Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 16

Research Advances in the Treatment of Riehl’s Melanosis

Authors Xu L, Huang Q, Wu T, Mu Y

Received 29 December 2022

Accepted for publication 21 April 2023

Published 4 May 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 1181—1189

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S403090

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jeffrey Weinberg



Liuli Xu, Qing Huang, Ting Wu, Yunzhu Mu

Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Yunzhu Mu, Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Riehl’s melanosis (RM) is a contact photodermatitis, with fast progressive gray-brown skin pigmentation as the main manifestation, which can seriously affect the psychology and physiology of patients. Currently, although the etiological factors of Riehl’s melanosis is still be unknown, the existing literature proves clearly the cause of it is related to the contacting with suspected allergens. For decades, there has been no standard method for the treatment of RM, but with both conventional drug therapy and laser therapy having been attempted. Topical application of bleaching agents is mainly used as an auxiliary treatment modality. The laser treatment modality remains a hot spot, among which Q-switched Nd:YAG laser is well received for RM. Positive outcomes have been achieved by the combined treatment modalities attempted in recent years also achieve positive outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to review and summarize recent advances in the treatment of the disease.

Keywords: Riehl’s melanosis, pigmented contact dermatitis, therapy

Introduction

Riehl’s melanosis, commonly considered as pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD) or pigmented cosmetic dermatitis, is regarded as a contact dermatitis to cosmetic products and perfume, which affects the appearance of patients.1 The disease was reported by Riehl during the First World War, and he attributed its cause to wartime food substitutes, mainly poor-quality flour.2 Later, some experts considered Riehl’s melanosis almost equivalent to PCD of the face or neck,3 and Nakayama4 considered it was mainly caused by allergies after exposure to cosmetic products. It develops over the face and neck with progressive hyperpigmentation as its clinical manifestation.1 The affected skin is texture rough, with grayish-black, grayish-brown, or purple-brown patches with finely powdered scales on the surface.5 Under the dermoscopy,6,7 brown or grey pseudonetwork, dots, globules and telangiectasias appeared in all patients. However, various stages mean different dermoscopic features through serial dermoscopy. In the initial stage, only pigment dots are observed, while it is featured by vacuolization of the stratum basale and slight pigment incontinence in histopathology. With the progress of the disease and severe pigment incontinence, the false network structure and grey dot-like pigment structure are finally formed (melanin bacteria diffusely destroys the dermis and eliminates the normal pigment network). Besides, follicular keratotic plugs and perifollicular whitish halo are also commonly found, with basal pigmentation, melanin cell proliferation, skin pigment incontinence, dilated vessels and inflammatory cell infiltration as the main histopathological manifestations.8 With the increasing prevalence of RM, the negative psychosocial impact of the disease has become wider. Up to now, there is no standard therapy for the pigmented cosmetic dermatitis and the treatment is still challenging. In this paper, therapies of Riehl’s melanosis are mainly reviewed and summarized.

Routine Therapy

Allergen Avoidance

Pigmented contact dermatitis, as the name implies, is mainly caused by contacting with suspected allergens, thus, avoiding contacting with allergens or staying away from occupational exposure environment is the key to the treatment. A study by Sharma et al9 has shown that the common allergens in Indian population may be preservatives (cetrimonium bromide, thimerosal and gallate mix), followed by hair dye components, fragrance components, nickel(II) sulfate hexahydrate, potassium dichromate and emulsifiers. Other reports showed that PCD is caused by henna,10–12 a kind of hair dye components. Recently, Hassan et al13 also reported a case of Riehl’s melanosis caused by ethylhexylglycerin, a synthetic compound used in many cosmetic products, like cleansers and sunscreens. Therefore, it is necessary to remove or stay away from pathogenic factors to prevent further progress and recurrence of Riehl’s melanosis. To date, some possible allergens that can cause RM have been tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1 Possible Allergens Causing Pigmented Contact Dermatitis

