Skip to main content
Log in

Random Subspace Regression Ensemble for Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Calibration of Tobacco Samples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An ensemble, a model-independent technique based on combining several models for classification/regression tasks, allows us to achieve a high accuracy that is often not achievable with single models. Such combinations have gained increasing attention in many fields. This paper proposes the use of random subspace (RS)-based regression ensemble as an alternative method for near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopic calibration of tobacco samples. Because of the considerable reduction of variables in a random subspace, multiple linear regression (MLR) is used as the base algorithm and the method is therefore also referred to as RS-MLR. The overall performance of the proposed RS-MLR method is compared to those of partial least square regression (PLSR), kernel principal component regression (KPCR) and kernel partial least square regression (KPLSR). The results reveal that the RS-MLR method not only has a simple concept but also can produce a more parsimonious and more accurate calibration model than PLSR, KPCR and KPLSR, at a lower computational cost. Besides, we also found that the RS-MLR method is very appropriate for the so-called small sample problems and that the calibration models built by RS-MLR are less sensitive to overfitting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Sádecká and J. Polonský, J. Chromatogr., A, 2003, 988, 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Garrigues, A. Pérez-Ponce, S. Garrigues, and M. Guardia, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1998, 373, 63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. P. Xie, J. H. Jiang, Z. Q. Chen, G. L. Shen, and R. Q. Yu, Anal. Sci., 2006, 22, 1111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. X. G. Shao and Y. D. Zhuang, Anal. Sci., 2004, 20, 451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Tan and M. L. Li, Anal. Sci., 2007, 23, 201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Rantanen, H. Wikström, R. Turner, and L. S. Taylor, Anal. Chem., 2005, 77, 556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. R Li, H. Wang, T. X. Yang, and H. S. Zhang, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2003, 377, 350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Casale, M. J. S. Abajo, J. M. G. Sáiz, C. Pizarro, and M. Forina, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2006, 557, 360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Q. S. Chen, J. W. Zhao, X. Y. Fang, H. D. Zhang, and M. H. Liu, Microchem. J., 2006, 83, 42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. L. R. O. Jose, H. Maria, and C. Juan, J. Agric. Food Chem., 1997, 45, 2815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. H. Jiang, R. J. Berry, H. W. Siesier, and Y. Ozaki, Anal. Chem., 2002, 74, 3555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. P. Du, Y. Z. Liang, J. H. Jiang, R. J. Berry, and Y. Ozaki, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004, 501, 183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Leardi, J. Chemometr., 2000, 14, 643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Centner and D. L. Massart, Anal. Chem., 1996, 68, 3851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Borin and R. J. Poppi, Vib. Spectrosc., 2005, 37, 27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Leardi and L. Nørgaard, J. Chemometr., 2004, 18, 486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Q. Ding and G. W. Small, Anal. Chem., 1998, 70, 4472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Leardi, M. B. Seasholtz, and R. J. Pell, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2002, 461, 189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Rossi, A. Lendasse, D. Francois, V. Wertz, and M. Verleysen, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2006, 80, 215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. A. Hageman, M. Streppel, R. Wehrens, and L. M. C. Buydens, J. Chemometr., 2003, 17, 427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Saeki, K. Funatsu, and K. Tanabe, Anal. Sci., 2003, 19, 309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Xiang, G. Q. Fan, J. H. Li, H. Kang, Y. L. Yan, J. H. Zheng, and D. Guo, Phytochem. Anal., 2002, 13, 272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. X. G. Shao, F. Wang, D. Chen, and Q. D. Su, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2003, 19, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. E. W. Gributs and D. H. Burns, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2006, 83, 44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Borin, M. F. Ferrão, C. Mello, D. A. Maretto, and R. J. Poppi, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2006, 579, 25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. U. Thissen, B. Üstun, W. J. Melssen, and L. M. C. Buydens, Anal. Chem., 2004, 76, 3099.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Kim, J. M. Lee, and I. B. Lee, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2005, 79, 22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Cheng, Q. S. Liu, H. Q. Lu, and Y. W. Chen, Pattern Recogn., 2006, 39, 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. J. Sáiz-Abajo, B.-H. Mevikb, V. H. Segtnan, and T. Næs, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2005, 533, 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. B. H.-Mevik, V. H. Segtnan, and T. Næs, J. Chemometr., 2004, 18, 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. H. Zhang, Q. S. Xu, and D. L. Massart, Anal. Chem., 2005, 77, 1423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. H. Shinzawa, J. H. Jiang, P. Ritthiruangdej, and Y. Ozaki, J. Chemometr., 2006, 20, 436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Christian, M. Harald, S. G. Tanja, R. Olivier, S. Martin, and L. Thomas, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2004, 44, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A. Tsymbal, M. Pechenizkiy, and P. Cunningham, Inf. Fusion, 2005, 6, 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. G. Brown, J. L. Wyatt, and P. Timo, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2005, 6, 1621.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. He, C. J. Xu, Y. Z. Liang, and K. T. Fang, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2004, 70, 39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. N. Benoudjita, E. Cools, M. Meurens, and M. Verleysen, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2004, 70, 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R. Rosipal and L. Trejo, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2001, 2, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. K. H. Galváo, M. C. U. Araújo, G. E. José, M. J. C. Pontes, E. C. Silva, and T. C. B. Saldanha, Talanta, 2005, 67, 736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Menglong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, C., Li, M. & Qin, X. Random Subspace Regression Ensemble for Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Calibration of Tobacco Samples. ANAL. SCI. 24, 647–653 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.24.647

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.24.647

Navigation