Abstract
Invasive fungal disease continues to be a problem associated with significant morbidity and high mortality in immunocompromised and, to a lesser extent, immunocompetent individuals. Triazole antifungals have emerged as front-line drugs for the treatment and prophylaxis of many systemic mycoses.Fluconazole plays an excellent role in prophylaxis, empirical therapy, and the treatment of both superficial and invasive yeast fungal infections. Voriconazole is strongly recommended for pulmonary invasive aspergillosis. Posaconazole shows a very wide spectrum of activity and its primary clinical indications are as salvage therapy for patients with invasive aspergillosis and prophylaxis for patients with neutropenia and haematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. Itraconazole also has a role in the treatment of fungal skin and nail infections as well as dematiaceous fungi and endemic mycoses. Fluconazole and voriconazole are well absorbed and exhibit high oral bioavailability, whereas the oral bioavailability of itraconazole and posaconazole is lower and more variable. Posaconazole absorption depends on administration with a high-fat meal or nutritional supplements. Itraconazole and voriconazole undergo extensive hepatic metabolism involving the cytochrome P450 system. The therapeutic window for triazoles is narrow, and inattention to their pharmacokinetic properties can lead to drug levels too low for efficacy or too high for good tolerability or safety. This makes these agents prime candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Target drug concentrations for voriconazole and itraconazole should be >1 μg/mL and for posaconazole >1.5 mg/mL for treatment. Blood should be drawn once the patient reaches steady state, which occurs after 5 and 7 days of triazole therapy. Routine TDM of fluconazole is not required given its highly favourable pharmacokinetic profile and wide therapeutic index. The aim of this review is to provide a brief update on the pharmacology, activity, clinical efficacy, safety and cost of triazole agents (itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole) and highlight the clinical implications of similarities and differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vfend [package insert]. New York: Pfizer Inc., 2010
Sporanox oral solution [package insert]. Raritan (NJ): Orth Biotech Products, L.P., 2003
Noxafil [package insert]. Kenilworth (NJ): Schering-Plough, 2009
Diflucan [package insert]. New York: Pfizer Inc., 2010
Slavin MA, Osborne B, Adams R, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after marrow transplantation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Infect Dis 1995; 171: 1545–52
Rex JH, Bennett JE, Sugar AM, et al. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. Candidemia Study Group and the National Institute. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1325–30
Glasmacher A, Cornely O, Ullmann AJ, et al. An open-label randomized trial comparing itraconazole oral solution with fluconazole oral solution for primary prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancy and profound neutropenia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 57: 317–25
Glasmacher A, Prentice A, Gorschluter M, et al. Itraconazole prevents invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients treated for hematologic malignancies: evidence from a meta-analysis of 3,597 patients. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 4615–26
Marr KA, Crippa F, Leisenring W, et al. Itraconazole versus fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants. Blood 2004; 103: 1527–33
Winston DJ, Maziarz RT, Chandrasekar PH, et al. Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous and oral fluconazole for long-term antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients: a multicenter, randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 705–13
Caillot D. Intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole for the treatment of amphotericin-B-refractory invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Acta Haematol 2003; 109: 111–8
Caillot D, Bassaris H, McGeer A, et al. Intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole in the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies, chronic granulomatous disease, or AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: e83–90
Denning DW, Lee JY, Hostetler JS, et al. NIAID Mycoses Study Group multicenter trial of oral itraconazole therapy for invasive Aspergillosis. Am J Med 1994; 97: 135–44
Dupont B. Itraconazole therapy in aspergillosis: study in 49 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 607–14
Denning DW, Riniotis K, Dobrashian R, et al. Chronic cavitary and fibrosing pulmonary and pleural aspergillosis: case series, proposed nomenclature change, and review. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37 Suppl. 3: S265–80
Stevens DA, Schwartz HJ, Lee JY, et al. A randomized trial of itraconazole in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 756–62
Kullberg BJ, Sobel JD, Ruhnke M, et al. Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in nonneutropenic patients: a randomised noninferiority trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1435–42
Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, et al. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 408–15
Schwartz S, Ruhnke M, Ribaud P, et al. Improved outcome in central nervous system aspergillosis, using voriconazole treatment. Blood 2005; 106: 2641–5
Mouas H, Lutsar I, Dupont B, et al. Voriconazole for invasive bone aspergillosis: a worldwide experience of 20 cases. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40: 1141–7