Sun Protection

Although no experimental report has shown the clear correlation between Riehl’s melanosis and ultraviolet exposure, the skin lesions usually occur on the face and neck, because they are easily exposed to ultraviolet light. Besides, Woo et al,14 by skin biopsy, showed that patients with Riehl’s melanosis have higher tissue expression of paracrine melanogenic molecules like SCF/c-kit. Human keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells can promote the production of SCF or c-kit after exposure to UV light. Therefore, the disease can be associated with ultraviolet radiation. Khanna15 suggests that people should try to avoid exercising during the peak hours of sunlight and use physical sunscreen (parasols and broad rimmed hats) or sunscreening cream timely. Meanwhile, it is necessary to avoid contacting sunscreens with allergens contained.

Drug Therapy

So far, it has been challenging to conduct treatment of intractable hyperpigmentation disease with drug therapies. For facial melanoses (FM), Riehl’s melanosis is one of the defined causes.15 Application of topical depigmenting agents alone shows varying degrees of efficacy in the treatment of FM. Hydroquinone (HQ) may be the gold standard for FM, azelaic acid, kojic acid, retinoids, glycolic acid, tretinoin and topical corticosteroids are also used for RM, but lack dependable and controlled clinical trials.15,16 In the future, meaningful statistical analysis is allowed to appear in the literatures’ study design. A case report by Iwayama12 found the patient’s pigmentation still persisted after various treatment drugs tried such as HQ ointments, ointments containing vitamin C, tranexamic acid (TA) tablets and other antihistamine tablets. Recommended drug therapy includes hydroquinone creams plus tretinoin or glycolic acid.16 In a prospective pilot study, Xu17 reported that oral tranexamic acid combined with glycyrrhizic acid could increase the curative effect of treatment of recalcitrant Riehl’s melanosis. They found that tranexamic acid directly inhibited melanin synthesis in melanocytes and inhibited neovascularization at the same time and glycyrrhizic acid, aiming to prevent or reduce the inflammatory response, could relieve the facial itchiness, erythema and edema of patients. The final result showed that mean Melanin Index (MI) and Erythema Index (EI) scores of ten RM patients were significantly decreased after six-month treatment. Yumei18 suggested that oral viaminate capsules combined with topical hydrocortisone butyrate cream had a good effect on the treatment of occupational melanosis with relatively few side effects. Thus, compared to the application of the decolorization agents alone, drug combinations are one of the significant therapy for RM patients. What is noteworthy is that in an open-label pilot study, oral mycophenolate mofetil was initially applied in acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation (ADMH), an umbrella term including RM.19,20 Mycophenolate mofetil is one of immunomodulators, which can reduce immunosuppressive effect. It can reduce the hyperpigmentation through targeting the lymphocytes’ de-novo purine production pathway and probably inhibiting fibroblasts, which are also recognized with melanin contained. Thirty-five of 46 patients showed >10% reduction in dermal pigmentation area and severity index. Nevertheless, mycophenolate mofetil may have a more profound impact on stable period of the disease and cause observable reduction in the degree of hyperpigmentation. In addition, using the therapy for a long time is also necessary.

Laser Therapy

In recent years, with the development and maturity of cosmetic laser technology, it has begun to be applied to the treatment of Riehl’s melanosis. While researches focus on the application of intense pulsed light (IPL) and Q-switched Nd: YAG (QSNY) laser, picosecond alexandrite laser or fractional thulium fiber laser (TFL) is attempted to be a promising and feasible option for RM.

