독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식

@article{ART001879883},
author={ 최장근 },
title={독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식},
journal={日本文化學報},
issn={1226-3605},
year={2014},
number={61},
pages={241-260},
doi={10.21481/jbunka..61.201405.241},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.21481/jbunka..61.201405.241}

TY - JOUR
AU - 최장근
TI - 독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식
T2 - 日本文化學報
PY - 2014
VL -
IS - 61
PB - 한국일본문화학회
SP - 241-260
SN - 1226-3605
AB - The Japanese government require territorial sovereignty on Takeshima, Senkaku Islands, northern territories. Current Korea actually has managed Takeshima, and Japan has actually managed Senkaku Islands, and Russia has actually managed the Northern Territories. this study are analyzed Japan's territorial disputes between 1950 to 1970. In particular, The Japanese government was not claimed the Senkaku Islands and the Northern Territoriesfor less than Dokdo. The reason is as follows. South Korea managed effectively before the signing of the peace treaty. The reason is that Union recognized Dokdo as Korea territory in the peace treaty. In addition, The Japanese government has recognized Dokdo as Korea territory implicitly in the peace talks between Korea and Japan. However, the Government of Japan strongly argued for the sovereignty on Northern Territory. Okinawa was returned to Japan from the United States. then the United States had given the Jurisdiction right of Senkaku Islands to Japan. Taiwan and China demanded Senkaku Islands territorial sovereignty to the Japanese. Currently Japan and China are surrounding on the ownership of Senkaku Islands. Japan are in trouble for China to claim ownership of Senkaku Islands. Japan got in trouble for Russia does not give up ownership of the archipelago kulril.
KW - Senkaku Islands, daowi Island, Northern Territory, Kuril Islands, Dokdo, Takeshima
DO - 10.21481/jbunka..61.201405.241
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.21481/jbunka..61.201405.241
ER -

최장근 (2014). 독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식. 日本文化學報, 61, 241- 260.

최장근 . 2014, “독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식”, 日本文化學報, no. 61, pp. 241-260. Available from: doi:10.21481/jbunka..61.201405.241

최장근 “독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식” 日本文化學報 61 pp. 241-260 (2014): 241.

최장근 . 독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식 日本文化學報 [Internet]. 2014; 61: 241-260. Available from: doi:10.21481/jbunka..61.201405.241

최장근 . “독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식” 日本文化學報 no.61 (2014): 241-260. doi: 10.21481/jbunka..61.201405.241

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식

日本文化學報

약어 : -

2014, no.61, pp.241 - 260

DOI : 10.21481/jbunka..61.201405.241

발행기관 : 한국일본문화학회

연구분야 : 일본어와문학

최장근¹

¹대구대학교

인용한 논문 수 : - 서지 간략 보기

초록

The Japanese government require territorial sovereignty on Takeshima, Senkaku Islands, northern territories. Current Korea actually has managed Takeshima, and Japan has actually managed Senkaku Islands, and Russia has actually managed the Northern Territories. this study are analyzed Japan's territorial disputes between 1950 to 1970. In particular, The Japanese government was not claimed the Senkaku Islands and the Northern Territoriesfor less than Dokdo. The reason is as follows. South Korea managed effectively before the signing of the peace treaty. The reason is that Union recognized Dokdo as Korea territory in the peace treaty. In addition, The Japanese government has recognized Dokdo as Korea territory implicitly in the peace talks between Korea and Japan. However, the Government of Japan strongly argued for the sovereignty on Northern Territory. Okinawa was returned to Japan from the United States. then the United States had given the Jurisdiction right of Senkaku Islands to Japan. Taiwan and China demanded Senkaku Islands territorial sovereignty to the Japanese. Currently Japan and China are surrounding on the ownership of Senkaku Islands. Japan are in trouble for China to claim ownership of Senkaku Islands. Japan got in trouble for Russia does not give up ownership of the archipelago kulril.

키워드

Senkaku Islands, daowi Island, Northern Territory, Kuril Islands, Dokdo, Takeshima

참고문헌(15)

[단행본] 동북아역사재단편 / 2009 / 일본국회독도관련기록모음집 제1부 1948-1976년 / 동북아역사재단 : 1 ~ 1345
[단행본] 송병기 / 1999 / 울릉도와 독도 / 단국대학교 출판부 : 15 ~ 251
[단행본] 신용하 / 1996 / 독도의 민족영토사　연구 / 지식산업사 : 23 ~ 322
[단행본] 오오니시 토시테루 / 2011 / 독도개관 / 인문사 : 148 ~ 149
[학술지] 최장근 / 2010 / 한일협정에서 확인된 일본의 독도 영유권 주장의 한계성 - 비준국회(1965년 6월~12월)의 의회속기록을 중심으로 - / 일어일문학 (47) : 429 ~ 447
[단행본] 井上清 / 1972 / 「尖閣」列島 / 現代評論社 : 9 ~ 278
[단행본] 外務省国内広報課 / 2000 / われらの北方領土 / 外務省国内広報課 : 18
[단행본] 木村汎 / 1981 / 北方領土を考える / 北海道新聞社 : 88
[단행본] 下條正男 / 2004 / 竹島は日韓どちらのものか : 7 ~ 188
[단행본] 芹田健太郎 / 2002 / 日本の領土 / 中公叢書 : 52 ~ 66
[단행본] 戸丸広安監修 / 1993 / 北方領土　ー新聞編集ー　上巻1947年ー1979年 / 大空社 : 193
[단행본] 内藤正中 / 2007 / 竹島＝独島論争 / 新幹社 : 11 ~ 342
[단행본] 安岡昭男 / 2002 / 幕末維新の領土と外交 / 清文堂出版 : 227
[단행본] 毎日新聞社 / 1952 / 対日平和条約 / 毎日新聞社
[단행본] 和田春喜 / 1999 / 北方領土問題　ー歴史と未来ー / 朝日選書 : 219 ~ 228