Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to design the English syllabus for first semester students of the Islamic Education Study Program at IAIN Palopo. Based on the observation in June 2019, the researcher found several problems from the previous syllabus, such as the syllabus used general English, not specific English; the syllabus served a little portion of the discussion on topics of students’ needs and interests of Islamic Education. The research design used in this research was Research and Development (R&D) utilized the 4D model. It consists of defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. The procedures included analyzing English materials needed by the students of the Islamic Education study program then design the syllabus. The designed English syllabus for students of the Islamic Education study program at IAIN Palopo includes learning goals, learning material, learning methodology, learning indicators, and learning media. The product was tried out to the second semester of students of the Islamic Education study program at IAIN Palopo. The instruments were used in this research were questionnaires for need analysis and observation sheets for three expert validators and students’ perception. In this research, three experts were involved in order to validate the product. There were five systematic aspects that they validate of the product: Format Syllabus, Syllabus Content, Language and Writing, and Time allocation. Therefore, the result indicated that based on the experts’ validation as well as try-out design result, the product of this research was appropriate to be applied for students of the Islamic study program in the first semester as the primary syllabus for the English course.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Reski Jayanti Sagita, State Islamic Institute of Palopo, Indonesia

     

 

 

Sahraini Sahraini, State Islamic Institute of Palopo, Indonesia

     

 

 

Andi Tenrisanna Syam, State Islamic Institute of Palopo, Indonesia

     

 

 

How to Cite
Sagita, R. J., Sahraini, S., & Syam, A. T. (2020). Designing English Syllabus for Islamic Education Study Program at IAIN Palopo. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v1i1.4

References

  1. Al-Manduriy, Shohibul Muttaqien. “The Need To Use Contrastive Analysis for Elt in Islamic Higher Education Institutions.” OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra 12, no. 1 (2018): 87. doi:10.19105/ojbs.v12i1.1764.
  2. Amin, Kamarudin. “Standar Kompetensi Lulusan (SKL) Dan Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan (CPL) Program Studi Jenjang Sarjana Pada Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Dan Fakultas Agama Islam (FAI) Pada Perguruan Tinggi,” 2018. http://diktis.kemenag.go.id/NEW/file/dokumen/2815324462893280LFULL.pdf.
  3. Arifin, Zainal. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, 2013.
  4. Badruddin, Dahniar. “Developing a Task-Based Syllabus Based on Needs Analysis for Midwifery At Uin Alauddin Makassar.” ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning and Research Journal) 1, no. 1 (2016): 112–30. doi:10.24252/eternal.v11.2015.a4.
  5. Barathayomi, Wieka, Dina Rachmawati, and Rita Handayani. “Designing English for Specific Purpose Syllabus for Editing Course.” The Journal of English Language Studies 01, no. 02 (2016): 2527–7022.
  6. Basturkmen, Helen. Developing Course in English for Specific Purposes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  7. Borg, and Gall. Education Research: An Introduction. London: Longman, 1983.
  8. Carver, D. “Some Prepositions about ESP.” The ESP Journal 2, no. 2 (1983): 131–37.
  9. Darajat, Zakiah. Materi Pokok Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jakarta: Proyek Pembinaan Pendidikan Agama Islam Pada Perguruan Tinggi Depag dan Universitas Terbuka Depdikbud, 1993.
  10. ———. Metodik Khusus Pengajaran Agama Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.
  11. Dick, Walter, and Lou Carey. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Addison-Wesley Educational Publisher Inc, 2001.
  12. Douglas L., Susan, and Munir A. Shaikh. “Defining Islamic Education.” Current Issues in Comparative Education 7, no. 1 (2004): 5–18. doi:10.1109/PDP.2007.55.
  13. Dudley-Evans, T, and MJ St. John. Development in English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  14. Gerlach, V.S., and D.P. Ely. Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1980.
  15. Habanakah, Abdurrahman. Pokok-Pokok Akidah Islam. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 1998.
  16. Hall, Stephen, and David Crabbe. English for Business and Technology Course Design. Singapore: SEAMEO RELC, 1994.
  17. Hutchinson, Tom, and Alan Waters. English for Specific Purposes. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  18. Ibrahim, Adzikra. “Pengertian Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Accessed June 30, 2020. https://pengertiandefinisi.com/pengertian-pendidikan-agama-islam/.
  19. Idham, Khalid. “AKAR-AKAR DAKWAH ISLAMIYAH (AKIDAH, IBADAH, DAN SYARIAH).” Orasi Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi 8, no. 1 (2017): 68–85.
  20. Ilham, D. (2020). The Challenge of Islamic Education and How to Change. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i1.16
  21. Johns, A.M. English for Specific Purposes (ESP): Its History and Contributions. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 1991.
  22. Jono, Ali Akbar (Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris IAIN Bengkulu). “Studi Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kkni Pada Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Di Lptk Se-Kota Bengkulu.” MANHAJ 4, no. 1 (2017). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/mhj.v4i1.148.
  23. Krahnke, K.J. Approaches to Syllabus for Foreign Language Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1987.
  24. Long, Michael H. “Overview: A Rationale for Needs Analysis and Needs Analysis Research.” Second Language Needs Analysis, 2010, 1–16. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667299.001.
  25. Majid, Abdul, and Dian Andayani. Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Kompetensi Konsep Dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, 2004.
  26. Mataram, Iain. “Developing English for Islamic Studies for Students of Islamic Education Department Mataram State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN Mataram) Muhsinin.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional ISBN (2013): 978–602.
  27. Matejka, Ken, and Lance B. Kurke. “Designing a Great Syllabus.” College Teaching 42, no. 3 (1994). doi:10.1080/87567555.1994.9926838.
  28. McKey, S. “Syllabus: Structural, Situational, and Notional.” TESOL Newsletter 12, no. 5 (1978).
  29. Nunan, D. Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
  30. Nurwandani, Paristiyani, Ridwan Roy Tutupoho, and Edy Mulyono. “Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum. Kementrian Riset, Teknologi Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran Dan Kemahasiswaan Direktorat Pembelajaran.,” 2016, 79.
  31. Print. Curriculum Development and Design. 2nd ed. Australia: Allenand Uuwin, 1993.