Transport And Communications 2018, 6(2):10-15 | DOI: 10.26552/tac.C.2018.2.3

Financial Health Assessment of International Airports

Jaroslav Mazanec1, Viera Bartosova1, Maksym Bezpartochnyi2
1 Department of Economics, University of Zilina, The Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Zilina, 010 26, Slovakia
2 Department of Economics and Marketing, National Aerospace University - Kharkiv Aviation Institute, Kharkiv, 610 70, Ukraine

The financial health of company is extremely important for potential investment decisions. Financial health is mainly assessed by financial analysis which identify strengths and weakness. The aim of paper is to evaluate and to compare financial health of selected international Slovak and Czech airports. We applied the best-known financial variables, particularly liquidity ratios, asset management ratios, debt ratios and profitability ratios. Then, we compare results of Bratislava Airport with Kosice Airport, Ostrava Airport and Prague Airport. We calculate financial ratios based on statements of international airports. The results show that Bratislava Airport is mainly good at current assets management during analysed period. On the other hand, Bratislava Airport have long-term problem with profitability ratios.

Keywords: Financial Analysis, Financial Health, Financial Ratios, International Airport, Liquidity Ratios, Asset Management Ratios, Debt Ratios, Leverage Ratios
JEL classification: G30

Published: September 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mazanec, J., Bartosova, V., & Bezpartochnyi, M. (2018). Financial Health Assessment of International Airports. Transport And Communications6(2), 10-15. doi: 10.26552/tac.C.2018.2.3
Download citation

References

  1. Bartosova V, Hraskova D, Paliderova M. Basic Rules and Methodological Framework of the Financial Analysis of the Group of Companies in the Slovak Republic. 2nd International Conference on Economics and Social Science (ICESS); 2014 Jul 29-30; Shenzhen, China. USA: Information Engineering Research Inst, p. 86-91, 2014.
  2. Grunwald R, Holeckova J. Financni analyza a planovani podniku. Praha: EKOPRESS, 2007.
  3. Kicova E, Kramarova K. Possibilities of Using Financial Analysis. In the Bus Transport Companies. 9th International Scientific Conference on Financial Management of Firms and Financial Institutions; 2013 Sep 09-10; Ostrava; Czech Republic. Ostrava: VSB-TECH UNIV Ostrava, p. 332-341, 2013.
  4. Cisko S, Kliestik T. Financny manazment podniku II. ®ilina: EDIS; 2013.
  5. Misankova M. Comparison of Selected Statistical Methods for the Prediction of Bankruptcy. 10th International Days of Statistics and Economics; 2016 Sep 08-10; Prague, Czech Republic. Slany: Melandrium, p. 1260-1269, 2016.
  6. Kliestik T, Kocisova K, Misankova M. Logit and Probit Model used For Prediction of Financial Health of Company. 2nd Global Conference on Business, Economics and Management and Tourism (BEMTUR); 2014 Oct 29-31; Prague, Czech Republic. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 850-855, 2015. Go to original source...
  7. Svabova L, Durica M. Korelacna analyza prediktorov pouzitych bankrotnych predikcnych modeloch na Slovensku. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum. 10 (1), 2-11, 2016
  8. Salaga J, Bartosova V, Kicova E. Economic Value Added as a Measuement Tool of Financial Performance. 4th World Conference on Business, Economics and Management (WCBEM); 2015 Apr-May 30-02; Ephesus, Turkey. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 484-489, 2015. Go to original source...
  9. Spuchlakova E, Michalikova KF. Comparison of LOGIT, PROBIT and Neural Network Bankruptcy Prediction Models. ISSGBM International Conference on Information and Business Management (ISSGBM-IB 2016); 2016 Sep 03-04; Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Singapore; Singapore Management & Sports Science Inst Pte Ltd, p. 49-53, 2016.
  10. Rowland Z, Dvorakova L, Rousek P. Stanoveni bankrotniho modelu dopravnych podniku v CR pomoci vicenasobne diskriminacni analzy. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum.10 (1), 32-46, 2016.
  11. Spuchlakova E, Michalikova KF. Predicting the Financial Health of Companies Using the Altman Z-score. ISSGBM International Conference on Information and Business Management (ISSGBM-IB 2016); 2016 Sep 03-04; Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Singapore; Singapore Management & Sports Science Inst Pte Ltd, p. 54-59, 2016.
  12. Plaminek J. Reseni problemu a rozhodovani. Praha: GRADA Publishing; 2008.
  13. Bartosova V, Kral P. Methodological Framework of Financial Analysis Results Objectification in the Slovak Republic. 3rd International Conference on Business and Economics (BE-ci); 2016 Sep 21-23; Univ Teknologi Mara, Malaysia. Cyprus: Future Acad, p. 1189-1197, 2016. Go to original source...
  14. Mace M. Financni analyza a statnch organizaci, prakticke priklady a pouzitie. Praha: GRADA Publishing; 2006.
  15. Knapkova A, Pavelkova D, Steker K. Financni analyza, komplexni pruvodce s priklady, 2. rozsirene vydani. Praha: GRADA Publishing; 2012.
  16. Kislingerova E. Manazerske financie, 3. edt. Praha: C.H. Beck, 2007.
  17. Marinic P. Hodnotovy management ve financnim rizeni. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2014.
  18. Register of Annual Reports in Slovak Republic [homepage on the internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.registeruz.sk/
  19. Register of Annual Reports in Czech Republic [homepage on the internet]. 2017. Available from: https://or.justice.cz/ias/ui/vypis-sl-firma?subjektId=715683
  20. Lai PL, Potter A, Beynon, M, Beresford A. Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique. Transport Policy; 2015; 42: 75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.008. Go to original source...
  21. Fragoudaki A, Giokas D, Glyptou K. Efficiency and productivity changes in Greek airports during the crisis years 2010-2014. Journal of Air Transport Management, 57, 306-315, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.09.003. Go to original source...
  22. Orkcu HH, Balikci C, Dogan, MI, Genc A. An evaluation of the operational efficiency of Turkish airports using data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist productivity index: 2009-2014 case. Transport Policy, 48: 92-104, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.02.008. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.