Reason and Fiat in the Jurisprudence of Justice Alito

17 Pages Posted: 6 Apr 2022 Last revised: 9 May 2022

Date Written: March 18, 2022

Abstract

This is an essay prepared for a conference in honor of Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., March 23-24, 2022. It offers a constructive account of Justice Alito’s jurisprudence through the lens of Lon Fuller’s 1946 essay “Reason and Fiat in Case Law,” published in the Harvard Law Review. Fuller argued that the true spirit of American law was to combine reason and positive fiat in ways that would conduce to the well-being of the community, and that our law needed to recover that sensibility. The essay examines some of Justice Alito’s most famous opinions — on administrative procedure, reviewability, and free speech — and finds them highly compatible with Fuller’s vision. Justice Alito is, plausibly, our most Fullerian justice.

Keywords: Alito, Fuller, administrative law, free speech

Suggested Citation

Vermeule, Adrian, Reason and Fiat in the Jurisprudence of Justice Alito (March 18, 2022). Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 22-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4060925 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4060925

Adrian Vermeule (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1525 Massachusetts
Griswold 500
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
671
Abstract Views
1,890
Rank
72,592
PlumX Metrics