Jain LR, Denning DW. The efficacy and tolerability of voriconazole in the treatment of chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis. J Infect 2006; 52: e133–7
Ullmann AJ, Lipton JH, Vesole DH, et al. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 335–47
Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, et al. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 348–59
Mohr J, Johnson M, Cooper T, et al. Current options in antifungal pharmacotherapy. Pharmacotherapy 2008; 28: 614–45
Groll AH, Gea-Banacloche JC, Glasmacher A, et al. Clinical pharmacology of antifungal compounds. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2003; 17: 159–91
Warrilow AG, Martel CM, Parker JE, et al. Azole binding properties of Candida albicans sterol 14-alpha demethylase (CaCYP51). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 4235–45
Lass-Flörl C, Mayr A, Perkhofer S, et al. Activities of antifungal agents against yeasts and filamentous fungi: assessment according to the methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 3637–41
Van de Velde VJ, Van Peer AP, Heykants JJ, et al. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of a new hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin formulation of itraconazole. Pharmacotherapy 1996; 16: 424–8
Lass-Flörl C. The changing face of epidemiology of invasive fungal diseases in Europe. Mycoses 2009; 52(3): 197–205
Denning DW, Hope WW. Therapy for fungal diseases: opportunities and priorities. Trends Microbiol 2010; 18: 195–204
Lipp HP. Clinical pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the antifungal extended-spectrum triazole posaconazole: an overview. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 70: 471–80
Li Y, Theuretzbacher U, Clancy CJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of posaconazole. Clin Pharmacokinet 2010; 49: 379–96
Purkins L, Wood N, Kleinermans D, et al. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of multiple-dose oral voriconazole. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 56 Suppl. 1: 17–23
Andes D. Clinical utility of antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2004; 17: 533–40
Purkins L, Wood N, Kleinermans D, et al. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists have no clinically significant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 56 Suppl. 1: 51–5
Zimmermann T, Yeates RA, Laufen H, et al. Influence of concomitant food intake on the oral absorption of two triazole antifungal agents, itraconazole and fluconazole. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 46: 147–50
Zimmermann T, Yeates RA, Riedel KD, et al. The influence of gastric pH on the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole: the effect of omeprazole. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 32: 491–6
Sporanox capsules [package insert]. Raritan (NJ): PriCara, 2009
Barone JA, Koh JG, Bierman RH, et al. Food interaction and steady-state pharmacokinetics of itraconazole capsules in healthy male volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37: 778–84
Van Peer A, Woestenborghs R, Heykants J, et al. The effects of food and dose on the oral systemic availability of itraconazole in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 36: 423–6
Ezzet F, Wexler D, Courtney R, et al. Oral bioavailability of posaconazole in fasted healthy subjects: comparison between three regimens and basis for clinical dosage recommendations. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44: 211–20
Courtney R, Radwanski E, Lim J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of posaconazole coadministered with antacid in fasting or nonfasting healthy men. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 804–8
Courtney R, Wexler D, Radwanski E, et al. Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of posaconazole in healthy adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 57: 218–22
Krishna G, Moton A, Ma L, et al. Pharmacokinetics and absorption of posaconazole oral suspension under various gastric conditions in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 958–66
Sansone-Parsons A, Krishna G, Calzetta A, et al. Effect of a nutritional supplement on posaconazole pharmacokinetics following oral administration to healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1881–3
Dodds-Ashley E. Management of drug and food interactions with azole antifungal agents in transplant recipients. Pharmacotherapy 2010; 30: 842–54
Arndt CA, Walsh TJ, McCully CL, et al. Fluconazole penetration into cerebrospinal fluid: implications for treating fungal infections of the central nervous system. J Infect Dis 1988; 157: 178–80
Foulds G, Brennan DR, Wajszczuk C, et al. Fluconazole penetration into cerebrospinal fluid in humans. J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 28: 363–6
Lutsar I, Roffey S, Troke P. Voriconazole concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue of guinea pigs and immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37: 728–32
Andes D, Pascual A, Marchetti O. Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: established and emerging indications. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 24–34
Nivoix Y, Ubeaud-Sequier G, Engel P, et al. Drug-drug interactions of triazole antifungal agents in multimorbid patients and implications for patient care. Curr Drug Metab 2009; 10: 395–409
Hafner V, Czock D, Burhenne J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of sulfobutyletherbeta-cyclodextrin and voriconazole in patients with end-stage renal failure during treatment with two hemodialysis systems and hemodiafiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 2596–602
