Skip to main content
Log in

Improving the Estimation Accuracy of Copper Oxide Leaching in an Ammonia–Ammonium System Using RSM and GA-BPNN

  • Metallurgy of Nonferrous Metals
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a response surface methodology (RSM) model was used to analyze and optimize the factors affecting copper leaching efficiency in a copper oxide ammonia-ammonium (AA) system based on the parameters of AA concentration (ammonium hydroxide and ammonium bicarbonate matched with 1: 1), leaching time, grinding fineness, liquid-solid ratio, and temperature. The RSM analysis showed that five individual variables had a significant influence and that the interaction between AA concentration and leaching time had the most significant influence on leaching efficiency. In order to improve the estimation accuracy of the copper leaching efficiency, a model consisting of a genetic algorithm and a back propagation neural network (GA-BPNN) was used to optimize the operation index. A back propagation feed forward neural network with 3 layers (5–10–1) was applied to predict copper leaching efficiency. The genetic algorithm was applied to analyze the optimal leaching conditions. The results revealed that the GA-BPNN model outperformed the RSM model for predicting and optimizing copper oxide AA leaching. The optimization results of the GA-BPNN resulted in an R2 of 0.99827 and the highest predicted copper leaching efficiency of 79.49% was obtained under the conditions of an AA concentration of 4.78 mol/L, a leaching time of 157 min, a grinding fineness of 86.86% (–74 μm content account), a liquid-solid ratio of 2.87: 1, and a temperature of 313.17 K. A prediction and optimization method combining RSM and GA-BPNN, as used in this paper, can be further employed as a reliable and accurate method for ore leaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deng, J.S., Wen, S.M., Deng, J.Y., and Wu, D.D., Int. J. Min. Met. Mater., 2015, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kilicarslan, A., Saridede, M.N., Stopic, S., and Friedrich B., Int. J. Min. Met. Mater., 2014, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 138–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, Z.Y., Yang, H.Y., Huang, S.T., Yang, L., and Xiong, L., Int. J. Min. Met. Mater., 2015, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 582–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma, J.Y., Liu, Y.Q., Hu, H.P., and Chen, Q.Y., J. Cent. South. Univ., 2012, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2059–2068.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, T.M., Fang, J.J., Jiang, T.G., and Mao, Y.B., Conserv. Util. Miner. Resour., 2014, no. 1, pp. 26–29 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adlan, M.N., Palaniandy, P., and Aziz, H.A., Desalination, 2011, vol. 277, no. 1, pp. 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, Z., Liu, X.F., He, Y., and Xie, J.X., Int. J. Min. Met. Mater., 2010, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 770–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, Q.C. and Li, D.X., T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc., 2011, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Govindaraju, R.S., J. Hydrol. Eng., 2015, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tanda, B.C., Eksteen, J.J., and Oraby E.A., Hydrometallurgy, 2017, vol. 167, pp. 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferreira, S.L.C., Bruns, R.E., Ferreira, H.S., Matos, G.D., David, J.M., Brandão, G.C., da Silva, E.G.P., Portugal, L.A., dos Reis, P.S., Souza, A.S., and dos Santos, W.N.L., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2007, vol. 597, no. 2, pp. 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koca, S., Aksoy, D.O., Cabuk, A., Celik, P.A., Sagol, E., Toptas, Y., Oluklulu, S., and Koca, H., Fuel, 2017, vol. 192, pp. 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deutsch, J.L. and Dreisinger, D.B., Hydrometallurgy, 2013, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 156–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kabuba, J., Mulaba-Bafubiandi, A., and Battle, K., Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2014, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 6793–6803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang, N.H., Zhai, W.B., and Cao, X.S., J. Chin. Coal. Soc., 2008, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 977–982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Allahkarami, E., Nuri, O.S., Abdollahzadeh, A., Rezaiet, B., and Maghsoudi., B., Physicochem. Probl. Mi., 2017, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 366–378.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dučić, N., Ćojbašić, Ž., Slavković, R., Jordović, B., and Purenović, J., Hem. Ind., 2016, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Polat, M. and Chander S., Int. J. Miner. Process., 2000, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianjun Fang.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, M., Fang, J., Zhang, L. et al. Improving the Estimation Accuracy of Copper Oxide Leaching in an Ammonia–Ammonium System Using RSM and GA-BPNN. Russ. J. Non-ferrous Metals 58, 591–599 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821217060177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821217060177

Keywords

Navigation