovak Republic
3 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
4 St. Elizabeth University of Health and Social Sciences Bratislava, n. o., Internal Outpatient Clinic Focusing on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Diseases, Remedium, s.r.o., Bardejovské Kúpele, Slovak Republic

Introduction: Strokes are the third most common cause of hospitalization in Slovakia. This is a serious social and economic problem, because after a stroke almost half of the patients have a persistent neurological deficit. The goal of this research was to assess the quality of life of patients who have had an acute stroke.

Design: Quantitative cross-sectional study.

Methods: The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0) was completed by 80 patients, an average age of 69.9 (± 9.49) years within 28 days after a stroke. The results were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation.

Results: The average score for each SIS 3.0 domain ranged from 48.28 (social participation) to 75.18 (communication). The overall recovery rate was estimated at an average of 54.10 (± 29.19) points. There were no significant differences in the SIS domains by gender, and a worse score in the memory and thinking domain was only identified in women (p ≤ 0.05). Older age significantly correlated with most domains (p ≤ 0.05). The association between overall recovery rate and all SIS domains (p ≤ 0.05), except the emotion domain, was confirmed.

Conclusions: Assessing the consequences of strokes is important for the effective management of healthcare, psychological and social care, respecting the individual needs of the patient.

Keywords: Gender; Quality of life; Stroke; Stroke impact scale
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Received: May 17, 2020; Revised: August 11, 2020; Accepted: September 23, 2020; Prepublished online: October 9, 2020; Published: September 3, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dimunová L, Sováriová Soósová M, Kardosová K, Červený M, Belovičová M. Quality of life in post-stroke patients. Kontakt. 2021;23(3):157-161. doi: 10.32725/kont.2020.036.
Download citation

References

  1. Al-Qazzaz NK, Ali SH, Ahmad SA, Islam S, Mohamad K (2014). Cognitive impairment and memory dysfunction after a stroke diagnosis: a post memory assessment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 10: 1677-1691. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S67184. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS, Moreira CM (2008). The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke 39(9): 2477-2484. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Chen CHX, Mao RH, Li AX, Zhao YN, Zhang M (2015). Effect of visual training on cognitive function in stroke patients. IJNS 2(4): 329-333. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.11.002.13. Go to original source...
  4. Choi SU, Lee HS, Shin JH, Ho SH, Koo MJ, Park KH, et al. (2017). Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version. Ann Rehabil Med 41(3): 387-393. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.387. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Drugdová I, Rogalewicz V, Šrámek M, Kopalová V, Krahula O, Gavurová B, et al. (2020). Health-related quality of life measures for a cost-effectiveness analysis of ischemic stroke therapies. Kontakt 22(2): 128-136. DOI: 10.32725/kont.2020.019. Go to original source...
  6. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(7): 950-963. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00035-2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Tyler D, Perera S, Reker DM, Studenski S (2002). Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 33(11): 2593-2599. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000034395.06874.3e. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ (1999). The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30(10): 2131-2140. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Fadrná T, Školoudík D (2017). Kvalita života u soběstačných pacientů po cévní mozkové příhodě. [Quality of life in self-suffient patients after stroke]. Cesk Slov Neurol 113(3): 323-327. DOI: 10.14735/amcsnn2017csnn.eul. Go to original source...
  10. Gdovinová Z (2013). Manažment cievnej mozgovej príhody vo svetle súčasných odporúčaní. [Stroke management in the light of current guidelines]. Interná med 13(10): 441-444.
  11. Gorelick PH (2019). The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling. Lancet Neurol 18(5): 417-418. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30030-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Gurková E (2011). Hodnocení kvality života. Pro klinickou praxi a ošetřovatelský výzkum. [Evaluation of quality of life. For clinical practice and nursing research]. Praha: Grada Publishing, 224 p.
  13. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Crocker H, Peters M (2013). The Stroke Impact Scale: validation in a UK setting and development of a SIS short form and SIS index. Stroke 44(9): 2532-2535. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001847. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Johnson CO, Nguyen M., Roth GA, Nichols E, Alam T, Abade D, et al. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 18(5): 439-458. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Kamel A, Ghani A, Zaiton MA, El-Motayam AS, El-Fattah DA (2010). Health related quality of life in stroke survivors measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Egypt J Neurol Psychiat Neurosur 47(2): 267-274.
  16. Lizáková L, Mrosková S, Novotná Z, Horanská V, Filičková M (2017). The quality of life of dialysis patients in the context of nursing. Aktuality v nefrologii 23(3): 139-144.
  17. Národné centrum zdravotníckych informácií (2019). Zdravotnícka ročenka Slovenskej republiky 2018. [National Health Information Center in Slovakia]. [online] [cit. 2019-12-04]. Available from: http://www.nczisk.sk/Documents/rocenky/2018/Zdravotnicka_rocenka_Slovenskej_republiky_2018.pdf.
  18. Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A, Dichgans M, Cordonnier CH, Guekht A, et al. (2018). Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018-2030. Eur Stroke J 3(4): 309-336. DOI: 10.1177/2396987318808719. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Ramos-Lima MJM, Brasileiro IC, Lima TL, Braga-Neto P (2018). Quality of life after stroke: impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 73: e418. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017/e418. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Solgajová A, Vörösová G, Zrubcová D (2017). Determinants of quality of life in patients after stroke. Ošetrovateľstvo: teória, výskum, vzdelávanie 1(1): 34-39.
  21. Suhonen R, Välimäki M., Leino-Kilpi H (2009). The driving and restraining forces that promote and impede the implementationof individualised nursing care: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 46(12): 1637-1649. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, Nichols D, Rose DK, Yoshida R, et al. (2013). Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: Process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Phys Ther 93(10): 1383-1396. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120492. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Šupínová M, Sklenková G (2018). The quality of life of patients after an acute stroke. Kontakt 20(2): e153-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2018.02.001. Go to original source...
  24. Szilasiová J (2011). Vybrané kapitoly zo špeciálnej neurológie pre študentov zubného lekárstva. [Select chapters from special neurology for students of dental medicine]. Košice: Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach, 234 p.
  25. Tóthová V, Bártlová S, Dolák F, Kaas J, Kimmer D, Maňhalová J, et al. (2014). Quality of life in patients with chronic diseases. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 35(Suppl. 1): 11-18. Go to PubMed...
  26. Törnbom K, Persson HC, Lundälv J, Sunnerhagen KS (2017). Self-Assessed Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional Impact of Stroke at 1 Month: The Importance of Stroke Severity and Participation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 26(1): 57-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.029. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, Dickson VV, Melkus GD, Carod-Artal FJ, et al. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs 30(3): 229-241. DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Wolfe A (2001). Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. PPNP 2(3): 233-235. DOI: 10.1177/152715440100200312. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.