Summary
In the past, post-stroke aphasia (in common with aphasia of other origin) has been treated mainly by means of logopaedic language therapy, i.e. language training provided by speech therapists. So-called ‘supportive drug therapy’ was not based on conclusions drawn from controlled studies. It appeared promising to complement language therapy with the administration of appropriate drugs, the efficacy of which had been demonstrated scientifically. In animal experiments and single photon emission tomography studies in patients with acute ischaemic stroke, piracetam has been shown to improve microcirculation and neuronal metabolism, and to enhance transmitter functions.
Two double-blind placebo-controlled studies in patients with chronic aphasia have demonstrated a beneficial effect of oral piracetam 4.8 g/day preceded by intravenous bolus injection of 12g, as measured by improvement in some functionally important scores of the Aachen Aphasia Test. In a further 3 double-blind placebo-controlled studies in patients with acute stroke, it was shown that improvement of aphasia was significantly greater in the group receiving piracetam than in the placebo group. Particular mention is made of a study (the Piracetam Acute Stroke Study) in patients with acute stroke. These patients received placebo or intravenous piracetam 12 g/day for 5 days followed by oral piracetam 12 g/day until the end of week 4, and 4 to 8 g/day until the end of week 8. After 12 weeks of treatment, significantly more piracetam-treated patients who had initially presented with aphasia were no longer aphasia compared with the placebo group.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Robey RR. The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons: a meta-analysis. Brain Lang 1994; 47: 582–608
Lincoln NB, McGuirk E, Mulley GP, et al. Effectiveness of speech therapy for aphasic stroke patients. Lancet 1984; 1: 1197–200
Hartmann J, Landau WM. Comparison of formal language therapy with supportive counselling for aphasia due to acute vascular accident. Arch Neurol 1987; 44: 646–9
Meikle M, Wechsler E, Tupper A-M, et al. Comparative trial of volunteer and professional treatments of dysphasia after stroke. BMJ 1979; 2: 87–9
Poeck K, Huber W, Willmes K. Outcome of intensive language treatment in aphasia. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 54: 471–9
Basso A. Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology 1992; 6(4): 337–48
Basso A, Capitani E, Vignolo LA. Influence of rehabilitation on language skills in aphasic patients. A controlled study. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 190–6
Wertz RT, Weiss DG, Aten JL, et al. Comparison of clinic, home and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Arch Neurol 1986; 43: 653–8
Huber W, Willmes K, Poeck K, et al. Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 245–50
Huber W, Poeck K, Willmes K. The Aachen Aphasia Test. In: FC Rose, editor. Progress in aphasiology. New York: Raven Press, 1984: 291–303
Enderby P, Broeckx J, Hospers W. Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. Clin Neuropharmacol 1994; 17: 320–31
Herrschaft H. Die Wirksamkeit von Piracetam bei der akuten zerebralen Ischamie des Menschen. Med Klin 1988; 83(20): 667–77
Platt D, Horn J, Summa J-D, et al. The efficacy of piracetam in geriatric patients with an acute cerebral ischaemia — a clinically controlled double-blind study. Med Welt 1992; 43: 181–90
De Deyn PP, De Reuck J, Deberdt W, et al. Treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with piracetam. Stroke 1997; 28: 2347–52
De Deyn PP, De Reuck J, Milonas I, et al. Piracetam Acute Stroke Study (PASS). Eur J Neurol 1996; 3Suppl. 5: 72
Enderby PM, Wood VA, Wade DT, et al. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1987; 8: 166–70
Giurgea C, Mouravieff-Lesuisse F, Leemans R. Corrélations électro-pharmacologiques au cours de l’anoxie axyprive chez le lapin en respiration libre ou artificielle. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1970; 122/6: 484–6
Müller W, Hartmann H, Koch S, et al. Neurotransmission in aging: therapeutic aspects. In: Racagni G, Brunello N, Langer SZ, editors. Recent advances in the treatment of neuro-degenerative disorders and cognitive dysfunction. Int Acad Biomed Drug Res 1994; 7: 166–73
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poeck, K. Piracetam Treatment in Post-Stroke Aphasia. Mol Diag Ther 9 (Suppl 1), 51–56 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199809001-00006
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199809001-00006