Skip to main content
Log in

Is amplification of c-MYC, MLL and RUNX1 genes in AML and MDS patients with trisomy 8, 11 and 21 a factor for a clonal evolution in the karyotype?

  • Published:
Cytology and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our study was (1) to define if the amplification of c-MYC, MLL and RUNX1 genes is related to the progressive changes of the karyotype in patients with AML and MDS with trisomy 8, 11, and 21 (+8, +11, and +21) in bone marrow and (2) can that amplification be accepted as part of the clonal evolution (CE). Karyotype analysis was performed in 179 patients aged 16–81 with AML or MDS with different chromosomal aberrations (CA). The findings were distributed as follows: initiating balanced CA (n = 60), aneuploidia (n = 55), unbalanced CA (n = 64). Amplification of c-MYC, MLL and RUNX1 genes by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was found in 35% (7 out of 20) of AML and MDS patients with +8, +11, and +21 as a single CA in their karyotype; in 63.6% of the pts (7 out of 11)—with additional numerical or structural CA and in 75% (9 out of 12)—with complex karyotype. We assume that the amplification of the respective chromosomal regions in patients with +8, +11, and +21 is related to CE. Considering the amplification as a factor of CE, we established 3 patterns of karyotype development depending on the type of the initiating CA in it. Significant statistical differences were found between the three patterns regarding the karyotype distribution in the different stages of progression (p < 0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grinwade, D., Hills, R.K., Moorman, A.V., et al., Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom medical research council trials, Blood, 2010, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Makishima, H., Rataul, M., Gondek, L.P., et al., FISH and SNP-A karyotyping in myelodysplastic syndromes: improving cytogenetic detection of del(5q), monosomy 7, del(7q), trisomy 8, and del(20q), Leuk. Res., 2010, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 447–453.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Byrd, J.C., Mrozek, K., Dodge, R.K., et al., Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461), Blood, 2002, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 4325–4336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoch, C., Kohlmann, A., Dugas, M., et al., Genomic gains and losses influence expression levels of genes located within the affected regions: a study on acute myeloid leukemias with trisomy 8, 11, or 13, monosomy 7, or deletion 5q, Leukemia, 2005, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1224–1228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sloand, E.M., Pfannes, L., Chen, G., et al., Cd34 cells from patients with trisomy 8 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) express early apoptotic markers but avoid programmed cell death by up-regulation of antiapoptotic proteins, Blood, 2007, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 2399–2405.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolman, S.R., Gundacker, H., Appelmaum, F.R., and Slovak, M.L., Impact of trisomy 8 (+8) on clinical presentation, treatment response, and survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study, Blood, 2002, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jennings, B.A. and Mills, K.I., c-myc locus amplification and the acquisition of trisomy 8 in the evolution of chronic myeloid leukaemia, Leuk. Res., 1998, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 899–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeller, K.I., Jegga, A.G., Aronow, B.J., et al., An integrated database of genes responsive to the Myc oncogenic transcription factor: identification of direct genomic targets, Genome Biol., 2003, vol. 4, no. 10, p. R69.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kameoka, J., Funato, T., Obara, Y., et al., Clonal evolution from trisomy into tetrasomy of chromosome 8 associated with the development of acute myeloid leukemia from myelodysplastic syndrome, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 2001, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 159–164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farag, S.S., Archer, K.J., Mrozek, K., et al., Isolated trisomy of chromosomes 8, 11, 13 and 21 is an adverse prognostic factor in adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8461, Int. J. Oncol., 2002, vol. 21, pp. 1041–1051.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, N., Leung, J., Warrier, R.P., et al., Nonrandom chromosomal aberrations and clonal chromosomal evolution in acute leukemia associated with down’s syndrome, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 1987, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 155–162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Naithani, R., Singhal, D., Kumar, R., et al., Sole acquired trisomy 21 in a case of CD7 and CD10 positive acute myeloid leukemia, Indian J. Cancer, 2008, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 132–134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Udayakumar, A.M., Pathare, A.V., Muralitharan, S., et al., Trisomy 21 as a sole acquired abnormality in an adult Omani patient with CD7- and CD9-positive acute myeloid leukemia, Arch. Med. Res., 2007, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 797–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strati, P., Daver, N., Ravandi, F., et al., Biological and clinical features of trisomy 21 in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia, J. Leuk. Res., 2013, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 742–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roumier, C., Fenaux, P., Lafage, M., et al., New mechanisms of AML1 gene alteration in hematological malignancies, Leukemia, 2003, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 9–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Viguié, F., Aboura, A., Bouscary, D., et al., Isodicentric/pseudoisodicentric chromosome 21 amplification in four cases of acute myelocytic leukemia or myelodysplasia, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 2002, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 80–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dorrance, A.M., Liu, S., Yuan, W., et al., Mll partial tandem duplication induces aberrant Hox expression in vivo via specific epigenetic alterations, J. Clin. Invest., 2006, vol. 116, no. 10, pp. 2707–2716.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarova, I., Březinová, J., Zemanová, Z., et al., Cytogenetic manifestation of chromosome 11 duplication/amplification in acute myeloid leukemia, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 2010, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 121–127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenberg, P., Cox, C., LeBeau, M.M., et al., International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes, Blood, 1997, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 2079–2088.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN, 2009), Shaffer, L.G., Slovak, M.L., and Campbell, L.J., Eds., Basel: S. Karger, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kern, W., Haferlach, T., Schnittger, S., et al., Karyotype instability between diagnosis and relapse in 117 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: implications for resistance against therapy, Leukemia, 2002, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2084–2091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grimwade, D., Walker, H., Oliver, F., et al., The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1.612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children’s Leukaemia Working Parties, Blood, 1998, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 2322–2333.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Estey, E., Keating, M.J., Pierce, S., and Stass, S., Change in karyotype between diagnosis and first relapse in acute myelogenous leukemia, Leukemia, 1995, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 972–976.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rücker, F.G., Bullinger, L., Schwaenen, C., et al., Disclosure of candidate genes in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotypes using microarray-based molecular characterization, J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 3887–3894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beyer, V., Mühlematter, D., Parlier, V., et al., Polysomy 8 defines a clinico-cytogenetic entity representing a subset of myeloid hematologic malignancies associated with a poor prognosis: report on a cohort of 12 patients and review of 105 published cases, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 2005, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 97–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Byrd, J.C., Lawrence, D., Arthur, D.C., et al., Patients with isolated trisomy 8 in acute myeloid leukemia are not cured with cytarabine-based chemotherapy: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8461, Clin. Cancer Res., 1998, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1235–1241.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Angelova.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angelova, S., Spassov, B., Nikolova, V. et al. Is amplification of c-MYC, MLL and RUNX1 genes in AML and MDS patients with trisomy 8, 11 and 21 a factor for a clonal evolution in the karyotype?. Cytol. Genet. 49, 165–172 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452715030032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452715030032

Keywords

Navigation