Skip to main content
Log in

No room for kinkiness in a public healthcare system

  • Commentary
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Severens JL, Brunenberg DEM, Fenwick EAL, et al. Costeffectiveness acceptability curves and a reluctance to lose. Pharmacoeconomics 2005; 23 (12): 1187–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Brien BJ, Gertsen K, Willan AR, et al. Is there a kink in consumers’ threshold value for cost-effectiveness in health care? Health Econ 2002; 11: 175–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dowie J. Why cost effectiveness should trump (clinical) effectiveness: the ethical economics of the south-west quadrant. Health Econ 2004; 13: 453–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Dowie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dowie, J. No room for kinkiness in a public healthcare system. Pharmacoeconomics 23, 1203–1205 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200523120-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200523120-00004

Keywords

Navigation