Intense Pulsed Light

So far, IPL has been used extensively to treat a variety of pigmentation diseases.21 It converts light energy into heat energy, directly targeting melanin in the epidermis and making melanosomes in epidermis move to the upper layer of skin quickly, showing the characteristics of decolorization.22 There are few literature reports confirming the effectiveness of IPL for treating Riehl’s melanosis. Oiso et al23 used IPL to treat an elderly woman diagnosed with RM. 12 J/cm2 was set to the initial fluence of IPL and the wavelength of 500 nm. After applying nine sessions at monthly intervals, the therapy showed excellent improvements without significant negative events noticed. The author speculated that IPL not only eliminated melanin granules in the epidermis, but also realized improvement in the photoaged skin. But only one patient was treated and patch test showed a negative reaction to her commonly used cosmetics. Later, Li et al24 implemented a pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of IPL for the treatment of RM. They used the randomized, split-face pattern, with half of their face exposing to IPL treatment. After treating eight to ten sessions with using cut-off filters of 590, 640, and 695 nm in serial treatment and a fluence ranging from 11 to 17 J/cm2, they came to satisfactory outcomes. The average MI and EI values of the experimental group showed a remarkable decrease trend compared to the control group. On the other hand, the results of histology of skin biopsies confirmed that IPL eliminated the melanosomes both in epidermis and dermis. In both the subjective clinical improvement and standardized photographs, all patients exhibited good to exceptional improvement throughout the 6-month follow-up. The slight and transient cutaneous erythema and edema were noticed at the end of the treatment, but no serious adverse reactions were permitted while patients were receiving treatment. The above researches indicate that IPL is effective in clinical treatment of RM patients, and there are certain adverse reactions. However, due to limited clinical applications and incomplete clinical data, further expansion of sample size and improvement of controlled trials are needed to obtain effective conclusions.

Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser

1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser is widely utilized in clinical dermatosis, which can induce non-ablation of target pigments and selective photopyrolysis. It is reported that the using the laser to treat chronic hyperpigmentation diseases like chloasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) shows significant benefits.25 1064 nm QSNY can precisely target melanin phages of lesion and destroy the melanin particles within lesional melanin phages.26 Compared to short wavelength laser (523 nm), the selected long wavelength laser (1064 nm) can be easier to pass through the epidermis to the dermis. Therefore, long wavelength laser can target the deeper pigmentation and obtain better effects compared with the short wavelength.26–28 Recently, a variety of studies have been attempted to show the effectiveness of low fluence 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser for RM, although the general sessions of treatment may be relatively long.29–31 In a case report conducted by On,29 two patients caused by hair dye were treated with a low-pulsed 1064 nm QSNY laser at the settings of 1.8 J/cm2 and 8 mm spot size. Compared to initial biopsy specimen, there was a significant decrease trend in melanocytes and lymphocytes in the dermis, and both clinical evaluation and histological evaluation came to significant changes. However, lacking of samples and long course treatment, treating deeper and larger pigmentation of RM with a low fluence 1064 nm QSNY laser may be obviously insufficient. Therefore, after five years, Cho et al32 performed a retrospective review. A total of 21 patients’ lesions were treating with middle fluence of 1064 nm QSNY laser, setting of 3.5–5 J/cm2 and 5-mm spot size. To assess the effectiveness, standardized photographs, the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores and skin biopsy were used. The final outcomes showed that 76.1% of patients obtained moderate to much improvement, with side effects of only itching and erythema. Both the average MASI score and mean number of melanophages decreased obviously. Compared to other pigmentary disorders, the deeper pigmentation that occurs during RM needs higher fluence modality, while medium energy can destroy melanin phages in the dermis and be slowly absorbed. Accordingly, the treatment with a mid-fluence 1064 nm QSNY laser is a safe and available method for RM.

Picosecond Alexandrite Laser

The 755 nm picosecond alexandrite laser can provide more fine-tuning energy to cause simultaneous photothermal and photoacoustic effects, selectively damage melanin without causing excessive thermal damage to surrounding tissues. In this way, it can significantly clean out pigments, promote the growth of new collagen cells and improve skin color.33,34 This laser has good curative effect on wrinkle, tattoo removal, scar, acne, Nevus of Ota and facial photopigmentation.35 In a study by Iwayama,12 a Japanese woman (type IV) who was diagnosed with henna-induced Riehl’s melanosis, was treated with the 755 nm picosecond alexandrite laser in total seven sessions at monthly intervals, substantial improvement observed in clinical appearance and histopathology findings. Meanwhile, the adverse events like edema, erythema or hyperpigmentation were not noticed at the follow-up visit. It illustrates that 755 nm picosecond alexandrite laser possibly is an reliable and effective method to alleviate the pigmentation of RM, which can destroy melanosomes by generating selective photodisruptive and photothermal effects. However, this study only included one patient and contingency cannot be excluded. Therefore, a great quantity of clinical studies, especially randomized control trials, are needed to verify the availability of the laser in the future.

