A 5G RURAL, REMOTE, AND DIFFICULT AREAS HOPE: A REVIEW

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 10, 2021
https://doi.org/10.31943/teknokom.v4i1.57
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): TEKNOKOM

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Harry Candra Sihombing
Universitas Mercu Buana

Abstract

The 5G cellular networks are “urban” areas technology in nature, extensively deployed where the user’s density is high to provide very high data rates, coupled with extremely low delays and dealing with very high mobility of users. On the contrary, one-third of people experience a lack of mobile broadband connectivity living in rural zones. These mobile broadband lacks recognized as the main barriers impairing the Sustainable Developing Goals (SDGs) defined by the United Nations. Those that are not currently covered will be unlikely to be covered also soon, as the network operators are not keen to invest in such zones, because of potentially low revenues. While it is confirmed that 5G would meet stringent requirements in urban zones, rural areas still suffer from almost inexistent MBB (Mobile Broadband) coverage, especially in the developing world. The big deal of isolated rural areas, which are sparsely inhabited by low-income populations, is that the classical access using traditional backhaul technologies is a bad solution for operators since it does not ensure a good ROI (Return of Investment).

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Harry Candra Sihombing, Universitas Mercu Buana

Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia

How to Cite
Candra Sihombing, H. . (2021). A 5G RURAL, REMOTE, AND DIFFICULT AREAS HOPE: A REVIEW. TEKNOKOM, 4(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.31943/teknokom.v4i1.57

References

  1. L. Chiaraviglio, W. Liu, J. A. Gutierrez, and N. Blefari-Melazzi, "Optimal pricing strategy for 5G in rural areas with unmanned aerial vehicles and large cells," 2017 27th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 1-7, 2017.
  2. A. Markhasin, V. Belenky, V. Drozdova, A. Loshkarev, and I. Svinarev, "Cost-effective ubiquitous IoT/M2M/H2H 5G communications for rural and remote areas," 2016 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT), Tashkent, pp. 1-8, 2016.
  3. A. Karlsson, O. Al-Saadeh, A. Gusarov, R. V. R. Challa, S. Tombaz and K. W. Sung, "Energy-efficient 5G deployment in rural areas," 2016 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), New York, NY, pp. 1-7, 2016.
  4. A. Loshkarev and A. Markhasin, "Performance modeling and optimization of flexible QoS-guaranteed multifunctional MAC for rural profitable ubiquitous 5G IoT/M2M systems," 2016 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT), Tashkent, pp. 1-5, 2016.
  5. L. Chiaraviglio, W. Liu, J. A. Gutierrez, and N. Blefari-Melazzi, "Optimal pricing strategy for 5G in rural areas with unmanned aerial vehicles and large cells," 2017 27th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 1-7, 2017.
  6. L. M. Amine, E. B. Adil and P. H. Aawatif, "Toward enhancing connectivity through TVWS in an outdoor rural isolated environment," 2017 Sensors Networks Smart and Emerging Technologies (SENSET), Beirut, pp. 1-4, 2017.
  7. A. Markhasin, "Fundamentals of the extremely green, flexible, and profitable 5G M2M ubiquitous communications for remote e-healthcare and other social e-Applications," 2017 International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON), Novosibirsk, pp. 292-297, 2017.
  8. M. Villapol et al., "Connecting the unconnected 10% of New Zealanders by 2025: Is a MahiTahi Approach Possible?," 2017 27th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 1-7, 2017.
  9. L. Chiaraviglio et al., "Bringing 5G into Rural and Low-Income Areas: Is It Feasible?," in IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 50-57, September 2017.
  10. A. V. Herrera, M. Ron, and C. Rabadão, "National Cyber-Security Policies Oriented to BYOD (bring your own device): Systematic review," 2017 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Lisbon, pp. 1-4, 2017.
  11. L. R. Ferretto, C. R. Cervi and A. C. B. de Marchi, "Recommender systems in mobile apps for health a systematic review," 2017 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Lisbon, pp. 1-6, 2017.
  12. A. Porto Proenca, M. Miranda, E. Afonso Lamounier Jr, A. Cardoso, and P. Notargiacomo, "Systematic Review on Cognitive Engineering Applied to Critical Systems for Proposition of Evaluation Heuristics for Virtual Reality," in IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2024-2029, Oct. 2017.
  13. E. J. Oughton, W. Lehr, K. Katsaros, I. Selinis, D. Bubley, and J. Kusuma, “Revisiting Wireless Internet Connectivity: 5G vs Wi-Fi 6,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 45, no. 5, p. 102127, Jun. 2021.
  14. H. Sedjelmaci, “Cooperative attacks detection based on artificial intelligence system for 5G networks,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 91, p. 107045, May 2021.
  15. G. L. Rosston and A. Skrzypacz, “Reclaiming spectrum from incumbents in inefficiently allocated bands: Transaction costs, competition, and flexibility,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 45, no. 7, p. 102167, Aug. 2021.
  16. M. Falk and E. Hagsten, “Impact of high-speed broadband access on local establishment dynamics,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 45, no. 4, p. 102104, May 2021.