분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토

@article{ART001978757},
author={ 이호승 },
title={분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토},
journal={비교문화연구},
issn={1598-0685},
year={2015},
volume={38},
pages={433-459},
doi={10.21049/ccs.2015.38..433},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.21049/ccs.2015.38..433}

TY - JOUR
AU - 이호승
TI - 분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토
T2 - 비교문화연구
PY - 2015
VL - 38
IS -
PB - 경희대학교(국제캠퍼스) 비교문화연구소
SP - 433-459
SN - 1598-0685
AB - A Study on Some Types of Separable Syntactic Atomsin KoreanLee, Ho-SeungThis paper aims at a better understanding of the concept of korean separablesyntactic atom, of which inner parts is separable in syntax, and at examiningwhether or not this concept can apply to derivatives, functional complexconstructions, idiomatic expressions in korean. I defined a syntactic atom as a minimum unit which is drawn directly fromlexicon and then is applied to syntactic rules. And I insist that so-called ‘lexicalisland constraint’ has some problems and that the syntactic rules can be appliedto inner parts of syntactic atom, if the syntactic rules is irrelevant to new syntacticatom formation. The greater part of derivatives is non-separable syntactic atoms. But the likesof ‘반짝거리다’, ‘죄송스럽다’, ‘칭얼대다’ are the separable syntactic atoms. Thedegree of separability of them is different in the insertion of korean particlesor negative adverbs and the omission of root of sytactic atom. The derivativesof ‘X-적’, of which roots is regular nominal roots, permit the syntactic link betweenroots and the syntactic combination of the root and its argument. These kindsof derivatives is separable syntactic atoms. Also the derivatives of ‘bracket paradox’and ‘X-답-’ derivatives is separable syntactic atoms. All functional complex constructions are not separable syntactic atoms. Accordingto the degree of grammaticalization, inner parts of some are separable, some isnon-separable. Separable functional complex constructions only permit theswitching of endings or Josas but not application of other syntactic rules. Allidiomatic expressions which are composed of two or more syntactic atoms areseparable syntactic atoms. Some of them have so strong separability to allowthe insertion of syntactic atom, adverb or adnominal modification and the nounin idiomatic expression to become the head of the relative clause. And someidiomatic expressions which have weak separability only permit interrogative’ssubstitution or form change in fraction of idiomatic expressions.
KW - 분리성 통사원자, 어휘부, 어휘고도제약, 파생어, 기능적 복합구성, 관용표현
DO - 10.21049/ccs.2015.38..433
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.21049/ccs.2015.38..433
ER -

이호승 (2015). 분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토. 비교문화연구, 38, 433- 459.

이호승 . 2015, “분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토”, 비교문화연구, vol. 38, pp. 433-459. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2015.38..433

이호승 “분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토” 비교문화연구 38 pp. 433-459 (2015): 433.

이호승 . 분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토 비교문화연구 [Internet]. 2015; 38 : 433-459. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2015.38..433

이호승 . “분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토” 비교문화연구 38 (2015): 433-459. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2015.38..433

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

분리성 통사원자의 유형별 검토

비교문화연구

약어 : -

2015, vol.38, pp.433 - 459

DOI : 10.21049/ccs.2015.38..433

발행기관 : 경희대학교(국제캠퍼스) 비교문화연구소

연구분야 : 문학

이호승¹

¹충북대학교

인용한 논문 수 : - 서지 간략 보기

초록

A Study on Some Types of Separable Syntactic Atomsin KoreanLee, Ho-SeungThis paper aims at a better understanding of the concept of korean separablesyntactic atom, of which inner parts is separable in syntax, and at examiningwhether or not this concept can apply to derivatives, functional complexconstructions, idiomatic expressions in korean. I defined a syntactic atom as a minimum unit which is drawn directly fromlexicon and then is applied to syntactic rules. And I insist that so-called ‘lexicalisland constraint’ has some problems and that the syntactic rules can be appliedto inner parts of syntactic atom, if the syntactic rules is irrelevant to new syntacticatom formation. The greater part of derivatives is non-separable syntactic atoms. But the likesof ‘반짝거리다’, ‘죄송스럽다’, ‘칭얼대다’ are the separable syntactic atoms. Thedegree of separability of them is different in the insertion of korean particlesor negative adverbs and the omission of root of sytactic atom. The derivativesof ‘X-적’, of which roots is regular nominal roots, permit the syntactic link betweenroots and the syntactic combination of the root and its argument. These kindsof derivatives is separable syntactic atoms. Also the derivatives of ‘bracket paradox’and ‘X-답-’ derivatives is separable syntactic atoms. All functional complex constructions are not separable syntactic atoms. Accordingto the degree of grammaticalization, inner parts of some are separable, some isnon-separable. Separable functional complex constructions only permit theswitching of endings or Josas but not application of other syntactic rules. Allidiomatic expressions which are composed of two or more syntactic atoms areseparable syntactic atoms. Some of them have so strong separability to allowthe insertion of syntactic atom, adverb or adnominal modification and the nounin idiomatic expression to become the head of the relative clause. And someidiomatic expressions which have weak separability only permit interrogative’ssubstitution or form change in fraction of idiomatic expressions.

