Abstract
In view of the different opinions of documentologists about documents we believe that the debate about this entity is not over yet. The document is a unique social phenomenon that deserves separate in-depth study. Attempts to combine it with the book in one object of scientific knowledge have not yet been successful: they have not been theoretically substantiated and practically justified. The purpose of this paper is to show the differences between the book and the document as different social phenomena.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Otle, P., Biblioteka, bibliografiya, dokumentatsiya: Izbrannye trudy pionera informatiki (Library, Bibliography, and Documentation: Selected Works of the Pioneer of Informatics), Moscow: FAIR-PRESS, Pashkov dom, 2004.
Stolyarov, Yu.N., The ontological status of the document and its practical importance for libraries, Bibliotekovedenie, 1999, no. 4, pp. 50–59.
Pleshkevich, E.A., Osnovy obshchei teorii dokumenta (General Theory of Documents), Saratov: Nauchnaya kniga, 2005.
Ozhegov, S.I., Slovar’ russkogo yazyka: Ok. 60000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazhenii (Russian Dictionary: About 60000 Words and Idiomatic Expressions), Skvortsov, L.I., Ed., Moscow: OOO Izd-vo Feniks, 2007, ed. 25.
Mayakovskii, I., Archive, Library, and Museum, Arkhivnoe Delo, 1926 no. 7, pp. 21–36.
Mityaev, K.G., Documentology, its problems and prospects of development, Vopr. Arkhivoved., 1964, no. 2, pp. 27–37.
Mityaev, K.G., To the methodology of classification and expertise of values of documents, in Trudy MGIAI (Tr. MGIAI), Moscow, 1967, vol. 25, pp. 118–138.
Kozlov, V.P., Osnovy teoreticheskoi i prikladnoi arkheografii (Fundamentals of Theoretical and Applied Archeology), Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2008.
Mel’vil’, A.Yu., Mironyuk, M.G., Shmachkova, T.V., et al., Mir politicheskoi nauki. Uchebnik (The World of Political Science. Textbook), vol. 2: Categories, Mel’vil’, A.Yu., Ed., Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2004.
Emel’yanov, V.V., Drevnii Shumer. Ocherki kul’tury (Ancient Sumer. Essays on Culture), St. Petersburg: Peterb. Vostokoved., 2001. http://bookre.org/reader?file=628087. Cited August 8, 2014.
Verblovskii, G., Written Evidence, in Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ Brokgauza i Efrona (Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary), St. Petersburg, 1898, vol. 23.
Dvoretskii, I.Kh., Latinsko-russkii slovar’ (Latin-Russian Dictionary), Moscow: Russkii yazyk, 2002, ed. 7.
Pleshkevich, E.A., The formation of the scientific concepts about the documental forms of information. The gnoseological and managerial concepts of a document, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2010, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 227–249.
Kashtanov, S.M., Russkaya diplomatika (Russian Diplomatics), Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1988.
Dvoenosova, G.A., Problems in the theory of documentation through the prism of specialist training, Dokumentatsiya v informatsionnom obshchestve: Sovremennye tekhnologii dokumentooborota. Doklady i soobshcheniya na XIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii 22–23 noyabrya 2006 g. (Documentation in the Information Society: Modern Workflow Technologies. Proc. 13th Int. Sci. Pract. Conf., November 22–23, 2006), Moscow: Rosarkhiv, VNIIDAD, 2007, pp. 247–252.
Pleshkevich, E.A., Documentality as a document’s attribute feature, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2013, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 146–151.
Sokolov, A.V., The epistemology of documents (A methodological essay), Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2009, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 57–68.
Ilyushenko, M.P., Istoriya deloproizvodstva v Rossii (do 1917 g.): Ucheb. posobie (History of Records Management in Russia (until 1917): Textbook), Moscow: Ross. Gos. Gumanit. Univ., 2007.
Russkaya Pravda, in Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ Brokgauza i Efrona (Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary), St. Petersburg, 1898, vol. 27.
Pleshkevich, E.A., Proto-documental communications: A new category in communication technologies, Nauchn.-Tekhn. Bibl., 2006, no. 12, pp. 19–20.
Chiera, E., They Wrote on Clay: The Babylonian Tablets Speak Today, University Of Chicago Press, 1956.
Latinsko-russkii slovar’ (Latin-Russian Dictionary), Moscow: Russkii yazyk, 1976, ed. 2.
Dvoyenosova, G.A., The features of a document, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2012, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 169–172.