Non-Ablative Fractional Thulium Fiber Laser

Most studies on 1927 nm non-ablative fractional thulium fiber laser focus on the phototherapies of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and melasma, suggesting that the application of this laser to treat pigmented disorders is a secure and efficient choice. The laser can probably target epidermal cells, reverse the disruption of the dermoepidermal junction (basement membrane), and induce neocollagenosis and elastinogenesis in the upper dermis.36 Kim et al37 considered that TFL could be a viable and promising therapy option for Riehl’s melanosis and has recently been attempted in their study, given that histopathologically RM and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation are similar. All nine patients were treated with more than three to seven sessions of TFL at the energy between 10 and 20 mJ. To observe the effectiveness of TFL, the quartile grading scale of clinical improvement, dermal pigmentation area and severity index (DPASI) and biopsy specimens in one patient were used. The final results showed that the average grade of clinical improvement was 2.89, while the mean DPASI score decreased from 9.55 to 5.25. Besides, after the comparison before and after 7 sessions treatment in one patient, there was a remarkable decreasing trend of melanosomes in the epidermis and superficial dermis. Regarding side effects, slight and transient erythema were observed and resolved in three days. As the shallow penetration of TFL, it can be recommended for RM patients with pigmentation in the epidermis and upper dermis. Some clinical trials of single therapy have been summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Mechanism of Different Single Treatment Modalities

Combined Treatment

At the present time, for recalcitrant forms, combination of therapies should be considered. The combined use of several therapies not only can increase the efficacy, but also reduce adverse events.

Salicylic Acid Plus Others

Salicylic acid (SA), as a peeling agent, is a member of a class of substances known as hydroxy acids that inhibits melanin production by inhibiting prostaglandin and tyrosinase production.38 It contains whitening and anti-inflammatory properties by affecting the rapid differentiation of keratinocytes, making the necrotic melanocytes of keratinocytes migrate upward and enhancing the transport of melanophage.38,39 The above effects make salicylic acid become a reasonable and effective way of treatment of RM. At present, the application of salicylic acid individually for Riehl’s melanosis has not been introduced. In the study by Wang et al,40 VISIA (Canfield Imaging Systems) showed that both brownish and red area of patients all alleviated in different sessions after being given a triple combination therapy including 30% salicylic acid, glycyrrhizin compound (150 mg daily) and Vitamin C (100 mg daily) given for about 16 weeks. Besides, it also demonstrated that salicylic acid combined with bleaching agents is a feasible and safe treatment modality for Riehl’s melanosis, with mild side effect.

Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser Plus Others

In a study conducted by Kwon et al,41 eight patients (type III–V) were treated with 1064 nm QSNY for 10 to 18 sessions at a three-week interval. After assessing the skin type of patients, the appropriate mode was chosen (1.1–1.3 J/cm2 and 10-mm spot size). For improving the efficacy of light, during the laser treatment period, 4% HQ cream, one common bleaching agent, was applied to patients, with tranexamic acid tablets 250 mg taken daily also. Improvements were found through clinical assessment. Besides, comparing to the baseline, average MI and EI values and histopathological score showed a great decrease trend with statistical significance. At the same time, in the dosage range, no significant adverse events are observed. For the treatment of intractable Riehl’s melanosis, combination effects with light-based therapies are more stable without notable side effects. In another retrospective study,31 after using 1064 nm QSNY with topical 4% HQ for RM, it was also shown that the combined treatment modality is effective. Notably, according to the researchers, the patients with dark brown hyperpigmentation, in contrast to those with mild brown hyperpigmentation, showed more significant development. They reasoned that it is probably related to the quantity and location of the pigment melanin in the skin. There have been listed certain clinical trials of combination therapy in Table 3.

