Spray drift characteristics test of unmanned aerial vehicle spray unit under wind tunnel conditions

Changling Wang, Aijun Zeng, Xiongkui He, Jianli Song, Herbst Andreas, Wanlin Gao

Abstract


Since the 2010s, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer was applied more and more widely for low-volume aerial pesticides spraying operations in China. However, droplets from the UAV sprayer have a higher drift risk due to more fine droplets sprayed and a higher flight height than ground sprayers. Study on UAV spray drift has been a new hot spot within the field of pesticide application technology. Most of previous studies used direct field methods for spray drift, but the meteorological conditions in field were unstable and uncontrollable, and drift research under an actual operation state in wind tunnel has not been reported. Therefore, 25 treatments of wind tunnel measurements and droplets spectrum tests of 10 models of nozzles were conducted to explore the influence factor on spray drift characteristics of UAV chemicals application in this study. A spray unit with a rotor of UAV was innovatively installed in wind tunnel, and the airstream from the wind tunnel was regarded as the relative moving natural wind to simulate the flight status. The airborne and the sediment spray drift was measured to study the effects of the nozzle type and size (flat fan, hollow cone and air-inclusion nozzles), flight speed, adjuvant (DRS-60, Y-20079, MF and G-611) and meteorological parameters (20°C & 40%, 20°C & 80%, 30°C & 40% and 30°C & 60%). The drift potential (DP) and the drift potential reduction percentage (DPRP) in vertical and horizontal directions were obtained for each test. Both nozzle type and size had an impact on the spray drift potential obviously by affecting the droplet size and the ratio of fine droplets, and the regression linear models between DPRPV/DPRPH and DV50, V75 were established (R2=0.934/0.925). Flight speed also had a significant effect on the spray drift characteristics, and reducing the flight speed could increase the DP effectively. Adding spray adjuvants could affect the DP under experimental meteorological parameters, and the anti-drift performance ranked in the order of DRS-60>MF>Y-20079>G-611. Recommendations were proposed in order to reduce the spray drift for UAV sprayer’s operation. These findings can contribute to provide guidelines and technical support for the wind tunnel spray drift tests of UAV and the field operation regulation of unmanned aerial PPP application.
Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer, wind tunnel, spray drift potential, nozzle, adjuvant
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20201303.5716

Citation: Wang C L, Zeng A J, He X K, Song J L, Herbst A, et al. Spray drift characteristics test of unmanned aerial vehicle spray unit under wind tunnel conditions. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(3): 13–21.

Keywords


unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer, wind tunnel, spray drift potential, nozzle, adjuvant

Full Text:

PDF

References


He X K, Bonds J, Herbst A, Langenakens J. Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle for plant protection in East Asia. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(3): 18–30.

Lan Y, Chen S, Deng J, Zhou Z, Ouyang F. Development situation and problem analysis of plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle in China. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019; 40(5): 217–225. (in Chinese)

Huang Y, Hoffmann W C, Lan Y, Wu W, Fritz B K. Development of a spray system for an unmanned aerial vehicle platform. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2009; 25(6): 803–809.

He X, Liu Y, Song J, Zeng A, Zhang J. Small unmanned aircraft application techniques and their impacts for chemical control in Asian rice fields. Aspects of Applied Biology, 2014; 122: 33–45.

Lan Y, Chen S. Current status and trends of plant protection UAV and its spraying technology in China. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018, 1(1): 1–9.

Yang S, Yang X, Mo J. The application of unmanned aircraft systems to plant protection in China. Precision Agriculture, 2018; 19: 278–292.

He X. Rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for plant protection and application technology in China. Outlooks on Pest Management, 2018, 29(4): 162–167.

Wang C L, Song J L, He X K, Wang Z C, Wang S L, Meng Y H. Effect of flight parameters on distribution characteristics of pesticide spraying droplets deposition of plant-protection unmanned aerial vehicle. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(23): 109–116. (in Chinese)

He X K. Brief analysis on the research, development and application of plant protection UAV in China. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2018; 39(9): 10–17. (in Chinese)

ISO 22866. Equipment for crop protection - Methods for field measurement of spray drift. ISO International Standard, 2005.

Wang X N, He X K, Song J L, Wang Z C, Wang C L, Wang S L, et al. Drift potential of UAV with adjuvants in aerial applications. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(5): 54–58.

Wang J, Lan Y B, Zhang H H, Zhang Y L, Wen S, Yao W X, Deng J. Drift and deposition of pesticide applied by UAV on pineapple plants under different meteorological conditions. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(6): 5–12.

Wang J, Lan Y, Wen S, Hewitt A J, Yao W, Chen P. Meteorological and flight altitude effects on deposition, penetration, and drift in pineapple aerial spraying. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020; 15(1): e2382.

Herbst A, Bonds J, Wang Z C, Zeng A J, He X K, Goff P. The influence of unmanned agricultural aircraft s ystem design on spray drift. Journal für Kulturpflanzen, 2020; 72(1): 1–11.

ISO 22856. Equipment for crop protection — Methods for the laboratory measurement of spray drift — Wind tunnels. ISO International Standard, 2008.

ISO 22401. Equipment for crop protection — Method for measurement of potential spray drift from horizontal boom sprayers by the use of a test bench. ISO International Standard, 2015.

Douzals J-P, Tinet C, Goddard R. Use of a flexible drop counter for a better comparability of potential spray drift measurement protocols in wind tunnels. Aspects of Applied Biology International Advances in Pesticide Application, 2018; 137(1): 277–284.

ISO 25358. Crop protection equipment-droplet-size spectra from atomizers-measurement and classification. ISO International Standard, 2018.

Van de Zande J C, Holterman H J, Wenneker M. Nozzle classification for drift reduction in orchard spraying; identification of drift reduction class threshold nozzles. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, 2008; 5: 253–260.

Sousa Alves G, Kruger G R, da Cunha J P A R, Vieira B C, Henry R S, Obradovic A, et al. Spray drift from dicamba and glyphosate applications in a wind tunnel. Weed Technology, 2017; 31(3): 387–395.

Brusselman E, Van Driessen K, Steurbaut W, Gabriels D, Cornelis W, Nuyttens D, et al. Wind tunnel evaluation of several tracer and collection techniques for the measurement of spray drift. Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences, 2004; 69(4): 829–836.

Torrent X, Garcerá C, Moltó E, Chueca P, Abad R, Grafulla C, et al. Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift. Crop Protection, 2017; 96: 130–143.

Nuyttens D, Taylor W A, De Schampheleire M, Verboven P, Dekeyser D. Influence of nozzle type and size on drift potential by means of different wind tunnel evaluation methods. Biosystems Engineering, 2009; 103(3): 271–280.

Torrent X, Gregorio E, Douzals J P, Tinet C, Rosell-Polo J R, Planas S. Assessment of spray drift potential reduction for hollow-cone nozzles: Part 1. Classification using indirect methods. Science of the Total Environment, 2019; 692: 1322–1333.

Herbst A. A method to determine spray drift potential from nozzles and its link to buffer zone restrictions. ASAE Annual International Meeting. Sacramento, California, USA: 01-1047, 2001

Zhang W J, He X K, Song J L, Wang C L, Herbst A. Effect of adjuvant S240 on atomization of water dispersible granule and emulsion solution. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(11): 61–67. (in Chinese)

Wang X, He X K, Herbst A, Langenakens J, Zheng J, Li Y. Development and performance test of spray drift test system for sprayer with bar. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(18): 55–62. (in Chinese)

Blocken B. 50 years of computational wind engineering: past, present and future. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014; 129: 69–102.

Helck C, Herbst A. Drift potential index-a new parameter for the evaluation of agricultural nozzles concerning their drift potential. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzd, 1998; 50(9): 225–232.

ASABE S572.1. Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. ASABE Standard, 2009.

Himel C M, Moore A D. Spray droplet size in the control of spruce budworm, boll weevil, bollworm, and cabbage looper. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1969; 62(4): 916–919.

Wang X N, He X K, Wang C L, Wang Z C, Li L L, Wang S L, et al. Spray drift characteristics of fuel powered single-rotor UAV for plant protection. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(1): 117–123. (in Chinese)

Wang C L. Droplet atomization and deposition distribution characteristics of unmanned aerial vehicle chemical application, Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese)




Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office