Keating GM. Posaconazole. Drugs 2005; 65(11): 1553–67; discussion 1568-9
Wexler D, Courtney R, Richards W, et al. Effect of posaconazole on cytochrome P450 enzymes: a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004; 21: 645–53
Krieter P, Flannery B, Musick T, et al. Disposition of posaconazole following single-dose oral administration in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 3543–51
Andes D, Marchillo K, Conklin R, et al. Pharmacodynamics of a new triazole, posaconazole, in a murine model of disseminated candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 137–42
Andes D, Marchillo K, Stamstad T, et al. In vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new triazole, voriconazole, in a murine candidiasis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 3165–9
Andes D, Marchillo K, Stamstad T, et al. In vivo pharmacodynamics of a new triazole, ravuconazole, in a murine candidiasis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 1193–9
Andes D, van Ogtrop M. Characterization and quantitation of the pharmacodynamics of fluconazole in a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 2116–20
Louie A, Drusano GL, Banerjee P, et al. Pharmacodynamics of fluconazole in a murine model of systemic candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 1105–9
Andes D. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antifungals. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2006; 20: 679–97
Mavridou E, Bruggemann RJ, Melchers WJ, et al. Impact of cyp51A mutations on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of voriconazole in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 4758–64
Mavridou E, Bruggemann RJ, Melchers WJ, et al. Efficacy of posaconazole against three clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates with mutations in the cyp51A gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 860–5
Eiden C, Peyriere H, Tichit R, et al. Inherited long QT syndrome revealed by antifungals drug-drug interaction. J Clin Pharm Ther 2007; 32: 321–4
Esch JJ, Kantoch MJ. Torsades de Pointes ventricular tachycardia in a pediatric patient treated with fluconazole. Pediatr Cardiol 2008; 29: 210–3
Justo D, Zeltser D. Torsade de pointes induced by systemic antifungal agents: lessons from a retrospective analysis of published case reports. Mycoses 2006; 49: 463–70
Owens Jr RC, Nolin TD. Antimicrobial-associated QT interval prolongation: points of interest. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43: 1603–11
Pham CP, de Feiter PW, van der Kuy PH, et al. Long QTc interval and torsade de pointes caused by fluconazole. Ann Pharmacother 2006; 40: 1456–61
Prosser JM, Mills A, Rhim ES, et al. Torsade de pointes caused by polypharmacy and substance abuse in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus. Int J Emerg Med 2008; 1: 217–20
Tatetsu H, Asou N, Nakamura M, et al. Torsades de pointes upon fluconazole administration in a patient with acute myeloblastic leukemia. Am J Hematol 2006; 81: 366–9
Desta Z, Zhao X, Shin JG, et al. Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41: 913–58
Scholz I, Oberwittler H, Riedel KD, et al. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and bioavailability of the triazole anti-fungal agent voriconazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotype. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 68: 906–15
Trifilio S, Pennick G, Pi J, et al. Monitoring plasma voriconazole levels may be necessary to avoid subtherapeutic levels in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Cancer 2007; 109: 1532–5
Matsumoto K, Ikawa K, Abematsu K, et al. Correlation between voriconazole trough plasma concentration and hepatotoxicity in patients with different CYP2C19 genotypes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 34: 91–4
Pascual A, Calandra T, Bolay S, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with invasive mycoses improves efficacy and safety outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 201–11
Neely M, Rushing T, Kovacs A, et al. Voriconazole pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50: 27–36
Pascual A, Nieth V, Calandra T, et al. Variability of voriconazole plasma levels measured by new high-performance liquid chromatography and biomass methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 137–43
Smith J, Safdar N, Knasinski V, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1570–2
Imhof A, Schaer DJ, Schanz U, et al. Neurological adverse events to voriconazole: evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring. Swiss Med Wkly 2006; 136: 739–42
Denning DW, Ribaud P, Milpied N, et al. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 563–71
Tan K, Brayshaw N, Tomaszewski K, et al. Investigation of the potential relationships between plasma voriconazole concentrations and visual adverse events or liver function test abnormalities. J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 46: 235–43
Trifilio S, Ortiz R, Pennick G, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 509–13
Ullmann AJ, Cornely OA, Burchardt A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of posaconazole in patients with persistent febrile neutropenia or refractory invasive fungal infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 658–66
Gubbins PO, Krishna G, Sansone-Parsons A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of oral posaconazole in neutropenic stem cell transplant recipients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1993–9
Kohl V, Muller C, Cornely A, et al. Factors influencing pharmacokinetics of prophylactic posaconazole in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 207–12