키워드

분리성 통사원자, 어휘부, 어휘고도제약, 파생어, 기능적 복합구성, 관용표현

참고문헌(32)

[단행본] 고영근 / 2008 / 우리말 문법론 / 집문당
[학술지] 김의수 / 2013 / 어휘부와 통사론 / 國語學 66 (66) : 415 ~ 444
[단행본] 김창섭 / 1991 / 형태 / 태학사 : 151 ~ 181
[학술지] 김창섭 / 2011 / 부접어의 설정과 부접 구성 / 國語學 62 (62) : 47 ~ 72
[학술지] 도재학 / 2014 / 우언적 구성의 개념과 유형에 대하여 / 國語學 (71) : 259 ~ 304
[학술지] 목정수 / 2007 / 형태론과 통사론 사이에: 통사론적 단위 설정을 중심으로 / 한국어학 37 : 127 ~ 147
[학위논문] 문금현 / 1996 / 國語의 慣用表現硏究
[학술지] 문병열 / 2014 / 어휘부 등재소와 복합 구성 / 國語學 (69) : 135 ~ 166
[학위논문] 문병열 / 2015 / 한국어 조사 상당 구성에 대한 연구-[조사+용언 활용형]의 경우
[학술지] 박진호 / 1994 / 통사적 결합 관계와 논항구조 / 국어연구회 123
[학술지] 박진호 / 2003 / 관용표현의 통사론과 의미론 / 國語學 41 : 361 ~ 379
[학술지] 시정곤 / 2004 / 등재소 설정 기준에 대한 연구 / 한국어학 22 (22) : 185 ~ 214
[학위논문] 이호승 / 2003 / 국어 복합서술어 연구: [명사+조사+동사] 구성의 경우
[학술지] 이호승 / 2013 / 분리성 통사원자에 대하여 / 어문학 122 (122) : 181 ~ 208
[학술지] 임홍빈 / 1979 / 용언의 어근 분리 현상에 대하여 / 언어 4 (2) : 55 ~ 76
[단행본] 임홍빈 / 1995 / 국어문법론Ⅰ / 한국방송대학교출판부
[단행본] 조성식 / 1990 / 영어학사전 / 신아사
[학술지] 채현식 / 2010 / 정보의 처리와 표상의 측면에서 본 괄호매김역설 / 한국언어문학 74 (74) : 147 ~ 169
[학술지] 채현식 / 2013 / 어휘부란 무엇인가-인접 학문 분야와와 관계를 중심으로 / 國語學 66 (66) : 307 ~ 334
[학술지] 최형용 / 2013 / 어휘부와 형태론 / 國語學 66 (66) : 361 ~ 414
[학술지] 한정한 / 2009 / 단어를 다시 정의해야 하는 시급한 이유들 / 언어 34 (3) : 761 ~ 788
[단행본] 한정한 / 2011 / 한국어 통사론의 현상과 이론 / 태학사 : 13 ~ 69
[학위논문] 許喆九 / 1998 / 國語의 合成動詞形成과 語基分離
[단행본] BLOOMFIED, L. / 1933 / Language / George Allen & Unwin
[단행본] BOOIJ, Geert / 2010 / Construction Morphology / Oxford University Press
[단행본] BROWN, Keith / 2006 / Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics / Elsevier
[단행본] CHOMSK, N. / 1970 / Remarks on Nominalization : 184 ~ 221
[단행본] Di SCHIULLO, Anna-Maria / 1987 / On the Definition of Word / The MIT Press
[학술지] HARLOW, S / 2006 / Transformational Grammar: Evolution / Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics 13 : 22 ~ 39
[단행본] HOCKETT, C. F. / 1958 / A Course in Modern Linguistics / The Macmillan Company
[단행본] JACOBS, R. A. / 1970 / Readings in English Transformational Grammar / Ginn and Company
[학술지] JULIEN, M. / 2006 / Word / Encyclopedia of Language &Linguistics 13 : 617 ~ 624