Table 3 Clinical Trials of Combination Therapy for RM

Conclusion

There is no single medication that can ensure guaranteed efficacy for Riehl’s melanosis, despite the variety of treatment options that are now available, lacking of randomized controlled trials. For pigmented contact dermatitis, routine therapy including keeping away from suspected allergens and sun protection is significantly necessary. In general, the existing literature show that laser treatment modalities are more effective than topically application of bleaching agents. Intense pulsed light and Q-switched Nd: YAG laser, picosecond alexandrite laser and fractional thulium fiber laser were clinically responsive to proper settings, with the risk of irritation and subsequent pigmentation increasing. QSNY laser, whether low fluence or medium fluence, is still the most principal and reliable treatment. For deeper pigmentary disorders, mid-fluence is probably more available and effective. The combination of QSNY laser and HQ cream successfully comes to positive clinical improvement, with fewer adverse reactions than that in other experiments. Intense pulsed light, picosecond alexandrite laser and fractional thulium fiber laser still need to expand the sample size and extend the follow-up time in the treatment of RM to further explore its indications, effectiveness, safety, incidence of adverse reactions, and recurrence rate. In summary, in real clinical environment, determining the specific relevant allergens and avoiding possible causative factor are both difficult in the majority of patients. Therefore, getting a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the pathogeny and pathogenesis of Riehl’s melanosis will help to develop more effective and targeted and treatment methods.

Funding

No Funding sources.

Disclosure

No conflict of interest to report.

References

1. Daadaa N, Ben Tanfous A. Riehl melanosis. In: Statpearls[Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearlsPublishing; 2022.

2. Rorsman H. Riehl’s melanosis. Int J Dermatol. 1982;21(2):75–78. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1982.tb00500.x

3. Kumarasinghe SPW, Pandya A, Chandran V, et al. A global consensus statement on ashy dermatosis, erythema dyschromicum perstans, lichen planus pigmentosus, idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation, and Riehl’s melanosis. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58(3):263–272. doi:10.1111/ijd.14189

4. Nakayama H, Matsuo S, Hayakawa K, Takhashi K, Shigematsu T, Ota S. Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis. Int J Dermatol. 1984;23(5):299–305. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1984.tb04055.x

5. Tong L, Li L. Research advances of pathogenesis and treatment of Riehl’s melanosis. J Practical Dermatol. 2015;8(6):446–448.

6. Krueger L, Saizan A, Stein JA, Elbuluk N. Dermoscopy of acquired pigmentary disorders: a comprehensive review. Int J Dermatol. 2022;61(1):7–19. doi:10.1111/ijd.15741

7. Vinay K, Bishnoi A, Parsad D, Saikia UN, Sendhil Kumaran M. Dermatoscopic evaluation and histopathological correlation of acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56(12):1395–1399. doi:10.1111/ijd.13782

8. Wang L, Xu A-E. Four views of Riehl’s melanosis: clinical appearance, dermoscopy, confocal microscopy and histopathology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(9):1199–1206. doi:10.1111/jdv.12264

9. Sharma VK, Bhatia R, Yadav CP. Clinical profile and allergens in pigmented cosmetic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics in India. Dermatitis. 2018;29(5):264–269. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000407

10. Shin JW, Choi JY, Huh CH, Na JI. Two cases of pigmented contact dermatitis caused by pure henna hair dyes. Ann Dermatol. 2018;30(6):735–737. doi:10.5021/ad.2018.30.6.735

11. Woo YR, Kim JS, Lim JH, et al. Acquired diffuse slate-grey facial dyspigmentation due to henna: an unrecognized cause of pigment contact dermatitis in Korean patients. Eur J Dermatol. 2018;28(5):644–648. doi:10.1684/ejd.2018.3404

12. Iwayama T, Oka M, Fukumoto T. Treatment of henna-induced Riehl’s melanosis with a 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser. Lasers Med Sci. 2020;35(7):1659–1661. doi:10.1007/s10103-020-03077-0

