Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of soil particle-size distribution models for describing deposited soils adjacent to constructed dams in the China Loess Plateau

  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil particle-size distributions (PSD) have been used to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Various parametric PSD models have been proposed to describe the soil PSD from sparse experimental data. It is important to determine which PSD model best represents specific soils. Fourteen PSD models were examined in order to determine the best model for representing the deposited soils adjacent to dams in the China Loess Plateau; these were: Skaggs (S-1, S-2, and S-3), fractal (FR), Jaky (J), Lima and Silva (LS), Morgan (M), Gompertz (G), logarithm (L), exponential (E), log-exponential (LE), Weibull (W), van Genuchten type (VG) as well as Fredlund (F) models. Four-hundred and eighty samples were obtained from soils deposited in the Liudaogou catchment. The coefficient of determination (R 2), the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), and the modified AIC (mAIC) were used. Based upon R 2 and AIC, the three- and four-parameter models were both good at describing the PSDs of deposited soils, and the LE, FR, and E models were the poorest. However, the mAIC in conjunction with R 2 and AIC results indicated that the W model was optimum for describing PSD of the deposited soils for emphasizing the effect of parameter number. This analysis was also helpful for finding out which model is the best one. Our results are applicable to the China Loess Plateau.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1973), Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: B.N. Petrov and F. Csáki (eds.), Proc. Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, E.M., J.E.F.W. Lima, L.N. Rodrigues, and J.A. de Azevedo (2004), Comparison of mathematical models for fitting particle-size distribution curves, Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 39, 4, 363–370, DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2004 000400010 (in Portuguese with English abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund, M.D., D.G. Fredlund, and G.W. Wilson (2000), An equation to represent grain-size distribution, Can. Geotech. J. 37, 4, 817–827, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-37-4-817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giménez, D., W.J. Rawls, Y. Pachepsky, and J.P.C. Watt (2001), Prediction of a pore distribution factor from soil textural and mechanical parameters, Soil Sci. 166, 2, 79–88, DOI: 10.1097/00010694-200102000-00001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkamp, R., and J.Y. Parlange (1986), Predicting the water-retention curve from particle-size distribution: 1. Sandy soils without organic matter, Soil Sci. 142, 6, 325–339, DOI: 10.1097/00010694-198612000-00001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. (2004), Effect of texture on the performance of soil particle-size distribution models, Geoderma 123, 3–4, 363–371, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaky, J. (1944), Soil Mechanics, Egyetemi Nyomda, Budapest (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolev, B., S. Rousseva, and D. Dimitrov (1996), Derivation of soil water capacity parameters from standard soil texture information for Bulgarian soils, Ecol. Model. 84, 1–3, 315–319, DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00134-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko, A., and R. Zhang (1998), Estimating the soil water retention from particle-size distributions: A fractal approach, Soil Sci. 163, 3, 171–179, DOI: 10.1097/00010694-199803000-00001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P.H., L.P. Mercer, and N.W. Flodin (1975), General model for nutritional responses of higher organisms, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 11, 4327–4331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemes, A., and W.J. Rawls (2006), Evaluation of different representations of the particle-size distribution to predict soil water retention, Geoderma 132, 1–2, 47–58, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemes, A., J.H.M. Wösten, A. Lilly, and J.H. Oude Voshaar (1999), Evaluation of different procedures to interpolate particle-size distributions to achieve compatibility within soil databases, Geoderma 90, 3–4, 187–202, DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00014-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoa, F.K.H., Y.H. Pan, and H. Xu (2009), Analysis of supersaturated designs via the Dantzig selector, J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 139, 7, 2362–2372, DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.10.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseva, S.S. (1997), Data transformations between soil texture schemes, Eur. J. Soil Sci. 48, 4, 749–758, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00574.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, P., and G. Sénéchal (2010), Relationships between water flow rate and geophysical measurements in an alluvial aquifer, Acta Geophys. 58, 1, 83–95, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-009-0024-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs, T.H., L.M. Arya, P.J. Shouse, and B.P. Mohanty (2001), Estimating particle-size distribution from limited soil texture data, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 4, 1038–1044, DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2001.6541038x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smettem, K.R.J., and P.J. Gregory (1996), The relation between soil water retention and particle size distribution parameters for some predominantly sandy Western Australian soils, Aust. J. Soil Res. 34, 5, 695–708, DOI: 10.1071/SR9960695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguas, F.J., M.A. Martín, and E. Perfect (1999), Simulation and testing of self-similar structures for soil particle-size distributions using iterated function systems, Geoderma 88, 3–4, 191–203, DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(98) 00104-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten, M.Th. (1980), A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 5, 892–898, DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, W. (1951), A statistical distribution function of wide application, J. Appl. Mech. 18, 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., J.A. Vomocil, and S.W. Childs (1990), Pore size, particle size, aggregate size, and water retention, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 4, 952–956, DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400040002x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R.A. (1980), Characteristics of eroded sediment, Trans. ASAE 23, 5, 1139–1142, 1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, A., M. Huang, and Z. Shi (2008), Evaluation of parameter models for estimation loess soil particle-size distribution, Trans. CSAE 2008-01, DOI: CNKI:SUN:NYGU.0.2008-01-000 (in Chinese with English abstract).

  • Zhao, P., M. Shao, and J. Zhuang (2009), Fractal features of particle size redistributions of deposited soils on the dam farmlands, Soil Sci. 174, 7, 403–407, DOI: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3181aea79a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, J., Y. Jin, and T. Miyazaki (2001), Estimating water retention characteristic from soil particle-size distribution using a non-similar media concept, Soil Sci. 166, 5, 308–321, DOI: 10.1097/00010694-200105000-00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-an Shao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, P., Shao, Ma. & Horton, R. Performance of soil particle-size distribution models for describing deposited soils adjacent to constructed dams in the China Loess Plateau. Acta Geophys. 59, 124–138 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-010-0037-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-010-0037-2

Key words

Navigation