本研究の目的は日本語と韓国語のポライトネス・ストラテジーを分析し、両言語の共通点と相違点を明らかにすることである。日本のテレビ・ドラマとそれをリメークした韓国のテレビ・ドラマを対象とし、そのドラマに現れたポジティブ・ポライトネス・ストラテジー(以下、PPS)とネガティブ・ポライトネス・ストラテジー(以下、NPS)に関して3段階の分析プロセスを通して両言語の異同を分析した。1段階では両国で共通の場面を抽出し、その場面の会話を書き起こすプロセスを通してテキスト化した。2段階ではPPSとNPSの頻度や割合を調査し、量的分析をした。3段階ではポライトネスの核心的概念として「距離」を抽出し、主題語によって会話のテキストを範疇化し、質的分析を行った。主題語として「心の距離を縮める対話」「距離を維持する対話」「遠近調節のバランスの良い対話」という3つのカテゴリーを設定し、その下位範疇として「親交を全面に出した説得」「盛んな勧め」「目上の尊重」「控え目な発話」「理性的な反応」「遠近調節のバランスの良い会話」という6つを設定した。分析の結果、日韓の共通点もあれば、相違点も見つけることができた。
The purpose of this study is to analyze politeness strategies and discovering similarities and differences between Japanese and Korean. Based on Japanese TV dramas and Korean remakes of these dramas, similarities and differences between the two languages were analyzed through the 3-step analysis process regarding positive politeness strategy (PPS from here on) and negative politeness strategy (NPS from here on). In the first step, common scenes were extracted and the conversations were transcribed into texts. In the second step, the frequency of PPS and NPS were counted and qualitatively analyzed in the microscopic perspective. In the step 3, the ‘distance’, the essential concept of politeness, was extracted and the transcription was categorized according to the topic for a qualitative analysis in the macroscopic perspective. For the categorization, there were 3 categories: conversations ‘which narrow the distance between minds’, ‘which maintain the distance’, and ‘which have a balanced perspective’. There were 6 subcategories as subthemes. The analysis result showed that there were many similarities and some differences. For further research, I would like to analyze the polite strategy based on daily conversations in the two languages.
The purpose of this study is to analyze politeness strategies and discovering similarities and differences between Japanese and Korean. Based on Japanese TV dramas and Korean remakes of these dramas, similarities and differences between the two languages were analyzed through the 3-step analysis process regarding positive politeness strategy (PPS from here on) and negative politeness strategy (NPS from here on). In the first step, common scenes were extracted and the conversations were transcribed into texts. In the second step, the frequency of PPS and NPS were counted and qualitatively analyzed in the microscopic perspective. In the step 3, the ‘distance’, the essential concept of politeness, was extracted and the transcription was categorized according to the topic for a qualitative analysis in the macroscopic perspective. For the categorization, there were 3 categories: conversations ‘which narrow the distance between minds’, ‘which maintain the distance’, and ‘which have a balanced perspective’. There were 6 subcategories as subthemes. The analysis result showed that there were many similarities and some differences. For further research, I would like to analyze the polite strategy based on daily conversations in the two languages.