13. Hassan S, Chen JK. A case of pigmented contact dermatitis caused by ethylhexylglycerin. Dermatitis. 2022;33(3):e23–e24. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000873

14. Woo YR, Park HE, Jeong SW, Park HJ. Melanogenic properties and expression profiles of melanogenic paracrine molecules in Riehl’s melanosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1695. doi:10.3390/ijms21051695

15. Khanna N, Rasool S. Facial melanoses: Indian perspective. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(5):552–563. doi:10.4103/0378-6323.84046

16. Pérez-Bernal A, Muñoz-Pérez MA, Camacho F. Management of facial hyperpigmentation. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2000;1(5):261–268. doi:10.2165/00128071-200001050-00001

17. Xu Z, Xing X, Zhang C, Chen L, Flora Xiang L. A pilot study of oral tranexamic acid and glycyrrhizin compound in the treatment of recalcitrant Riehl’s melanosis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(1):286–292. doi:10.1111/jocd.12797

18. Yumei Z. Observation on the efficacy of viaminate capsules combined with hydrocortisone butyrate cream in the treatment of occupational melanosis. J Diagn Ther Derma Venereol. 2011;18(2):118.

19. Bishnoi A, Vinay K, Parsad D, et al. Oral mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation: an open-label pilot study. Australas J Dermatol. 2021;62(3):278–285. doi:10.1111/ajd.13567

20. Vinay K, Bishnoi A, Kamat D, Chatterjee D, Kumaran MS, Parsad D. Acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation: an update. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021;12(5):663–673. doi:10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_881_20

21. Cai Y, Zhu Y, Wang Y, et al. Intense pulsed light treatment for inflammatory skin diseases: a review. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(8):3085–3105. doi:10.1007/s10103-022-03620-1

22. Li N, Han J, Hu D, et al. Intense pulsed light is effective in treating postburn hyperpigmentation and telangiectasia in Chinese patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018;20(7–8):436–441. doi:10.1080/14764172.2017.1418517

23. Oiso N, Tsuruta D, Imanishi H, et al. Therapeutic hotline: the effectiveness of intense pulsed light for possible Riehl’s melanosis. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23(5):561–563. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2010.01362.x

24. Li YH, Liu J, Chen JZ, et al. A pilot study of intense pulsed light in the treatment of Riehl’s melanosis. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(1):119–122. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01831.x

25. Chen J, Yu N, Peng L, et al. Efficacy of low-fluence 1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser for the treatment of melasma: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(7):2840–2848. doi:10.1111/jocd.15126

26. Kong SH, Suh HS, Choi YS. Treatment of melasma with pulsed-dye laser and 1064-nm Q-switched Nd: YAGLaser: a split-face study. Ann Dermatol. 2018;30(1):1–7. doi:10.5021/ad.2018.30.1.1

27. Kim JH, Kim H, Park HC, Kim IH. Subcellular selective photothermolysis of melanosomes in adult zebrafish skin following 1064-nm Q-switched Nd: YAGlaser irradiation. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(9):2333–2335. doi:10.1038/jid.2010.129

28. Mun JY, Jeong SY, Kim JH, Han SS, Kim IH. A low fluence Q-switched Nd: YAGlaser modifies the 3D structure of melanocyte and ultrastructure of melanosome by subcellular-selective photothermolysis. J Electron Microsc. 2011;60(1):11–18. doi:10.1093/jmicro/dfq068

29. On HR, Hong WJ, Roh MR. Low-pulse energy Q-switched Nd: YAGlaser treatment for hair-dye-induced Riehl’s melanosis. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2015;17(3):135–138. doi:10.3109/14764172.2015.1007058

30. Chung BY, Kim JE, Ko JY, Chang SE. A pilot study of a novel dual-pulsed 1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser to treat Riehl’s melanosis. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014;16(6):290–292. doi:10.3109/14764172.2014.946054

