Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Waveform Cross Correlation to Reconstruct the Aftershock Sequence of the August 14, 2016, Sakhalin Earthquake

  • Published:
Seismic Instruments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The waveform cross correlation technique is used to detect signals from aftershocks of the ML = 6.1, August 14, 2016, Sakhalin earthquake using regional seismic network data. Regular P- and S-wave phase arrivals are associated with seismic sources; the resulting cross correlation bulletin is compared with a standard seismic bulletin for the same aftershock sequence. An advantage of the cross correlation bulletin is that it has more detected seismic events tied to three or more stations and a lower catalog completeness threshold; even the epicenters of the weakest aftershocks are located with greater accuracy. The exact aftershock locations tend to cluster along a narrow zone related to the Central Sakhalin Fault.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Adushkin, V.V., Kitov, I.O., Konstantinovskaya, N.L., Nepeina, K.S., Nesterkina, M.A., and Sanina, I.A., Detection of ultraweak signals on the Mikhnevo small-aperture seismic array by using cross-correlation of waveforms, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2015, vol. 460, no. 2, pp. 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X15020142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adushkin, V.V., Kitov, I.O., and Sanina, I.A., Application of a three-component seismic array to improve the detection efficiency of seismic events by the matched filter method, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2016, vol. 466, no. 1, pp. 47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adushkin, V.V., Bobrov, D.I., Kitov, I.O., Rozhkov, M.V., and Sanina, I.A., Remote detection of aftershock activity as a new method of seismic monitoring, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2017, vol. 473, no. 1, pp. 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X17030011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobrov, D., Khukhuudei, U., Kitov, I., Sitnikov, K., and Zerbo, L., Automated recovery of the 2012 Sumatera aftershock sequence using waveform cross correlation, J. Earth Sci. Eng., 2013a, vol. 3, pp. 437–460.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bobrov, D., Kitov, I., and Rozhkov, M., Wave form cross correlation applied to earthquakes in the Atlantic Ocean, 2013b. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0520. Accessed June 1, 2018

  6. Bobrov, D., Kitov, I., and Zerbo, L., Perspectives of cross-correlation in seismic monitoring at the International Data Centre, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2014, vol. 171, no. 3–5, pp. 439–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bobrov, D.I., Kitov, I.O., Rozhkov, M.V., and Friberg, P., Towards global seismic monitoring of underground nuclear explosions using waveform cross correlation. Part I. Grand master events, Seism. Instrum., 2016a, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bobrov, D.I., Kitov, I.O., Rozhkov, M.V., and Friberg, P., Towards global seismic monitoring of underground nuclear explosions using waveform cross correlation. Part II. Synthetic master-events, Seism. Instrum., 2016b, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geller, R.J. and Mueller, C.S., Four similar earthquakes in central California, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1980, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 821–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbons, S.J. and Ringdal, F., The detection of low-magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation, Geophys. J. Int., 2006, vol. 165, pp. 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris, D.B. and Dodge, D.A., An autonomous system for grouping events in a developing aftershock sequence, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2011, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris, D. and Kvaerna, T., Super-resolution with seismic arrays using empirical matched field processing, Geophys. J. Int., 2010, vol. 182, pp. 1455–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04684.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Israelsson, H., Correlation of waveforms from closely spaced regional events, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1990, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 2177–2193.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kitov, I.O., Sanina, I.A., Nepeina, K.S., and Konstantinovskaya, N.L., Using a matched-filter technique at the Mikhnevo small-aperture seismic array, Seism. Instrum., 2015, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitov, I.O., Volosov, S.G., Kishkina, S.B., Konstantinovskaya, N.L., Nepeina, K.S., Nesterkina, M.A., and Sanina, I.A., Detection of regional phases of seismic body waves using an array of three-component sensors, Seism. Instrum., 2016, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Konovalov, A.V., Stepnov, A.A., Safonov, D.A., Safonov, D.A., Kozhurin, A.I., Pavlov, A.S., Gavrilov, A.V., Manaychev, K.A., Tomilev, D.Ye., Takahashi, H., and Ichiyanagi, M., The Mw = 5.8 14 August 2016 middle Sakhalin earthquake on a boundary between Okhotsk and Eurasian (Amurian) plates, J. Seismol., 2018, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9744-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nadeau, R.M. and McEvilly, T.V., Seismological studies at Parkfield V: Characteristic microearthquake sequences as fault-zone drilling targets, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1997, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1463–1472.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richards, P., Waldhauser, F., Schaff, D., and Kim, W.Y., The applicability of modern methods of earthquake location, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2006, vol. 163, pp. 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schaff, D., Broad-scale applicability of correlation detectors to China seismicity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2009, vol. 36. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038179

  20. Schaff, D., Improvements to detection capability by cross-correlating for similar events: A case study of the 1999 Xiuyan, China, sequence and synthetic sensitivity tests, Geophys. J. Int., 2010, vol. 180, pp. 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaff, D.P., Bokelmann, G.H.R., Ellsworth, W.L., Zanzerkia, E., Waldhauser, F., and Beroza, G.C., Optimizing correlation techniques for improved earthquake location, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2004, vol. 94, pp. 705–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schaff, D.P. and Richards, P.G., Repeating seismic events in China, Science, 2004, vol. 303, pp. 1176–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaff, D. and Richards, P., On finding and using repeating seismic events in and near China, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 2011, vol. 116. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007895

  24. Schaff, D. and Richards, P., Improvements in magnitude precision using the statistics of relative amplitudes measured by cross correlation, Geophys. J., 2014, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schaff, D.P. and Waldhauser, F., Waveform cross-correlation-based differential travel-time measurements at the Northern California seismic network, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2005, vol. 95, pp. 2446–2461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schaff, D.P. and Waldhauser, F., One magnitude unit reduction in detection threshold by cross correlation applied to Parkfield (California) and China seismicity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2010, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 3224–3238. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shearer, P., Hauksson, E., and Lin, G., Southern California hypocenter relocation with waveform cross-correlation: Part 2. Results using source specific station terms and cluster analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2005, vol. 95, pp. 904–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Trees, H.L., Detection, Estimation and Modulation Theory, New York: Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Waldhauser, F. and Schaff, D., Large-scale cross-correlation based relocation of two decades of Northern California seismicity, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 2008, vol. 113. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005479

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Integrated Program for Basic Scientific Research of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, “Far East” Program (project 18-5-024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Stepnov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Translated by B. Shubik

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitov, I.O., Turuntaev, S.B., Konovalov, A.V. et al. Use of Waveform Cross Correlation to Reconstruct the Aftershock Sequence of the August 14, 2016, Sakhalin Earthquake. Seism. Instr. 55, 544–558 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923919050074

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923919050074

Keywords:

Navigation