Krishna G, Parsons A, Kantesaria B, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole and rifabutin following coadministration to healthy men. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23: 545–52
Jain R, Pottinger P. The effect of gastric acid on the absorption of posaconazole [letter]. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46(10): 1627; author reply 1627-8
Jang SH, Colangelo PM, Gobburu JV. Exposure-response of posaconazole used for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections: evaluating the need to adjust doses based on drug concentrations in plasma. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010; 88: 115–9
Mayr A, Lass-Flörl C. Epidemiology and antifungal resistance in invasive Aspergillosis according to primary disease: review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2011; 16: 153–7
Binder U, Lass-Flörl C. Epidemiology of invasive fungal infections in the mediterranean area. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. Epub 2011 Mar 31
Lewis RE. Antifungal drug monitoring. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 2010; 4: 158–67
Hope WW, Billaud EM, Lestner J, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring for triazoles. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2008; 21: 580–6
Perkhofer S, Lass-Flörl C, Hell M, et al. The Nationwide Austrian Aspergillus Registry: a prospective data collection on epidemiology, therapy and outcome of invasive mould infections in immunocompromised and/or immunosuppressed patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 36: 531–6
Gafter-Gvili A, Vidal L, Goldberg E, et al. Treatment of invasive candidal infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2008; 83: 1011–21
Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Oude Lashof AM, Kullberg BJ, et al. Voriconazole salvage treatment of invasive candidiasis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 22: 651–5
Perfect JR, Marr KA, Walsh TJ, et al. Voriconazole treatment for less-common, emerging, or refractory fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 1122–31
Steinbach WJ, Benjamin Jr DK, Kontoyiannis DP, et al. Infections due to Aspergillus terreus: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 83 cases. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 192–8
Walsh TJ, Raad I, Patterson TF, et al. Treatment of invasive aspergillosis with posaconazole in patients who are refractory to or intolerant of conventional therapy: an externally controlled blinded trial. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 2–12
Mukherjee PK, Sheehan DJ, Hitchcock CA, et al. Combination treatment of invasive fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18: 163–94
Lyseng-Williamson KA. Posaconazole: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease in immunocompromised hosts. Pharmacoeconomics 2011 Mar 1; 29(3): 251–68
Jansen JP, O’Sullivan AK, Lugtenburg E, et al. Economic evaluation of posaconazole versus fluconazole prophylaxis in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the Netherlands. Ann Hematol 2010; 89: 919–26
Stam WB, O’Sullivan AK, Rijnders B, et al. Economic evaluation of posaconazole vs. standard azole prophylaxis in high risk neutropenic patients in the Netherlands. Eur J Haematol 2008; 81: 467–74
Greiner RA, Meier Y, Papadopoulos G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole compared with standard azole therapy for prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients at high risk in Switzerland. Oncology 2010; 78: 172–80
Dranitsaris G, Khoury H. Posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing intensive cytotoxic therapy for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasis: a cost effectiveness analysis. Support Care Cancer 2010; 19(11): 1807–13
Al-Badriyeh D, Liew D, Stewart K, et al. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63: 197–208
Al-Badriyeh D, Heng SC, Neoh CF, et al. Pharmacoeconomics of voriconazole in the management of invasive fungal infections. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2010; 10: 623–36
Sohn HS, Lee TJ, Kim J, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Korea. Clin Ther 2009; 31: 1105–15
Pechlivanoglou P, Vries RD, Daenen SM, et al. Cost benefit and cost effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients treated for haematological malignancies: reviewing the available evidence. Pharmacoeconomics 2011; 29(9): 737–51
Menzin J, Meyers JL, Friedman M, et al. Mortality, length of hospitalization, and costs associated with invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66: 1711–7
Wilson LS, Reyes CM, Stolpman M, et al. The direct cost and incidence of systemic fungal infections. Value Health 2002; 5: 26–34
Acknowledgements
No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this review. In the past 5 years, the author has received grant support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) P174840, MFF Tirol, Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Schering Plough and Merck Sharp and Dohme. She has been an advisor/consultant to Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer and Schering Plough. She has been paid for talks on behalf of Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma and Schering Plough.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lass-Flörl, C. Triazole Antifungal Agents in Invasive Fungal Infections. Drugs 71, 2405–2419 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11596540-000000000-00000
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11596540-000000000-00000