Home > Journals > Minerva Urology and Nephrology > Past Issues > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2017 April;69(2) > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2017 April;69(2):181-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2017 April;69(2):181-8

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02675-8

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Incidence and causes of urolithiasis in children between 0-2 years

Erkin SERDAROĞLU, Mahfuz AYDOĞAN, Kadriye ÖZDEMİR, Mustafa BAK

Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Dr Behcet Uz Child Disease And Surgery Education And Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey


PDF


BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis (UL) is a common problem in pediatric nephrology practice. About 9-23% of all pediatric UL cases consist of patients under 1 years old. The aim of the present study was to determine etiologic causes, clinical features and short term prognosis of urolithiasis in the first two years of life.
METHODS: Two-hundred children between 0-2 years of age (mean age 10.3±6.1 months) with urolithiasis were included to the study. All children were completely evaluated for urolithiasis etiology. Patients were followed for at least 1 year with 3-month follow-up intervals.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 36.2 months. Family history was positive for urolithiasis in 99 (49.5%) patients. The cause of admission were urinary tract infection and related symptoms in 101 (50.5%), incidentally during imaging for other causes in 40 (20%), stone passage in 21 (10.5%), hematuria in 18 (9%), voiding difficulty in 14 (7%) and antenatal detected urinary anomaly in 6 (3%) patients. Accompanying urinary anomalies (anatomical defects) in 51 (25.5%) patients were detected primarily including vesiculoureteral reflux (VUR) in 32 (62.9%) of them. Development of new stones was determined in 45 (22.5%) patients in the first year, in 15 (22%) patients in the second year and in 8 (36.3%) patients in the third year.
CONCLUSIONS: In result, among pediatric urinary stone diseases, infantile UL appears to be a seperate clinical entity in terms of both the etiological characteristics and the clinical course of the disease. Furthermore, when an infant is presented with nonspecific symptoms for kidney stone, a renal ultrasonography could be performed for detecting nephrolithiasis.


KEY WORDS: Urolithiasis - Calculi - Urinary tract infections - Infant

top of page