바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

한국어판 정당한 세상에 대한 믿음 척도 (Belief in a Just World Scale: K-BJWS)의 타당화

Validation of the Korean Version of the Belief in a Just World Scale (K-BJWS)

초록

정당한 세상에 대한 믿음 (Belief in a Just World; BJW)은 세상은 정당하며 사람들은 자신이 노력한 만큼 그 보상을 받는다는 믿음으로 해외에서는 개인의 심리적 건강과 사회적 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 활발하게 연구되어 왔다. 하지만 아직까지 우리나라에서는 BJW를 측정하는 도구를 찾아보기 어렵다. 이에 본 연구에서는 미국에서 개발되어 BJW을 측정하는 도구로써 유용성을 인정받은 “정당한 세상에 대한 믿음 척도: 분배공정성과 절차공정성(Procedural and Distributive Just World Belief Scale; PDJWBS)”을 한국어로 번안 및 타당화하였다. 이를 위해 연구표본 1(대학생 266명)과 연구표본 2(성인 231명)를 대상으로 탐색적 및 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 원척도와 동일하게 4개 하위요인 16문항이 적절한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 수렴타당도, 준거타당도, 문화적 타당도를 확인한 결과, 한국어판 정당한 세상에 대한 믿음 척도(The Korean Version of the Belief in a Just World Scale; K-BJWS)는 한국인에게 사용하기에 타당한 도구로 확인되었다. 4개 하위요인의 신뢰도는 .83∼.90으로 나타났다.

keywords
정당한 세상에 대한 믿음 척도, 요인구조, 타당화, 신뢰도, Belief in a Just World Scale, factor analysis, validity, reliability

Abstract

Belief in a just world (BJW), that the world is just and people get what they deserve, has been studied as a cognitive factor and predictor for mental health and social attitudes. As no valid scale measuring BJW exists in Korea, the purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Procedural and Distributive Just World Belief Scale (PDJWBS), a scale currently utilized in the United States to measure BJW. Two samples, one with 266 college students and another with 231 adults were used. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses resulted in 16 items and 4 factors, identical to the original scale. The tests of convergent validity, concurrent validity, and cross-cultural validity revealed strong evidence for the validity of the Korean version of the Belief in a Just World Scale and the reliabilities of the four factors were .83∼.90.

keywords
정당한 세상에 대한 믿음 척도, 요인구조, 타당화, 신뢰도, Belief in a Just World Scale, factor analysis, validity, reliability

참고문헌

1.

권현수 (2013). 한국어판 빈곤에 대한 태도 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도 평가–영남지역 대학생을 중심으로. 한국지역사회복지학, 47(4), 257-282.

2.

김기범 (1996). 대인관계 속에서의 도덕성과 내집단-외집단 수별: 문화 비교 분석 연구. 중앙대학교 석사학위 논문.

3.

김은하, 김도연, 김수용 (2016). 정당한 세상에대한 믿음이 일반 성인들의 화병 증상에미치는 영향: 분배공정성과 절차공정성을중심으로. 상담학연구, 17(5), 25-45.

4.

김은하, 김혜림 (2015). 기혼여성의 생활스트레스와 화병간의 관계: 내외통제성을 통한정당한 세상에 대한 믿음의 매개된 조절효과. 상담학연구, 16(5), 1-15.

5.

김주희, 유정원, 송인한 (2015). 사회경제적 박탈이 우울에 미치는 영향. 보건사회연구원, 35(3), 42-70.

6.

박지원 (1985). 사회적 지지척도 개발을 위한 일연구. 연세대학교 박사학위논문.

7.

박현경, 이영희 (2004). 집단상담 참가자의 개인주의-집단주의 성향, 상담자 역할기대 및 치료적 요인 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 16(4), 571-596.

8.

배병렬 (2011). AMOS 19 구조방정식 모델링-원리와 실제. 서울: 도서출판 청람.

9.

양병화 (1998). 다변량 자료분석의 이해와 활용. 서울: 학지사.

10.

엄나연, 김은하 (2016). 취업스트레스가 우울과심리적 안녕감에 미치는 영향과 자아탄력성 및 사회적 지지의 조절효과. 산학기술학회지, 17(5), 619-630.

11.

유명순 (2016). 사회정신 불건강의 조건과 맥락. 서울대학교 사회발전연구소 학회 세미나.

12.

유혜진 (2013). 개인주의와 집단주의 문화성향이친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향–북한이탈 청소년을 대상으로 한 공공재 게임을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.

13.

윤혜정 (1993). 청소년의 일상적 스트레스와 사회관계망 지지 지각. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.

