Skip to main content
Log in

Allelopathic potential of canola and wheat to control weeds in soybean (Glycine max)

  • Plant Growing
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

A filed experiment was done to develop management practices to reduce the use of synthetic herbicides, in the arid and semi-arid agricultural ecosystems of north east of Iran. Five treatments including I: chopped residues of canola (Brasica vulgaris), II: chopped residues of wheat (Triticum aestivum) both were separately incorporated to 25 cm depth soil, 20 days before sowing, III: shoot aqueous extract of canola, IV: shoot aqueous extract of wheat which were separately sprayed at post emergence stage and V: without any residues and spraying as control. The weed control treatments reduced the total weed cover, weed density and biomass of weed. The reduction in weed density with canola and wheat residues incorporation were up to 67.5 and 62.2% respectively, at 40 days after sowing and 65.3 and 75.6%, respectively, at 90 days after sowing, compared to control. However, post emergence spraying of shoot aqueous extract of canola and wheat, suppressed weed density up to 41.8 and 36.6% at 40 days after sowing and 54.2 and 52.7% at 90 days after sowing respectively, compared to control. Weed control treatments reduced weed cover (%), weed biomass and weeds stem length. Incorporation of canola and wheat residues in soil reduced weed cover (%) by 62.5 and 63% respectively, while spraying of shoot water extract of canola and wheat suppressed weed cover (%) by 39.6 and 40.4% respectively at 90 days after sowing. Application of canola and wheat residues increased soybean yield by 45.4 and 69.5% respectively, compared to control while post emergence application of shoot aqueous extract of canola and wheat increased soybean yield by 22 and 29.8% respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akemo, M.C., Regnier, E.E., and Bennett, M.A., Weed suppression in spring-sown rye (Secale cereale)–Pea (Pisum sativum) cover crop mixes, Weed Tech., 2000, Vol. 14, pp. 545–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Hammounda, M., Kremer, R.J., Minor, H.C., and Sarwar, M., A chemical basis for differential allelo-pathic potential of Sorghum hybrids on wheat, J. Chem. Ecol., 1995, Vol. 21, pp. 775–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertholdsson, N.O., Variation in allelopathic activity in spring wheat, in Proc. Second European Allelopathy Symp. “Allelopathy: from Understanding to Application,” Pulawy, Poland, June 4, 2004, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheema, Z.A., Asim, M., and Khaliq, A., Sorghum allelopathy for weed control in cotton (Gossypium arboretum L.), Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2000, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dadkhah, A., Phytotoxic effect of aqueous extract of eucalyptus, sunflower, and sugar beet on seed germination, growth and photosynthesis of Amarabthus regrof-lexus, Allelopathy. J., 2012, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dayan, F., Romagni, J., Tellez, M., Rimando, A., and Duke, S., Managing weeds with natural products, Pesticide Outlook, 1000, Vol. 10, pp. 185–188.

  7. De-Herralde, F., Biel, C., Save, R., Morales, M.A., Torrecillas, A., and Alarcon, J.J., Effects of water and salt stresses on growth, gas exchange and water relations in Argyranthemum coronopiflium plants, Crop Sci., 1998, Vol. 139, pp. 9–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Elijarrat, E. and Barcelo, D., Sample handling and analysis of allelochemical compounds in plants, Trends Anal. Chem., 2001, Vol. 20, No. 10, pp. 584–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fenwick, G.R., Griffiths, N.M., and Heaney, R.K., Bitterness in Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea L. var. gemmifera): The role of glucosinolates and their break-down products, J. Sci. Food Agric., 1983, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 73–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Florentine, S.K., Westbrooke, M. E., Gosney, K, Ambrose, G., and O’Keefe, M., The arid lands invasive weed Nicotiana glauca R. Graham (Solanaceae): popu-lation and soil seed bank dynamics, seed germination patterns and seedling response to flood and drought, J. Arid Environ., 2006, Vol. 66, pp. 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hegab, M.M., Khodary, S.E.A., Hammouda, O., and Ghareib, H.R., Autotoxicity of chard and its allelo-pathic potentiality on germination and some metabolic activities associated with growth of wheat seedlings, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2008, Vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 884–892.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jefferson, L.V. and Pennacchio, M., Allelopathic effects of foliage extracts from four Chenopodiaceae species on seed germination, J. Arid Environ., 2003, Vol. 55, pp. 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oyun, M.B., Allelopathic potentialities of Gliricidia sepium and Acacia auriculiformis on the germination and seedling vigor of maize (Zea mays L.), Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 2006, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 44–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rice, E.L., Allelopathy, New York: Academic, 1984, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rizvi, S.J.H., Ketata, H., Bazazi, D., Roostaii, M., and Pala, M., Weed suppressing ability of bread wheat gen-otypes under greenhouse and field conditions, in Proc. Second European Allelopathy Symp. “Allelopathy: from Understanding to Application,” Pulawy, Poland, June 4, 2004, 2004, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh, H.P., Daizy, R., and Kohli, R.K., Allelopathic interactions and allelochemicals: New possibilities for sustainable weed management, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 2003, Vol. 22, pp. 239–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, A.E., The potential importance of allelopathy in the pasture ecosystem, a review, Adv. Agron., 1991, Vol. 45, pp. 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, H., Pratley, J., Lemerle, D., and Haig, T., Labora-tory screening for allelopathic potential of wheat (Triti-cum aestivum) accessions against annual ryegrass, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 2000, Vol. 51, pp. 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, H., Pratley, J., Lemerle, D., and Haig, T., Allelop-athy in wheat (Triticum aestivum), Ann. Appl. Biol., 2001, Vol. 139, pp. 1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xuan, T.D., Eiji, T., and Khan, T.D., Methods to deter-mine allelopathic potential of crop for weed control, Allelopathy J., 2004, Vol. 13, pp. 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Dadkhah.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dadkhah, A. Allelopathic potential of canola and wheat to control weeds in soybean (Glycine max). Russ. Agricult. Sci. 41, 111–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367415020081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367415020081

Keywords

Navigation