Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find out whether a set of habitat characteristics, derived from the National Corine Land Cover (CLC) database of habitat types, could indicate the occurrence of white stork nests in a settlement. The analyses were performed for the settlements closer than 35 km from the Drava River (northern Croatia). Sixteen habitat characteristics were determined around 257 settlements occupied with white stork nests and 152 control sites without white stork nests within the same geographic region. We performed multivariate inspection of the data and a non-metric multidimensional preference analysis. The best variables for stork habitat selection were: distance to the nearest grassland habitat (P < 0.0001), distance to three nearest grassland habitats (P < 0.0001), altitude of the settlements above the sea level (P < 0.001), sum of distances to the three nearest agricultural mosaic habitats (P < 0.005) and standardized area proportion of forests (P < 0.05). The explanatory capacity of the model was 81.1%. We conclude that it is possible to define a small number of habitat characteristics derived from CLC database which can indicate the occurrence of white stork nests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso C.J., Alonso J.A. & Carrascal L.M. 1991. Habitat selection by foraging white storks, Ciconia ciconia, during the breeding season. Can. J. Zool. 69: 1957–1962.
BirdLife International 2004. Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Brotons L., Thuiller W., Araujo M.B. & Hirzel A.H. 2004. Presence-absence versus presence only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography 27: 437–448. DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03764.x
Bursac Z., Gauss C.H., Williams D.K. & Hosmer D.W. 2008. Purposeful Selection of Variables in Logistic Regression. Source Code for Biology and Medicine 3(17).
Busea J., Schröderb B. & Assman T. 2007. Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle — A case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biol. Conserv. 137:372–381. DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.025
Carroll J.D. 1972. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling, pp. 105–155. In: Shepard R.N., Romney A.K. & Nerlove S.B. (eds), Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 1, Theory, New York: Seminar Press. (Reprinted in Davies P. & Coxon A.P.M. (eds), (1984), Key Texts on Multidimensional Scaling. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.)
Collins J.P. & Storfer A. 2003. Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses. Divers. Distrib. 9: 89–98. DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00012.x
Cramp S. (ed.) 1997. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 722 pp.
Creutz G. 1988. Der Weisstorch. Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei. 375. A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt, pp. 1–236.
Crkvenčić I. (ed.) 1974. Geografija SR Hrvatske — Središnja Hrvatska [Geography of Croatia — Middle part]. Vol. I. Školska knjiga, 220 pp.
Crkvenčić I. (ed.) 1975. Geografija SR Hrvatske — Istočna Hrvatska [Geography of Croatia — Eastern part]. Vol. III. Školska knjiga, 256 pp.
Denac D. 2006. Intraspecific exploitation competition as cause for density dependent breeding success in the White Stork. Waterbirds 29: 391–394.
EEA 2004. Agriculture and the environment in the EU accession countries: implications of applying the EU common agricultural policy. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 55 pp.
Erdos S., Szép T., Báldi A. & Nagy K. 2007. The effects of farmland composition and heterogeneity on the density of three farmland bird species in Hungary. J. Landscape Ecol. 5: 161–172.
Gabriel K.R. 1981. Biplot Display of Multivariate Matrices for Inspection of Data and Diagnosis, pp. 147–173. In: Barnet V. (ed.), Interpreting Multivariate Data, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., London.
Guisan A. & Zimmermann 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135(2–3): 147–186. DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
Heroldová M., Bryja J., Zejda J. & Tkadlec E. 2007. Structure and diversity of small mammal communities in agriculture landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 120: 206–210.
Hosmer D.W. & Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley, 392 pp.
Hutchinson G.E. 1957. “Concluding remarks”. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22(2): 415–427
Kluber M.R., Olsona D.H. & Puettmann K.J. 2008. Amphibian distributions in riparian and upslope areas and their habitat associations on managed forest landscapes in the Oregon Coast Range. For. Ecol. Manag. 256: 529–535. DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.043
Krishna Y.C., Krishnaswamy J. & Kumar N.S. 2008. Habitat factors affecting site occupancy and relative abundance of four-horned antelope. J. Zool. 276: 63–70.
Latus C., Kujawa K. & Glemnitz M. 2000. The influence of landscape structure on White Stork’s Ciconia ciconia nest distribution. Acta Ornithol. 35: 97–102.
Ministry of Culture (MoC) 2005. Nacionalna klasifikacija staništa — nadopunjena verzija iz 2004 (Radna skupina za Nacionalnu klasifikaciju staništa — U okviru projekta ‘Kartiranje staništa RH’ [National classification of habitats — update version form 2004. Working group for National classification of habitat types — in the scope of project “Mapping of the habitats of Republic of Croatia”]. OIKON d.o.o., Institut za primijenjenu ekologiju [Oikon Ltd Institute for applied ecology].
Mužinić J. 1999. The population of the white stork, Ciconia ciconia in Croatia, pp. 213–217. In: Shultz H. (ed.), Weisstorch im Aufwing? — White Stork on up? Proceedings Int. Symp. on the White Stork, 1996, NABU, Hamburg.
Nowakowski J.J. 2003. Habitat structure and breeding parameters of the White Stork Ciconia ciconia in the Kolno Upland (NE Poland). Acta Ornithol. 38: 39–46.
Ottvall R., Green M., Lindström Å., Svensson S., Essen P.-A. & Marklund L. 2008. Distribution and habitat choice of the Ortolan Bunting Emberiza hortulana in Sweden. Ornis Svecica 18: 3–16.
Sæther B.E., Grotan V., Tryjanowski P., Barbraud C. & Fulin M. 2006. Climate and spatio-temporal variation in the population dynamics of a long distance migrant, the white stork. J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 80–90.
Schneider M. 1988. Periodisch überschwemmtes Dauergrünland ermöglicht optimalen Bruterfolg des Weißstorches (Ciconia ciconia) in der Save-Stromaue (Kroatien/Jugoslawien). Die Vogelwarte 34(3): 164–174.
Seoane J., Bustamante J. & Díaz-Delgado R. 2004. Are existing vegetation maps adequate to predict bird distributions? Ecol. Model. 175: 137–149. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.011
Tryjanowski P., Jerzak L. & Radkiewicz J. 2005a. Effect of water level and livestock on the productivity and numbers of breeding white storks. Waterbirds 28: 378–382.
Tryjanowski P. & Kuźniak S. 2002. Population size and productivity of the white stork Ciconia ciconia in relation to common vole Microtus arvalis density. Ardea 90: 213–217.
Tryjanowski P., Sparks & Profus P. 2005b. Uphill shifts in the distribution of the white stork Ciconia ciconia in Southern Poland: the importance of nest quality. Divers. Distrib. 11: 219–223. DOI 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00140.x
Tryjanowski P., Sparks T.H., Jakubiec Z., Jerzak L., Kosicki, J.Z., Kuzniak S., Profus P., Ptaszyk J., Wuczynski A. 2005c. The relationship between population means and variance in reproductive success differs between local populations of White Stork (Ciconia ciconia). Popul. Ecol. 47: 119–125. DOI 10.1007/s10144-005-0217-0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radović, A., Tepić, N. Using Corine Land Cover Habitat Database for the analysis of breeding bird habitat: case study of white storks (Ciconia ciconia) from northern Croatia. Biologia 64, 1212–1218 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0206-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0206-4