Skip to main content
Log in

Piracetam Treatment in Post-Stroke Aphasia

  • Review Article
  • Published:
CNS Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the past, post-stroke aphasia (in common with aphasia of other origin) has been treated mainly by means of logopaedic language therapy, i.e. language training provided by speech therapists. So-called ‘supportive drug therapy’ was not based on conclusions drawn from controlled studies. It appeared promising to complement language therapy with the administration of appropriate drugs, the efficacy of which had been demonstrated scientifically. In animal experiments and single photon emission tomography studies in patients with acute ischaemic stroke, piracetam has been shown to improve microcirculation and neuronal metabolism, and to enhance transmitter functions.

Two double-blind placebo-controlled studies in patients with chronic aphasia have demonstrated a beneficial effect of oral piracetam 4.8 g/day preceded by intravenous bolus injection of 12g, as measured by improvement in some functionally important scores of the Aachen Aphasia Test. In a further 3 double-blind placebo-controlled studies in patients with acute stroke, it was shown that improvement of aphasia was significantly greater in the group receiving piracetam than in the placebo group. Particular mention is made of a study (the Piracetam Acute Stroke Study) in patients with acute stroke. These patients received placebo or intravenous piracetam 12 g/day for 5 days followed by oral piracetam 12 g/day until the end of week 4, and 4 to 8 g/day until the end of week 8. After 12 weeks of treatment, significantly more piracetam-treated patients who had initially presented with aphasia were no longer aphasia compared with the placebo group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robey RR. The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons: a meta-analysis. Brain Lang 1994; 47: 582–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lincoln NB, McGuirk E, Mulley GP, et al. Effectiveness of speech therapy for aphasic stroke patients. Lancet 1984; 1: 1197–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartmann J, Landau WM. Comparison of formal language therapy with supportive counselling for aphasia due to acute vascular accident. Arch Neurol 1987; 44: 646–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meikle M, Wechsler E, Tupper A-M, et al. Comparative trial of volunteer and professional treatments of dysphasia after stroke. BMJ 1979; 2: 87–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Poeck K, Huber W, Willmes K. Outcome of intensive language treatment in aphasia. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 54: 471–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Basso A. Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology 1992; 6(4): 337–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basso A, Capitani E, Vignolo LA. Influence of rehabilitation on language skills in aphasic patients. A controlled study. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 190–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wertz RT, Weiss DG, Aten JL, et al. Comparison of clinic, home and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Arch Neurol 1986; 43: 653–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huber W, Willmes K, Poeck K, et al. Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 245–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huber W, Poeck K, Willmes K. The Aachen Aphasia Test. In: FC Rose, editor. Progress in aphasiology. New York: Raven Press, 1984: 291–303

    Google Scholar 

  11. Enderby P, Broeckx J, Hospers W. Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. Clin Neuropharmacol 1994; 17: 320–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrschaft H. Die Wirksamkeit von Piracetam bei der akuten zerebralen Ischamie des Menschen. Med Klin 1988; 83(20): 667–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Platt D, Horn J, Summa J-D, et al. The efficacy of piracetam in geriatric patients with an acute cerebral ischaemia — a clinically controlled double-blind study. Med Welt 1992; 43: 181–90

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Deyn PP, De Reuck J, Deberdt W, et al. Treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with piracetam. Stroke 1997; 28: 2347–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Deyn PP, De Reuck J, Milonas I, et al. Piracetam Acute Stroke Study (PASS). Eur J Neurol 1996; 3Suppl. 5: 72

    Google Scholar 

  16. Enderby PM, Wood VA, Wade DT, et al. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1987; 8: 166–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Giurgea C, Mouravieff-Lesuisse F, Leemans R. Corrélations électro-pharmacologiques au cours de l’anoxie axyprive chez le lapin en respiration libre ou artificielle. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1970; 122/6: 484–6

    Google Scholar 

  18. Müller W, Hartmann H, Koch S, et al. Neurotransmission in aging: therapeutic aspects. In: Racagni G, Brunello N, Langer SZ, editors. Recent advances in the treatment of neuro-degenerative disorders and cognitive dysfunction. Int Acad Biomed Drug Res 1994; 7: 166–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poeck, K. Piracetam Treatment in Post-Stroke Aphasia. Mol Diag Ther 9 (Suppl 1), 51–56 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199809001-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199809001-00006

Keywords

Navigation