31. Choi CW, Jo G, Lee DH, Jo SJ, Lee C, Mun JH. Analysis of clinical features and treatment outcomes using 1064-nm Nd-YAG Laser with topical hydroquinone in patients with Riehl’s melanosis: a retrospective study in 10 patients. Ann Dermatol. 2019;31(2):127–132. doi:10.5021/ad.2019.31.2.127

32. Cho MY, Roh MR. Successful treatment of Riehl’s melanosis with mid-fluence Q-switched Nd: YAG1064-nm laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2020;52(8):753–760. doi:10.1002/lsm.23214

33. Hu S, Yang CS, Chang SL, Huang YL, Lin YF, Lee MC. Efficacy and safety of the picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser for treatment of dermal pigmentation in Asians-a retrospective study. Lasers Med Sci. 2020;35(6):1377–1383. doi:10.1007/s10103-020-02959-7

34. Tanghetti EA, Tartar DM. Comparison of the cutaneous thermal signatures over twenty-four hours with a picosecond alexandrite laser using a flat or fractional optic. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(11):1347–1352.

35. Serra M, Bohnert K, Sadick N. A randomized, single-blind, study evaluating a 755-nm picosecond pulsed Alexandrite laser vs. a non-ablative 1927-nm fractionated thulium laser for the treatment of facial photopigmentation and aging. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018;20(6):335–340. doi:10.1080/14764172.2018.1493513

36. Bae YC, Rettig S, Weiss E, Bernstein L, Geronemus R. Treatment of post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation in patients with darker skin types using a low energy 1927 nm non‐ablative fractional laser: a retrospective photographic review analysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2020;52(1):7–12. doi:10.1002/lsm.23173

37. Kim SM, Hwang S, Almurayshid A, Park MY, Oh SH. Non-ablative 1927 nm fractional thulium fiber laser: new, promising treatment modality for Riehl’s melanosis. Lasers Surg Med. 2021;53(5):640–646. doi:10.1002/lsm.23341

38. Arif T. Salicylic acid as a peeling agent: a comprehensive review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015;8:455–461. doi:10.2147/CCID.S84765

39. Al-Talib H, Al-Khateeb A, Hameed A, Murugaiah C. Efficacy and safety of superficial chemical peeling in treatment of active acne vulgaris. An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(2):212–216. doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20175273

40. Wang L, Wen X, Hao D, Li Y, Du D, Jiang X. Combination therapy with salicylic acid chemical peels, glycyrrhizin compound, and vitamin C for Riehl’s melanosis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(6):1377–1380. doi:10.1111/jocd.13153

41. Kwon HH, Ohn J, Suh DH, et al. A pilot study for triple combination therapy with a low-fluence 1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAGlaser, hydroquinone cream and oral tranexamic acid for recalcitrant Riehl’s melanosis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28(2):155–159. doi:10.1080/09546634.2016.1187706

42. Zaaroura H, Bergman R, Nevet MJ. Pigmented facial contact dermatitis to benzyl salicylate: a comparative histopathological and immunohistochemical study of the involved skin and the positive patch test site. Am J Dermatopathol. 2019;41(6):443–447. doi:10.1097/DAD.0000000000001258

43. Annabathula A, Priya S, Srinivas CR. Kumkum-induced allergic contact dermatitis: are we missing the actual culprit? Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2018;84(2):153–156. doi:10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_45_17

44. Bishnoi A, Vinay K. Contact sensitization to hair colours in acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation: results from a patch and photo-patch test study of 108 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(7):1349–1357. doi:10.1111/jdv.15576

45. Kim DH, Lee DH. Riehl’s melanosis caused by occupational exposure to personal protective equipment. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(6):720–721. doi:10.1111/cod.13954

46. Kwong HL, Lim SPR. Pigmented contact dermatitis in the axillae caused by hydroperoxides of limonene. JAAD Case Rep. 2020;6(6):476–478. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.04.007

47. Pongcharoensuk T, Thaiwat S. Systemic pigmented contact dermatitis to cobalt following ingestion of cobalamin supplement. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9(5):e04103. doi:10.1002/ccr3.4103

Creative Commons License © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.