Cent Eur J Public Health 2017, 25(1):64-66 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a4931

Pressure Pain Sensitivity: Marker for Stress Affecting General Health

Václav Vaněček1, Milan Tuček1, Søren Ballegaard2
1 Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Ull Care, Hellerup, Denmark

Objective: The study examined the links between pressure pain sensitivity (PPS) measured during preventive medical examination of men, their health status and occupation.

Method: A one year (2015-2016) convenience sampling technique was used to gain primary data from actual medical examination, health records (personal and occupational history) and pressure pain sensitivity (PPS) measured by Ull Meter equipment during preventive medical examination of 371 men of different occupations (average age 43.6±10.4 years, range 19-66 years). Measured PPS values of 60 or more indicate high PPS, contrary PPS values to 40 indicate low PPS.

Results: 345 men (93%) were considered healthy (without diagnosis of a disease), 26 men (7%) had positive personal history/symptoms of disease. The average of measured PPS values for the whole group was 36.6±9.5 (first measurement) and 36.7±8.5 (second, repeated measurement), suggesting a high reproducibility of the measurements (r=0.80). Decreased PPS values were measured in men without reported diagnosis of a disease compared to men with diagnosed diseases. Elevated PPS values were measured in men with symptoms of neurocirculatory asthenia (NCA) compared to asymptomatic men and also to men with different diagnosis. The group of men with other than NCA symptoms did not differ significantly in PPS values compared to group of asymptomatic men. Road drivers (177 men) did not differ significantly compared to other occupations (194 men).

Conclusion: The increased neuropsychological load/stress is connected with increased pain sensitivity to pressure. The PPS method is objective, reliable, simple, and noninvasive evaluation of the impact of stress and may be helpful in assessing medical fitness to work.

Keywords: pressure pain sensitivity, stress marker, health impact

Received: September 13, 2016; Revised: February 15, 2017; Accepted: February 15, 2017; Published: March 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vaněček V, Tuček M, Ballegaard S. Pressure Pain Sensitivity: Marker for Stress Affecting General Health. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2017;25(1):64-66. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4931. PubMed PMID: 28399357.
Download citation

References

  1. Selye H, editor. Selye's guide to stress research. Volume 1. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1980.
  2. Axelsson CK, Ballegaard S, Karpatschof B, Schousen P. Pressure pain sensitivity as a marker for stress and pressure pain sensitivity-guided stress management in women with primary breast cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014 Aug;74(5):399-407. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Ballegaard S, Petersen PB, Harboe GS, Karpatschof B, Gyntelberg F, Faber J. The association between changes in pressure pain sensitivity and changes in cardiovascular physiological factors associated with persistent stress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014 Mar;74(2):116-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Ballegaard S, Karpatschof B, Trojaborg W, Hansen AM, Magnusson G, Petersen PB. A simple and objective marker for stress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(6):713-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Magnusson G, Ballegaard S, Karpatschof B, Nyboe J. Long-term effects of integrated rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a nonrandomized comparative feasibility study. JAltern Complement Med. 2010Apr;16(4):36974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Tuček M. Transport safety, neurobehavioral disorders and medical fitness standards. Neural Network World. 2010;20(6):723-36.