Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Techniques for Health Status Measurement in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Disease Management
  • Published:
BioDrugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measuring health status in rheumatoid arthritis is complex, and there are a number of methods available. These range from observed measures of function to broader measures of general health status or quality of life which can be assessed by questionnaires which are completed by the patient or administered by a trained interviewer. The choice of measure depends on the purpose of measurement and the context in which the measurement is being made. Many of the measures available (for example, the SF-36) were developed for use in research and have not been adopted for widespread clinical use. There are, however, some measures, such as the disease repercussion profile, which were developed specifically as clinical tools, or which lend themselves to clinical use by virtue of their ease of completion and their clinical meaningfulness.

The choice of method will depend on the purpose of measurement, the question being asked and the instrument the investigator feels most comfortable with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liang M. The historical and conceptual framework for functional assessment in rheumatic disease. J Rheumatol 1987; 14Suppl. 15: 2–5

    Google Scholar 

  2. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences: I. Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 345–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Impairments Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva. WHO, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: international classification of impairments, activities and participation. A manual of dimensions of disablement and functioning: beta-1 draft for field trials. Geneva: WHO, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements. JAMA 1994; 272: 619–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinbroker O, Trager CH, Batterman RC. Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA 1949; 140: 659–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 498–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stucki G, Stoll T, Bruhlmann P, et al. Construct validation of the ACR 1991 revised criteria for global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1995; 13: 349–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson II, Felson DT, Meenan RF, et al. Which traditional measures should be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials? Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 1093–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pincus T, Callahan LF, Vaughn WK. Questionnaire, walking time and button test measures of functional capacity as predictive markers for mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 240–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Newcomer KL, King HE, Mahowald ML. Validity and reliability of the timed-stands test for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic diseases. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 21–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang MR, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990; 28: 632–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carr AJ, Thompson PW, Young A. Do health status measures have a role in rheumatology? A survey of the use of and attitudes towards health status measures in the UK. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40Suppl.: S261

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stucki G, Sangha O. Clinical quality management: putting the pieces together. Arthritis Care Res 1996; 9: 405–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, et al. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980: 23: 137–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pincus T, Callahan LF. Rheumatology function tests: grip strength, walking time, button tests and questionnaires document and predict long-term morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 1051–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramey DR, Raynauld JP, Fries JF. The Health Assessment Questionnaire 1992: status and review. Arthritis Care Res 1992; 5: 119–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, et al. A generic health status instrument in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1992; 31: 87–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirwan JR, Reeback JS. Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire modified to assess disability in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1986; 25: 206–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart MW, Palmer DG, Knight RG, et al. A self-report articular index: relationship to variations in mood and disease activity measures. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32: 631–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tennant A, Hillman M, Fear J, et al. Are we making the most of the Standford Health Assessment Questionnaire? Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 574–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van den Ende CH, Hazes JM, Le Cessie S, et al. Discordance between objective and subjective assessment of functional ability of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34: 951–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci Jr SA, et al. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 1346–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ziebland S, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, et al. Comparison of two approaches to measuring change in health status in rheumatoid arthritis: the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and modified HAQ. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 1202–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolfe F. Data collection and utilization: a methodology for clinical practice and clinical research. In: Wolfe F, Pincus T, editors. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathogenesis, assessment, outcome, and treatment. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994: 463–514

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis: the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 146–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL. A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185: 914–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brook RH, Ware Jr JE, Davies-Avery A, et al. Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand’s Health Insurance Study. Med Care 1979; 17Suppl. 7: 1–131

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status index: category ratings versus magnitude estimation for measuring levels of well-being. Med Care 1979; 17: 501–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Katz JN, Larson MG, Philips CB, et al. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status measures. Med Care 1992; 30: 917–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brown JH, Kazis LE, Spitz PW, et al. The dimensions of health outcomes: a cross-validated examination of health status measurement. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 159–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Houssien DA, Choy EHS, Carr A, et al. The outcome of rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical practice: a comparison of different outcome measures [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40Suppl.: S152

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pincus T, Callahan LF, Sale WG, et al. Severe functional declines, worse disability, and increased mortality in seventy-five rheumatoid arthritis patients studied over nine years. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 864–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Reeback J, Simian A. Predictors of outcome at two years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J R Soc Med 1984; 77: 1002–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sherrer YS, Bloch DA, Mitchell DM, et al. The development of disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 494–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nevitt MC, Yelin EH, Henke CJ, et al. Risk factors for hospitalization and surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: implications for capitated medical payment. Ann Intern Med 1986 Sep; 105(3): 421–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sherrer YS, Block DA, Mitchell DM, et al. Disability in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of prognosis factors across three populations. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 705–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wolfe F, Kleinheksel SM, Cathey MA, et al. The clinical value of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Functional Disability Index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1480–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pincus T, Callahan LF, Brooks RH, et al. I: self-report questionnaire scores in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional physical, radiographic and laboratory measures. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 259–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kazis LE, Callahan LF, Meenan RF, et al. Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 1243–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Meenan RF. Response. Marketing and the American College of Rheumatology: a professional approach for a professional society. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 439–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Anderson KO, Keefe FJ, Bradley LA, et al. Prediction of pain behavior and functional status of rheumatoid arthritis patients using medical status and psychological variables. Pain 1988; 33: 25–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dailey PA, Bishop GD, Russell IJ, et al. Psychological stress and the fibrositis/fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 1380–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bell M, Bombardier C, Tugwell P. Measurement of functional status, quality of life, and utility in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 591–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. EuroQol Group. EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Carr-Hill R. A second opinion: health related quality of life measurement - Eurostyle. Health Policy 1992; 20: 321–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Brazier J, Harper R, Waterhouse J, et al. Comparison of outcome measures for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 5th European Health Services Research Conference; 1993 Dec: Maastricht