Banasyukevich, V.D., Functions of administrative documents, in Terminologicheskie problemy v oblasti dokumentovedeniya i arkhivovedeniya: Tez. Soobshchenii k teoreticheskomu seminaru (Terminology Issues in the Field of Documentology and Archive Science: Theses of Messages to the Theoretical Seminar), Moscow: VNIIDAD, 1973, pp. 69–75.
Savin, V.A., Document—archive document—historical source—monument of history and culture: Problems of displays of essential characteristics, Arkhivovedenie i istochnikovedenie otechestvennoi istorii. Problemy vzaimodeistviya na sovremennom etape. Doklady i tezisy vystuplenii na vtoroi vserossiiskoi konferentsii 12–13 marta 1996 g. (Archive Science and Source Science of National History. Problems of Interaction at the Present Stage. Proc. 2nd All-Russian Conf., March 12–13 March, 1996), Moscow: Fed. Arkh. Sluzhba Ross.; VNIIDAD, 1997, pp. 181–187.
Sokova, A.N., Ways of influence of the state on the work with documents in the private sphere of the economy, in Dokumentovedenie: Teoriya i praktika (Documentation Management: Theory and Practice: Featured Papers), Moscow, 2009, pp. 258–268.
Schmandt-Besserat, D., From tokens to writing: The pursuit of abstraction, Bull. Georgian Natl. Acad. Sci., 2007, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 1–6.
Gimbutas, M., Civilization of the Great Goddess. World of Ancient Europe, HarperCollins, 1991.
Kramer, S., Sumerians. The First Civilization on Earth. http://www.historylib.org/historybooks/Samyuel-Kramer-SHumery-Pervaya-tsivilizatsiya-na-Zemle/. Cited August 10, 2014.
Capellae, M., De Nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii, Leipzig: Teubner, 1983.
Khrapchenko, M.B., Nature of the Aesthetic Sign, Vopr. Filos., 1976, no. 2, pp. 148–158.
Zil’berman, D.I., Tradition as communication: Transfer of values, writing, Vopr. Filos., 1996, no. 4, pp. 76–105.
Seignobos, Ch., La Méthode Historique Appliquée aux Sciences Sociales, Paris: Félix Alcan, éditeur, 1901.
Akopyan, V.G. and Veselov, P.V., Two methodological approaches to defining the subject of documentology, Tezisy dokladov i soobshchenii k teoreticheskomu seminaru “Teoreticheskie problemy dokumentovedeniya” (Proc. Theor. Sem. Theoretical Problems of Documentology), Moscow: VNIIDAD, 1975, pp. 82–90.
Rudel’son, K.I., Sovremennye dokumentnye klassifikatsii (Modern Classifications of Documents), Moscow, 1973.
Shvetsova-Vodka, G.N., Functional nature and properties of books, in Kniga. Issledovaniya i materialy (Books. Research and Materials), Moscow: Terra, 1995, vol. 71, 69–96.
Pleshkevich, E.A., Documentology and bibliography theory in search of “their document,” Bibliotekoved., 2004, no. 4, pp. 46–49.
Korshunov, O.P., Bibliografiya, teoriya, metodologiya, metodika (Bibliography, Theory, Methodology, and Technique), Moscow, 1986.
Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ (Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary), Il’ichev, L.F., et al., Eds., Moscow: Sov. Entsikl., 1983.
Avtokratov, V.N., Some aspects of the study of the object and the subject of archive science, Tr. VNIIDAD, 1976, vol. 6(1), pp. 17–73.
Larin, M.V., Upravlenie dokumentatsiei v organizatsiyakh (Document Management in Organizations), Moscow: Nauchn. Kn., 2002.
Sokova, A.N., Workflow and its role in management, Dokumentatsiya v informatsionnom obshchestve: Administrativnaya reforma i upravlenie dokumentatsiei: Doklady i soobshcheniya na odinnadtsatoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii 23–25 noyabrya 2004 g. (Documentation in the Information Society: Administrative Reform and Document Management: Proc. 11th Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf., November 23–25, 2004), Moscow: Rosarkhiv, VNIIDAD, Moscow, 2005, pp. 71–79.
Dil’tei, V., Vvedenie v nauki o dukhe: Opyt polaganiya osnov dlya izucheniya istorii i obshchestva (Introduction to Sciences of the Spirit: The Experience of Positing the Foundations for the Study of History and Society), vol. 1, Moscow: Dom Intellect. Kn., 2000.
Berger., P.L., and Luckmann., Th., The Social Construction of Reality, Anchor Books, 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © G.A. Dvoenosova, 2015, published in Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1, 2015, No. 6, pp. 1–8.
About this article
Cite this article
Dvoenosova, G.A. The phenomenon of documents. Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 42, 85–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688215020112
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688215020112