Abstract
Two-Stage GITBlow, a special injection molding process developed by Polymer Processing Paderborn, combines the advantages of gas-assisted injection molding and blow molding. This is achieved by producing a preform with gas-assisted injection molding, which is then inflated into a larger cavity in the same mold. The inflation behavior is heavily influenced by the temperature distribution over the cross section of the preform. The preform is not rotationally symmetric and features functional geometries that are not inflated during the second process stage. Therefore, the temperature development during the first stage, i.e. the gas-assisted injection molding, as well as cooling and handling of the preform, is essential for the subsequent inflation. If certain thermal conditions are met, inflation and the creation of a homogeneous wall thickness is improved. The development of the necessary temperature profiles for homogeneous inflation is heavily dependent on the geometry of the gas chamber. Due to the preform's geometry, characteristic material accumulations are formed during the gas injection. These create local temperature hotspots that act as heat sources during the temperature equalization before inflation starts. Simulations were conducted to predict the gas chamber geometry and its influence on the temperature distribution and development during the process. The combination of two different simulation approaches creates a new method to analyze GITBlow and similar processes. Simulation results were verified with extensive experimental studies.
References
Association of German Engineers (VDI): VDI Heat Atlas, 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin (2010)Search in Google Scholar
BaehrH. D., StephanK.: Heat and Mass Transfer, 3rd Edition, Springer, Berlin (2011) 10.1007/978-3-642-20021-2Search in Google Scholar
BeckerO., KoellingK. and AltanT., “Influence of Various Gas Nozzle Designs upon the Gas Bubble Distribution and the Pressure Development in Gas-Assisted Injection Molding”, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 610–617 (1997)Search in Google Scholar
BrinsonH. F., BrinsonL. C.: Polymer Engineering Science and Viscoelasticity – An Introduction, Springer, New York (2008) 10.1007/978-0-387-73861-1Search in Google Scholar
BuckleyC. P., JonesD. C., “Glass-Rubber Constitutive Model for Amorphous Polymers Near the Glass Transition”, Polymer, 36, 3301–3312 (1995) 10.1016/0032-3861(95)99429-XSearch in Google Scholar
BuckleyC. P., JonesD. C. and JonesD. P., “Hot-Drawing of Polyethylene Terephtalate under Biaxial Stress Application of a Three-Dimensional Glass Rubber Constitutive Model”, Polymer, 37, 2403–2414 (1996) 10.1016/0032-3861(96)85352-3Search in Google Scholar
ChiuC.-C., SuC.-T., YangG.-S., HuangJ.-S., ChenS.-C. and ChengN.-T. “Selection of optimal Parameters in Gas-Assisted Injection Moulding Using a Neural Network Model and the Taguchi Method”, International Journal of Quality Science, 2, 106–120 (1997) 10.1108/13598539710167096Search in Google Scholar
CoelhoP. M., PinhoF. T., “A Generalized Brinkman Number for Non-Newtonian Duct Flows”, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 156, 202–206 (2009) 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.07.001Search in Google Scholar
GaoD. M., NguyenK. T., Garcia-RejonA. and SalloumG. “Numerical Modelling of the Mould Filling Stage in Gas-Assisted Injection Moulding”, Int. Polym. Proc., 12, 267–277 (1997) 10.3139/217.970267Search in Google Scholar
DupretF., VanderschurenL., “Calculation of the Temperature Field in Injection Molding”, AIChE J., 34, 1959–1972 (1988) 10.1002/aic.690341205Search in Google Scholar
EhrensteinG. W.: Polymeric Materials – Structure, Properties, Applications, Hanser, Munich (2001) 10.3139/9783446434134Search in Google Scholar
LeopoldT., “Computer-Aided Design of Stretch-Blow Moulded Plastic Containers”, PhD Thesis, University of Aachen, Mainz, Aachen (2011)Search in Google Scholar
Manas-ZloczowerI., BlakeJ. W. and MacoskoC. W., “Space-Time Distribution in Filling a Mold”, Polym. Eng. Sci., 27, 1229–1235 (1987) 10.1002/pen.760271605Search in Google Scholar
MarekR., NitscheK.: Praxis der Wärmeübertragung, 3rd Edition, Hanser, Munich (2012) 10.3139/9783446433205Search in Google Scholar
MoritzerE., PluggeT., “Phenomenon-Oriented Process and Part Optimization of Complex Injection Molded Parts with Thin-Walled Molded-On Hollow Areas (GITBlow), Taking into Account the Residual Wall Thickness Distribution”, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 1692–1696 (2011)Search in Google Scholar
MoritzerE., SchäfersM. and PluggeT., “Two-Stage GITBlow – Herstellungsverfahren für komplexe und multifunktionale Spritzgießbauteile”, J. Plast. Technol., 8, 24–51 (2012)Search in Google Scholar
MoritzerE., LeßmannJ. S. and PluggeT., “Description by Dimensional Analysis of the Wall Thickness Distribution in the Two-Stage GITBlow Process”, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 1420–1426 (2012)Search in Google Scholar
MoritzerE., SeidelS. and PluggeT., “Experimental Verification of Process-Parameter-Dependent Temperature Simulation of the Two-Stage GITBlow-Process”, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 205–210 (2013)Search in Google Scholar
NassehiV., “Generalized Hele-Shaw Models for non-Newtonian, Nonisothermal Flow in Thin Curved Layers”, IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Business & Industry, 7, 71–88 (1996) 10.1093/imaman/7.1.71Search in Google Scholar
ParvezM. A., OngN. S., LamY. C. and TorS. B., “Gas-Assisted Injection Molding: The Effects of Process Variables and Gas Channel Geometry”, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 121, 27–35 (2002) 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01184-0Search in Google Scholar
PolynkinA., PittmanJ. F. T. and SienzJ., “Gas Assisted Injection Molding of a Handle: Three-Dimensional Simulation and Experimental Verification”, Polym. Eng. Sci., 45, 1049–1058 (2005) 10.1002/pen.20353Search in Google Scholar
PotenteH., HansenM., “The Gas-Assisted Injection Molding Process – Comparison between Experiment and Simulation”, Int. Polym. Proc., 8, 345–351 (1993) 10.3139/217.930224Search in Google Scholar
PotenteH., SchäfersM. and RidderH., “Model Laws for Gas-Assisted Injection Moulding“, J. Plast. Technol., 4, 1–19 (2007)Search in Google Scholar
SchäfersM., “Beitrag zur Entwicklung des Spritzgießsonderverfahrens, GITBlow”, PhD Thesis, University of Paderborn, Shaker Publishers, Aachen (2009)Search in Google Scholar
TadmorZ., BroyerE. and GutfingerC., “Flow Analysis Network (FAN) – A Method for Solving Flow Problems in Polymer Processing”, Polym. Eng. Sci., 14, 660–665 (1974) 10.1002/pen.760140913Search in Google Scholar
TsoC. P., MahulikarS. P., “The Use of the Brinkman Number for Single Phase Forced Convective Heat Transfer in Microchannels”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 41, 1759–1769 (1998) 10.1016/S0017-9310(97)00232-9Search in Google Scholar
TurngL. S., “Development and Application of CAE Technology for the Gas-Assisted Injection Molding Process”, Adv. Polym. Technol., 14, 1–13 (1995) 10.1002/adv.1995.060140101Search in Google Scholar
VergnesB., VincentM., DemayY., CoupezT., BillonN. and AgassantJ.-F., “Present Challenges in the Numerical Modeling of Polymer-Forming Processes”, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 80, 1143–1152 (2002) 10.1002/cjce.5450800616Search in Google Scholar
© 2015, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich
