Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 1, 2014

Learning object-oriented paradigm by playing computer games: concepts first approach

  • Jakub Livovský EMAIL logo and Jaroslav Porubän
From the journal Open Computer Science

Abstract

Since the beginning of teaching object-oriented programming at universities in the mid 90’s, university teachers are trying to come up with more effective ways of teaching. Number of researches has been made in this area. They are trying to identify errors teachers are making in learning process. These researches suggest different teaching methodologies and tools, which should help them to avoid these mistakes.

The subject of this paper is to present a solution we developed to teach and illustrate basic concepts of object oriented paradigm through playing of computer game. In this approach, we are teaching basic principles, such as class, objects and relationship between them in the beginning of object oriented programming (OOP) course and postpone learning of specific objective language to later time. Also we are taking advantage of attractiveness of computer games to increase students motivation, which should lead to improved learning performance of students.

[1] A. Robins, J. Rountree, N. Rountree, Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion, Comput. Sci. Educ. 13(2), 137–172, 2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/csed.13.2.137.1420010.1076/csed.13.2.137.14200Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. Bennedsen, C. Schulte, What Does “Objects-first” Mean?: An International Study of Teachers’ Perceptions of Objects-first, Proceedings of the Seventh Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research — Volume 88, Koli Calling’ 07 (Australian Computer Society, Inc., Australia, 2007) 21–29 Search in Google Scholar

[3] N. Liberman, C. Beeri, Y. Ben-David Kolikant, Difficulties in Learning Inheritance and Polymorphism, ACM T. Comput. Educ. 11(1), 1–23, 2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1921607.192161110.1145/1921607.1921611Search in Google Scholar

[4] N. Ragonis, M. Ben-Ari, On understanding the statics and dynamics of object-oriented programs, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 37(1), 226, 2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1047124.104742510.1145/1047124.1047425Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Pasa Uysal, The Effects of Objects-First and Objects-Late Methods on Achievements of OOP Learne, J. Software Eng. Appl. 5(10), 816–822, 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2012.51009410.4236/jsea.2012.510094Search in Google Scholar

[6] T.M. Connolly, E.A. Boyle, E. MacArthur, T. Hainey, J.M. Boyle, A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games, Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686, 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.00410.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. Papastergiou, Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation, Computers & Education 52(1), 1–12, 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.00410.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004Search in Google Scholar

[8] B. Meyer, Reality: a cousin twice removed [object technology], Computer 29(7), 96–97, 1996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.51197410.1109/2.511974Search in Google Scholar

[9] K. Sanders, J. Boustedt, A. Eckerdal, R. McCartney, J.E. Moström, L. Thomas, C. Zander, Student Understanding of Object-oriented Programming As Expressed in Concept Maps, Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE’ 08 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2008) 332–336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1352135.135225110.1145/1352135.1352251Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Georgantaki, S. Retalis, Using educational tools for teaching object oriented design and programmin, Journal of Information Technology Impact 7(2), 111–130, 2007 Search in Google Scholar

[11] C. Linehan, B. Kirman, S. Lawson, G. Chan, Practical, Appropriate, Empirically-validated Guidelines for Designing Educational Games, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ′11 (ACM, New York, USA, 2011) 1979–1988 10.1145/1978942.1979229Search in Google Scholar

[12] M.P.J. Habgood, The Effective Integration of Digital Games and Learning Content, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, 2007 Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. Kölling, B. Quig, A. Patterson, J. Rosenberg, The BlueJ System and its Pedagogy, Comput. Sci. Educ. 13(4), 249–268, 2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/csed.13.4.249.1749610.1076/csed.13.4.249.17496Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Kölling, The Greenfoot Programming Environment, Trans. Comput. Educ. 10(4), 1–21, 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1868358.186836110.1145/1868358.1868361Search in Google Scholar

[15] W. Dann, D. Cosgrove, D. Slater, D. Culyba, S. Cooper, Mediated Transfer: Alice 3 to Java, Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ′12, (ACM, New York, USA, 2012) 141–146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2157136.215718010.1145/2157136.2157180Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Muratet, P. Torguet, J.-P. Jessel, F. Viallet, Towards a Serious Game to Help Students Learn Computer Programming, Int. J. Comput. Games Technol. 2009, 1–12 (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/47059010.1155/2009/470590Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-10-1
Published in Print: 2014-9-1

© 2014 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 3.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s13537-014-0209-2/html
Scroll to top button