14.

이현진 (2009). 대학생이 지각한 사회적 지지와진로태도성숙 및 진로준비행동과의 관계. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.

15.

전겸구, 최상진, 양병창 (2001). 통합적 한국판CES-D 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 6(1), 59-76.

16.

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.

17.

Atherton, C. R., Gemmel, R. J., Haagenstad, S., Holt, D. J., Jensen, L. A., O’Hara, D. F., & Rehner, T. A. (1993). Measuring attitudes toward poverty: A new scale. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 29(4), 28-30.

18.

Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79-98.

19.

Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

20.

Dzuka, J., & Dalbe rt, C. (2002). Mental health and personality of Slovak unemployed adolescents: About the belief in a just world’s impact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 732-757.

21.

Fischer, R., & Smith, P. B. (2006). Who cares about justice? The moderating effect of values on the link between organizational justice and work behavior. Applied Psychology, 55(4), 541-562.

22.

Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world:Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 795-817.

23.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

24.

Hatfield, E., Walster, E. H., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

25.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.

26.

Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory:Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 818-919.

27.

Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260-265.

28.

Khera, M. L., Harvey, A. J., & Callan, M. J. (2014). Beliefs in a just world, subjective well-being and attitudes toward refugees among refugee workers. Social Justice Research, 27(4), 432-443.

29.

Jason, L. (2015, October 2). Psychology of Hell Joseon. The Korean Times. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2016/01/352_187869.html

30.

Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer Science & Business Media.

31.

Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 767-780.

32.

Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(11), 1171-1178.

33.

Lipkus, I., M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 666-677.

34.

Lucas, T. (2009). Justifying outcomes versus processes: Procedural and distributive justice beliefs as predictors of positive and negative affectivity. Current Psychology, 28(4), 249-265.

35.

Lucas, T., Alexander, S., Firestone, I. J., & Lebreton, J. M. (2007). Development and initial validation of a procedural and distributive just world measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 71-82.

36.

Lucas, T., Kamble, S. V., Wu, M. S., Zhdanova, L., & Wendorf, C. A. (2016). Distributive and procedural justice for self and others:Measurement invariance and links to life satisfaction in four countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(2), 234-248.

37.

Lucas, T., Rudolph, C., Zhdanova, L., Barkho, E., & Weidner, N. (2014). Distributive justice for others, collective angst, and support for exclusion of immigrants. Political Psychology, 35(6), 775-793.

38.

Lucas, T., Young, J. D., Zhdanova, L., & Alexander, S. (2010). Self and other justice beliefs, impulsivity, rumination, and forgiveness:Justice Beliefs can both prevent and promote forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 851-856.

39.

Lucas, T., Zhdanova, L., & Alexander, S. (2011). Procedural and distributive beliefs for self and others: Assessment of a four-factor individual differences model. Journal of Individual Differences, 32(1), 14-25.

40.

Mackintosh, M., Morland, L. A., Kloezeman, K., Greene, C. J., Rosen, C. S., Elhai, J. D., et al. (2014). Predictors of anger treatment outcomes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(10), 905-913.

41.

MacLeod, B. P. (2014, January 24). Addressing clients’ prejudices in counseling. Counseling Today. Retrieved from http://ct.counseling.org/2014/01/addressing-clients-prejudices-in-counseling/

42.

McClintock, C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement, and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 121-137.

43.

Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(1), 1-25.

44.

Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A selfreport depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401.

45.

Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reaction to another’s lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 29(4), 73-93.

46.

Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Science, 31(3), 65-89.

47.

Seligman, M. E., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61(8), 774-788.

48.

Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural Research, 29(3), 240-275.

49.

Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

50.

Sutton, R., & Douglas, K. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 637-645.

51.

Tajfel, H. (Ed.) (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

52.

Van Lange, P. A., Otten, W., DeBruin, E. M., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733-746.

53.

Ware, J. E., Harris, W. J., Gandek, B., Rogers, B. W., & Reese, P. R. (1997). MAP-for windows: Multitrait/multi-item program-revised user’s guide. Boston, VA: Health Assessment Lab.

54.

Wu, M. S., Sutton, M. R., Yan, X., Zhou, C., Chen, Y., & Han, B. (2013). Time frame and justice motive: Future perspective moderates the adaptive function of general belief in a just world. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80668.

55.

Wu, S. T., Wang, L., Zhou, M. J., Wang, W. Z., & Zhang, J. X. (2009). Belief in a just world and subjective well-being: Comparing disaster sites with normal areas. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(3), 579-587.

logo