Review
BibTex RIS Cite

The Use of Libertarian Paternalism in Pension Policies and Automatic Enrolment in Private Pension Programmes

Year 2020, Volume: Cilt 10 Issue: Sayı 2, 289 - 300, 20.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.32331/sgd.840680

Abstract

Son yirmi, otuz yıl içinde refah reformları, çalışma ve refah alanlarının yeniden tanımlandığı aktif refah anlayışı temelinde yeniden tanımlanmaktadır. Bu anlayışa göre vatandaşlardan çalışmaya ve herhangi bir işe hazır olmaları ya da refah fayda ve hizmetlerine erişimde daha fazla özel çözümlere dayanmaları beklenmektedir. Bu çalışma, aktif refah anlayışının özellikle otomatik katılım gibi yeni stratejiler yoluyla, özel emeklilik sisteminin kapsamını genişletilmesi örneği üzerinden emeklilik reformları üzerindeki etkisini ele almaktadır. Otomatik katılım dürtme temelli bir politika müdahalesi olarak davranışsal yaklaşım/özgürlükçü paternalizmin etkisiyle geliştirilmiş bir sistemdir. Özgürlükçü paternalizm kamu politikalarında özgürlükleri koruyan, vatandaşların refahını önceleyen bir iddiaya sahip olsa da emeklilik politikalarında yansımaları büyük oranda özel emeklilik piyasalarında risklerin bireyselleşmesi ve fona dayanan, özel emeklilik şemaları yoluyla finansallaşma olmuştur.

References

  • Antolin, P., Payet, S. and Yermo, J. (2012). Coverage of Private Pensions. OECD Working Papers on Finance.
  • Barry, N. (1997). v-Conservative Thought and the Welfare State. Political Studies. XLV. 331-354.
  • Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W. J. and Galing, S. (2017). Should Governments Invest More in Nudging. 28 (8). 1041-1055.
  • Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. H. (2013). Behavioural Economics and the Retirement Saving Crisis, Science. 339. 1152-1153.
  • Benish, A., Haber, H. and Eliahou, R. (2017). The Regulatory Welfare State in Pension Markets: Mitigating High Charges for Low-Income Savers in the United Kingdom and Israel. Journal of Social Policy. 46 (2). 313-330.
  • Berry, C. (2016). Austerity, Ageing and the Financialization of Pension Policy in the UK, British Politics. 11 (1). 2-25.
  • Bouchal, P. and Norris, E. (2014). Implementing Automatic Enrolment into Pensions. London, UK: Institute for Government.
  • Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioural Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective. 105 (5). 1-33.
  • Calrence, E. (2002). Editorial Technocracy Reinvented: The New Evidence Based Policy Movement. Public Policy and Administration. 17 (3). 1-11.
  • Curchin, K. (2017). Using Behavioural Insights to Argue for a Stronger Social Safety Net: Beyond Libertarian Paternalism. Journal of Social Policy. 46 (2). 231-249.
  • Ebbinhaus, B. (2019). Multipillarisation Remodelled: The Role of Interest Organizations in British and German Pension Reforms. Journal of European Public Policy. 26 (4). 521-539.
  • Etienne, J. (2013). Thoughts on How to Regulate Behaviours: An Overview of the Current Debate. British Journal Guidance and Counselling. 41 (1). 36-45.
  • Gillion, C. (2000). The Development and the Reform of Social Security Pensions: The Approach of International Labour Office. International Social Security Review. 53(1). 35-63.
  • Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012). Old Wine in New Casks: Libertarian Paternalism Still Violates Liberal Principles. Social Choice and Welfare. 38. 635-645.
  • Holden, C. (2012). Commercial Welfare, The Student’s Companion to Social Policy (Editors: Pete Alcock, Margaret May, and Sharon Wright), West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. 215-220.
  • Jones, R., Pykett, J. and Whitehead, M. (2014). Environment and Planning. 32. 54-69.

Emeklilik Politikalarında Libertarian Paternalizmin Kullanılması ve Özel Emeklilik Programlarında Otomatik Katılım Sistemi

Year 2020, Volume: Cilt 10 Issue: Sayı 2, 289 - 300, 20.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.32331/sgd.840680

Abstract

References

  • Antolin, P., Payet, S. and Yermo, J. (2012). Coverage of Private Pensions. OECD Working Papers on Finance.
  • Barry, N. (1997). v-Conservative Thought and the Welfare State. Political Studies. XLV. 331-354.
  • Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W. J. and Galing, S. (2017). Should Governments Invest More in Nudging. 28 (8). 1041-1055.
  • Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. H. (2013). Behavioural Economics and the Retirement Saving Crisis, Science. 339. 1152-1153.
  • Benish, A., Haber, H. and Eliahou, R. (2017). The Regulatory Welfare State in Pension Markets: Mitigating High Charges for Low-Income Savers in the United Kingdom and Israel. Journal of Social Policy. 46 (2). 313-330.
  • Berry, C. (2016). Austerity, Ageing and the Financialization of Pension Policy in the UK, British Politics. 11 (1). 2-25.
  • Bouchal, P. and Norris, E. (2014). Implementing Automatic Enrolment into Pensions. London, UK: Institute for Government.
  • Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioural Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective. 105 (5). 1-33.
  • Calrence, E. (2002). Editorial Technocracy Reinvented: The New Evidence Based Policy Movement. Public Policy and Administration. 17 (3). 1-11.
  • Curchin, K. (2017). Using Behavioural Insights to Argue for a Stronger Social Safety Net: Beyond Libertarian Paternalism. Journal of Social Policy. 46 (2). 231-249.
  • Ebbinhaus, B. (2019). Multipillarisation Remodelled: The Role of Interest Organizations in British and German Pension Reforms. Journal of European Public Policy. 26 (4). 521-539.
  • Etienne, J. (2013). Thoughts on How to Regulate Behaviours: An Overview of the Current Debate. British Journal Guidance and Counselling. 41 (1). 36-45.
  • Gillion, C. (2000). The Development and the Reform of Social Security Pensions: The Approach of International Labour Office. International Social Security Review. 53(1). 35-63.
  • Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012). Old Wine in New Casks: Libertarian Paternalism Still Violates Liberal Principles. Social Choice and Welfare. 38. 635-645.
  • Holden, C. (2012). Commercial Welfare, The Student’s Companion to Social Policy (Editors: Pete Alcock, Margaret May, and Sharon Wright), West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. 215-220.
  • Jones, R., Pykett, J. and Whitehead, M. (2014). Environment and Planning. 32. 54-69.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Aslı Güleç Taşdemir This is me 0000-0002-5750-1661

Publication Date December 20, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: Cilt 10 Issue: Sayı 2

Cite

APA Güleç Taşdemir, A. (2020). The Use of Libertarian Paternalism in Pension Policies and Automatic Enrolment in Private Pension Programmes. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, Cilt 10(Sayı 2), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.32331/sgd.840680