Women’s Right, A Call for Life: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pres. Donald Trump’s Speech for the 2020 March for Life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v7i1.1906Keywords:
March for Life, language and power, political discourse, transitivity, women and lifeAbstract
Political ideologies and power are shaped by politicians’ manipulation of linguistic features that appeared in their public discourses. Employing transitivity system, this study investigated President Donald Trump’s speech during the 2020 “March for Life†to identify the transitivity processes and to determine how these processes are assimilated in the said discourse. Findings revealed that 126 transitivity processes are dominantly material, relational, and mental. Being the first US president who graced this event, material processes constructed a self-statement of initiatives and efforts in preserving human life and his attack on his political nemesis as threats to the preservation of the value and dignity of life. Relational processes have constructed life-protection ideas by valuing the significance of the children and the unborn. Trump’s feelings toward the dignity of life are shaped by mental processes by his direct association to the public as among the advocates of human life.  Ironically, transitivity processes have shown minimal involvement of women in his speech, contrary to the theme. Data prove that language employed in a public discourse builds power and ideologies that serve as the human framework to understand the mind of the speaker.
References
Adjei, A.A. & Ewusi-Mensah, L. (2016). Transitivity in Kufour’s 2008 farewell speech to the Ghanaian parliament. British Journal of English Linguistics, 4(1), 36-49.
Adjei, A.A., Ewusi-Mensah, L. & Okoh, H. (2015). Transitivity in political discourse – A study of the major process types in the 2009 state-of-the-nation address in Ghana. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 16, 23-32.
Ahmed, S., Mahmood, R., Arif, S. & Shakir, A (2014). A critical discourse analysis of Pakistani and Indian budget speeches. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(3), 141- 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i3.5334
Akinseye, T.A. (2015). “I belong to everybody and I belong to nobody†An Interpersonal investigation of President Mohammadu Buhari’s Inaugural speech of May 29, 2015. I.B.A.D.A.N. Journal of English Studies, 11, 61-106.
Alvi, S. D. & Baseer, A. (2011). An investigation of political discourse of Obama’s selected speeches: A Hallidian perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(16), 150-160.
Balog, P.S. (2019). Transitivity analysis of selected privilege speeches of Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 7, pp. 43-65.
Bustam, M.R. (2011). Analyzing clause by Halliday’s transitivity system. Jurnal Ilmu Sastra, 6(1), 22-34.
Chefor, V.M. (2019). Interpersonal function in Paul Biya’s 2018 French inaugural speech and its English translation. International Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2(2), 47-54. http:// dx.doi.org/10.22225/ijsfl.2.1.669.113
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Darani, L. H. (2014). Persuasive style and its realization through transitivity analysis: An S.F.L. perspective. Elsevier / Procedia: Social Behavioral Sciences 158, 179-186.
Darweesh, A.D. & Abdullah, N.M. (2016). A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s sexist ideology. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(30), 87-95.
Ezzina, R. (2015). Transitivity analysis of « The Crying lot of 49 » by Thomas Pynchon. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(3), 283-292.
Goddard, A. & Carey, N. (2017). Discourse: The basics. Routledge.
Green, C. (2007). Discursive strategies in political speeches: The words of Dr. Bingu Wa Mutharika. Journal - Issues in Political Discourse Analysis, 2(1). 1-15.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Horváth, J. (n.d). Critical discourse analysis of Obama's political discourse. http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~sbenus/Teaching /APTD/Horvath_CDO_Obama.pdf
Isti’anah, A. (2014). Transitivity analysis in four selected opinions about Jakarta governor election. Phenomena, 14(2), 163-175.
Jäger, S. & Maier, F. (2016). Analysing discourse and dispositives: A Foucauldian approach to theory and methodology. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer’s (Eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Jeffries, L. (2007). Textual construction of female body: A critical discourse approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jegede, O.O. (2018). Interpersonal meaning in Nigeria’s President Muhammadu Buhari’s 2015 victory speech. Papers in English and Linguistics (PEL), 19(3&4), 183-195.
Kondowe, W. (2014a). Interpersonal metafunctions in Bingu wa Mutharika’s second-term political discourse: A systemic functional grammatical approach. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(3), 70-84.
Kondowe, W. (2014b). Presidents and ideologies: A transitivity analysis of Bingu wa Mutharika’s inaugural address. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 174-180.
Liping, C. (2014). Experiential metafunctional analysis of Winston S. Chruchill’s speech on Hitler’s invasion of the USS.R. English Language Teaching, 7(9), 132-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n9p132
Marbun, L.A.Y. (n.d). Process Types of transitivity system in the National Geographic’s article. https://uhn.ac.id/files/akademik_files/1712070831_2016_The Episteme Journal of Linguistics and Literature Vol3 No1_5. Process Types of Transitivity System in the National Geographics Articles.pdf.
March for Life (2020). https://marchforlife.org/national-march-for-life/.
Martin, J.R., Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., & Painter, C. (2010). Deploying functional grammar. The Commercial Press.
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., Teruya, K. & Lam, M. (2010). Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Mayo, M.A. & Taboada, M. (2017). Evaluation in political discourse to women: Appraisal analysis of Cosmopolitan’s online coverage of the 2014 midterm elections. Discourse, Content & Media, 18, 40-48. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.003
Munawar, B. (2016). Critical discourse analysis of Z.A Bhutto’s speech at Security Council (December 15, 1971) in perspective of transitivity and modality. International Journal of Advanced Research 9(8), 1029-1045. http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/1301
Norgaard, N., Montoro, R., & Busse, B. (2010). Key terms in stylistics. Continuum International Group.
Ong’onda, N. (2016). Transitivity analysis of newspaper headlines on terrorism attack in Kenya: A case study of Westgate Mall, Nairobi. International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences, 6(9), 77-85.
Remorosa, R.R. (2018). President Rodrigo Roa Duterte’s political speeches: A critical discourse analysis. I.O.S.R. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IOSR-JHSS), 23(8), 72-87.
Rotaru, M.C. (2010). Royal speech prevents crisis Queen Elizabeth’s speech on the death of Princess Diana. Professional Communication and Translation Studies, 3(1-2), 41-48.
Salayo, J.D. & Macam, A.L. (2019). Exploring character delineation: A transitivity analysis of O. Henry’s ‘A Retrieved Reformation’. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 7, 151-168.
Sharififar, M. & Rahimi, E. (2015). Critical discourse analysis of political speeches: A case study of Obama’s and Rouhani’s speeches at U.N. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 343-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0502.14
Sharndama, E.C. (2015). Political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of President Muhammadu Buhari’s inaugural speech. European Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 3, 12-24.
Toolan, M. (2010). Language in literature: An introduction to stylistics. Routledge.
United States of America. White House (2020 January 24). Remarks by President Trump at the 4th Annual March for Life. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-47th-annual-march-life/.
Wang, J. (2010). A critical discourse of Barack Obama’s speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 254-261.
Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s first television debate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(7), 65-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.65
Zhao, M. & Zhang, Y. (2017). A transitivity analysis of American President Donald J. Trump’s inaugural address. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 5(5), 31-43.
Zhu Yujie, L. F. (2018). Transitivity analysis of American President Donald Trump’s inaugural address. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 6(2), 28-34.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