  48. Hurst NP, Kind P, Ruta D, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQuol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 551–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bergner M, Babbitt RA, Pollard WE. The Sickness Impact Profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976; 14: 57–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Patrick D. Standardisation of comparative health status measure: using scales developed in America in an English-speaking country. 3rd Biennial Conference on Health survey research methods; Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 1981

  51. Chambers L, MacDonald L, Tugwell P, et al. The McMaster Health Index Questionnaire as a measure of quality of life for patients with rheumatoid disease. J Rheumatol 1982; 9: 780–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hunt S, McEwen P, McKenna S. Measuring health status. London: Croom Helm, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hunt S, McEwen P. The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illness 1980; 2: 231–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19: 787–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Stross JK, Schumacher HR, Weisman MH, et al. Changing behavior and improving outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28: 1163–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick RA. Measurement of health status in patients with chronic illness: comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the General Health Questionnaire. Fam Pract 1990; 7: 121–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, et al. A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 429–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Fitzpatrick R, Newman S, Archer R, et al. Social support, disability and depression: a longitudinal study of rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 1991; 33: 605–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Mckenna S, Hunt S, Tennant A. The development of a patient-completed index of a completed index of distress from the Nottingham health profile: a new measure for use in cost-utility studies. J Med Econ 1993; 6: 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  61. Houssien DA, McKenna S, Scott DL. The Nottingham Health Profile as a measure of disease activity and outcome in RA. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Donovan JL, Frankel SJ, Eyles JD. Assessing the need for health status measures. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 158–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jenkinson C. Why are we weighting? A critical examination of the use of item weight in a health status measure. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 1413–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kind P, Car-Hill R. The NHP: a useful tool for epidemiologists? Soc Sci Med 1987; 25: 905–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Brook RH, Ware JE, Davies-Avery A, et al. Does free care improve adults’ health? Results from a randomised controlled trial. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 1426–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ware JE, Brook RH, Rogers WH, et al. Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care. Lancet 1986; I: 1017–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tarlove AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, et al. The Medical Outcome Study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 1989; 262: 925–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Brazier JE, Harper RA, Jones NMB, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 160–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1993; 29/306: 1437–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Jenkinson C, Peto V, Coulter A. Measuring change over time: a comparison of results from a global single item of health status and the multi-dimensional SF-36 health status survey questionnaire in patients presenting with menorrhagia. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 317–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 1: 247–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JF, et al. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Talamo J, Frater A, Gallivan S, et al. Use of the short form 36 (SF36) for health status measurement in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 463–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Houssien DA, Whalley D, McKenna S, et al. The value of health status measures in the assessment of RA. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36Suppl. 1: 150

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hill S, Harries U, Popay J. Is the short form 36 (SF-36) suitable for routine health outcomes assessment in health care for older people? Evidence from preliminary work in community based health services in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: 94–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, et al. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Aging 1995; 24: 120–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Jenkinson C. MYMOP, a patient generated measure of outcomes: research into outcomes has moved away from symptom based assessments [letter]. BMJ 1996; 313: 626–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Tennant A, Hillman M, Chamberlain M, et al. Missing values and the MOS SF36. An over-55 year old sample with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38Suppl. 9: S178

    Google Scholar 

  79. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS Short Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26(7): 724–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 369–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Tuttleman M, Pillemer SR, Tilley BC, et al. A cross sectional assessment of health status instruments in patients with RA participating in a clinical trial. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 1910–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Ware JE, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, et al. An arthritis-specific SF-36 health index: development and cross-validation in relation to changes in disease severity. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39Suppl.: 90

    Google Scholar 

  83. de Jong Z, van der Heijde D, McKenna S, et al. The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis—specific quality of life instrument. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 878–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hunt SM, McKenna SR The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy 1992; 22: 307–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. McGee HM, O’Boyle CA, Hickey A, et al. Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population. Psychol Med 1991; 21: 749–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Hickey AM, Bury G, OBoyle CA, et al. A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ 1996; 313(7048): 29–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Carr AJ. A patient-centred approach to evaluation and treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: the development of a clinical tool to measure patient-perceived handicap. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 921–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, et al. The MACTAR patient preference disability questionnaire: an individualized functional priority approach for assessment of improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 44–51

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, et al. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard-item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 59–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Liang M, Larson M, Cullen K, et al. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28: 542–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Spector TD, Hochberg MC. An epidemiological approach to the study of outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1992; 6: 235–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical and Academic Rheumatology, King’s College Hospital (Dulwich), East Dulwich Grove, Dulwich, London, SE22 8PT, England

    Dhiya A Houssien & Alison J Carr

Authors
  1. Dhiya A Houssien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alison J Carr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhiya A Houssien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houssien, D.A., Carr, A.J. Techniques for Health Status Measurement in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis. BioDrugs 11, 21–30 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-199911010-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-199911010-00003

Keywords

Search

Navigation